Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Ban the burkha ? (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33660540)

Maggy 19-01-2010 12:46

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 34947991)
There are constantly topics commenting on Muslims and Islam in a negative light. Just do a search for Muslim on the forum and you'll see what I mean. As soon as this topic ends another one will be started. At any one time there seems to be a ongoing topic, sometimes more, about something negative involving Muslims.

Was it only yesterday/Sunday you started the topic about the loophole for Islamic Schools which was actually a loophole for any school whose pupils only attended a certain amount of hours?

You'll find most of these people aren't 'taking offence for other people' but are themselves offended at the constant vilification of a entire group of people based on their religion.


:tu:

Gary L 19-01-2010 12:56

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 34947991)
You'll find most of these people aren't 'taking offence for other people' but are themselves offended at the constant vilification of a entire group of people based on their religion.

But it's not always the entire group of people. and it's not always really about their religion.
if we discuss muslim terrorists it's about a select few of them. a select few extremists. but it's oh no they're picking on all the muslims again.

Muslims are in the news all the time. there's a war that will bring up the discussion of it. there's recent terrorism and probable terrorism. there's immigration. there's hostility from 'both' sides. all sorts of reasons why it's in the media all the time.

all sorts of reasons why it's a topic of discussion in everyday life.

Russ 19-01-2010 13:07

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 34948030)
all sorts of reasons why it's a topic of discussion in everyday life.

And usually only one reason why 99% of 'Muslim' threads are negative.

Gary L 19-01-2010 14:53

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 34948036)
And usually only one reason why 99% of 'Muslim' threads are negative.

What reason is that?

---------- Post added at 15:53 ---------- Previous post was at 14:12 ----------

IN the mainly Muslim enclaves of Derby, near my childhood home, you now see women hidden behind the full-length (burka) robe, their faces completely shielded from view.
In London, I see an increasing number of young girls, aged four and five, being made to wear the hijab (head covering) to school.
Thanks to fundamentalist Muslims and "hate" preachers working in Britain, the veiling of women is suddenly all-pervasive and promoted as a basic religious right. We are led to believe we must live with this in the name of "tolerance".

http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/a...an_963096a.jpg


And yet, as a British Muslim woman, I abhor the practice and am calling on the Government here to follow the lead of the French proposal and ban the burka in Britain.
I believe the covering of one's face in public is dangerous and, for security reasons, should be banned from British streets.
Nowhere in the Koran does it state that a woman's face and body must be covered in a layer of heavy black cloth.
Instead, Muslim women should dress modestly, covering their arms and legs.
The burka is an imported Saudi Arabian tradition and the growing number of women veiling their faces in Britain is a sign of a creeping radicalisation which is not just regressive but oppressive and dangerous.
So what should we do in Britain? For decades, Muslim fundamentalists, using human-rights laws, have been allowed to get their own way.
It is now time for ministers and ordinary British Muslims to say enough is enough. For the sake of women and children, the Government here must ban the burka in public places. To do so is not racist, as extremists would have us believe, it is common sense.
In today's society. where we are threatened with terrorist acts, we should demand to see people's faces in public - so that we do not feel scared or frightened. It will only be a matter of time before extremists use the wearing of the burka to breach security and carry out attacks on innocent people.

Pog66 19-01-2010 15:21

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 34948038)

And yet, as a British Muslim woman, I abhor the practice and am calling on the Government here to follow the lead of the French proposal and ban the burka in Britain.
I believe the covering of one's face in public is dangerous and, for security reasons, should be banned from British streets.
Nowhere in the Koran does it state that a woman's face and body must be covered in a layer of heavy black cloth.
Instead, Muslim women should dress modestly, covering their arms and legs.
The burka is an imported Saudi Arabian tradition and the growing number of women veiling their faces in Britain is a sign of a creeping radicalisation which is not just regressive but oppressive and dangerous.
So what should we do in Britain? For decades, Muslim fundamentalists, using human-rights laws, have been allowed to get their own way.
It is now time for ministers and ordinary British Muslims to say enough is enough. For the sake of women and children, the Government here must ban the burka in public places. To do so is not racist, as extremists would have us believe, it is common sense.
In today's society. where we are threatened with terrorist acts, we should demand to see people's faces in public - so that we do not feel scared or frightened. It will only be a matter of time before extremists use the wearing of the burka to breach security and carry out attacks on innocent people.

Useful to have a link to original quote......I;m assuming you are not a British Muslim woman Gary? :)

Gary L 19-01-2010 15:31

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pog66 (Post 34948105)
Useful to have a link to original quote......


http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...he-French.html


Quote:

I;m assuming you are not a British Muslim woman Gary? :)
Unfortunately not :)

martyh 19-01-2010 15:34

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pog66 (Post 34948105)
Useful to have a link to original quote......I;m assuming you are not a British Muslim woman Gary? :)


yes , i was very confused reading that ;) ...or is it gary that's getting confused:D

Gary L 19-01-2010 15:44

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 34948119)
yes , i was very confused reading that ;) ...or is it gary that's getting confused:D

Spot the man! :)

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2010/01/33.jpg

The picture was from The Sun

martyh 19-01-2010 15:55

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 34948126)


the one on the right ..i can see his adams apple :D

Gary L 19-01-2010 16:10

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 34948135)
the one on the right ..i can see his adams apple :D

See, you let his mate on the left through! :D

martyh 19-01-2010 16:15

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 34948145)
See, you let his mate on the left through! :D

damn,bet he's got the bomb aswell ;)

Gary L 19-01-2010 16:26

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 34948148)
damn,bet he's got the bomb aswell ;)

A baum?

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2010/01/34.jpg :D

papa smurf 19-01-2010 16:29

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
it seems the French are turning up the wick with regard to burka's........


Ban women wearing the burka from benefits and public transport, demands French government spokesman

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worl...#ixzz0d52nKdcR

Hugh 19-01-2010 16:33

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 34948126)

None of them - as they are all Barbie dolls, which you knew (as you probably got it from your favourite tabloid)

You could, of course, shown how it was reported in the Independent, where the doll was part of a collection of multi-cultural versions of Barbie.

Gary L 19-01-2010 16:34

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 34948155)
it seems the French are turning up the wick with regard to burka's........

The benefits one. is that because they don't know if it's actually her signing on?

Chris 19-01-2010 16:35

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Is there any topic left here, or am I going to have to close it?

martyh 19-01-2010 16:35

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34948159)
None of them - as they are all Barbie dolls, which you knew (as you probably got it from your favourite tabloid)

You could, of course, shown how it was reported in the Independent, where the doll was part of a collection of multi-cultural versions of Barbie.

and here's me thinking the one in the middle had had plastic surgery;)

Gary L 19-01-2010 16:36

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34948159)
None of them - as they are all Barbie dolls, which you knew (as you probably got it from your favourite tabloid)

You could, of course, shown how it was reported in the Independent, where the doll was part of a collection of multi-cultural versions of Barbie.

Why?
it was my joke, I'll deliver it how I want ;)

papa smurf 19-01-2010 17:22

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 34948160)
The benefits one. is that because they don't know if it's actually her signing on?

no Gary L its to enforce the law when it comes in

from the article in the mail
"When you ignore rules that make things illegal, like a ban on the burka, you have have some of your rights taken away, like the right to state benefits or using public transport."

soicky 19-01-2010 17:25

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 34948161)
Is there any topic left here, or am I going to have to close it?

Seems dead, don't go anywhere though, another one will open soon.

Peter_ 19-01-2010 17:35

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
This is just going around in circles now.

Gary L 19-01-2010 18:02

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
I think the argument is whether it's a religious requirement or just a personal choice to hide your face.
we determined that a 'hoody' wasn't anything at all to do with religion but just a personal choice from the 'Chav' culture to hide their face. we even determined that smoking was not religious, just bad for everyones health :)

papa smurf 19-01-2010 18:09

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 34948227)
I think the argument is whether it's a religious requirement or just a personal choice.
we determined that a 'hoody' wasn't anything at all to do with religion but just a personal choice from the 'Chav' culture. we even determined that smoking was not religious, just bad for everyones health :)

i think the question is -is it acceptable to hide your face in public places .

Gary L 19-01-2010 18:18

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 34948234)
i think the question is -is it acceptable to hide your face in public places .

That's a very good point papa smurf. I've edited my post.

rogerdraig 19-01-2010 18:34

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 34948234)
i think the question is -is it acceptable to hide your face in public places .

yep in a free country it is perfectly acceptable to not show your face if you so wish

and i really cant see how showing it would make us safer anyway

see post #73

Hugh 19-01-2010 18:37

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 34948234)
i think the question is -is it acceptable to hide your face in public places .

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2010/01/31.jpg

rogerdraig 19-01-2010 18:39

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
lol

Gary L 19-01-2010 18:40

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Why did they hide their identity?

Hugh 19-01-2010 18:41

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
I don't know, Gary - why don't you ask them?

Gary L 19-01-2010 19:00

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Because I can't work out who they are. they've hidden their faces.

Hugh 19-01-2010 19:05

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Is that acceptable?

Gary L 19-01-2010 19:10

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Err, isn't that what we're trying to determine already? :rolleyes:

Hugh 19-01-2010 19:13

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
What is your viewpoint on it?

Gary L 19-01-2010 19:22

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/34947550-post28.html

http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/34947856-post82.html

http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/34947864-post86.html

http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/34947874-post89.html

http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/34948145-post110.html

http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/34948227-post122.html

Other than what I've already said. I haven't really given it much thought.

sollp 19-01-2010 19:38

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34948261)

Think you'll find that they are wearing PROTECTIVE clothing, this includes a boiler type suit, gloves, helmet, CLEAR face visor,protective boots, stab vest, possibly shin guards and other various padding, all clothing would be fire resistant which would also include a balaclava mask to protect the exposed parts of the face and neck when faced with petrol bombs and chemicals. Not to hide there identity's.

Oh and it would keep you nice and warm on a winters day.

Try doing this when having just a shield and bog standard issue clothing and i think you would opt for the wardrobe these guys are wearing.

Hugh 19-01-2010 19:56

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Not the burqa, dunderhead - the policeman (but you knew that).

Chris 19-01-2010 20:01

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sollp (Post 34948337)
Think you'll find that they are wearing PROTECTIVE clothing, this includes a boiler type suit, gloves, helmet, CLEAR face visor,protective boots, stab vest, possibly shin guards and other various padding, all clothing would be fire resistant which would also include a balaclava mask to protect the exposed parts of the face and neck when faced with petrol bombs and chemicals. Not to hide there identity's.

Oh and it would keep you nice and warm on a winters day.

Try doing this when having just a shield and bog standard issue clothing and i think you would opt for the wardrobe these guys are wearing.

Of course, none of the Met's finest would countenance removing their numbers from their epaulettes whilst on riot duty, would they? I think the question about disguising identity in these circumstances is a very valid one.

Hugh 19-01-2010 20:07

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Anyway, other things that would be banned because they cover someone's face in public.

http://www.fotosearch.com/bthumb/BLD.../BLD057886.jpg Wedding veils https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2010/01/29.jpg Royal Ascot hats http://ratemyhagwon.com/wp-content/u...santa_oath.jpg Santa outfits

http://www.ebka.org/userfiles/image/...atChenwill.jpg bee keepers https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2010/01/23.gif clowns https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2010/01/30.jpg The Stig

Gary L 19-01-2010 20:14

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34948355)
Not the burqa, dunderhead - the policeman (but you knew that).

I didn't know you wanted to go off topic, and talk about something that has been in another thread that I've discussed with you before, no.

---------- Post added at 21:14 ---------- Previous post was at 21:10 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34948371)
Anyway, other things that would be banned because they cover someone's face in public.

I think these don't count because as an example with the bride, she only wears it for a few hours in just that one day.

the lady with the lampshade only when she's at the races.

the bee keepers only when they're playing about with bees.

:erm:

Hugh 19-01-2010 20:16

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 34948375)
I didn't know you wanted to go off topic, and talk about something that has been in another thread that I've discussed with you before, no.

How is it off-topic - they are wearing something that covers their faces in a public place.

Or is it because they is not Muslim?;)

---------- Post added at 21:16 ---------- Previous post was at 21:14 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 34948375)
I didn't know you wanted to go off topic, and talk about something that has been in another thread that I've discussed with you before, no.

---------- Post added at 21:14 ---------- Previous post was at 21:10 ----------



I think these don't count because as an example with the bride, she only wears it for a few hours in just that one day.

the lady with the lampshade only when she's at the races.

the bee keepers only when they're playing about with bees.

:erm:

So Muslim women could wear burqas in a public place as long as it was only for a couple of hours every so often?

papa smurf 19-01-2010 20:16

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 34948375)
I didn't know you wanted to go off topic, and talk about something that has been in another thread that I've discussed with you before, no.

he doesn't want to discuss the topic hence the silly pictures and the repeated attempts to derail the thread imho .

Hugh 19-01-2010 20:19

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 34948381)
he doesn't want to discuss the topic hence the silly pictures and the repeated attempts to derail the thread imho .

I am trying to highlight the stupidity of the proposition, because posters keep stating "it is not because it is the burqa, it is anything that disguises someone's identity". But when I show other things that can disguise someone's identity, it is "off-topic" or "derailing".

As the founder of the UKIP said today in the Times letter page
Quote:

Sir, During the greatest financial crisis facing this country since the 1930s, how typical it is of UKIP’s present pathetic leadership that its flagship policy for the forthcoming general election should be to attack the less than 1 per cent of our female population who wear the burka. This is desperate and inane.
If the party is really so obsessed with race, immigration and Islam, it should simply merge with the BNP, which it increasingly resembles. Why have a competition in intolerance?

Maggy 19-01-2010 20:20

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 34948375)
I didn't know you wanted to go off topic, and talk about something that has been in another thread that I've discussed with you before, no.

---------- Post added at 21:14 ---------- Previous post was at 21:10 ----------



I think these don't count because as an example with the bride, she only wears it for a few hours in just that one day.

the lady with the lampshade only when she's at the races.

the bee keepers only when they're playing about with bees.

:erm:

I'm getting a trifle confused.

So you don't mind anyone else covering their faces except those who wear Burkhas.

Or you don't want anyone to cover their faces at any time for any reason

Or you don't mind anyone covering their faces provided it's only connected with certain events for short periods of time

Gary L 19-01-2010 20:25

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 34948387)
I'm getting a trifle confused.

So you don't mind anyone else covering their faces except those who wear Burkhas.

Or you don't want anyone to cover their faces at any time for any reason

Or you don't mind anyone covering their faces provided it's only connected with certain events for short periods of time

I don't think I've said one way or another. I'm only here to discuss what other people think.

Hugh 19-01-2010 20:29

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 34948391)
I don't think I've said one way or another. I'm only here to discuss what other people think.

The sad thing is, he probably believes it.......:erm:

martyh 19-01-2010 20:35

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34948386)
I am trying to highlight the stupidity of the proposition, because posters keep stating "it is not because it is the burqa, it is anything that disguises someone's identity". But when I show other things that can disguise someone's identity, it is "off-topic" or "derailing".

As the founder of the UKIP said today in the Times letter page


i will repeat what i said earlier just for Forevers benefit .Why should women wearing a burka be excempt from removing the facial covering in sensitive areas like banks/post offices /airports ect when other people have to remove helmets /hoodies ect

danielf 19-01-2010 20:36

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34948396)
The sad thing is, he probably believes it.......:erm:

It's probably because he is unable to think himself...

Maggy 19-01-2010 20:37

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 34948405)
i will repeat what i said earlier just for Forevers benefit .Why should women wearing a burka be excempt from removing the facial covering in sensitive areas like banks/post offices /airports ect when other people have to remove helmets /hoodies ect

Because the wearing of helmets,hoodies etc are not connected to religious beliefs.:rolleyes:

Gary L 19-01-2010 20:39

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 34948406)
It's probably because he is unable to think himself...

I think you two will find that Maggy is a she :)

Maggy 19-01-2010 20:40

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Keep digging the hole..

Gary L 19-01-2010 20:41

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 34948408)
Because the wearing of helmets,hoodies etc are not connected to religious beliefs.:rolleyes:

That's what the debate is about. not just in here but all over. is it a religious thing, or is it just a personal choice.

I have posted quotes. one from a muslim herself that says it is choice that is the reason. not religion so much.

Tuftus 19-01-2010 20:42

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 34948406)
It's probably because he is unable to think himself...

If he cannot 'think himself' why is he able to carry on the debate, countering and answering peoples questions?

Because he does not have a stack of reps maybe? Or maybe because he is not afraid to ask the questions he does?

I may not agree with some of his posts but i do respect him for posting them.

martyh 19-01-2010 20:42

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 34948408)
Because the wearing of helmets,hoodies etc are not connected to religious beliefs.:rolleyes:

there are countless quotes on the web from muslims stating that the wearing of a burka is not compulsory it is a choice made by the woman or forced on her by her husband

Hugh 19-01-2010 20:44

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 34948405)
i will repeat what i said earlier just for Forevers benefit .Why should women wearing a burka be excempt from removing the facial covering in sensitive areas like banks/post offices /airports ect when other people have to remove helmets /hoodies ect

I actually agree with you (if done in a sensitive way, like they do at airport security) - I don't agree with the concept of the burqa (I think it represents an oppressive paternalistic society, which devalues women and treats them as possessions), but I also don't agree with telling people what to wear, especially when there doesn't seem to have been mass outbreaks of people wearing burqas committing crimes (one or two, yes, but not to the vast extent of people wearing crash-helmets or ski-masks).

I think Nigel is going for cheap sensationalist headlines, and as the Times put in on the 16th of this month, under the heading "Veil of Ignorance"
Quote:

The reasons it gives for its policy are transparently disingenuous. They claim that the burka marginalises women. This is a new concern for UKIP. It is, after all, the party of Godfrey Bloom, the MEP who says that “any small businessman or woman who employs a woman of child-bearing age needs their head examined”. Perhaps Mr Bloom, who thinks that women do not clean behind the fridge enough, worries that their burkas are getting in the way.

UKIP argues further that the burka has no place in Islam and that the religion does not require it. The Times had not hitherto realised that Nigel Farage was an authority on such matters, or that the party leader Lord Pearson of Rannoch, who was visited by God when on the operating table in 1977, thereby gained not only his Christian faith but also a mastery of the Koran. This newly acquired scholarship notwithstanding, the religious insights of politicians are entirely irrelevant when judging the right of British citizens to dress as they wish.

The most offensive UKIP assertion is that wearing the burka is inconsistent with British values. Advocates of the policy then point out (without irony) that the French, whose example is rarely cited elsewhere in UKIP literature, are trying to implement a similar policy.

What is inconsistent with British values is picking on people quietly going about their business in religious garb of their own choice and banning it. If UKIP properly understood this country, it would appreciate that.

Maggy 19-01-2010 20:45

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 34948413)
That's what the debate is about. not just in here but all over. is it a religious thing, or is it just a personal choice.

I have posted quotes. one from a muslim herself that says it is choice that is the reason. not religion so much.

It's a matter of semantics among Muslims..they have differences of opinions about how they interpret the Koran just as Christians have differences of opinions about interpreting the meanings in the Bible. The fact is some Muslim women regard it as a religious requirement to cover them selves with this garment,others do not.

Hugh 19-01-2010 20:48

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 34948421)
It's a matter of semantics among Muslims..they have differences of opinions about how they interpret the Koran just as Christians have differences of opinions about interpreting the meanings in the Bible. The fact is some Muslim women regard it as a religious requirement to cover them selves with this garment,others do not.

Ah, but that is introducing shades of cultural gradiations and variances in religious interpretation into the discussion, rather than it being simply right or wrong. ;)

For instance, some Catholic women always cover their heads in Church, but some don't - who is right (or is it a matter of choice)? Most CofE churches allow other Christians to take communion at Mass, but Catholics (the last time I attended), don't.

There are variations in all walks of life and faiths, and trying to make them binary just to back up a proposition just doesn't work.

Maggy 19-01-2010 20:49

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 34948416)
there are countless quotes on the web from muslims stating that the wearing of a burka is not compulsory it is a choice made by the woman or forced on her by her husband


http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/34948421-post155.html

Gary L 19-01-2010 20:52

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 34948421)
It's a matter of semantics among Muslims..they have differences of opinions about how they interpret the Koran just as Christians have differences of opinions about interpreting the meanings in the Bible. The fact is some Muslim women regard it as a religious requirement to cover them selves with this garment,others do not.

I know. and there has to be some that say it's their own choice rather than say she's made to wear it.

Russ 19-01-2010 20:53

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
It doesn't matter how much logic or common sense you use, when you're up against the attitude of "I don't like it so ban it" you're never going to get anywhere.

chris9991 19-01-2010 20:56

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
If it was to be banned what would be the punishment? Would it be a fine or a custodial sentence?

Russ 19-01-2010 20:58

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by chris9991 (Post 34948434)
If it was to be banned what would be the punishment? Would it be a fine or a custodial sentence?

I assume those in favour of the ban would want them deported or sent back to Muslimia.

martyh 19-01-2010 20:58

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 34948430)
I know. and there has to be some that say it's their own choice rather than say she's made to wear it.


yes and there are some that get stoned for not wearing it .
We all seem to be in agreement ..including Maggie;)...that the burka is a voluntary item of clothing in this country so there should be no objection to removal in some places

Gary L 19-01-2010 21:00

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by chris9991 (Post 34948434)
If it was to be banned what would be the punishment? Would it be a fine or a custodial sentence?

The french will take away their rights. we'll probably give them an ASBO.

---------- Post added at 22:00 ---------- Previous post was at 21:58 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 34948436)
I assume those in favour of the ban would want them deported or sent back to Muslimia.

I suppose stoning isn't an option then? :rolleyes:

Russ 19-01-2010 21:01

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 34948438)
I suppose stoning isn't an option then? :rolleyes:

Whatever floats your boat.

Gary L 19-01-2010 21:16

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 34948437)
yes and there are some that get stoned for not wearing it .
We all seem to be in agreement ..including Maggie;)...that the burka is a voluntary item of clothing in this country so there should be no objection to removal in some places

Right then. where do we all sign? ;) :)

Arthurgray50@blu 19-01-2010 21:22

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
For the secruity aspex we should BAN the burka, If a motorcyclist enters a building for secruity reasons, he MUST take his helmet off, so why can't the burka be removed in the street for the same reason.

martyh 19-01-2010 21:24

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
[QUOTE=Arthurgray50@blu;34948468]For the secruity aspex we should BAN the burka, If a motorcyclist enters a building for secruity reasons, he MUST take his helmet off, so why can't the burka be removed in the street for the same reason.[/QUOTE]

not in the street Arthur thats going to far

chris9991 19-01-2010 21:35

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Isn't it usually that case that buildings that ban motorcycle helmets are places like banks which can set their own rules, and hence why can't they set their own rules with regards to the burkha?

punky 19-01-2010 21:39

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by chris9991 (Post 34948480)
Isn't it usually that case that buildings that ban motorcycle helmets are places like banks which can set their own rules, and hence why can't they set their own rules with regards to the burkha?

Because you can't discriminate on the basis of religion but you can on the basis of mode of transport to the bank.

Russ 19-01-2010 21:40

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 34948468)
For the secruity aspex we should BAN the burka, If a motorcyclist enters a building for secruity reasons, he MUST take his helmet off, so why can't the burka be removed in the street for the same reason.

Do you agree that hats and hoodies should also be banned from the street too?

Also have you heard of many people committing crimes while disguised under a burkha?

martyh 19-01-2010 21:44

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 34948486)
Do you agree that hats and hoodies should also be banned from the street too?

Also have you heard of many people committing crimes while disguised under a burkha?




already addressed that Russ and there has been quite a few in recent years examples in previous posts

Maggy 19-01-2010 21:46

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 34948437)
yes and there are some that get stoned for not wearing it .
We all seem to be in agreement ..including Maggie;)...that the burka is a voluntary item of clothing in this country so there should be no objection to removal in some places

Voluntary removal under the right and correct system and in the RIGHT place..Say at the airport or banks or hospital or clinics..

But not a complete ban as Farage and Arthur are advocating.

from the links provide in the OP

Quote:

Nigel Farage, has announced that UKIP, the main party in the EFD group, are calling for the traditional Muslim clothing, worn by women to be Banned. Going further than the far-right British National Party, who are accused of neo-fascist ideology and only wish to prohibit the wearing of the burqa in schools. UKIP are asking for the burqa, that covers the body and the nijab, or veil to be banned from public and private places.
Quote:

MUSLIM women should be banned from wearing the burkha and other veils that cover their faces in *public, the UK *Independence Party said yesterday.


Nigel Farage, the party’s former leader, said the move would prevent extremists imposing their culture – including Sharia law – on Britain.
The latter quote really does imply it's a Muslim thing in particular..:erm:

Russ 19-01-2010 21:47

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 34948488)
already addressed that Russ and there has been quite a few in recent years examples in previous posts

Did you address how many crimes have been committed by people wearing hoodies and hats whilst not having calls for those items to be banned?

sollp 19-01-2010 21:53

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 34948495)
Did you address how many crimes have been committed by people wearing hoodies and hats whilst not having calls for those items to be banned?

Difficult one really i would have thought, not having the official figures to hand nor of course for those commiting crimes whilst women wearing burkas or men posing as a burka clad women. Wheres those fiures when you need them.

AS has already been stated that certain shopping precincts,shops,banks, petrols stations have been know to ban the wearing of hoodies/hats, again thought those figures are difficult to come by.. any help out there collecting them.

martyh 19-01-2010 21:56

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 34948495)
Did you address how many crimes have been committed by people wearing hoodies and hats whilst not having calls for those items to be banned?

the comparison i used was banks /posts offices .I used these because we already have bans on these items in such places so i was trying to make the point that criminals are now using the burka as a alternative
I am fully aware that crimes are still commited with hoodies and crash helmets ,like street muggings ,we can never stop this but what we can do is minimalize the opportunities criminals have .We also have to concider places were facial recognition is vital like at airports ,is the person entering /leaving the country realy who it says on the passport?

Maggy 19-01-2010 21:57

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
By the way maybe we should ban baseball caps as well because they hide faces on the CCTV. :scratch:
















































By the way I'm not actually being serious..:D

Russ 19-01-2010 22:00

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sollp (Post 34948498)
Difficult one really i would have thought, not having the official figures to hand nor of course for those commiting crimes whilst women wearing burkas or men posing as a burka clad women. Wheres those fiures when you need them.

AS has already been stated that certain shopping precincts,shops,banks, petrols stations have been know to ban the wearing of hoodies/hats, again thought those figures are difficult to come by.. any help out there collecting them.

I'll make my position clear on this - I think the majority of anti-burkha posters on here have their view simply because it's based in Islam, nothing more.

I'm all for the banning of any types of clothing for security purposes in banks, airports etc whether a burkha, helmet, hat etc

But banning it from all public places? That's just pure Islamiphobia. There is no evidence to suggest wearing something which completely covers someone's face in public creates a significant security risk. If you insist on burkhas being banned in public then you have to agree to helmets, hats, opened umbrellas and hoodies being banned too otherwise you're on the way to supporting an 1984 type state.

sollp 19-01-2010 22:06

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 34948506)
I'll make my position clear on this - I think the majority of anti-burkha posters on here have their view simply because it's based in Islam, nothing more.

I'm all for the banning of any types of clothing for security purposes in banks, airports etc whether a burkha, helmet, hat etc

But banning it from all public places? That's just pure Islamiphobia. There is no evidence to suggest wearing something which completely covers someone's face in public creates a significant security risk. If you insist on burkhas being banned in public then you have to agree to helmets, hats, opened umbrellas and hoodies being banned too otherwise you're on the way to supporting an 1984 type state.

I'm not for the total ban either, security risk yes it can be as already pointed out, it's difficult to identify a person wearing one, the implications of getting there ID must be a absolute nightmare. Of course asking anyone for there id will cause some discomfort but to have the added problem of,"You've insulted my religion,beliefs" whatever is another weapon that THE extremist will use it to there advantage, so people want to counter that by saying,"well ban the burka then".

martyh 19-01-2010 22:11

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 34948506)
I'll make my position clear on this - I think the majority of anti-burkha posters on here have their view simply because it's based in Islam, nothing more.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 34948506)

I'm all for the banning of any types of clothing for security purposes in banks, airports etc whether a burkha, helmet, hat etc

But banning it from all public places? That's just pure Islamiphobia. There is no evidence to suggest wearing something which completely covers someone's face in public creates a significant security risk. If you insist on burkhas being banned in public then you have to agree to helmets, hats, opened umbrellas and hoodies being banned too otherwise you're on the way to supporting an 1984 type state.


i aggree with that Russ ,
incidently there was a case a while back concerning Shabina Begum that addressed this issue .Eventually she lost her case, i'm not sure if a precedent was set but a ruling was made that

"The legal status of Islamic dress in schools was clarified by the Shabina Begum case, where the Judicial Committee of the House of Lords ruled that freedom to manifest religious beliefs was not absolute, and could be restricted"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hijab_by_country

Peter_ 20-01-2010 09:29

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Its quite simple if you refuse to remove your facial covering being it a motorcycle helmet, hat, veil or any other garment that may be covering your face when going into a place that requires your face to be seen then you should be disallowed from entry.

Hugh 20-01-2010 09:36

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 34948488)
[/B]


already addressed that Russ and there has been quite a few in recent years examples in previous posts

That's exaggerating a little (well, quite a lot) - there have been a couple in the last few years; there have been lots involving hoodies, crash helmets, and ski-masks.

Chris 20-01-2010 09:37

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Moldova (Post 34948632)
Its quite simple if you refuse to remove your facial covering being it a motorcycle helmet, hat, veil or any other garment that may be covering your face when going into a place that requires your face to be seen then you should be disallowed from entry.

I would tend to agree on that point, Moldova. Unfortunately, some people in this thread seem to be trying to suggest that there is something uniquely threatening about the burkha, such that it should be banned outright. That, to me, is draconian and unacceptable in a free and democratic society.

TheDaddy 20-01-2010 16:13

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 34948638)
to me, is draconian and unacceptable in a free and democratic society.

Funnily enough I'd bet a lot of people calling for the ban say the same, except they'd add the word oppressive to your list.

Chris 20-01-2010 16:24

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
It may well be oppressive, but is it the job of the State to legislate against culture and tradition? That's a whole different can of worms than issues of security.

TheDaddy 20-01-2010 16:39

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 34948888)
It may well be oppressive, but is it the job of the State to legislate against culture and tradition?

I think it may well be the states job when those cultures and traditions go against everything this country has stood for and in more recent times has made specific laws to protect people from being oppressed, discriminated against and coerced into doing things against their will.

Mr Angry 20-01-2010 16:53

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 34948895)
....and coerced into doing things against their will.

That works both ways.

Gary L 20-01-2010 17:04

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Angry (Post 34948906)
That works both ways.

I don't understand?

Peter_ 20-01-2010 18:44

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 34948638)
I would tend to agree on that point, Moldova. Unfortunately, some people in this thread seem to be trying to suggest that there is something uniquely threatening about the burkha, such that it should be banned outright. That, to me, is draconian and unacceptable in a free and democratic society.

As I said in my post above, the should be no exceptions purely for security reasons but otherwise it does not bother me what they want to wear.

This is supposed to be a free country so we should have need to ban this style of dress.

Jimmy-J 07-02-2010 16:53

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Armed robbers disguised in burkhas carry out £4,000 raid
Quote:

Now those fighting for the ban claim the robbery – which is the first of its kind in France – shows how useful the burkha is as a disguise.
Link

martyh 07-02-2010 17:03

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
france will just ban it outright and refuse to take any crap from the freedom brigade

Maggy 07-02-2010 17:06

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Product 13 (Post 34959734)

Well that's France who already are trying to ban this item of clothing..They really do have a poor relationship with the Muslims in their country so I don't see why we should copy them..

nomadking 07-02-2010 17:13

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
IMHO The issue of complete bans has only arisen because of the problems of partial/selective bans. You can ban the wearing of motorcycle helmets in banks etc but not the burkha etc, although the reasons for any ban would be the same, ie concealment of faces. It ends up with the only solution being a complete ban.

martyh 07-02-2010 17:16

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 34959744)
IMHO The issue of complete bans has only arisen because of the problems of partial/selective bans. You can ban the wearing of motorcycle helmets in banks etc but not the burkha etc, although the reasons for any ban would be the same, ie concealment of faces. It ends up with the only solution being a complete ban.


even without a complete ban people wearing the burkha will start to be viewed suspiciously just as someone walking down the street in a balaclava is assumed to be a bank robber

Maggy 07-02-2010 17:17

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 34959744)
IMHO The issue of complete bans has only arisen because of the problems of partial/selective bans. You can ban the wearing of motorcycle helmets in banks etc but not the burkha etc, although the reasons for any ban would be the same, ie concealment of faces. It ends up with the only solution being a complete ban.

But in the situation like a bank you only have to refuse permission to enter.

A complete ban on the wearing of a burkha anywhere in Britain is a complete overkill which is what is envisioned in this thread.not the banning in certain institutions.

martyh 07-02-2010 17:22

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 34959749)
But in the situation like a bank you only have to refude permission to enter.

A complete ban on the wearing of a burkha anywhere in Britain is a complete overkill which is what is envisioned in this thread.not the banning in certain institutions.


how do you refuse a bank robber permission to enter a bank ?
it's getting into the bank in the first place that the burkha is most useful whereas someone in a balaclava approaching a bank is going to raise suspicion

nomadking 07-02-2010 17:27

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
And what would happen to anyone who refused somebody entry on those legitimate grounds? It is supporters of the burkha who would complain about the refusal of entry that are inadvertently(?) creating the climate where a complete ban becomes the only option.

Stuart 07-02-2010 17:35

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 34959753)
how do you refuse a bank robber permission to enter a bank ?
it's getting into the bank in the first place that the burkha is most useful whereas someone in a balaclava approaching a bank is going to raise suspicion


And would banning the burkha in banks not have the same effect as banning any other headwear that covers the face?

Taf 07-02-2010 17:36

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 34959753)
how do you refuse a bank robber permission to enter a bank ?

In France many banks have twin airlock doors you have to be buzzed to get in or out...

Stuart 07-02-2010 17:37

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 34959744)
IMHO The issue of complete bans has only arisen because of the problems of partial/selective bans. You can ban the wearing of motorcycle helmets in banks etc but not the burkha etc, although the reasons for any ban would be the same, ie concealment of faces. It ends up with the only solution being a complete ban.

Actually, the problems with the burkha are relatively easy to overcome. Just ensure burkha wearing women are served only by women..

martyh 07-02-2010 17:45

Re: Ban the burkha ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 34959758)
And what would happen to anyone who refused somebody entry on those legitimate grounds? It is supporters of the burkha who would complain about the refusal of entry that are inadvertently(?) creating the climate where a complete ban becomes the only option.

you are correct imo ,but a complete ban on the burkha brings it's own problems ,what about other suspicious items of clothing such as the aforementioned balaclava or hoody or even a scarf

---------- Post added at 18:45 ---------- Previous post was at 18:39 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stuart C (Post 34959764)
And would banning the burkha in banks not have the same effect as banning any other headwear that covers the face?

yes it will ..no effect at all ,bank robbers still wear them to rob banks but anyone wearing a balaclava or a crash helmet in a bank will arouse suspicion (usually) and possibly the cashiers willl set the alarms off so banks would have to adopt this with burkhas .entering a bank with a burkha on and the alarm goes off


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:54.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum