![]() |
Re: 3d tv
Quote:
|
Re: 3d tv
Quote:
|
Re: 3d tv
Quote:
Giving advice and imposing views are two different things, flaming, name calling, and slandering is against all forum rules. Im glad you have the powers to step into my mind and personally know for a fact if i had taken any advice, but just for those less fortunate not to have your powers, I SAID ONCE.........I HAD TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT WHAT EVERYONE SAID, AND THAT WAS NO THEY WOULDNT BUY A 3D TV AND WHY THEY WOULDNT. So once again, goodbye, farewell, enjoy your bickering and bitching between eachother. |
Re: 3d tv
:wavey:
|
Re: 3d tv
Hilarious. I access the forum through http://www.nthellworld.co.uk/home.php
At this moment there are Littlewoods ads for the TV/Bluray player etc. in question on the right hand side! :D |
Re: 3d tv
Quote:
|
Re: 3d tv
I'm still not sure about 3DTV yet, the price is way over the top for one, and I've seen a few films at the cinema in 3D and at the start of the film I did think wow, but by half way through I had to take a break from it and wished I was watching the film in 2D. I also didn't like the lack of colour when using the glasses.
I'm sure it'll appeal to some, and I reckon gaming might be a laugh on it, but I still think it's too much of a gimmick and I reckon the novelty of it all would wear off quite quickly for me. So I reckon unless the price comes right down or when it's the norm for a TV to be able to view 3D (years away or never), I don't think I'll be considering one. |
Re: 3d tv
Quote:
|
Re: 3d tv
Quote:
---------- Post added at 15:03 ---------- Previous post was at 14:59 ---------- Quote:
---------- Post added at 15:03 ---------- Previous post was at 15:03 ---------- Quote:
---------- Post added at 15:09 ---------- Previous post was at 15:03 ---------- Quote:
the reason that you dont want to reply anymore is because you have been court out with trying to big yourself up when you thought that no one would realise. at the end of the day cut the crap mate we all know what the point of the OP was so stop lying your just digging a bigger hole for yourself. |
Re: 3d tv
Chris, dont think Bare is going to show his face again in this thread :)
|
Re: 3d tv
Quote:
---------- Post added at 15:23 ---------- Previous post was at 15:18 ---------- Chris the word ****er isint meant as a swear word, where im from it means the same as the word funny its just slang & not meant in a rude way at all. |
Re: 3d tv
Well, after coughing up all that money, better keep it away from the kids or it can permanantly damage their eyesight
http://science.slashdot.org/story/10...%28Slashdot%29 |
Re: 3d tv
|
Re: 3d tv
These 3D TVs are so realistic i nodded off during a liverpool game the other week and when i woke up my wallet had gone;);)
|
Re: 3d tv
Quote:
|
Re: 3d tv
nice lol
|
Re: 3d tv
Will 3D TV succeed?
The Register has an interesting opinion piece on it. Basically they are saying that they think it might not. Apparently it will happen purely because the TV companies are going to have to build support in in case their competitors do, and people may show more interest when there is more content available. Their reasons for suggesting it might not? Twofold. 1) Apparently in surveys, customers have shown more interest in Internet connections than 3D. 2) There is apparently anecdotal evidence that 3D in cinema is not doing as well as expected, which would suggest that people aren't going to see 3D films after the novelty value has worn off. http://www.reghardware.com/2010/07/0...or_fails_3dtv/ |
Re: 3d tv
Quote:
also,this bit made me laugh 'There is apparently anecdotal evidence that 3D in cinema is not doing as well as expected,' :rofl::rofl: have the Register heard of 'Avatar'?? 3D films have been doing very well,in fact so well there's a FLOOD of 3D films headed our way for 2011/12/13. |
Re: 3d tv
and still plenty for 2010.
Harry Potter ,Resident Evil,Last Airbender, cats and dogs the revenge of kitty galore,Jackass 3d,Saw VII, Pirana 3d,Alpha and Omega, Step up 3d,Tron, Yogi Bear, plus others http://www.film-releases.com/film-re...chedule-3D.php here is a nice little list |
Re: 3d tv
Quote:
|
Re: 3d tv
Alice is number 19 all time American takings with 334 million higher than Forest Gump,Lion King, Transformers
And number 5 globally with over a billion above dark knight and all the harry potters |
Re: 3d tv
Quote:
http://www.boxoffice.com/statistics/.../domestic/data I think where 3d is probably suffering at the moment is it's being used to bolster up films that would otherwise not get the publicity and not do so well. This means it is being added to films that were not made for 3d and I think unless Hollywood stops doing that, 3d will suffer because people will associate it with bad images. |
Re: 3d tv
I think you will find its a lack of screens. It took ages for my local cinema to upgrade and now it has 2. Cost of this update has been prohibited.
At one stage 3 films were being shown on only 1 screen its never gonna work that way is it? I still think 3D cinema is the future Look at the current US top 10 Last Air Bender , Shrek forever after , Toy Story 3D Toy story 3 is close to top 20 and not even full released yet it will imo hit top 10 What do you class a box office hit? Was Star Trek 2009 a box office hit? 127th Shrek forever after has almost caught up with it. Loads of 3d films above it( imdb global listing) |
Re: 3d tv
The films I have seen in 3D was because they were in 3D, as it was all new. But the novelty has now worn off for me, in future I'll probably stick to 2D.
At a push I might see Shrek or Toy Story in 3D, films like those, but for films like Saw etc I won't watch them in 3D as you tend to lose too much of what's going on. |
Re: 3d tv
Quote:
and yes,the others HAVE done well! Please check BO numbers if you don't believe me. |
Re: 3d tv
Do what I do. Dont go and see any 3D films. That way you dont know what (if anything) you're missing and its one less novelty expensive item to go out and spunk your hard earned on :)
|
Re: 3d tv
I do believe the point of the article in The Register is to question the value people place on 3d. It's all very well stating that Shrek, Harry Potter, Alice et al have or are expected to do well, but is that because of 3d? Also, is it well enough? If Wikipedia is to be believed, the sequel to Superman Returns was cancelled despite S.R. doing quite well at the box office. The sequel was cancelled because it did not do well enough.
---------- Post added at 23:24 ---------- Previous post was at 23:22 ---------- Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: 3d tv
Quote:
|
Re: 3d tv
Quote:
|
Re: 3d tv
Well I'm going to see piranha 3d to see Kelly brooks' boobs in 3d :)
|
Re: 3d tv
Quote:
I'll ask this. Apart from Avatar, which earned almost 2/3rds of it's income from 3d showings, how many films have done well based purely on their 3d showings? ---------- Post added at 01:21 ---------- Previous post was at 01:05 ---------- Anyway, it may appear I am attacking 3d. I am not. I like 3d films. I just think that if hollywood keeps using it as a gimmick to bolster films they don't think will do well by converting them at the last minute, it will ultimately fail because people will be disillusioned with the films produced. James Cameron would seem to agree. From http://www.deadline.com/2010/03/mich...e-jury-is-out/ Quote:
|
Re: 3d tv
oh I totally agree that they should not convert:)
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 17:05. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum