Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33673366)

Sparkle 05-05-2011 13:05

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Vincent Tabak pleads guilty to manslaughter of Joanna Yeates:
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-...At_Old_Bailey_

I knew it all along.

Maggy 05-05-2011 13:13

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sparkle (Post 35229358)
Vincent Tabak pleads guilty to manslaughter of Joanna Yeates:
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-...At_Old_Bailey_

I knew it all along.

Knew what?

Sparkle 05-05-2011 13:15

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35229367)
Knew what?

Make an educated guess ;)

Mal 05-05-2011 13:21

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
He's still facing trail for murder though.

Maggy 05-05-2011 13:22

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sparkle (Post 35229368)
Make an educated guess ;)

What that you knew who the murderer was?Well we all knew that..Hindsight is wonderful.

Sparkle 05-05-2011 13:29

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35229372)
What that you knew who the murderer was?Well we all knew that..Hindsight is wonderful.

Yet another example of how your powers of observation never cease to amaze me.

Hugh 05-05-2011 13:33

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sparkle (Post 35229358)
Vincent Tabak pleads guilty to manslaughter of Joanna Yeates:
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-...At_Old_Bailey_

I knew it all along.

Seriously - knew what all along?

There are a number of options, and it may be easier if you state what you knew, rather than people guessing incorrectly.

Pog66 05-05-2011 13:37

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sparkle (Post 35229358)

I knew it all along.

...perhaps you should have told the police then :dozey:

Sparkle 05-05-2011 13:40

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Its called sarcasm. Only a couple pages back I was stating that Tabak seemed an unlikely candidate for committing such a crime. Ergo, a tongue in cheek "I knew it all along", when in fact I'm a bit surprised by the plea.
As much as I suspected the police must have had evidence they weren't revealing, I was really hoping they had the wrong guy.

Hugh 05-05-2011 13:41

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Thank you for the clarification.

Sparkle 05-05-2011 13:42

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
4 posts about a clearly obvious sarcy remark and yet not one comment on topic. Yes pog I'm a bleedin' psychic and should have told the police, really - what exactly is your contribution to this discussion?

---------- Post added at 12:42 ---------- Previous post was at 12:41 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35229391)
Thank you for the clarification.

Apologies for the confusion..:D

Derek 05-05-2011 13:50

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Surprised they didn't accept the plea. The evidence must be pretty damming if they are willing to risk a trial.

Sparkle 05-05-2011 13:53

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
The DM's take on this:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...slaughter.html

I wonder (as do so many) what really happened. Could be so many plausible scenarios, difficult to even speculate at this stage. I recall reading that the police stated they didn't believe Joanna was sexually assaulted. So I'm wondering if it was murder made to appear like an opportunistic sexual assault (i.e. naked body) but perhaps the real motive was nothing of the sort. Could be anything from blackmail, feuding neighbors, money or even drugs for all we know. The next developments should be interesting, though we might have quite a wait still ahead.

Maggy 05-05-2011 14:04

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sparkle (Post 35229389)
Its called sarcasm. Only a couple pages back I was stating that Tabak seemed an unlikely candidate for committing such a crime. Ergo, a tongue in cheek "I knew it all along", when in fact I'm a bit surprised by the plea.
As much as I suspected the police must have had evidence they weren't revealing, I was really hoping they had the wrong guy.

I ask for some clarification and you fail to provide it.You are the one who wanted me to play guessing games and as a result I'm sarcastic for assuming that you think I'm stupid because I can't play the game and therefore I respond in kind.

I suggest you use less brevity when claiming knowledge so we can all have a clearer picture as to your meaning.After all I'm not a mind reader.

---------- Post added at 13:02 ---------- Previous post was at 13:01 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sparkle (Post 35229389)
Its called sarcasm. Only a couple pages back I was stating that Tabak seemed an unlikely candidate for committing such a crime. Ergo, a tongue in cheek "I knew it all along", when in fact I'm a bit surprised by the plea.
As much as I suspected the police must have had evidence they weren't revealing, I was really hoping they had the wrong guy.

How was I to know that as that's several weeks past and on another page.I'll repeat I'm not a mind reader.

---------- Post added at 13:04 ---------- Previous post was at 13:02 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sparkle (Post 35229376)
Yet another example of how your powers of observation never cease to amaze me.

Again I'm not a mind reader anymore than anyone else here.

You really ought to get your forum etiquette sorted out IF you wish to avoid sarcasm being applied to you.

Sparkle 05-05-2011 14:13

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35229420)
I ask for some clarification and you fail to provide it.You are the one who wanted me to play guessing games and as a result I'm sarcastic for assuming that you think I'm stupid because I can't play the game and therefore I respond in kind.

