![]() |
Re: Brexit
Quote:
If the exit deal is deliberately designed to inform the referendum debate, then the only incentive is for the exit deal to be bad, in order to influence the result to remain. The only way to fairly hold the referendum was the way it was actually held: without a deal on the table, so the argument could be settled on points of principle and a long-term view of where the U.K. sees itself in the world, not on the grubby details of any political deal. That, also, is why *there*will*not*be*a*second*referendum* - the debate was held, and the vote was cast, *without* being unduly influenced by a political circus that, 20 years from now, will have thoroughly faded from memory. |
Re: Brexit
1 Attachment(s)
It was quite simple.
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Do we have a deal?
https://www.ft.com/content/19529d88-...5-04b8afea6ea3 Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
The rest of your post is based on this one weak assumption. There are ways to ensure these things are done fairly. |
Re: Brexit
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
Is it just the minority of democracy abusers who paraded around London a few weeks ago, thinking throwing their toys out their pram one more time, will get them another referendum? :rolleyes: |
Re: Brexit
The EU will never agree a deal with us during the Article 50 period unless it's on their own terms. 2 years have proved this. Article 50 had to be served because otherwise the EU wouldn't even have looked at us in a potential Brexit context.
The difference between then and now is that what I said above was not obvious to most hopeful Leavers and certainly wasn't in the mind of most Remainers. One MP, David Gauke, came out publicly before the Referendum to explain why he was voting Remain - it was the uncertainties and unknowns we would be in for. For all that might have been, the EU has shown itself to be perfidious and nasty. That's enough reason to leave; were we now to rescind Article 50, we'll be the laughing stock with far less influence than we previously thought we had. Also we can't allow that perfidious Varadkar to be the tail that wags the dog, albeit a currently stupid dog. If the Customs Union exit rules are to be governed by the ECJ, we'll never be able to leave because the ECJ interprets everything according to the extant treaties which don't allow what we want in terms of sovereignty. SHort of a treaty that varies the current rules, no deal would be best. |
Re: Brexit
Quote:
Remainers didn't like that though which led to court cases, judicial decisions etc that left the EU in the driving seat. |
Re: Brexit
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:07. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum