Originally Posted by passingbat (Post 35931340)

No! he just made the right decision




You clearly don't understand the US voting system. That remark is pointless, given the system they choose

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35931319)

You keep throwing out this crap argument and I keep telling you cannot have California and New York deciding who is President and forgetting about all the ones in the in the middle. :rolleyes:

Originally Posted by passingbat (Post 35931381)

Especially California; America would be run over by Illegal immigrants, guilty of crimes and released from jails. Law and order would be over. Maybe Trump should build a second wall separaring California if they don't come to their senses and start obeying Federal Laws ;)

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35931383)

I thought the Republican Party and the Tea Party was all about “States’ Rights"?

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35931331)

They have to have committed an impeachable offense. High crime or misdemeanor, first for it to become a democratic decision in the House of Representatives and then the Senate. The process can take a long time. Bill Clinton was Impeached by the House, but cleared in the Senate, thus, he was not removed from office.

People call Trumps tweeting in to question but the President is entitled to his First Amendment rights like every other American citizen is.

A misdemeanor is about a President abusing his Constitutional powers.

A President cannot be removed from office because someone doesn't like how orange they look (I think calling someone how they look by the colour of the skin is plain nasty and ignorant btw) or how much crap someone thinks they are posting on twitter and obviously twitter was not around when the Constitution was written.

People with Republican Party allegiance had to put up with Obama for 8 years and yes there was even protests when he won the Presidency.

But just going back to the popular vote. When it was Bush vs. Al Gore, I really wanted Al Gore to win, the days when I was all for Democrats, a lots changed since then. Gore won the popular vote by hundreds of thousands.

Gore won the popular vote, but there was a bit of a tussle with Florida, Gore had 266 Electoral College votes, Bush had 246, Bush needed Florida to win, but so did Gore, this was the closest presidential election in the nation's history, with a .009% margin, 537 votes was in it, a recount was called for and ultimately the decision went to the Florida Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court. The high court's contentious 5:4 decision that was announced on December 12, 2000, ended a statewide recount ordered by the Florida Supreme Court on December 8, effectively awarding Florida's 25 EC votes to Bush and as history recalls, granting him the Presidency.

Originally Posted by passingbat (Post 35931386)

I believe certain Federal Laws 0ver ride State laws, Such as Protecting the safety of the United States of America?


Would you like illegal immigrants who have commited crimes in the UK, released from jail, free to wander around the UK?

Originally Posted by Mr Banana (Post 35931388)

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35931412)

Sorry (well, actually I am not), I don't click links that people don't bother to explain what they are linking to and why. :rolleyes:

I hope you're not trying to justify calling someone by their skin colour. Given that you have bold my reference to calling someone 'nasty and ignorant' for doing such a thing.

My point still remains, attacking someone by referencing their skin colour, is actually quite pathetic, which usually means they have no other valid argument to present, so they attack appearances instead.

Originally Posted by Mr Banana (Post 35931414)

Mick - I have no valid argument I want to present about this egotistical moron. I think the man is a disgusting, repulsive excuse for a human being and I have no problem calling a man who chooses to paint himself orange - an orange baffoon.

Is that clear enough for you?

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35931417)

It would appear your link does not agree with your POV, pity you didn't read it before posting.

Originally Posted by Mr Banana (Post 35931418)

I could post hundreds of other links to sites that point out that his colour is due to spray tanning or sun beds.

Originally Posted by Mr Banana (Post 35931414)

Mick - I have no valid argument I want to present about this egotistical moron. I think the man is a disgusting, repulsive excuse for a human being and I have no problem calling a man who chooses to paint himself orange - an orange baffoon.

Is that clear enough for you?

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35931433)

The bit I've put in bold is clear enough, sure.

He paints himself orange, wow, that's a new one on me. I did not realise having a different coloured skin was such an issue to you. This coming from a man who has a username as a yellow fruit... Okay then. :dozey: :rolleyes:

His skin colour looks normal to me but then again I don't pay too much attention to how he looks, but thanks for confirming you cannot present any valid argument and prefer to lower yourself to 'nastyness' to try and justify your hatred.