I suggest you use less brevity when claiming knowledge so we can all have a clearer picture as to your meaning.After all I'm not a mind reader.

Mind reader? No that's asking a bit much, but a thread reader would be a good start though.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sparkle (Post 35157022)
I can honestly say, hand on heart, I did not see this coming.
He doesn't fit the profile, but then you can never judge a book...

I truly hope the police have proper evidence to convict, and aren't using this guy as a scapegoat. i.e. all else fails, arrest the neighbor..

Sad world.

Then I posted "I knew it all along".

I see what I did wrong. Next time, before daring to surreptitiously sneak in some humour under the mod-dar, I'll preemptively send smoke signals, IFF and ensure to provide a liberal application of smilies for the less comically astute (or those who've simply forgotten to take their early afternoon's dose of prozac), all just for good measure.

Mr Angry 05-05-2011 14:16

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sparkle (Post 35229411)
The DM's take on this:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...slaughter.html

I wonder (as do so many) what really happened. Could be so many plausible scenarios, difficult to even speculate at this stage. I recall reading that the police stated they didn't believe Joanna was sexually assaulted. So I'm wondering if it was murder made to appear like an opportunistic sexual assault (i.e. naked body) but perhaps the real motive was nothing of the sort. Could be anything from blackmail, feuding neighbors, money or even drugs for all we know. The next developments should be interesting, though we might have quite a wait still ahead.

She wasn't found naked.

Zing 05-05-2011 14:20

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sparkle (Post 35229430)
Mind reader? No that's asking a bit much, but a thread reader would be a good start though.


Then I posted "I knew it all along".

I see what I did wrong. Next time, before daring to surreptitiously sneak in some humour under the mod-dar, I'll preemptively send smoke signals, IFF and ensure to provide a liberal application of smilies for the less comically astute (or those who've simply forgotten to take their early afternoon's dose of prozac), all just for good measure.



lmao

Sparkle 05-05-2011 14:23

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Angry (Post 35229434)
She wasn't found naked.

Ah yes thats right, but she was missing item(s) of clothing which would/could imply she either had been naked or there was a sexual motive.

Hugh 05-05-2011 15:06

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sparkle (Post 35229439)
Ah yes thats right, but she was missing item(s) of clothing which would/could imply she either had been naked or there was a sexual motive.

It was a missing sock....

Helluva implication (by whoever made the implication).

Sparkle 05-05-2011 15:16

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35229475)
It was a missing sock....

Helluva implication (by whoever made the implication).

I recall she wasn't dressed for the weather conditions and would've been unlikely to have made it to that location on her own (no coat or boots yet snow covered ground).

The defense will now no doubt be planning to convince the jury that somehow she drove him to murder (hence the manslaughter plea). I hope the character assasination that will no doubt follow doesn't cause any more grief for the family than is absolutely necessary.

Russ 06-05-2011 07:28

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
So no suggested sexual motive then, good. I'm glad people will hopefully pay more attention to the few facts that we do know about what happened from now on.

No point in trying to use pseudo-educated and eloquent language to hide the fact that we probably know less than 10% of what really happened.

Chris 06-05-2011 09:14

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Nor should we forget that proceedings are active, a trial is due, and we are bound by the same laws as the media when it comes to discussing details of the case pre-trial. Despite the fact he has admitted the killing ;)

Sparkle 06-05-2011 19:40

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 35230048)
So no suggested sexual motive then, good. I'm glad people will hopefully pay more attention to the few facts that we do know about what happened from now on.

No point in trying to use pseudo-educated and eloquent language to hide the fact that we probably know less than 10% of what really happened.

That's exactly the truth too. From searching the internet, everything from yahoo answers to the endless facebook discussions, the theories are the same - *cough* she refused his advances and he lost it *cough*.
But the reality is that there could be any number of plots/scenarios, ranging from the downright obvious, to the mind bogglingly complex, that culminated with the murder of Joanna Yeates. We can only wait and see what the trial dredges up, I just hope we get to hear the real version of events rather than a mere fantasy articulately engineered to yield the lesser manslaughter charge.

Derek 06-05-2011 20:03

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sparkle (Post 35230371)
I just hope we get to hear the real version of events rather than a mere fantasy articulately engineered to yield the lesser manslaughter charge.

Hopefully but doubtful. His chances of persuading a jury it was an accident took a huge blow with him hiding the body and other actions after the event.

Sparkle 06-05-2011 21:21

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
If I were the betting type, I'd wager that you're quite correct. As unfortunate as that is for the enquiring minds among us.

Derek 12-05-2011 11:23

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Some slappage for the Mirror and the Sun might be in the pipeline.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13371918

Quote:

The Sun and Daily Mirror are facing contempt of court proceedings over the way they reported the hunt for the killer of Jo Yeates last December.

Hugh 12-05-2011 11:35

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Excellent.

Maggy 12-05-2011 13:14

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35234525)
Excellent.

:tu:

Sparkle 12-05-2011 13:33

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
I hope he sues them for every last penny.

Sirius 29-07-2011 13:03

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Jo Yeates' landlord settles libel case out of court

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14339807

Quote:

Mr Jefferies was not at the High Court in London to hear about the settlement with the Sun, the Daily Mirror, the Sunday Mirror, the Daily Mail, the Daily Record, the Daily Express, the Daily Star and the Scotsman.

However, his lawyer Louis Charalambous said his client was "satisfied" with the outcome.

"Christopher Jefferies is the latest victim of the regular witch-hunts and character assassinations conducted by the worst elements of the British tabloid media," he said.
Another blow for the comics :tu:

Chris 29-07-2011 13:53

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
This, along with some of the shameless insinuations directed at the McCann family when Madeline went missing, serves to further underline the point that freedom of speech is subservient to an individual's right not to have their good name dragged through the mud.

This particular case highlights the media's recent trend towards pushing the boundaries of acceptable commentary and reporting while an unsolved case is under investigation. Had this individual eventually been sent to trial, he might have argued his right to a fair trial had been compromised by some of what was said about him.

Justice is more important than selling papers, and I am reluctantly coming round to the view that media regulation backed up by criminal law is the only way we can now ensure this.

Will21st 29-07-2011 15:19

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35280008)
Jo Yeates' landlord settles libel case out of court

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14339807



Another blow for the comics :tu:

very good! :clap:

Sirius 29-07-2011 15:46

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35280041)
Justice is more important than selling papers, and I am reluctantly coming round to the view that media regulation backed up by criminal law is the only way we can now ensure this.

Never going to happen whilst Murdoch has control of Politicians of all sides.

TheDaddy 29-07-2011 15:51

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35280112)
Never going to happen whilst Murdoch has control of Politicians of all sides.

You not been paying attention lately, the man is a busted flush, no politician will be aligning themselves with him anytime soon and his entire newspaper group is toxic, when he has to sell the lot we must make sure the government never allows one man to much influence over our press again.

Sirius 29-07-2011 15:55

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35280118)
You not been paying attention lately, the man is a busted flush, no politician will be aligning themselves with him anytime soon and his entire newspaper group is toxic, when he has to sell the lot we must make sure the government never allows one man to much influence over our press again.

I have been keeping up, At this moment in time the man is STILL in charge of the biggest media group in the UK is he not ?.

His papers including the likes of the Sun and his News Channel Sky news can still control what news is published. Politicians will be terrified of him printing all of the stuff they have saved for such a day.

TheDaddy 29-07-2011 16:02

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35280119)
I have been keeping up, At this moment in time the man is STILL in charge of the biggest media group in the UK is he not ?.

His papers including the likes of the Sun and his News Channel Sky news can still control what news is published. Politicians will be terified of him printing all of the stuff they have saved for such a day.

Yep pooing themselves, you can see that by the way Ed Miliband's been laying into them either that or Ed's grown a backbone, he's not the only one either.

Sirius 29-07-2011 16:38

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35280124)
Yep pooing themselves, you can see that by the way Ed Miliband's been laying into them either that or Ed's grown a backbone, he's not the only one either.

I bet nothing changes :)

Osem 29-07-2011 17:02

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35280145)
I bet nothing changes :)

Call me an old sceptic but I wouldn't be at all surprised if some cosy little 'deals' are entered into to ensure certain highly embarrassing political issues never see the light of day as a result of the enquiry.

Maggy 29-07-2011 20:09

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35280041)
This, along with some of the shameless insinuations directed at the McCann family when Madeline went missing, serves to further underline the point that freedom of speech is subservient to an individual's right not to have their good name dragged through the mud.

This particular case highlights the media's recent trend towards pushing the boundaries of acceptable commentary and reporting while an unsolved case is under investigation. Had this individual eventually been sent to trial, he might have argued his right to a fair trial had been compromised by some of what was said about him.

Justice is more important than selling papers, and I am reluctantly coming round to the view that media regulation backed up by criminal law is the only way we can now ensure this.

Sadly I have to agree.:erm:

Derek 28-10-2011 17:59

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
He has been found guilty. Sentenced to 20 years.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-15448121

denphone 28-10-2011 18:24

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek (Post 35322319)
He has been found guilty. Sentenced to 20 years.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-15448121

People like him should receive the death penalty in my mind .

devilincarnate 28-10-2011 18:30

re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35322331)
People like him should receive the death penalty in my mind .

+1 as well


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:04.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum