![]() |
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Vincent Tabak pleads guilty to manslaughter of Joanna Yeates:
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-...At_Old_Bailey_ I knew it all along. |
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
He's still facing trail for murder though.
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
There are a number of options, and it may be easier if you state what you knew, rather than people guessing incorrectly. |
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Its called sarcasm. Only a couple pages back I was stating that Tabak seemed an unlikely candidate for committing such a crime. Ergo, a tongue in cheek "I knew it all along", when in fact I'm a bit surprised by the plea.
As much as I suspected the police must have had evidence they weren't revealing, I was really hoping they had the wrong guy. |
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Thank you for the clarification.
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
4 posts about a clearly obvious sarcy remark and yet not one comment on topic. Yes pog I'm a bleedin' psychic and should have told the police, really - what exactly is your contribution to this discussion?
---------- Post added at 12:42 ---------- Previous post was at 12:41 ---------- Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Surprised they didn't accept the plea. The evidence must be pretty damming if they are willing to risk a trial.
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
The DM's take on this:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...slaughter.html I wonder (as do so many) what really happened. Could be so many plausible scenarios, difficult to even speculate at this stage. I recall reading that the police stated they didn't believe Joanna was sexually assaulted. So I'm wondering if it was murder made to appear like an opportunistic sexual assault (i.e. naked body) but perhaps the real motive was nothing of the sort. Could be anything from blackmail, feuding neighbors, money or even drugs for all we know. The next developments should be interesting, though we might have quite a wait still ahead. |
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
I suggest you use less brevity when claiming knowledge so we can all have a clearer picture as to your meaning.After all I'm not a mind reader. ---------- Post added at 13:02 ---------- Previous post was at 13:01 ---------- Quote:
---------- Post added at 13:04 ---------- Previous post was at 13:02 ---------- Quote:
You really ought to get your forum etiquette sorted out IF you wish to avoid sarcasm being applied to you. |
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
Quote:
I see what I did wrong. Next time, before daring to surreptitiously sneak in some humour under the mod-dar, I'll preemptively send smoke signals, IFF and ensure to provide a liberal application of smilies for the less comically astute (or those who've simply forgotten to take their early afternoon's dose of prozac), all just for good measure. |
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
lmao |
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
Helluva implication (by whoever made the implication). |
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
The defense will now no doubt be planning to convince the jury that somehow she drove him to murder (hence the manslaughter plea). I hope the character assasination that will no doubt follow doesn't cause any more grief for the family than is absolutely necessary. |
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
So no suggested sexual motive then, good. I'm glad people will hopefully pay more attention to the few facts that we do know about what happened from now on.
No point in trying to use pseudo-educated and eloquent language to hide the fact that we probably know less than 10% of what really happened. |
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Nor should we forget that proceedings are active, a trial is due, and we are bound by the same laws as the media when it comes to discussing details of the case pre-trial. Despite the fact he has admitted the killing ;)
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
But the reality is that there could be any number of plots/scenarios, ranging from the downright obvious, to the mind bogglingly complex, that culminated with the murder of Joanna Yeates. We can only wait and see what the trial dredges up, I just hope we get to hear the real version of events rather than a mere fantasy articulately engineered to yield the lesser manslaughter charge. |
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
If I were the betting type, I'd wager that you're quite correct. As unfortunate as that is for the enquiring minds among us.
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Some slappage for the Mirror and the Sun might be in the pipeline.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13371918 Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Excellent.
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
I hope he sues them for every last penny.
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Jo Yeates' landlord settles libel case out of court
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14339807 Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
This, along with some of the shameless insinuations directed at the McCann family when Madeline went missing, serves to further underline the point that freedom of speech is subservient to an individual's right not to have their good name dragged through the mud.
This particular case highlights the media's recent trend towards pushing the boundaries of acceptable commentary and reporting while an unsolved case is under investigation. Had this individual eventually been sent to trial, he might have argued his right to a fair trial had been compromised by some of what was said about him. Justice is more important than selling papers, and I am reluctantly coming round to the view that media regulation backed up by criminal law is the only way we can now ensure this. |
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
His papers including the likes of the Sun and his News Channel Sky news can still control what news is published. Politicians will be terrified of him printing all of the stuff they have saved for such a day. |
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
He has been found guilty. Sentenced to 20 years.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-15448121 |
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:04. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum