![]() |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
A subscription linked to a decoder and card would NOT mean the BBC is a private company. All it would do is make the BBC produce quality programs because if they don't they will not get the subscribers. If it mean that the BBC's output gets better then that's great if not then the senior managers might at last get a kick in the behind unlike now where they know they get the money no matter how bad they perform. |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
The question you have to ask is why would a public service broadcaster need a decoder ,the BBC is meant to be a public service with a shared cost ,any other model simply will not be a public service imo. If you are saying that we no longer need a public service broadcaster like the BBC,CH4 and i think CH5 then that is a totally different discussion to one of should we have TV licence |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
I'd imagine the BBC would do ok being a private entity, given the number of people who watch their amazing *gag* shows like Eastenders and the like, I bet they wouldn't mind paying £1-3 a month for access to all the BBC TV shows.
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
You can of course argue that a quality national broadcaster with a remit to produce a wide range of programming for a wide range of audiences is not actually socially necessary. You wouldn't be the only one to think that. But you would have a hard time pushing that view in a democratic forum like Parliament, which votes on the BBC's Royal Charter every 10 years. MPs are mostly in favour of the BBC's status and polls show that voters are too. |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
People are beginning to realise just how corrupt and out-of-date "Auntie" really is. The BBC, are losing the public's support and confidence, and this will show in their figures. Many people I know have already cancelled their direct debits, and many more are refusing to be forced into paying for something they no longer want nor need. |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
http://www.barb.co.uk/viewing/weekly...ry?period_year[]=2014&period_month[]=3&period_week[]=2&button_submit=View+figures&period[]=201403060102 |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
I wouldn't but the wife is quite partial along with about 7 million other people.You may want to look past 1 program you dislike and look at some others ,a really good one i watched over the last couple of days was a drama called 37 days ,about the build up to and causes of the first world war ,a class production and one typical of the BBC |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
Regarding the programme Planet Earth, I fail to see how you can dismiss it as "you've seen one rutting rhino, you've seen them all". That's like dismissing the output of Discovery by saying "Well, you've seen one Nazi Invasion, you've seen them all" or "You've seen one big machine, you've seen them all". Discovery has some excellent documentaries. As does the BBC, but you need to be prepared to look a little further than just BBC 1 or 2. BBC 4 has documentaries that, in some cases, are better than those provided by Discovery or National Geographic (and I speak as a fan of Discovery, which was actually the main reason I got cable). Regarding the comments about Doctor Who, refusing to watch the whole series because you didn't like one actress who stopped being a main character 8 years ago is a little odd, IMO. The series has changed a lot since it's re-launch and has given us what are, IMO, some of the best examples of storytelling on British TV recently. One example being Blink where a young girl, Sally Sparrow (played brilliantly by Carey Mulligan before she was famous) gets to rescue the doctor who has been trapped along with his assistant in 1969. This episode was wonderfully creepy. ---------- Post added at 13:12 ---------- Previous post was at 13:05 ---------- Quote:
To give an idea of prices, an episode of Eastenders costs around £141,000 to produce. A good drama can cost ten times that per episode. |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
I'll be honest, when Dr Who relaunched, I was very excited (being a long term fan). Then I saw the first couple of episodes and wondered why I'd bothered. A couple of weeks later, we had two of the best stories of the series (as a whole), "Dalek" and "The Empty Child/The Doctor Dances". Dalek was quite a taught action/thriller story about the Doctor, Rose and a few other people being trapped in a massive underground bunker in Nevada with the last remaining Dalek, and the story did a good job of making the Dalek look scary (especially the way it massacres a group of armed security guards without even moving from the spot). Then, the Empty Child came along, featuring the Doctor visiting WWII London, where a seriously creepy small boy was looking for his mummy. As a story, I have not done it justice, but it actually manages to be scary in the way a lot of Horror films aren't. |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
I think after years of supporting TV licencing my opinion has changed, it's been a year.since I got a TV again and I'm not getting value for money from it, if it wasn't for the kids I'd go without the idiot box again for another five years
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
I finally cancelled my licence this week, well perhaps I should say attempted to cancel it!
Their site sends you around in circles, if you choose the option of cancelling your licence it opens up a form for you to ask them a question with pre-defined categories. I cancelled the monthly direct debit with my bank and then used one of the generic headings about direct debit to inform them. I made it clear that I was not asking them a question but I was making a statement that I did not need a TV licence because I do not watch live or recorded TV. Note: I didn't elaborate but due to a number of reasons I don't watch live TV at home. a) I'm hardly ever there due to work commitments and spending the majority of my time at my partners house. (I don't even watch TV when I'm there) b) Any time I have at home is spent on my hobbies, study or achieving something else productive. c) The majority of programming appears to be soaps, game shows, talk shows and reality TV, which I would never watch anyway. The only sport I would watch is boxing, and the vast majority of this is on subscription TV anyway. (I cancelled my Sky subscription about 4 year ago and have not missed it one bit) I have received an email reply acknowledging that my direct debit has been cancelled on their system, and that it is paid in advance and I can follow another link supplied to apply for a refund. To be honest I'm not bothered about applying for a 1 month refund, but I'm keeping the email from them safe as I expect the threats of action to start soon. This is long overdue, I should have done it 4 years ago when I cancelled the Sky subscription. The only reason I kept paying is the hassle factor and the thought that they may gain entry by force because I'm hardly ever there. (As the police did last year when they were so sure without any evidence that I was running a large scale drugs operation. They had a lot of egg on their faces but are still refusing to pay for their incompetence on that one) |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Monday night on Discovery History - Fred Dibnah's Age of Steam
Discovery Home & Health - Homes Under The Hammer |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
http://www.thewrap.com/tv/article/bb...e-series-37851 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/End_Day http://www.discovery.com/tv-shows/ot...net-videos.htm |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
I finally got rid of the BT part of my youview box - so if I can talk Natalie into it I'm dumping it and going down the no license / on demand route.
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Pretty much as expected, following TVL's acknowledgement of my email that I don't need a licence.
I have now received a letter headed with bold 'Please respond urgently'. It informs me that I must set up a new direct debit or visit a link provided to inform them I don't need a TV licence. The link is the same form that I attempted to fill in previously, after completing the form it tells me that I cannot inform them that I don't need a TV licence as I already have a TV licence.:dunce: It appears that they deliberately send you around in circles, obviously they don't understand that some people wish to stop using their product/services. Or rather they refuse to accept that anyone could possibly do without live TV services. The link eventually sent me back to the section to ask them generic questions with pull-down question topics and sub-topics. What a surprise that there is no pull-down to inform them that I wish to ask a question about cancelling my licence. I don't want to ask them anything, I have already stated to them in an email that they have acknowledged that I don't need a TV licence. I have gone back to step one and had to use the generic question about a 'refund' to again tell them I don't need a licence. I'm not going to waste any further time on these people because it's obvious the only way to keep them off your back would be to carry on as I was paying for something I wasn't using.:td: |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
I would write to them the old fashioned way and send it by recorded post.
Keep the receipt and letter, you'll probably need it...you naughty criminal you! :P |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
The Times on Friday had an article (behind paywall) which said one way of funding by subscription could be supported would be by encrypting the broadcasts....
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
Including the BBC site(s). |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
How am I supposed to watch Eastenders?
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
And Doctor Who... How are we to survive without our dose of DW?
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
I think the writing is now on the wall for the TVL, and I think that is exactly what is the long-term aim of those who have successfully lobbied for decriminalisation of non-payment.
There will undoubtedly be those who were put off non-payment by the threat of a criminal record who will be willing to chance it if there is only a civil penalty. There will be others who see the 'downgrading' in severity as a signal that it is now sort-of OK to refuse to pay. By the time we get to negotiations for the 2027 charter renewal I predict the BBC will be struggling with a serious non-payment problem and this will force significant changes to the BBC's funding model from 2027. I don't believe the idea of encrypting its services will fly; half of all households still don't take subscription TV and the BBC will not take the chance that resistance to that funding model and the technology that supports it will lead to reduced take-up of its services. We are going to end up in a world where the BBC sells advertising slots just as ITV does, and as the BBC hoovers up a share of the finite advertising money available to our supermarkets, consumer brands etc, we are going to see some other less popular channels go to the wall. Interesting times ahead. |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
The BBC needs to be brought in to the real world and i hope that is about to be done. Ether the BBC finds a new model that allows choice for those who do not wish to watch them and therefore are not forced to pay the tax or they loss a lot of money. |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Good news
http://news.sky.com/story/1231467/tv...ce-jail-threat Quote:
:clap: |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
The BBC have already threatened to close services if this goes through and they lose revenue as a result.
The thing is however they managed to **** £100 million up the wall on a failed IT project with no real comebacks and have handed out hundreds of thousands of pounds in overly generous severance packages. It's definitely time for the BBC to feel a bit of a squeeze on its finances. Yes, it does make and transmit a lot of great stuff, and as someone who can only receive the 5 main BBC radio statons (R1-4 and Radio Cymru) I do have some support for them, but in broadcasting terms its a behemoth, and unlike Sky/VM/BT or any other broadcast platform I can't avoid paying them. Using the licence fee to pay for the world service/S4C/BBC Alba is a good start, as these are public/not commercially viable services that the licence fee was envisioned to pay for once ITV got going. Should the other broadcasters get a share? I'm not so sure. One thing is for certain though, if the licence fee must remain then it should be made a requirement that all TV masts carry all multiplexes, otherwise your in a situation where someone paying £145.50 in Cardiff is getting much better value for money than someone on a 3 multiplex relay paying the same £145.50 |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Why the BBC should keep the licence fee. I'm sure I know him from somewhere? ;) :D
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
he was the same with blueyonder back in the day. even the staff avoided him :) |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
....oh hell, Carl Waring? Scary stuff.
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
So we go from scrapping the licence to every household needing one regardless of having an actual TV or not
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/t...or-longer.html |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
They've been angling for it for years - this is not the first time someone has pointed out that online broadcasting will have to be brought within the remit of the licence at some point.
I think I can see the possibility of the TVL becoming a precept on top of council tax, with the collecting authority passing on the appropriate amount to the BBC as a 'PSB tax' or somesuch. I suspect, also, there is now a greater likelihood of an idea the BBC likes somewhat less : top slicing the fee so other broadcasters can apply for funding for public service programming. |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
From the article above Quote:
Would it be fair to pay the licence fee even if you do not own a television? Yes - we should take the rise of online on-demand viewing into account 11.49% (722 votes) No - this seems exploitative 86.28% (5,421 votes) Undecided 2.23% (140 votes) The BBC need to be brought to task and made to work for there money not just get handed it on a plate via a tax. Make it subscription and then they will find out if there programs are worth paying for. ---------- Post added at 09:50 ---------- Previous post was at 09:44 ---------- As soon as it is decriminalised i will not pay it. Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
I suspect that as some have already mentioned, it will become a tax, either on earnings or most likely added to council tax. This will be good news for those who don't work or pay any tax as those who work will be paying it for them.
I suspect that this is the real reason why Labour are in agreement with it becoming a non criminal offence, it fits in with their political policy where those who work to pay and those who won't work get it for free. Such a method of collecting the licence payment would be unfair because it would be compulsory for those tax payers who do not view the services. Subscription/conditional access is the only fair method:dozey: |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
£14 for The bedroom Tax £3 the TV licence £4 Poll Tax £2.50 Out of work Tax £1.50 Burden Tax £0.90 Dave Tax every week. after all the taxes, they'd have nothing left :) Probably best to deduct a Robbing Tax just in case. |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
Working or not, those who insist on downloading stuff for free & who refuse to pay for media are being subsidised by those who do pay. |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
I can't understand why Labour didn't think of this idea years ago. |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
BBC licence fee could be re-examined, says Harriet Harman.
http://www.theguardian.com/media/201...-harman-labour |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Look at what she said though. She wants the BBC to be universally available, so that rules out subscription. She wants it to have a measure of independence from government, so that rules out funding out of taxation. By implication, she doesn't find the prospect of making the BBC advert-supported appealing, otherwise she wouldn't have said "we haven't found it in the past" - the State-owned broadcaster, Channel 4, is funded in precisely this way. It is a solution that is well understood.
She wants to keep an open mind but she does not want to come to the table with a radical plan for change. I don't think the TVL is going anywhere quite yet. |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
I'm very surprised, it was over 3 months ago that I cancelled my licence. I had an initial contact where they had completely ignored my wish to cancel and sent me a letter to set up direct debit. I sent them an email reply being very blunt so I assume they got the message.
Since that I have heard nothing further from them, I guess they could have been around looking for me but they would be lucky to find me at home. A number of years ago when I didn't have a TV licence the letters arrived at least one a week. Then again I guess the threatening letters could start any day soon.:erm: |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
Must be an election coming up and she wants some publicity. She's been on a few things lately, maybe she is trying to become leader of the Labour Party. I doubt she could care less about the BBC and licence fee tbh. |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
"Every home needs a TV licence" Blatent lie. "Official warning: We have opened an investigation" :rolleyes: "You have not responeded to out letters yet" :rolleyes: No reason that I have to morons. "We are in the final stages of our investigation" :rolleyes: Not much of one when you've supposidly had a dozen or so now. "What you need to know if you go to court":rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: I'm not going to court, idiots. "Ignoring this letter could cost you more than the licence fee" :LOL: And they'll try harassing you by phone too. Caller ID is your friend. Repeat ad nausium. You'd think after 5 years they might get the message: Get lost losers. Oh I forgot the one that looks like a form where you should declare whether you have TV receiving/recording equipment and then send it back to TVL. I mean you have no licence and you're going to admit you're breaking the law. Really are these people for real.:rolleyes: |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
To think that people have been in jail for non payment of a TV license and the cost of the court case. How much does it cost to keep people in jail. Poor old tax payers footing the bill.
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
Dooh.. as if I did not know that... the point is what does it cost to keep THE PEOPLE WHO DO NOT PAY THE FINE... in jail. |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
If this come to pass I wonder what threats TVL will be able to use?
Comfy chair? :LOL: |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Be aware that the latest wheeze by TVL is to get their
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
They can't see in my windows and can't even get through the gate unless I buzz them in so I don't have to worry them seeing a movie playing from the media centre of bluray player. I have had them ring the buzzer and say they are here to inspect the property without saying who are they are and with it being a newly build place I was waiting for someone to have a look for the one year warranty on stuff anyway. Glad I pushed him for who he worked for, still wouldn't tell me at first and even when he told me he worked for Capita (which I know collect for them) he didn't mention bbc or tv licencing. So they are as crafty as can be, hardly come across as legitimate. Just like their threatening letters about investigations being opened. They must fool people in to paying who don't actually need one, which is criminal! |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
If it's their job to treat me like a criminal then there is something wrong with their job. Their time of getting their friends in politics to pull strings for them is coming to an end though. Assuming guilt here is the same us as assuming all BBC employee's are paedophiles. It's understandable considering some of their employers have been caught bang to rights.... |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
I've just heard that Sky are going to unscramble all their channels so that everyone will have access to them... The licence fee will be increased to £568.48 in order to pay for it.
Hang on, I don't watch Sky, I don't want it. Hard luck, pay up or suffer the monthly threats and random visits from the enforcement officers! |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
I have no reason to let anyone into my house to have a look around unless they have a search warrant. |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:50. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum