Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media TV Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   Virgin Media lack of tv investment (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33673732)

denphone 12-05-2011 17:23

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 35234731)
So On Sky you would be paying a lot more then :D

25 less HD channels. Just over a year ago VM only had 1 or 2 HD channels so we have actually come a long way in that time!

You aren't made to pay the £7 if you don't want to and also VM don't actually have a charge for HD channels. Same with TiVo you don't have to pay that if you don't want TiVo.

Virgin has come a long way but there is still a long way to go and why can,t you seperate yourself from your Virgin bias as it is very prevalent when you post your threads.

Stephen 12-05-2011 17:26

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
VM tend to only increase the prices when they have to. ie when Sky raise their prices.

What channels were lost recently?

As I tried to say earlier, my Gas and Electric have just gone up in price again even though I am still getting exactly the same as I had before, or I used to pay 35p for a mars bar and yet now its 55p and its actually lighter and smaller than it used to be. Should I demand they increase the size inline with the price increase?

---------- Post added at 16:26 ---------- Previous post was at 16:25 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35234740)
Virgin has come a long way but there is still a long way to go and why can,t you seperate yourself from your Virgin bias as it is very prevalent when you post your threads.

This has nothing to do with me working for VM at all. I am posting my own point of view on the subject and I don't agree with the postings of VM put up their prices so I want more channels, that a few people seem to keep posting.

muppetman11 12-05-2011 17:28

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 35234744)
VM tend to only increase the prices when they have to. ie when Sky raise their prices.

What channels were lost recently?

As I tried to say earlier, my Gas and Electric have just gone up in price again even though I am still getting exactly the same as I had before, or I used to pay 35p for a mars bar and yet now its 55p and its actually lighter and smaller than it used to be. Should I demand they increase the size inline with the price increase?

---------- Post added at 16:26 ---------- Previous post was at 16:25 ----------


This has nothing to do with me working for VM at all. I am posting my own point of view on the subject and I don't agree with the postings of VM put up their prices so I want more channels, that a few people seem to keep posting.

How long are VM staff going to flog this line of blaming Sky for all VM shortfalls :rolleyes:

denphone 12-05-2011 17:31

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35234750)
How long are VM staff going to flog this line of blaming Sky for all VM shortfalls :rolleyes:

We cannot blame Sky for everything even though l cannot stand them.

passingbat 12-05-2011 17:33

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 35234731)
25 less HD channels. Just over a year ago VM only had 1 or 2 HD channels so we have actually come a long way in that time!

You .

People seem to forget that. And they're free, not an extra £10.25 a month as they would be with Sky.

denphone 12-05-2011 17:37

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by passingbat (Post 35234763)
People seem to forget that. And they're free, not an extra £10.25 a month as they would be with Sky.

Well we are in mid May and we have had 2 HD channels added this year and we had to wait a year for them.

Stephen 12-05-2011 17:39

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35234750)
How long are VM staff going to flog this line of blaming Sky for all VM shortfalls :rolleyes:

I ain't blaming anyone! I am just stating a fact:mad:

muppetman11 12-05-2011 17:41

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by passingbat (Post 35234763)
People seem to forget that. And they're free, not an extra £10.25 a month as they would be with Sky.

There's 19 available free on XL , however 4 of those are available sub free BBC one HD , BBC HD , Channel 4 HD , ITV HD , so there's 15 subscription channels free however still not a bad offer.

denphone 12-05-2011 17:43

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 35234774)
I ain't blaming anyone! I am just stating a fact:mad:

Yes but you have your bias view based on your facts and l have a non bias view based on proper facts.:mad::D

denphone 12-05-2011 17:45

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35234776)
There's 19 available free on XL , however 4 of those are available sub free BBC one HD , BBC HD , Channel 4 HD , ITV HD , so there's 15 subscription channels free however still not a bad offer.

So why are you still with Sky the dark side then.:D

muppetman11 12-05-2011 17:47

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 35234774)
I ain't blaming anyone! I am just stating a fact:mad:

You stated Sky price rises , when in fact the last increase was £1.00 on XL and Sky prices were held , I can provide a link if you need it :D

passingbat 12-05-2011 17:55

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35234776)
There's 19 available free on XL , however 4 of those are available sub free BBC one HD , BBC HD , Channel 4 HD , ITV HD , so there's 15 subscription channels free however still not a bad offer.

I'm not saying there is no need for more channels, I think there is, even though for me, it's very desireable rather than essential (Sky atlantic being my 'biggest want') but to say VM haven't invested, I think is wrong.

The increase in free HD channels as previously mentioned is one and there must have been a massive investment in Tivo and an ongoing one to improove it and add the apps that are coming to tivo (wonder if we'll get the ones from 'The Apprentice'; I'd probably agree with Mersey70's view on apps if that happened :D).

denphone 12-05-2011 17:58

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
There,s is a definite need to add new channels just listening to most forum members so its not just my view also its great that tivo has arrived but they must keep investing in that and other things to keep competitive.

muppetman11 12-05-2011 18:05

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by passingbat (Post 35234795)
I'm not saying there is no need for more channels, I think there is, even though for me, it's very desireable rather than essential (Sky atlantic being my 'biggest want') but to say VM haven't invested, I think is wrong.

The increase in free HD channels as previously mentioned is one and there must have been a massive investment in Tivo and an ongoing one to improove it and add the apps that are coming to tivo (wonder if we'll get the ones from 'The Apprentice'; I'd probably agree with Mersey70's view on apps if that happened :D).

I fully agree , if you check my posts I'm not claiming VM haven't invested , my posts have been more related to Stephens post about not expecting more if prices go up which is wrong as I proved in post 91.

Hugh 12-05-2011 18:31

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35234779)
Yes but you have your bias view based on your facts and l have a non bias view based on proper facts.:mad::D

Amazing how everyone is biased but you....:D

btw, what are improper facts? (as opposed to proper facts).

denphone 12-05-2011 18:39

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35234823)
Amazing how everyone is biased but you....:D

btw, what are improper facts? (as opposed to proper facts).

I speak as l see which is forthright and giving a proper opinion on things, certain unnamed forum members have a in built bias before they start and is due to their close links with Virgin and l speak without a bias either way.:mad:

Digital Fanatic 12-05-2011 18:59

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35234786)
You stated Sky price rises , when in fact the last increase was £1.00 on XL and Sky prices were held , I can provide a link if you need it :D

If we are talking about Sky Premium channels...Sky puts it's prices up every September, without fail. ;)

VM usually absorbs the cost for a while, then they have to increase.

Quite a lot was added to XL in the 2 years or so without increases. :)

denphone 12-05-2011 19:02

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Digital Fanatic (Post 35234853)
If we are talking about Sky Premium channels...Sky puts it's prices up every September, without fail. ;)

VM usually absorbs the cost for a while, then they have to increase.

Quite a lot was added to XL in the 2 years or so without increases. :)

Right behind your masters again DF.

Digital Fanatic 12-05-2011 19:07

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35234859)
Right behind your masters again DF.

come on Denphone, you are better than that :nono:

I'm stating the facts of the case here.

muppetman11 12-05-2011 19:18

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Digital Fanatic (Post 35234853)
If we are talking about Sky Premium channels...Sky puts it's prices up every September, without fail. ;)

VM usually absorbs the cost for a while, then they have to increase.

Quite a lot was added to XL in the 2 years or so without increases. :)

I'm not stating your wrong I merely stated the last rise was a pound on XL , Sky prices were held.

Digital Fanatic 12-05-2011 19:20

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35234877)
I'm not stating your wrong I merely stated the last rise was a pound on XL , Sky prices were held.

They just change their prices at different times.

denphone 12-05-2011 19:21

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Digital Fanatic (Post 35234865)
come on Denphone, you are better than that :nono:

I'm stating the facts of the case here.

Come on DF its clear that Virgin need to do more in adding new channels and in doing it much quicker then they are doing at the moment, l was only jesting when l mentioned your masters.:D

Digital Fanatic 12-05-2011 19:23

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35234884)
Come on DF its clear that Virgin need to do more in adding new channels and in doing it much quicker then they are doing at the moment, l was only jesting when l mentioned your masters.:D

I know :)

Hugh 12-05-2011 19:23

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Employers....

denphone 12-05-2011 19:26

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35234886)
Employers....

Employee of the year.:D

muppetman11 12-05-2011 19:28

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Digital Fanatic (Post 35234881)
They just change their prices at different times.

Indeed they do , the Sky Sports OFCOM case is currently being dealt with in court so we'll see the outcome

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/money/art...=feeds-newsxml

denphone 12-05-2011 19:29

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35234899)
Indeed they do , the Sky Sports OFCOM case is currently being dealt with in court so we'll see the outcome

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/money/art...=feeds-newsxml

Thats going to take a eternity with Skys legal team.

devilincarnate 12-05-2011 19:31

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35234899)
Indeed they do , the Sky Sports OFCOM case is currently being dealt with in court so we'll see the outcome

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/money/art...=feeds-newsxml

Also the Movies are been handled by the Competition Commission as well?

http://www.competition-commission.or...y_tv/index.htm

The working papers are a good read.

Hugh 12-05-2011 19:32

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35234895)
Employee of the year.:D

Anion of the year, more like....:D

muppetman11 12-05-2011 19:33

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35234901)
Thats going to take a eternity with Skys legal team.

Even Sky have the right to defend themselves Den :D

denphone 12-05-2011 19:34

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35234906)
Anion of the year, more like....:D

Now, Now, Now less of that my dear Hugh.:D

ahardie 12-05-2011 19:38

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rillington (Post 35234736)
I think we all have differeing views as to the value of VM compared to Sky. If I had the same content with Sky then I'd be paying £20 per month more - £9 for ESPN and £10+ for HD. Therefore, VM on XL is good value when you compare like-for-like but not as good value as it was before as the last six months have seen two price increases (yes one was the VAT increase and out of VM's hands) but a reduction in the number of channels available.

The issue here is that VM upped the price by £2 per month in April but VM has made no effort to replace the channels lost. In other words, we are paying more but getting less. All it seems to be in 2011 is Tivo, and nothing else when it comes to TV and eventually people are going to downgrade of even cancel VM if VM continues to increase prices whilst offering fewer channels.

Like you say one increase was VAT and every company put their prices up so why call it two increases. The VAT increase is irrelevant as it is a government increase.

Quote:

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35234877)
I'm not stating your wrong I merely stated the last rise was a pound on XL , Sky prices were held.

Sky prices weren't held. Sky increased their tv packs by £1 as well. Last September. I think they also increased sports by a wopping £3. They also put their prices up in line with the VAT increase, same as every other company.

devilincarnate 12-05-2011 19:41

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ahardie (Post 35234918)
Sky prices weren't held. Sky increased their tv packs by £1 as well. Last September. I think they also increased sports by a wopping £3. They also put their prices up in line with the VAT increase, same as every other company.

Yes this is true:)

muppetman11 12-05-2011 19:42

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ahardie (Post 35234918)
Like you say one increase was VAT and every company put their prices up so why call it two increases. The VAT increase is irrelevant as it is a government increase.



Sky prices weren't held. Sky increased their tv packs by £1 as well. Last September. I think they also increased sports by a wopping £3. They also put their prices up in line with the VAT increase, same as every other company.

If you read back you'll see I said XL increased by a pound , Sky prices meaning premium channels to VM subscribers were held on the last increase, but as DF has correctly stated the Sky increases are at a different time to VM , I've never claimed Sky don't increase prices.

denphone 12-05-2011 19:44

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35234929)
If you read back you'll see I said XL increased by a pound , Sky prices meaning premium channels to VM subscribers were held on the last increase, but as DF has correctly stated the Sky increases are at a different time to VM , I've never claimed Sky don't increase prices.

l would say they are both greedy buggers.:mad:

Digital Fanatic 12-05-2011 19:46

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35234931)
l would say they are both greedy buggers.:mad:

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2011/05/76.gif https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2011/05/76.gif https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2011/05/76.gif https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2011/05/76.gif

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2011/05/77.gif

devilincarnate 12-05-2011 19:47

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35234931)
l would say they are both greedy buggers.:mad:

VM Did not increase their TV prices for 2 years before this APRIL. So how can VM be greedy buggers.

denphone 12-05-2011 19:49

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by devilincarnate (Post 35234939)
VM Did not increase their prices for 2 years before this APRIL. So how can VM be greedy buggers.

Then why has my bill risen relentlessly in the past 18 months.:mad::mad:

muppetman11 12-05-2011 19:49

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35234931)
l would say they are both greedy buggers.:mad:

Couldn't agree more mate , I personally believe TV subs are at an astonishing all time high , with youview , connected TVs and internet content so readily available pay TV companies will have to be careful.

ahardie 12-05-2011 19:52

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35234929)
If you read back you'll see I said XL increased by a pound , Sky prices meaning premium channels to VM subscribers were held on the last increase, but as DF has correctly stated the Sky increases are at a different time to VM , I've never claimed Sky don't increase prices.

Perhaps I misunderstood you but you did say this. :)
Quote:

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35234929)
You stated Sky price rises , when in fact the last increase was £1.00 on XL and Sky prices were held , I can provide a link if you need it :D


denphone 12-05-2011 19:52

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35234945)
Couldn't agree more mate , I personally believe TV subs are at an astonishing all time high , with youview , connected TVs and internet content so readily available pay TV companies will have to be careful.

l totally agree as l remember paying 30 quid a month now its 103 pounds.:mad::mad:

Digital Fanatic 12-05-2011 19:55

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35234954)
l totally agree as l remember paying 30 quid a month now its 103 pounds.:mad::mad:

You must have added a lot of services though. :shocked:

devilincarnate 12-05-2011 19:56

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35234943)
Then why has my bill risen relentlessly in the past 18 months.:mad::mad:

The TV side of the bill for the last 2 years have been down to SKY and do not forget that I think that they are putting their prices up later this year as well?

denphone 12-05-2011 19:59

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Digital Fanatic (Post 35234960)
You must have added a lot of services though. :shocked:

l have added a couple of services but l still say prices have moved relentlessly up with tv providers and maybe some of that is down to Skys greedyness but tv providers have to be careful about customers especially in the current economic climate.:mad:

muppetman11 12-05-2011 20:00

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ahardie (Post 35234953)
Perhaps I misunderstood you but you did say this. :)

I will give you that one , however I just assumed people would understand as we were talking VM price increases , apologies for the confusion.

ahardie 12-05-2011 20:01

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35234969)
I will give you that one , however I just assumed people would understand as we were talking VM price increases , apologies for the confusion.

No problem. ;)

muppetman11 12-05-2011 20:05

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35234901)
Thats going to take a eternity with Skys legal team.

Here we go Den a timeframe

Ofcom’s original ruling forcing BSkyB to offer Sky Sports was handed down on March 31 last year and tomorrow’s case, involving leading QCs, is expected to last for up to eight weeks.

Stephen 12-05-2011 20:13

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35234829)
I speak as l see which is forthright and giving a proper opinion on things, certain unnamed forum members have a in built bias before they start and is due to their close links with Virgin and l speak without a bias either way.:mad:

I don't know if you are referring to me but I have no bias toward Virgin Media at all. My posts are my own opinions and I make my own mind up about whether I like something or not.

I might work for them but that doesn't mean I will always stick up for everything the company does. What I post in here is what I think.

denphone 12-05-2011 20:14

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35234978)
Here we go Den a timeframe

Ofcom’s original ruling forcing BSkyB to offer Sky Sports was handed down on March 31 last year and tomorrow’s case, involving leading QCs, is expected to last for up to eight weeks.

Thats quicker then l thought.:mad:

Hugh 12-05-2011 21:10

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35234968)
l have added a couple of services but l still say prices have moved relentlessly up with tv providers and maybe some of that is down to Skys greedyness but tv providers have to be careful about customers especially in the current economic climate.:mad:

A couple of services....seriously?

Perhaps Sky Movies, Sky Sports, 30mb BB, XL TV, TiVo and another V+ box may be the reason your bill has gone up? What services did you have when you paid £30?

fwiw, my bill (not including call charges) has gone up around £5 in the last 2 years, but I have gained TiVo and an upgrade to 30Mb, so I consider that reasonable - ymmv.

alwaysabear 12-05-2011 22:35

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
I see VM have spent approx $15.6 million(£9.5 million) buying back there own shares in the last week.
http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix....556&highlight=
http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix....577&highlight=

howardmicks 12-05-2011 22:45

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by alwaysabear (Post 35235127)
I see VM have spent approx $15.6 million(£9.5 million) buying back there own shares in the last week.
http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix....556&highlight=
http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix....577&highlight=

Wish they had buy some new content whilst there at it ;)

Rillington 13-05-2011 00:27

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 35234744)
VM tend to only increase the prices when they have to. ie when Sky raise their prices.

What channels were lost recently?

The channels that VM chose to remove were MTV Classic, MTV +1 and MTV Shows.

The channels that have been shut down on all platforms are the Bravo channels and Channel One and its timeshift. They were closed by the channel's new owners.

Altogether around ten channels have disappeared from VM and just one - ITV1's timeshift channel - has been added. Yes I know that the Sky Arts HD channels have also appeared but they had been waiting to be laucnhed for many months and they are just a HD simulcast of a channel already on the platform rather than a new channel.

I know that True Entertainment has appeared fairly recently but another channel was removed at the same time.

denphone 13-05-2011 07:11

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 35234992)
I don't know if you are referring to me but I have no bias toward Virgin Media at all. My posts are my own opinions and I make my own mind up about whether I like something or not.

I might work for them but that doesn't mean I will always stick up for everything the company does. What I post in here is what I think.

You sure about that, l be keeping my eye on your opinions.:D:D

---------- Post added at 06:11 ---------- Previous post was at 06:09 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35235060)
A couple of services....seriously?

Perhaps Sky Movies, Sky Sports, 30mb BB, XL TV, TiVo and another V+ box may be the reason your bill has gone up? What services did you have when you paid £30?

fwiw, my bill (not including call charges) has gone up around £5 in the last 2 years, but I have gained TiVo and an upgrade to 30Mb, so I consider that reasonable - ymmv.

I am talking about 5 years ago when it was 30 quid and l suspect with your close contacts you will get some tidy discounts.:D:D:D:D

Hugh 13-05-2011 10:35

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Once again, you are mistaken - the only discounts I get are the standard XL bundle discount, and a £6 per month discount for a year because when I upgraded to 30Mb, they put on a charge they shouldn't have, and this balances that.

But I am sure you will caveat your smear/innuendo with "I was only joking".

FYI, I have no contacts with VM (formal or informal), and I receive no discounts for being a mod (as there is no connection between VM and CF, besides an informal one for escalating CF'ers problems).

denphone 13-05-2011 11:47

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
:mad:
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35235311)
Once again, you are mistaken - the only discounts I get are the standard XL bundle discount, and a £6 per month discount for a year because when I upgraded to 30Mb, they put on a charge they shouldn't have, and this balances that.

But I am sure you will caveat your smear/innuendo with with "I was only joking".

FYI, I have no contacts with VM (formal or informal), and I receive no discounts for being a mod (as there is no connection between VM and CF, besides an informal one for escalating CF'ers problems).

l am not in to smear and innuendo and resent that comment and my advice to you is to calm down and have a cup of tea.:mad::mad::mad:

Stephen 13-05-2011 11:48

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35235348)
:mad:

l am not in to smear and innuendo and resent that comment and my advice to you is to calm down and have a cup of tea.:mad::mad::mad:

I think it is you that needs to calm down Denphone. You post to try and wind people up and don't like it when you get called out for it. :dunce:

Chrysalis 13-05-2011 11:58

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
I would invest in broadband instead of tv also. I think its more future proof as tv on schedule is a dying trend. VOD is taking over slowly as well as IPTV. Also do VM still make a loss on various tv services? if so it would make sense to not invest in that.

LexDiamond 13-05-2011 12:14

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
The whole 'prices have gone up so I should get more channels' really annoys me.

I'm not a VM tv customer anymore but if I had been I presume my price would have gone up from 24.50 to 25.50. That is around 4% which is also around the inflation rate. I doubt VM actually make any increases in margin through the increase. So why people keep on expecting more channels is beyond me when the price increase wasn't actually to increase its margins. This thread is full of some members that are just arguing for the sake of arguing.

muppetman11 13-05-2011 12:22

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrysalis (Post 35235356)
I would invest in broadband instead of tv also. I think its more future proof as tv on schedule is a dying trend. VOD is taking over slowly as well as IPTV. Also do VM still make a loss on various tv services? if so it would make sense to not invest in that.

You wouldn't think so looking at what's on TV Choice on demand.:erm:

---------- Post added at 11:22 ---------- Previous post was at 11:16 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by LexDiamond (Post 35235366)
The whole 'prices have gone up so I should get more channels' really annoys me.

I'm not a VM tv customer anymore but if I had been I presume my price would have gone up from 24.50 to 25.50. That is around 4% which is also around the inflation rate. I doubt VM actually make any increases in margin through the increase. So why people keep on expecting more channels is beyond me when the price increase wasn't actually to increase its margins. This thread is full of some members that are just arguing for the sake of arguing.

Possibly some peoples bills are the same or more than Sky , if your theory is correct why do companies feel the need to tell you what's being added on the price rise letter , its because they no full well people expect more.

LexDiamond 13-05-2011 12:33

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35235368)
You wouldn't think so looking at what's on TV Choice on demand.:erm:

---------- Post added at 11:22 ---------- Previous post was at 11:16 ----------



Possibly some peoples bills are the same or more than Sky , if your theory is correct why do companies feel the need to tell you what's being added on the price rise letter , its because they no full well people expect more.

My theory is correct as inflation is a fact.

If, e.g., VM tv faces inflation of 3% a year on the selling price of a sub and let's say at a price of 24.50 VM do not raise their price for 5 years then in year 5 as per VM's inflation rate they should have received 28.40 but only receive 24.50 meaning they lose 3.90 on each sub that year. That 3.90 is an actual loss of revenue per sub to VM as they pay 3.90 more to deliver that sub.

Hugh 13-05-2011 12:35

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35235258)
You sure about that, l be keeping my eye on your opinions.:D:D

---------- Post added at 06:11 ---------- Previous post was at 06:09 ----------



I am talking about 5 years ago when it was 30 quid and l suspect with your close contacts you will get some tidy discounts.:D:D:D:D

Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35235348)
:mad:

l am not in to smear and innuendo and resent that comment and my advice to you is to calm down and have a cup of tea.:mad::mad::mad:

A pity your posts do not support each other....

muppetman11 13-05-2011 12:42

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LexDiamond (Post 35235376)
My theory is correct as inflation is a fact.

If, e.g., VM tv faces inflation of 3% a year on the selling price of a sub and let's say at a price of 24.50 VM do not raise their price for 5 years then in year 5 as per VM's inflation rate they should have received 28.40 but only receive 24.50 meaning they lose 3.90 on each sub that year. That 3.90 is an actual loss of revenue per sub to VM as they pay 3.90 more to deliver that sub.

I was more referring to , people will always expect more especially when prices go up , be it right or wrong , its easy to switch to another service or go down the freeview , youview route.

carlwaring 13-05-2011 14:16

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Yet they also expect prices to fall when channels, most of which are not under VM's control, close, even though they also don't rise when channels are added :confused:

royaltiger 13-05-2011 14:37

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Its about time vm got rid of the packs and charge for each channel individually, at least then you are getting what you pay for and removing 50% of the rubbish you dont watch or need thats buddled into each pack to look like your getting a large amount of channels.

Digital Fanatic 13-05-2011 14:52

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by royaltiger (Post 35235438)
Its about time vm got rid of the packs and charge for each channel individually, at least then you are getting what you pay for and removing 50% of the rubbish you dont watch or need thats buddled into each pack to look like your getting a large amount of channels.

You'd lose a lot of smaller niche channels as they wouldn't get much sub revenue. It could be a channel you like.

The choice would be limited to the bigger channels

denphone 13-05-2011 15:43

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 35235351)
I think it is you that needs to calm down Denphone. You post to try and wind people up and don't like it when you get called out for it. :dunce:

People can wind me up as much as they want, its other members that seem to take things too seriously.:D:D

devilincarnate 13-05-2011 15:45

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35235488)
People can wind me up as much as they want, its other members that seem to take things too seriously.:D:D

You are like clockwork, You need winding up everyday:p:

denphone 13-05-2011 15:52

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by devilincarnate (Post 35235492)
You are like clockwork, You need winding up everyday:p:

Tick tock. Tick tock.:D:D

LexDiamond 13-05-2011 16:11

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35235385)
I was more referring to , people will always expect more especially when prices go up , be it right or wrong , its easy to switch to another service or go down the freeview , youview route.

That is more or less the thinking I was referring to. In light of time between the last VM price increase and this increase plus increase from the government in VAT it is obvious that even after the tv sub increase, VM must be absorbing some of the hit it has on the higher outgoings it has.

This price increase should IMO be applauded as it is very measured. Instead some people on this thread want something for nothing and continue to complain relentlessly when, as you quite rightly pointed out, they have other options.

carlwaring 13-05-2011 16:13

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by royaltiger (Post 35235438)
Its about time vm got rid of the packs and charge for each channel individually, at least then you are getting what you pay for and removing 50% of the rubbish you dont watch or need thats buddled into each pack to look like your getting a large amount of channels.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Digital Fanatic (Post 35235448)
You'd lose a lot of smaller niche channels as they wouldn't get much sub revenue. It could be a channel you like.

I was just going to reply to make the same point. Though, thinking about it, maybe Sky has the right idea in bundling channels together into the various genres; Doco, Childrens.... etc.

Then again, I appreciate having certain channels available should I ever want to watch something off them without having to get them for a whole month.

So I guess it's the usual "six of one..." situation :)

denphone 13-05-2011 16:14

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LexDiamond (Post 35235517)
That is more or less the thinking I was referring to. In light of time between the last VM price increase and this increase plus increase from the government in VAT it is obvious that even after the tv sub increase, VM must be absorbing some of the hit it has on the higher outgoings it has.

This price increase should IMO be applauded as it is very measured. Instead some people on this thread want something for nothing and continue to complain relentlessly when, as you quite rightly pointed out, they have other options.

Lets be clear l do not want something for nothing but Virgin should be adding more channels more quickly then they are currently doing.:mad:

carlwaring 13-05-2011 16:16

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Maybe, but channel carriage agreements take time to ... well... agree... on :) VM is not like Satellite where anyone can start a channel.

denphone 13-05-2011 16:19

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by carlwaring (Post 35235526)
Maybe, but channel carriage agreements take time to ... well... agree... on :) VM is not like Satellite where anyone can start a channel.

How long does paint take to dry.:D:D

richard1960 13-05-2011 16:20

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35235527)
How long does paint take to dry.:D:D

A while when you are deep in debt and cannot really afford too much paint at once.:D:D:D

Stephen 13-05-2011 16:22

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by richard1960 (Post 35235528)
A while when you are deep in debt and cannot really afford too much paint at once.:D:D:D

Why, who is in 'deep' debt?

LexDiamond 13-05-2011 16:25

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35235524)
Lets be clear l do not want something for nothing but Virgin should be adding more channels more quickly then they are currently doing.:mad:

Not really. You knew what you were getting when you subscribed.

denphone 13-05-2011 16:26

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 35235530)
Why, who is in 'deep' debt?

Yes at the last count they were nearly 6 billion in debt unless by some miracle they have paid it off.

richard1960 13-05-2011 16:26

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 35235530)
Why, who is in 'deep' debt?

Virgin media are.

http://investors.virginmedia.com/pho...85&p=irol-debt

Current debt as of end of march 2011.

LexDiamond 13-05-2011 17:43

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by richard1960 (Post 35235535)
Virgin media are.

http://investors.virginmedia.com/pho...85&p=irol-debt

Current debt as of end of march 2011.

That's not really deep debt though.

denphone 13-05-2011 17:47

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LexDiamond (Post 35235584)
That's not really deep debt though.

Well if that is not a big debt then what is.:erm:

richard1960 13-05-2011 17:53

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LexDiamond (Post 35235584)
That's not really deep debt though.

Deep enough probably to stop them adding channels at a fast pace imo, ie unlike sky vm is not sitting on a "cash mountain" i point to the example of it taking 9 months to add sky arts HD and only after the april price increase went through.

To me virgins debt is substantial,now i am well pleased with the tv service it carries all the channels i require now so i am in no way being critical of vm at all,just putting or trying to put a rational argument as to why vm perhaps cannot afford to add new channels as fast as people may like.:)

To me vm HAVE invested in tv substantially in the past 18 months more HD,sky sports Red Button,upgrading the headends ect,the pace in future may slow a little.

denphone 13-05-2011 17:57

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
At the moment it has slowed to a snail,s pace.

LexDiamond 13-05-2011 18:04

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35235587)
Well if that is not a big debt then what is.:erm:

Considering the way the actual debt is structured and the fact that VM has an infrastructure which is tangible, I would say the debt is sensible.

Quote:

Originally Posted by richard1960 (Post 35235597)
Deep enough probably to stop them adding channels at a fast pace imo, ie unlike sky vm is not sitting on a "cash mountain" i point to the example of it taking 9 months to add sky arts HD and only after the april price increase went through.

To me virgins debt is substantial,now i am well pleased with the tv service it carries all the channels i require now so i am in no way being critical of vm at all,just putting or trying to put a rational argument as to why vm perhaps cannot afford to add new channels as fast as people may like.:)

To me vm HAVE invested in tv substantially in the past 18 months more HD,sky sports Red Button,upgrading the headends ect,the pace in future may slow a little.

You are ignoring the fact that VM can fund its operations via its current revenue stream. If that wasn't the case you wouldn't see the core infrastructure investment plus operational investment that VM have consistently made since its inception as a media co.

Stephen 13-05-2011 18:06

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by richard1960 (Post 35235597)
Deep enough probably to stop them adding channels at a fast pace imo, ie unlike sky vm is not sitting on a "cash mountain" i point to the example of it taking 9 months to add sky arts HD and only after the april price increase went through.

To me virgins debt is substantial,now i am well pleased with the tv service it carries all the channels i require now so i am in no way being critical of vm at all,just putting or trying to put a rational argument as to why vm perhaps cannot afford to add new channels as fast as people may like.:)

To me vm HAVE invested in tv substantially in the past 18 months more HD,sky sports Red Button,upgrading the headends ect,the pace in future may slow a little.

Sky Arts HD has nothing to do with any money issues. That channel was part of the deal done with Sky last year. It may have taken a while to appear on the tv platform but the deal was done ages ago.

Carriage rights and contracts can take a long time to agree. So new channels could be coming and VM could have been talking to other parties for a long time for all we know.

VM isn't really that in debt. A lot of companies are operating in debt these days.

denphone 13-05-2011 18:12

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 35235628)
Sky Arts HD has nothing to do with any money issues. That channel was part of the deal done with Sky last year. It may have taken a while to appear on the tv platform but the deal was done ages ago.

Carriage rights and contracts can take a long time to agree. So new channels could be coming and VM could have been talking to other parties for a long time for all we know.

VM isn't really that in debt. A lot of companies are operating in debt these days.

They have been in talks for a awful long time with some companies then.:(

devilincarnate 13-05-2011 18:13

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35235636)
They have been in talks for a awful long time with some companies then.:(

Its good to talk:D:D:D:D

richard1960 13-05-2011 19:13

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LexDiamond (Post 35235625)
Considering the way the actual debt is structured and the fact that VM has an infrastructure which is tangible, I would say the debt is sensible.



You are ignoring the fact that VM can fund its operations via its current revenue stream. If that wasn't the case you wouldn't see the core infrastructure investment plus operational investment that VM have consistently made since its inception as a media co.

Well i am not party to wether vm can fund its current operations totally from their current revenue stream as i am only joe public,but i will bow to your knowledge on the subject,as i say i am not waiting any new channels i am happy enough now sky sport red button is here.:)

---------- Post added at 18:13 ---------- Previous post was at 18:08 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 35235628)
Sky Arts HD has nothing to do with any money issues. That channel was part of the deal done with Sky last year. It may have taken a while to appear on the tv platform but the deal was done ages ago.

Carriage rights and contracts can take a long time to agree. So new channels could be coming and VM could have been talking to other parties for a long time for all we know.

VM isn't really that in debt. A lot of companies are operating in debt these days.

No i am aware the deal was done last year but the channel took 9 months to appear! wether that was down to finances i do not know for sure,but it seems an awfully long time to me.:shocked:

I know carriage rights can take a long time no argument there but it was rumoured at least 2 years ago that History HD ws in negotiation they must have fallen asleep,as i say iam happy with my channel selection now though.:)

denphone 13-05-2011 19:15

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by devilincarnate (Post 35235638)
Its good to talk:D:D:D:D

It certainly is on this wonderful forum.:D:D:D:D

devilincarnate 13-05-2011 19:15

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by richard1960 (Post 35235736)

I know carriage rights can take a long time no argument there but it was rumoured at least 2 years ago that History HD ws in negotiation they must have fallen asleep,as i say iam happy with my channel selection now though.:)

Yes that is true and I for one am happy with the channel line up as well:D

carlwaring 13-05-2011 19:24

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Me too. Obviously I hope we get certain channels that I have mentioned previously at some point, but I'm sure we will :)

denphone 13-05-2011 19:26

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by carlwaring (Post 35235782)
Me too. Obviously I hope we get certain channels that I have mentioned previously at some point, but I'm sure we will :)

Always look on the bright side of life.:D:D:D

devilincarnate 13-05-2011 19:27

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35235758)
It certainly is on this wonderful forum.:D:D:D:D

It would be boring if we did not talk:( So all opinions are welcome, If not agreed with:D

---------- Post added at 18:27 ---------- Previous post was at 18:27 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35235790)
Always look on the bright side of life.:D:D:D

Monty Python:D:D:D

richard1960 13-05-2011 19:30

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by devilincarnate (Post 35235760)
Yes that is true and I for one am happy with the channel line up as well:D

Good to have some happy customers tonight in the VM camp.:LOL::)

denphone 13-05-2011 19:30

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by devilincarnate (Post 35235792)
It would be boring if we did not talk:( So all opinions are welcome, If not agreed with:D

---------- Post added at 18:27 ---------- Previous post was at 18:27 ----------



Monty Python:D:D:D

Now they were worth paying for.:D

carlwaring 13-05-2011 19:31

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35235790)
Always look on the bright side of life.:D:D:D

Oh for goodness sake don't break into song :erm::monkey::Yikes::D

denphone 13-05-2011 19:32

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by richard1960 (Post 35235799)
Good to have some happy customers tonight in the VM camp.:LOL::)

l am always happy but the perceived perception from some members is that l am a bit of a Victor Meldrew.:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

denphone 13-05-2011 19:33

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by carlwaring (Post 35235803)
Oh for goodness sake don't break into song :erm::monkey::Yikes::D

We can have a duet on the X Factor.:D:D:D:D

richard1960 13-05-2011 19:41

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35235806)
l am always happy but the perceived perception from some members is that l am a bit of a Victor Meldrew.:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

No " i do not believe it":D:D:D:LOL:

denphone 13-05-2011 19:43

Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by richard1960 (Post 35235826)
No " i do not believe it":D:D:D:LOL:

One of the great series me thinks.:rolleyes::rolleyes:


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:35.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum