![]() |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
even if he did,what difference does it make? |
Re: Thousands sign petition to get IDS to prove anyone can live on £7 a day
Quote:
He published no end lies he dont know the truth anymore. Coalision talks 300 bn welfare which fabricated lies only true welfare around 117bn this year figures. Only measly 9.8bn is unemployment if check pensions out only 35.6bn is disabilty that wont be going in peoples pockets all of it goes to atos too. http://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/ye...474849#ukgs302 These figures negilable for protection help those who cant help themselves. The country earns 1.5 trillion its sickens me they making out they cant afford the social protection. Reality we cant afford the parasites who bleeding nation to death those getting fat off corporate welfare. |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Quote:
He didn't marry into high political office though. That was as a result of hard work and a lot of determination, especially so in IDS's case, seeing as he was unceremoniously dumped as party leader. Many senior politicians have simply given up and taken cushy jobs at charities and pressure groups with less provocation. |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
an MP doesn't count as work really. it's just one of them work positions where everything is paid for by the taxpayer. so whatever money you do 'earn' you can keep saving it all up :) Found this on his website. Quote:
---------- Post added at 15:39 ---------- Previous post was at 15:35 ---------- Quote:
you're just making them word association guesses thing with your mind. |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Gary, you are jealous of Iain Duncan Smith's money and possessions. Why else are you talking about them? They have nothing to do with how our benefits system is run.
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
---------- Post added at 15:56 ---------- Previous post was at 15:53 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
If you're concerned about the schooling of our senior politicians, blame the idiots that scrapped the Grammar schools. They were a powerful engine of social mobility but because not everyone could go to them, they were burned on the altar of fairness and equality, the same thinly-veiled religion of envy and jealously that says people who have done well for themselves - or who have parents who did - are somehow worthy of hatred and derision, simply for daring to have a bigger bank balance than the rest of us. |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Fact is you have to work hard no matter what your background to be successful... Background and privilege may give you a head-start but if you're rubbish at what you do than that won't help you.I see this in the Film Industry all the time. Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
He's a stand up guy getting people off benefits is his speciality , he managed in 2001 to secure his unemployed wife a £15,000 salary off of the taxpayer acting as his diary secretary , if that doesn't show his commitment to the cause I don't know what will.
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Many MPs did many ridiculous things that were uncovered during the expenses scandal but I happen to think employing spouses to run their offices was not one of them. YMMV naturally. |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Being totally honest i couldn't give a fig who has what or where they did or didn't go to school i just want a welfare system that does what it is meant to and is not a politicians football anytime they want to abuse it for their own ends. Are too many on disability yes there are at the time of the last election there were about a million people claiming disability benefits that should not have been but were because for labour it was easier to encourage them to go on disability and not show up on the unemployment figures then to actually do anything real and long lasting to create proper jobs.
All political parties in power have misused the benefit system for their own ends over the decades and while this lot talk about sorting it all out they are not really, they are still leaving the system wide open for political abuse the next time any of them need to use it so whose right or wrong. This time we have the triumphant chant of creating a million jobs just gets a bit sketchy on what sort of jobs full time or part time majority of them being part time not paying a living wage and not lowering the welfare dependence that much as they earn so little they still need benefits to top them up maybe less then they were getting maybe more the system is such a mess it's hard to tell. As for the so called bedroom tax hitting a lot of people that wanted to and couldn't do a thing to avoid it because wanting to downsize doesn't matter when the housing is not there to downsize too which was the case for a lot of people. It's all just another load of hot air sounds good looks good even on paper but get down to the detail and it's as useless as all before it. Anyone speaks against what this government is doing and they quickly get labelled "socialist", "freeloader", "anti tory" it really is a joke there are serious points about this so called benefit reform that need to be examined and debated by all groups in society and no debate is allowed because one side is right and the other side is wrong. Such a moronic approach to the whole thing it clearly avoids both entrenched sides that both sides have some right and some wrong and the smart thing to do would be to meet in the middle but no were into a good old slanging match it's all or nothing folks and most of the talking is being done by people that are not even affected by any of it. For the record i am a claimant would dearly love not to be but i have a medical condition that has royally screwed me i have been a Tory voter all my life but the conservatism i was bought up to believe in isn't what this government are doing. I fully agree the system needs reform and needs tightening up, i also think it is only fair at times of economic hardship that claimants don't get more then those who work have no problem with any of that. Never in my life have i ever been referred to as a socialist only on this forum have i been called that all because i don't think this reform is going to do sod all to sort the problem out. It is political pandering to society backed with distortion of facts and ridiculous rhetoric which we heard more of today from osbourne with his "workers are right" rubbish. People that are unemployed don't stop being workers they are simply workers without work usually through no fault of their own hopefully for a short time and his speech today was so divisive it was unbelievable. For the very small section that does believe in benefit for life when they are capable of work i fully endorse them being hit and hit as hard as we can to make them work but they are a minority and that needs to be remembered and we don't need a sledgehammer to crack this nut we need people with their eye on the problem and not the next headline or poll. |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
---------- Post added at 17:40 ---------- Previous post was at 17:34 ---------- http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/poli...a-gambler.html OH Dear ,seems mister "i live on £53 a week" is an out and out......well i won't say it on a public forum Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Great. If he has that sort of disposable income, despite having to claim housing benefit, then he won't have any objections to paying towards the cost of his spare rooms.
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
That discredits him it does not alter the fact IDS spoke crap
And I am not envious of IDS I am quite happy how I am now I have my ESA sorted out with how things have worked out for me I am not actually better off ;) Just as I have said before standing by my convictions and I do not care how someone tries to discredit me here I will continue to |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
You sound like you're preaching again, Chris :)
Why should anyone have to be jealous of someone's wealth in this 'argument' I don't know. who started that one? |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
You did, by making IDS's wealth and privilege a topic of discussion instead of the benefit changes.
IDS's house, his car and his wife make no difference at all to the government's benefits policy. The policy is either right or wrong on its own terms. |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
I merely asked if it's true that he married into wealth. which contradicts the working hard for the wealth. Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
That's because some posters are making an issue out of other people being rich and privileged, instead of discussing whether the benefits reforms are correct in the context of the economic situation and the stated policy aim of making it more worthwhile for those that can work, to work. Arthur and Mertle are good examples of two posters who have made an issue out of the rich, although IMO Mertle does it rather more intelligently. He makes an argument for a socialist approach to wealth redistribution, which is well made even though I believe his premise is fundamentally flawed.
|
Re: Poor affected - The Rich not affected again - why?
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Seriously mate we discuss these issues as I said before I have courage of conviction and stand by and fight for my point of view. It is no different to what you marty or any other members do. Why do you feel the need to single me out and make out like its only me that stubborn? most of us in these threads are just a stubborn so I would appreciate it if you and others were to stop singling me out acting likes its only me ok?? ---------- Post added at 18:45 ---------- Previous post was at 18:43 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
I consider I know what goes on in your head only to the extent that you share your thoughts in this thread, and others like it. I have seen you arguing that people who don't share your experience can't speak to it as well as you can. I have seen you observing that you think others are trying to discredit or attack you when all I can see is people addressing social situations that you happen to personally identify with. A national welfare policy is a blunt instrument. We can only discuss the rights and the wrongs of it in blunt fashion. There will always be personal stories of hardship and a sense of injustice in this area. A policy designed to address the needs of millions is always going to have anomalies that disadvantage some. However I do not see anywhere in this thread, any discussion about the technicalities and what might need to be done in order to address injustices and anomalies. The thread so far has been very high level, discussing the overall right or wrong of the benefit reforms. As such, I can see no justification at all for you feeling like your position is being personally attacked. I might just as well be accused of attacking myself, seeing as I am currently and by some distance a net beneficiary of the system rather than a net contributor - a fact you have previously dismissed as less relevant than your own experience as I'm not actually on the 'bread line'. But there we go round in circles again. |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Just seen a piece on the news where Osbourne goes to of all places 'where people are working' to discuss what's happening to those who are not working?
they mention that they'll be £300 a year better off. I assume that £300 is a fortune? so what is around £900 a year loss then? that some of the non workers are losing??!! it's a triple fortune! madness. |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Saying that one person's comments are offered more intelligently is not the same thing as saying the other person's comments lack intelligence. Not the same thing at all. One is a relative statement and the other is an absolute. ---------- Post added at 18:58 ---------- Previous post was at 18:55 ---------- Quote:
The benefit reforms are supposed to make it more worthwhile to work than not to work. They are also meant to address the injustice felt by many low-paid, hard-working people that they have friends and neighbours who are better off on benefits and not working at all. Taking the government's message about welfare reform and sharing it in front of an audience of workers who will be happy to hear it is simply good politics. |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Chris it appears to me that you are only interested in your own opinion and no one elses matters === things like this you recognise eh? You seem to think you past knowledge on a subject that has changed is as relevant as upto date experience === see I can do it to if you want to play that game You and marty argue the same point only yours seems a little more intelligent ===== hows about that one then... |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
you're just of the opinion that it's not :) Quote:
tell them that there's jobs out there. forget that not so long ago there wasn't, because now there's jobs galore for everyone. Quote:
we're going to be sorry. |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Quote:
---------- Post added at 19:10 ---------- Previous post was at 19:09 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
all you can see is my type your observation is flawed not an aspect of the discussion at all but its your prejudice towards me just standing by my beliefs just like you :) |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Which, as it happens, I think is a relevant consideration, which is why I don't think twice about observing other posters' apparent motivations and moods when I post. I think envy and hatred have played a major part in some people's contributions to this discussion. IDS has been pilloried not for making a supposedly incoherent argument on welfare but for being rich. |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
I fully concur ,I tend to argue my point a little more bluntly than Chris (that is why you and me come to blows so often ,we have a similar style just opposite sides of the coin) ,Chris has obviously had a more advanced education than me ,i concider myself average in intelligence and Chris more fluent and well written .The difference between Mertles posts and Arthurs is Mertle does research his posts whereas Arthur just rants and contradicts himself sometimes |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
the fact its appears to not be like that now Chris is not my fault |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Maybe not the dream job they always wanted,but at least a first step. There was a time when I worked as a cleaner because times were tough and I just needed the money.No shame in that,although it was strange that most of my colleagues at the time were foreign and the English who applied and were offered the job only lasted a day or two..... must've been beneath them and the benefits were obviously sufficient to live on. |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
but Arthur still deserves the same amount of respect as any other member though surely? |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Time to stop that addiction and I hope the Government will go much further in their welfare reforms.Just a shame the Tories have to appease the LIbDems. |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Not had many dealings with the system before but today I had to call them and I came to this conclusion.....anyone who can get an issue resolved with them in less than a day deserves a medal along with any benefits they need. It was hard enough to find a number to call. Then had the numerous levels of automated system, 28 minutes of being in a queue before being answered and told I need another department and the line going dead while they transferred me. Frustrating and after all the waiting and calls I still didn't get the issue resolved.
I can see how it can be a full time job on benefits, 9-5 dealing with DWP calls, days spent at the CAB to help fill in forms to re-apply for benefits when they rename it and make you re-apply, going to medical appointments to get paperwork to send in and have the ATOS Dr's causing you to have to do it all again, back to the CAB for help with an appeal, day spent at tribunal, another day spent chasing the DWP because they haven't paid you after the tribunal has said their initial refusal was stupid, fill in more forms because the change in benefits affects 4 other benefits so you have to re-apply so that 75p can be juggled between them, meaning you end up 30p worse off in the end, very tired and wish you was dead. That is the kind of impression I get from one day of phonecalls and the various horror stories I have heard from people I know. Full time work seems a lot less stressful! |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Nobody should mind paying tax if it used correctly and efficiently for the betterment of the society ,when it is used in the amount it is for state support then people paying that tax quite rightly start to kick back because the society they are paying for is going backwards |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
if it only targeted the right people I would support it but it does not which spoils it imo
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Oh, we will. Quote:
As in the 'them' team is bigger than the 'us' team? who's going to be the referee when the time comes? |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
besides. they haven't finished yet. they've got to find more money. and there's only a certain part of society left in which to do that with. at the moment you're just there to approve of the present measures. but your time will come. it has to. it's the whole point of the phrase "we're all in this together" you didn't think he didn't mean you. did you? :) |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
---------- Post added at 19:43 ---------- Previous post was at 19:41 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
---------- Post added at 19:48 ---------- Previous post was at 19:47 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
the one about some money going to better places and everyone living happily ever after :) In my dream I had. they were putting it all to one side and then Dave, Ian, and George did a runner with it to another country. |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
I think that for some people it's easier to turn this issue into a them and us, rich v. poor, right v. left argument than accepting the reality that the welfare state cannot carry on supporting people who could and should be working harder to support themselves.
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
I feel ok. |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Shame really,they're wasting precious time. :) ---------- Post added at 19:55 ---------- Previous post was at 19:54 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
---------- Post added at 19:59 ---------- Previous post was at 19:57 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
And the sick and disabled can not work harder to support ourselves, and I don't see anyone here actually defending the the workshy either. I must be reading a different forum to you, I don't see the 'rich vs the poor' thing and the 'them as us thing' it's the usual against the usual but just a different subject. |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
I'm not unemployed, sick or disabled.
Technically. I should be on the tax payers side :) |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
also ,a bit more relevant ,it was labour who insisted disabled people in receipt of benefits get re assessed in order to cut welfare spending ,the coalition are just completing their policy . |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
The extent to which the sick or disabled can work or work harder will vary according to how severe their illness or disability is. Some are able to do a lot more than others and many want to as the Remploy workers will testify. |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
As Carers of our own handicapped twins (now young adults), My wife and I are very, very grateful for the Benefits we receive to allow us to continue our roles.
We aren't rolling in money, but make do and pay our bills. A short period of respite would be a nice gesture, but it has never happened in over 21 years, so we're not holding our breath. I have often received verbal bashings from both working and unemployed people, thinking that being a full time Carer is somehow a "skive" or a "cushy life". Sadly, or poignantly, several have had to become Carers for members of their own family, and now see us in a totally different light. I suppose it would be the same with workers who slag off unemployed people, then become one themselves. Despite the REAL inflation rates, I reckon many in our position would have accepted a 0% rise in benefits if it meant getting this country out of the mess it's in financially. But looking at IDS's future plans for the "less" disabled, I fear we may be in for a rough ride ahead when the axe falls soon with PIP coming in to replace DLA. The ATOS assessments were hell enough, but I think IDS has further nasty surprises for us at the bottom of the pile. |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
---------- Post added at 20:19 ---------- Previous post was at 20:18 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
I'd say a lot of people don't see much of a future at the moment. and then you got people who are just depressed with Dave's face and voice. Quote:
Quote:
---------- Post added at 20:23 ---------- Previous post was at 20:21 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Yes people are going to struggle but they will survive the alternative is frightening and also very short sighted and a great disservice to future generations |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
the workers and the non workers looked on. then they went for the non workers. the workers looked on. and it all stops there? nothing for the disabled and the non workers to look on upon? |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Work should always pay,that's the bottom line.If someone on benefits can afford more,or as in some cases families on benefits have more disposable income than working families then there's something seriously wrong with the system. Agreed? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
---------- Post added at 21:05 ---------- Previous post was at 20:57 ---------- Quote:
Questions that no one has answer to and don't matter in the slightest right now... how about that. :p: |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
You cheapen the memory of Martin Niemöller, and the time he (and millions of others) spent in Saschenhausen and Dachau, by comparing reducing some benefits with the Holocaust. Shame on you. |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
The disabled should always be looked after in my opinion, however people who have kids to get money and people who have never worked a day in their life should be hit hard. My wife has a friend who has a number of kids by different people and gets a 4 bedroomed house paid for - how can that be right?
Also with regard to jobs - there is a tomato farm near where I live and a number of polish people work there from 6am till noon and then wait on tables from 6pm until midnight, yet people moan they can't get a job? |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
That'll be that history thing again proving a real pain isn't it ;) |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
---------- Post added at 21:27 ---------- Previous post was at 21:24 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
so what you really mean is it's ok for labour to do it but god help the tories if they try it ,totally missing the point and fact that many policies started by any party in power are usually finished by the party that follows . You didn't drink the milk anyway you just shoved the straws up your nose and pretended to be a walrus ;) |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
:( |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Sounds depressing :(
Anyway. welcome to Britain! how long you stopping? :) |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
My sights are firmly on the US though,so who knows. |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
They're doing a deal on one way flights at the moment :)
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
and in any case,you'd miss me... |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
To America. where you said you'd love to go.
you're not trying to get me into trouble are you? asking me to post that so you can use the "send em back" thing? :) Anyway. loads of stuff in the news about all this benefit cuts thing. I'll post some in a bit. |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Are you referring to the guy who generated benefits income through his numerous kids and burned them alive? Can't wait for your thoughts on that. |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
realistic not defeatist the human race has destroyed the planet for future generations in less than 150 years of technological advancement. Its called the inconvenient truth I believe ---------- Post added at 22:42 ---------- Previous post was at 22:41 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
---------- Post added at 22:44 ---------- Previous post was at 22:43 ---------- Quote:
---------- Post added at 22:45 ---------- Previous post was at 22:44 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:32. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum