![]() |
Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
Lol, scraping the bottom of the barrel there, Andrew, a laughable link from a dreadful Scottish rag!
|
Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
Quote:
---------- Post added at 19:16 ---------- Previous post was at 19:12 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
Quote:
So rough figures, a limited company director earning £60k a year is paying less than £5k in tax, plus he's claiming expenses on top. Don't ask me how I know, but I wish I had realised years ago the benefits of taking the plunge and being your own boss. Not forgetting the £40k into the pension tax free every year. |
Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
Quote:
You admire Gove, Raab, Dorries, Mogg, Braverman, Davis, Frost, etc? I thought your judgement was better than this. |
Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
Quote:
Gove? Muppet . Raab? Worse particularly as he won't answer a straight question. Dorries? Sycophant so she can have a cabinet job. Has good policies towards BBC Braverman? Don't know her faults yet. What's wrong with her? Davis? Muppet Frost? Seems OK. |
Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
Quote:
Raab. Agreed. Dorries. Muppet. There to make the rest of the underperformers look less terrible. Braverman. Never heard of her. Davis. Honourable muppet, one of the best on this rather weak list. Frost. Dishonourable muppet. ---------- Post added at 21:32 ---------- Previous post was at 21:29 ---------- Avert your eyes, Old Boy! Quote:
[/quote] |
Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
Quote:
Labour, I would argue, are still behind - even after all the shit thrown at Boris - I would also argue that the longer Boris resists all that is thrown at him - the more he will gain. There is, without doubt, a movement to oust Boris. A democratically elected PM ( that in my opinion should be removed democratically) but his enemies don’t want that test……..I wonder why? ……….where have seen that before? Not a new move………………… We will see the attack on Boris continue, hopefully he will stay the course, just to annoy people if nothing else. |
Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
Quote:
In what way do you define Labour as being behind? In terms of seats held, yes of course though it looks like they could be getting three more soon! Although I think those MPs should seek re-election if they do defect to Labour. In terms of polls they're consistently ahead as Johnson is clearly a spent force. Great salesman, orator and writer: Yes. Great Prime Minister: Nothing like, one of the worst. In terms of Labour having known policies that people can buy into or out of, I agree that they're behind. There comes a time when you need to put your cards on the table and be confident with your hand. |
Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
Quote:
Quote:
But it's not undemocratic for a party to depose their Prime Minister. It's happened to so many Prime Ministers. Johnson himself was part of the clique that removed May. Blair had to make way for Brown. Thatcher was booted out as well and so on. |
Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
Quote:
Labour are unelectable, everything they touch, turns to shit, they can’t even decide that a woman born with a vagina, is an actual woman. :rolleyes: |
Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
Quote:
By-elections are not necessarily indicative of the result of the General Election but they are not a bad barometer of how the public is feeling now. They can't be dismissed out of hand. At the moment, Labour is ahead. The other problem is the theory that Governments slump mid-term before coming back is based on the idea that they are getting the unpopular measures out of the way first before those measures pay off in time for the General or at least their unpopularity fades over time. This Government is only now heading into a time of high inflation and possibly recession with high living costs. It's hard to see where the turnaround is going to come from. The advantage the Tories have is that for Starmer to even match a hung Parliament he has to win more seats than any other Labour leader since 1997, such is the damage Corbyn did to the party. The fact we're talking about how him falling short of a majority is possibly a failure is a sign of how badly Johnson has tanked the Tory Party. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:54. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum