Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Internet Discussion (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=25)
-   -   has www.ntlcommunity.com sold out? (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=1713)

Ramrod 09-08-2003 21:35

Quote:

Originally posted by hawkmoon
Might be a drop in the ocean, but at a time that NTL is using lack of money to defend why it is not improving certain parts of their network - it is a little insulting to those customers that they feel the need to spend the money (regardless of how little) on this.
But it costs millions to improve their network, buying the site cost them a few thousand. They probably spend more on pens every year. It's small change to them. They could buy thousands of sites like that and still not make an impact on the funding needed to upgrade.

carlingman 10-08-2003 02:33

Quote:

Originally posted by Undisputedtruth snip
I certainly don't think Matty is a sellout. Afterall he is an NTL employee. Did he appreciate the concerns of genuine customers? Of course not. So on that basis alone he is not a sellout.
Suggest you get your facts rights there.

Matty is not as far as I know an NTL Employee unless he has had a job thrown into the buyout deal.

:)

Lord Nikon 10-08-2003 04:03

Ramrod,

it costs less to perform routing maintenance during slack system hours than to pay an engineer to do an emergency repair during peak hours and then compensate the people who complain about loss of service.

This would be a more valid expenditure of funds....


Buying another site which is against them is a waste of funds, makes more sense to start to rectify the problems...

I am sure even Andre would agree that the best possible result would be to see this site, and the other sites rendered redundant by NTL actually getting things sorted out.

Ramrod 10-08-2003 22:25

Quote:

Originally posted by Lord Nikon
Ramrod,

it costs less to perform routing maintenance during slack system hours than to pay an engineer to do an emergency repair during peak hours and then compensate the people who complain about loss of service.

This would be a more valid expenditure of funds....


Buying another site which is against them is a waste of funds, makes more sense to start to rectify the problems...

I am sure even Andre would agree that the best possible result would be to see this site, and the other sites rendered redundant by NTL actually getting things sorted out.

I totally agree. My only point was that it is a drop in the ocean for them.

KingPhoenix 11-08-2003 18:27

Sorry to bring this topic up again but.....


Website Title: ntl community
Server Type: Apache/1.3.27 (Unix) PHP/4.2.3 (Spry.com also uses Apache)
Website Status: Active
Reverse IP: Web server hosts 5 websites (reverse ip tool requires free login)
IP Address: 207.44.194.150 (ARIN & RIPE IP search)
IP Location: United States - California - San Francisco - Everyones Internet Inc
Visit Website: www.ntlcommunity.com
Record Type: Domain Name


The interesting part is...


Status: PROTECTED
Note: To help prevent malicious domain hijacking and domain
transfer errors, the registrar has protected the registrant
of this domain name registrant by locking it. Any attempted
transfers will be denied at the registry until the registrant
requests otherwise. The registrant for the name may unlock
the name at any time at the current registrar in order for
a transfer initiation to succeed

Matty has protected the domain name, thus making it non transferable at this time.....

:confused:


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:25.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum