Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33686412)

Chrysalis 28-03-2012 21:52

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
government are all a honest bunch who never lie, mislead, cover anything up etc. Didnt you know tim ;)

martyh 28-03-2012 21:58

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim Deegan (Post 35406443)
You really are very nieve about how governments operate :rolleyes:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrysalis (Post 35406444)
government are all a honest bunch who never lie, mislead, cover anything up etc. Didnt you know tim ;)


It's pointless trying to have a adult conversation with people so blinded by conspiracy and paranoia that they cannot even see common sense and facts

Thought you may be interested in this bit from my earlier link

Quote:

May not ‘damage’ just be official embarrassment when something has gone wrong?
  • Not as far as the DA-Notice System is concerned; political and official embarrassment are not reasons for excluding material from public disclosure.


Tim Deegan 28-03-2012 22:35

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35406445)
It's pointless trying to have a adult conversation with people so blinded by conspiracy and paranoia that they cannot even see common sense and facts

Thought you may be interested in this bit from my earlier link

It's not paranoia. We were told by the FBU that it would happen, and guess what, it did.

Remember it is only when you are directly involved that you see differences in what is normally reported, and what isn't reported when it suits the gevernments agenda.

If it was a car fire, or a bedroom fire with nobody injured, then you could just put it down to there not being space in the paper. But as I said previously, this was one story that would often be national news. But it wasn't even reported. Just the same as the serious accident that firefighters left the picket line to attend, on the personal request of an ambulance officer. The army were mobilised to it, and actually assisted the striking firefighters in rescuing the casualty. And the army officer in charge commented afterwards that they were glad that the firefighters broke their strike to attend, as they wouldn't have had a clue on their own, and the casualty would probably have died....this wasn't reported either. In fact try and find any reports during the period of industrial action that praised firefighters.

As for the earlier link, you can take that with a pinch of salt, as I also said earlier. The government would use the excuse that it was in the interest of the nation, because the MOD had to cover the strike, so the took them away from defending the country. And what would happen if that was challenged legally? Well the industrial action would most likely be over by then.

martyh 28-03-2012 22:44

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim Deegan (Post 35406457)
It's not paranoia. We were told by the FBU that it would happen, and guess what, it did.

.

and you believed them , like they don't have an agenda during industrial action

:rofl::rofl::rofl:

nomadking 28-03-2012 22:57

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
One thing I remember about when the Army took over fire fighting duties, is that they complained of boredom, because there was so little for them to do.

martyh 28-03-2012 23:05

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35406467)
One thing I remember about when the Army took over fire fighting duties, is that they complained of boredom, because there was so little for them to do.

That must have been a story made up by the government who forced the press to release it by using some obscure piece of legislation designed to feed misinformation to the germans in WWII :D

slowcoach 28-03-2012 23:16

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35406467)
One thing I remember about when the Army took over fire fighting duties, is that they complained of boredom, because there was so little for them to do.

That was probably because by the time they got the Green Goddess started and then ambled at 20 MPH to the fire the fire would have burned itself out, which is probably just as well .. trying to put out a fire with a stirrup pump in a bucket of water was not effective even back in the days when the Green Goddess was state of the art. :D

Tim Deegan 29-03-2012 02:24

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35406460)
and you believed them , like they don't have an agenda during industrial action

:rofl::rofl::rofl:

Like I said, you are very nieve. The FBU doesn't have an agenda, it's members do. THey give advice to the members on whatever the members vote to do. So there was no reason not to believe them. But you really have your blinkers on if you actually believe that governments don't play dirty, and bend the rules to suit themselves.

I have very stong evidence to back up what I say....what do you have to say otherwise???

---------- Post added at 03:24 ---------- Previous post was at 03:23 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35406467)
One thing I remember about when the Army took over fire fighting duties, is that they complained of boredom, because there was so little for them to do.

And that's because all they did was answer fire calls. That is about 5 -10% of what firefighters do. So they would be bored.

martyh 29-03-2012 07:49

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim Deegan (Post 35406501)
But you really have your blinkers on if you actually believe that governments don't play dirty, and bend the rules to suit themselves.

I know they bend the rules to suit themselves ,funny thing is though as soon as there is a wiff of rule bending from the government the press are all over it .


Quote:

I have very stong evidence to back up what I say....what do you have to say otherwise???

lets see it then

Hugh 29-03-2012 08:10

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim Deegan (Post 35406501)
Like I said, you are very nieve. The FBU doesn't have an agenda, it's members do. THey give advice to the members on whatever the members vote to do. So there was no reason not to believe them. But you really have your blinkers on if you actually believe that governments don't play dirty, and bend the rules to suit themselves.

I have very stong evidence to back up what I say....what do you have to say otherwise???

---------- Post added at 03:24 ---------- Previous post was at 03:23 ----------



And that's because all they did was answer fire calls. That is about 5 -10% of what firefighters do. So they would be bored.

Ahem....

From the FBU website
Quote:

The Fire Brigades Union has joined a number of other trade unions in urging a No vote in the referendum on 5 May. Matt Wrack, FBU general secretary said: “While we are happy to consider genuine options for improving the democracy of the voting system, the AV proposal simply does not deliver. AV will not improve accountability or increase democratic control over elected politicians. At the current time this referendum is also a wasteful diversion from the fact that this government has embarked on wrecking our public services and the destroying the living standards of millions of people.

Chrysalis 29-03-2012 09:10

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
nothing to do with paranoia martyh, its just blatantly obvious instead.

The bbc themselves have told me certian stories dont get published as they not in the public interest in their own words, of course the bbc dont have to worry about paper sales so for them its nothing to do with if it sells papers or not.

The facts are senior ministers will have direct lines to journalists and probably editors, there is probably arrangements between the 2, and on top of this papers will have their own political agendas as well eg. some will be pro left wing and others pro right wing.

Its probably a #1 rule when in government to have papers and tv news on side otherwise if they go against you then the people will be against you as well as the public are suckers for believing what they told. This is an obvious downside of democracy in that you have to worry what the people think of you and in turn you have to worry what the media think of you as the media controls the public. So the naivety is on your side if you think there is no relationship between media and government with them both fully independent of each other.

Its not just papers as well, its documentaries and soaps like eastenders which are also used for propoganda.

martyh 29-03-2012 09:24

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrysalis (Post 35406555)
nothing to do with paranoia martyh, its just blatantly obvious instead.

The bbc themselves have told me certian stories dont get published as they not in the public interest in their own words, of course the bbc dont have to worry about paper sales so for them its nothing to do with if it sells papers or not.

The facts are senior ministers will have direct lines to journalists and probably editors, there is probably arrangements between the 2, and on top of this papers will have their own political agendas as well eg. some will be pro left wing and others pro right wing.

Its probably a #1 rule when in government to have papers and tv news on side otherwise if they go against you then the people will be against you as well as the public are suckers for believing what they told. This is an obvious downside of democracy in that you have to worry what the people think of you and in turn you have to worry what the media think of you as the media controls the public. So the naivety is on your side if you think there is no relationship between media and government with them both fully independent of each other.

Its not just papers as well, its documentaries and soaps like eastenders which are also used for propoganda.

your putting words in my mouth again ,you realy must start reading properly .I was commenting on Tims ridiculous claim that a DA notice was used to supress/block a story about firemen saving a mother and son from a house fire in stevenage during the 2003 fire mans strike so please read the bloody posts before commenting in future

Hugh 29-03-2012 09:31

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
"propoganda (sic)" - When something is said, printed, or presented in media which disagrees with my views....;)

If there is a conspiracy by Government and 'Big Business' to have the media on the Government's side, they are not very good at it, considering all the critical items in the media about the Government (current and previous)....

Tim Deegan 29-03-2012 10:33

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35406531)
Ahem....

From the FBU website

And your point is???

Any union represents it's members. It can advise it's members, but it can't force them to do anything.

---------- Post added at 11:26 ---------- Previous post was at 11:15 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35406564)
your putting words in my mouth again ,you realy must start reading properly .I was commenting on Tims ridiculous claim that a DA notice was used to supress/block a story about firemen saving a mother and son from a house fire in stevenage during the 2003 fire mans strike so please read the bloody posts before commenting in future

What Chrysalis says is spot on. But for some reason you think that you know better.

I don't know for sure, and neither do you if a D-Notice was actually used officially, or if pressure was just put on the press. The fact is that as a D-Notice is a voulantary agreement, it wouldn't make any difference if it was used officially or not. The result was still the same, and will be with any dispute that the government have an interest in putting out negative propoganda.

In 2003 a friend of mine phoned up the Sun to ask why they were printing deliberate lies about firefighters. The response was that they knew what they were printing was lies, but they will print it anyway because they don't agree with the dispute.....Obviously on their usual form, they didn't want the truth to get in the way of a good story:rolleyes:

---------- Post added at 11:33 ---------- Previous post was at 11:26 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35406567)
"propoganda (sic)" - When something is said, printed, or presented in media which disagrees with my views....;)

If there is a conspiracy by Government and 'Big Business' to have the media on the Government's side, they are not very good at it, considering all the critical items in the media about the Government (current and previous)....

Sorry Hugh, but you really need to understand the underhand ways that governments and the press operate. We are starting to see more about how the press operate at the moment.

I was only using the firefighters dispute as one example. But if we continue to use this one. So the scenario is that a senior minister asks lets say the Sun editor not to print any story that puts firefighters in a good light, and in return they will feed the paper with a few exclusive stories.

Well this is a no brainer for the Sun. All they have to do is not print a couple of local stories, that would have only been fillers anyway. And in return they get a couple of nationally important exclusives.

Getting the picture??

Hugh 29-03-2012 10:38

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
Getting a picture....;)

[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

Tim Deegan 29-03-2012 10:59

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35406596)

And what is that supposed to mean??? I presume you are being insulting, which as a moderator you should know is against forum rules.

Healthy debate is good, but when it turns into people being abusive, then it has gone too far.

martyh 29-03-2012 11:56

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim Deegan (Post 35406610)
And what is that supposed to mean??? I presume you are being insulting, which as a moderator you should know is against forum rules.

Healthy debate is good, but when it turns into people being abusive, then it has gone too far.

You have stated that the government blocked a story using a DA notice .You have failed to provide any evidence of this aside from it not being reported in a local rag and your union rep told .You refuse to accept that any attempt by the government to block stories by the government just so they look good would make a bigger scandal than anything the government have had to deal with in recent years ,in all honesty Tim you are making yourself look crazy

Tim Deegan 29-03-2012 12:04

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35406623)
You have stated that the government blocked a story using a DA notice .You have failed to provide any evidence of this aside from it not being reported in a local rag and your union rep told .You refuse to accept that any attempt by the government to block stories by the government just so they look good would make a bigger scandal than anything the government have had to deal with in recent years ,in all honesty Tim you are making yourself look crazy

Maybe I should have worded it differently: The government stopped (by whatever means), the stories being reported. The D-Notice is one method that they may have used.

Why would it cause a scandal? They would be blocking a local story, not a national one with huge public interest.

My step father used to be the press officer for one of the major political parties (not saying which one). And you wouldn't believe some of the underhand tactics that he told me about that goes on between the government and the press.

martyh 29-03-2012 12:30

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim Deegan (Post 35406625)
Maybe I should have worded it differently: The government stopped (by whatever means), the stories being reported. The D-Notice is one method that they may have used.
.

Or maybe you could accept that the local didn't get the story untill after the print deadline or they just didn't think it was newsworthy or they just didn't know about it instead of jumping to conclusions that the government are blocking the free press


Quote:

Why would it cause a scandal? They would be blocking a local story, not a national one with huge public interest.
seriously??? you have no idea why the government using exceptional powers for such a trivial story ,or any story other than ones involving national security would cause a scandal

Chrysalis 29-03-2012 12:49

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35406564)
your putting words in my mouth again ,you realy must start reading properly .I was commenting on Tims ridiculous claim that a DA notice was used to supress/block a story about firemen saving a mother and son from a house fire in stevenage during the 2003 fire mans strike so please read the bloody posts before commenting in future

Well I got no idea if DA notices were issued or not i have never said that.

Tim Deegan 29-03-2012 12:58

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35406651)
Or maybe you could accept that the local didn't get the story untill after the print deadline or they just didn't think it was newsworthy or they just didn't know about it instead of jumping to conclusions that the government are blocking the free press

Considering that they have been known to report on wheelie bin fires more than two weeks after they happened, then the deadline theory doesn't apply.

It was far more newsworthy than most of the stories that they print. I mean come on, a 2 year old boy playing with a lighter, and causing a fire that very nearly killed him and his mother. Both resuscitated on scene, and then rushed to hospital. Then the toddler had to be transferred to Adenbrooks where he had to undergo a complete blood transfusion due to his blood being saturated with carbon monoxide. And then being kept in hospital for another three weeks until he recovered.....no I can't see that being newsworthy, can you?:rolleyes:

And they did know about it, because the press officer, who is the partner of a friend of mine actually gave them the report. As she also did for the RTC I mentioned. As the Ambulance press officer (who I also know well) also did. So that theory doesn't work either.


Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35406651)
seriously??? you have no idea why the government using exceptional powers for such a trivial story ,or any story other than ones involving national security would cause a scandal

I've explained that over and over again. There was a pay dispute, and the government didn't want public opinion to be on the side of the firefighters. So any stories that put them in a good light are supressed. And they release loads of propoganda (much of it lies) to make firefighters look bad. This is also done to stop firefighters putting over their side of the dispute.

It isn't a matter of national security, but they would have blown it all out of proportion.

martyh 29-03-2012 13:05

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrysalis (Post 35406663)
Well I got no idea if DA notices were issued or not i have never said that.


No you haven't have you ,but if you had bothered to read instead of jumping in and waffling on about nonsense just so you could have a dig at me then maybe now you wouldn't look so foolish

Tim Deegan 29-03-2012 13:07

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35406678)
No you haven't have you ,but if you had bothered to read instead of jumping in and waffling on about nonsense just so you could have a dig at me then maybe now you wouldn't look so foolish

Nobody should be having a dig at anyone. This is supposd to be a mature debate.

Alan Fry 16-04-2012 13:50

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim Deegan (Post 35404948)
And by any means you have made it quite clear what you mean....violence, rioting, terrorism, and murder!

I see your facebook page has also been shut down, probably due to your extremist posts.

Now stop tring to move all the topics towards your political agenda, and let us get back on topic.

For god sake, you keep on callling me an extremist, we sorry to dissapoint you, but I am not, I have not called for a "Ayran Race, "Workers of The World Unite", "Jihad" etc

---------- Post added at 14:45 ---------- Previous post was at 14:43 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrysalis (Post 35405359)
the main one been its anti growth.

---------- Post added at 09:59 ---------- Previous post was at 09:54 ----------



by increase the private sector pay rates?

adding a postcode lottery to job pay in the public sector is bad for growth but I do also agree with the point its bad as well for other reasons already stated such as.

attracting decent staff to poor areas, like good GPs and teachers.
people doing the same work but for different levels of pay based on where they live. I think its more likely to be based on the companys address tho, so it may be possible someone will live in an expensive area but travel to a poor located workplace. So it may force people to move to poorer areas.

So in affect it will make rundown areas even worse and good areas better widening poor/rich gap.

---------- Post added at 10:00 ---------- Previous post was at 09:59 ----------



I think the way they acting now they expecting to not be reelected so as such dont care about their public image and are just pushing through everything the tory donaters want (the rich want).


---------- Post added at 10:05 ---------- Previous post was at 10:01 ----------



people can be easily manipulated when the media backs government.

also proven with the voting referendum.

All this will do is make more people move to London or start rioting outside London, if this keeps going, it will be more than Scotland that starts demanding "freedom" from the UK! :mad:

---------- Post added at 14:47 ---------- Previous post was at 14:45 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim Deegan (Post 35405397)
The trouble is that they are unlikely to increase anybodys pay, and it is just a costcutting excercise.

In my profession, if I worked 20 miles down the road I would earn an extra £6000 London weighting. If I worked 10 miles down the road I would earn and extra £550 as fringe London weighting. If I worked in my old home town in West Yorkshire I would earn the same as I do now, but I would be better off due to the cost of living, by anything between £4000 and £6000. The area where I work is an extremely expensive part of the country, yet in real terms we are probably in the worst financial position....but do you think the wages would go up in my area to compensate?....I don't think so.

Remember London has a high cost of living and the wages do not compensate, and they are the highest in the UK!

---------- Post added at 14:48 ---------- Previous post was at 14:47 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrysalis (Post 35405445)
the variations in the private sector however could also be accounted for different jobs for different companies tho.

with GPs, teachers etc. they working for the same employer doing the same work.

its nothing to do with subsidies but more to do with the private sector changing its priorities from salary levels to profit.

the only reasonings for this policy is probably company owners using their joke of a minister hotlines ringing up to complain their employees want pay rises (how dare they) and its harder to turn them down when the public sector pays better. Also the good old saving money as I suspect there will be a net saving from it.

Its funny how you consider it a subsidy, I wonder how much cash is going to the private sector from the NHS contracts and th high speed rail work.

Also, there are less unionised workers in the private sector then in the public sector!

---------- Post added at 14:50 ---------- Previous post was at 14:48 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim Deegan (Post 35405472)
I used doctors and teachers because their jobs are more or less the same in the private and public sectors. I could also add firefighters and nurses to the list if you want, with the same results. In fact the only direct private comparrison to public sector firefighters would be airport firefighters, who I believe on average earn roughly 25% more.

Many public sector jobs have now gone to private contractors, who make a profit, and then pay very low wages. But this now puts those workers in the private sector.

You have to remember that many statistics are manipulated to fit in with the governments agenda, so don't take them too seriously. An example is how they reduced the number of fire death statistics. Now someone who dies in a fire that was started through arson, is not listed as a fire death, but as a murder. And someone who gets drunk, then passes out leaving their chip pan on, is listed as alocohol related, and not a fire death. Then someone who has a fire, and calls the fire service, but manages to knock the fire down themselves. If there are no visible flames on arrival of the fire service (even if it is still smoldering), this isn't put down as a fire.

There may be exceptions, but in general for long term employment it is well known that public sector jobs pay less. Although during a recession, businesses whos profits are down, may pay lower wages. But this usually changes as the economy improves, and unemployment drops.

By the way, it is illegal to pay men and women different pay rates just based on sex.

Which is why we need radical reform, like more trade union members and more powerful unions!

---------- Post added at 14:50 ---------- Previous post was at 14:50 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35405473)
so if the vote goes one way, it's democracy in action - if it goes the other way, it's manipulation.....;)

How can you explain people voting for a lower standard of living?

Hugh 16-04-2012 13:52

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
Strange, how your comments/answers very rarely relate to what was actually posted - you seem to reply to the statements you think the CF'ers should have posted (or are not related at all), rather than what they actually posted.....

Alan Fry 16-04-2012 14:06

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim Deegan (Post 35405482)
Sort of yes!

Don't you remember that the Sun was a tory paper in the 80's, spouting tory propoganda. Then when the tories started to lose popularity, the Sun switched to Labour, spouting Labour propoganda.

Many peole will believe what they read in the papers.

All governments manipulate the press when it suits them. An example is in the fire service pay dispute in 2003. The government put a block on the press reporting anything that put firefighters in a good light. When you think that normally local papers will report on a bin fire. But during the dispute, a 2 year old boy and his mother were rescued from a house fire in Stevenage. They both only just survived by the skin of their teeth, but this didn't even get a mention in the local press.

Maybe the BBC should take control on the newspapers, then the only bias would from the commentators

---------- Post added at 14:59 ---------- Previous post was at 14:58 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35414563)
Strange, how your comments/answers very rarely relate to what was actually posted - you seem to reply to the statements you think the CF'ers should have posted (or are not related at all), rather than what they actually posted.....

Still havent answered my question then :D[COLOR="Silver"]

---------- Post added at 15:06 ---------- Previous post was at 15:02 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim Deegan (Post 35406132)
It's not a legal block. But when a government minister says that they don't want you to report something, then believe me, unless it is a huge news story it would be in the business interest to follow their withes. Otherwise investigations may start into dodgy reporting practices, that may otherwise be ignored.

If it is a big story of national interest, and it came out that the government had tried to hush it up, then the poo could really hit the fan. But with a story about a mother and child being rescued from a fire, then nobody cares if it isn't reported.

And if you don't believe me, then do a bit of research. It was during the pay dispute in 2003 (if I remember right). And see if you can find any story about a mother and a two year old child being saved in Stevenage.

Why can't the Levison investigation deal with this?

Hugh 16-04-2012 14:17

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Fry (Post 35414554)
How can you explain people voting for a lower standard of living?

Common sense - you can't keep spending money you don't have.....

Ignitionnet 16-04-2012 14:37

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Fry (Post 35414554)
How can you explain people voting for a lower standard of living?

Pragmatism, realism.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-17335444

Quote:

Voters in Switzerland have rejected a proposal to give themselves more annual leave in a national referendum.

The plan would have given workers six weeks off a year, but business groups warned about the cost to the economy.

Sirius 16-04-2012 14:44

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Fry (Post 35414554)
For god sake, you keep on callling me an extremist,

Sorry but you are, Your twitter page backs that up and your facebook page did as well

LexDiamond 16-04-2012 15:28

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
It really is amazing how between Tony Blair coming to office and Gordon Brown leaving office that this country forgot how to live within its means.

There are people like Alan that think luxury is a right and doesn't need to be earnt.

Osem 16-04-2012 15:33

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LexDiamond (Post 35414612)
It really is amazing how between Tony Blair coming to office and Gordon Brown leaving office that this country forgot how to live within its means.

There are people like Alan that think luxury is a right and doesn't need to be earnt.

:tu:

Some folks don't think....... ;)

dilli-theclaw 16-04-2012 15:37

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Fry (Post 35414565)
<Snip twaddle>

Point one - you ARE an extemest you only have to look at what you post elsewhere and here to prove that.

But what makes me ponder you even more is that you are ALSO (According to what you post here) the type of person you despise the most and would be the first up against the wall when what you advocate happens.

Osem 16-04-2012 16:10

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
The sad irony of that fact clearly escapes him.

---------- Post added at 17:10 ---------- Previous post was at 17:08 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35414586)
And when the credit fuelled boom hit the buffers everybody has to tighten their belts and pay off the debts. The country is no different. The higher standard of living was an illusion that it was convenient for the previous government to keep going as long as possible. Then when it was clear thet it could not be sustained they resorted to scorched earth tactics and budget time bombs in order to say "I told you so, look at the nasty Torys" when they were rightly kicked in the gonads.

Too true - but conveniently overlooked by so many here who refuse to accept reality.

Maggy 16-04-2012 20:31

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Fry (Post 35414565)

Why can't the Levison investigation deal with this?

Not within the remit of the Inquiry which is about phone hacking/dark arts and the interaction/corruption between the press,government and the police.

Tim Deegan 16-04-2012 21:47

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35414589)
Sorry but you are, Your twitter page backs that up and your facebook page did as well

Alan doesn't think inciting rioting, terrorism, and murder is extreme :rofl::rofl::rofl:

martyh 16-04-2012 22:04

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim Deegan (Post 35414780)
Alan doesn't think inciting rioting, terrorism, and murder is extreme :rofl::rofl::rofl:

extremists never do ,they always without exception think their actions and words are reasonable,justyfied and logical ...........bit like a politician really;)

Tim Deegan 16-04-2012 23:14

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35414785)
extremists never do ,they always without exception think their actions and words are reasonable,justyfied and logical ...........bit like a politician really;)

And in the end when they are in prison, they will claim that they are a political prisoner. Whe the real reason they are in prison is to protect the public from their extremist behavior.

Alan Fry 17-04-2012 11:36

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35414574)
Common sense - you can't keep spending money you don't have.....

There is money, but it is in the hands of the rich :mad:

---------- Post added at 12:28 ---------- Previous post was at 12:26 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignitionnet (Post 35414582)

More like, continuing tobeliving in what businesses say, even though they have caused a big economic mess, 6 weeks is not too much to ask!

The cost to the economy would not be that much...

---------- Post added at 12:32 ---------- Previous post was at 12:28 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35414586)
And when the credit fuelled boom hit the buffers everybody has to tighten their belts and pay off the debts. The country is no different. The higher standard of living was an illusion that it was convenient for the previous government to keep going as long as possible. Then when it was clear thet it could not be sustained they resorted to scorched earth tactics and budget time bombs in order to say "I told you so, look at the nasty Torys" when they were rightly kicked in the gonads.

We borrow a lot of money because we wanted to have a higher standard of living even though thanks weaker unions and weaker workers rights (along with deregulation), wages was not rising fast enough to pay for it. In the meantime, the rich were taking control of more and more of the capital, in the end the bubble burst and the rich ended up with a lot of money at the expence of us, this has been going on sicne the 80s

---------- Post added at 12:34 ---------- Previous post was at 12:32 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35414589)
Sorry but you are, Your twitter page backs that up and your facebook page did as well

So standing up for working people make you into an extremist?

Reminds me of the Boers who ran South Africa until the 1990s, they called anyone who wanted the end to apartheid as "Communists" and "Terrorists" :D

---------- Post added at 12:36 ---------- Previous post was at 12:34 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by LexDiamond (Post 35414612)
It really is amazing how between Tony Blair coming to office and Gordon Brown leaving office that this country forgot how to live within its means.

There are people like Alan that think luxury is a right and doesn't need to be earnt.

I am saying that hard work should be rewarded and that the working people get a decent standard of living, I am also saying that people should be rewarded by how hard they work and how good they are in work, rather than who you parents are

Chris 17-04-2012 11:42

Re: National pay rates may be scrapped for public workers
 
This thread was dormant for almost a month and since it was bumped I'm struggling to find any relevant, on-topic comments being added to it.

This is a moderator instruction, for all members to follow: Please do not resurrect old threads merely to take them off topic. Bumping threads that have naturally come to an end is disruptive and needlessly clutters other members' subscription lists.

If you missed the topic when it was live, due to being on holiday, at work, or having had your posting rights suspended, that, frankly, is tough luck.

If I have to close any more threads due to a failure to follow this instruction, I will get the frack hammer out. Warning ends. Thread closed.


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:40.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are Cable Forum