![]() |
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
As for TTIP, don't expect the EU to sign up to that any time soon. I would have been in my grave for a century by the time that happens, and even that will be a miracle! |
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
The 'deal' we currently have have with the EU as a member is far more favourable to them than us in various ways which is why we voted to leave. Some people seem to want more of the same EU but not even that is on the agenda because the EU isn't changing it's stance positively on anything and is heading unerringly to a harder stance on everything. The US isn't going to just accept that and outside of Eurolalaland the UK will be well placed to make what concessions it wants to without being held to ransom by Brussels. |
Re: Brexit discussion
Trump will tell us to naff off. It's 'America First' remember. We need the EU, the EU is better off with us. The US can quite happily survive without the UK. Other countries e.g. India, are going to demand access for their citizens to the UK in any trade deal. Alone we have a very poor hand of cards to play (e.g what exactly do we produce that is vital for any other country and they can't get elsewhere ?)
|
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
Anyway looks like the figures we had for how much we trade outside of the EU might have been overestimated: http://news.sky.com/story/revealed-h...gures-11057545 Quote:
|
Re: Brexit discussion
If people on here are not aware of what the UK has to offer the U.S.A then you really don't understand the current arrangement we have much less any future deal and the U.S.A will definately be open to a wider trade aggreement then we currently have. Having observed the attitude on here that the UK has nothing to offer and will accept table scraps from whoever we do trade deals with also shows that despite what you think you don't understand or have any real knowledge of a sector where the UK is at worst at the forefront and usually is ahead of all competitors.
Personally I'm sick and tired of the entire defeatist attitude and the willingness at any point to run the UK down and often by elevating the position of the EU. Deals are being negotiated already and thank god the people handling them don't have the online attitude and view of the UK. Yes so far our negotiations with the EU haven't been very positive but I'm starting to understand the approach and the outcome that is being prepared for. I think the best thing for some on here is to move to the EU and leave the UK in your back mirror best outcome for everyone. |
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
---------- Post added at 23:48 ---------- Previous post was at 23:27 ---------- Meanwhile, the EU 27 have an interesting solution to the island of Ireland dilemma. Quote:
---------- Post added at 23:56 ---------- Previous post was at 23:48 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Brexit discussion
Because I wasn't responding to Damien i was responding to the general attitude on here and it's why i will soon not be bothering with this forum as i have with others. Thankfully I've found a couple of forums where this is being discussed with a far better balance then here and no it doesn't mean they are totally pro brexit but neither are they pro EU either. This isn't really a discussion it's brexit bashing and completely disregarding the strengths of the UK with most commentator's being happy to languish in negativity and running down the UK every chance they get. Clearly I don't fit in with this forum and rather then expect it to change I'll leave it for greener personal pastures :).
|
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
---------- Post added at 12:07 ---------- Previous post was at 11:45 ---------- *Sigh* http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/e...-divorce-terms This is not helpful. It is not the European Parliament's place to make this decision, it is down to the European Council. The timing of this is provocative and the entire exercise pointless. ---------- Post added at 14:05 ---------- Previous post was at 12:07 ---------- Quote:
On the second point it's absurd to suggest that most people made the decision based on that. As I've written a whole bunch of times there is a really good reason why the economy didn't feature highly in either Vote Leave or Leave.EU's campaigns. However often people repeat that even most of the vote either way was from well informed people who weighed up the evidence and made sober, fact-based decisions based on the likely future either way it doesn't make it any more factual. Pretty much no-one was adequately informed or in a position to make a completely educated decision. The economic impact, at least, of EU membership is, going by the middle of the line consensus, an economic advantage to both EU and UK. If this were not the case I'm pretty sure we'd have heard a lot more about this and a lot less about sovereignty, immigration and 350 million a week from the Leave campaign. The slogan was 'Vote Leave, take control' not 'Vote Leave and the UK will be wealthier.'. ---------- Post added at 14:20 ---------- Previous post was at 14:05 ---------- In a slightly different point good grief, Dan Hannan really has gone off the deep end. I genuinely can't believe I used to take this man seriously. He's a moron, a liar, or both. https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2017/09/22.png The tariff is on finished aircraft from Bombardier. As in Bombardier, Quebec, Canada. As in Canada, member of NAFTA, North American Free Trade Agreement, along with the USA and Mexico, an agreement considerably deeper and more encompassing than a basic FTA. |
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
The Irish PM has correctly analysed the situation. “It could well turn out to be a lesson for the UK,” Mr Varadkar said during a summit of European leaders in Tallinn, Estonia on Friday. “There’s been a lot of talk of a new trade deal between the UK and the US and how great that would be for the UK but we are now talking about the possibility of a trade war.” Referring to the issues raised by the Bombardier case, Mr Varadkar said: “Every country in the EU is a small country. We’re stronger together as a trading bloc.” https://www.ft.com/content/bc27d22c-...f-7f5e6a7c98a2 |
Re: Brexit discussion
Hmm.
http://news.sky.com/story/sir-jeremy...m-fox-11059514 Quote:
This vision is actually pretty much what you would expect from Boris Johnson, Liam Fox, Daniel Hannan, etc. They are neo-liberal in the extreme. I have no idea what else anyone would've expected them to look for. That aside it seems abundantly clear that we shouldn't be paying for celebration of the launch of a think tank. Daniel Hannan is not a part of HMG, but is certainly a member of the Conservative Party and a Conservative MEP. Be interesting to see what happens. What a fantastic choice we have in the UK. The Tory dog is having its tail wagged by those who want the UK to become Singapore, and they find the EU too socialist, restrictive, etc, the Labour leader wants Brexit because those awful neo-liberal EU types prevent his protectionism and state subsidy plans but seems to be slowly pushed towards a more moderate position. Schrodinger's European Union. The libertarian-right think it's socialist and protectionist, the authoritarian-left think it's neo-liberal crony capitalist. We were promised Schrodinger's exit from the EU: all things were promised to all people depending on their own desires. The socialist case was made by some, the neo-liberal case by others, with those awful people in the middle that've become pretty much marginalised now in this new era of extremes wanting the UK to leave the political union but continue to pool sovereignty as a part of the EEA. I'm hoping that the Conservative Party conference gets their internal power struggles sorted so that this process and, indeed, the entire Government, is no longer being run as a proxy war for control of that party and we get a clearer idea of what exactly the plans are. Right now I've no idea as Boris Johnson can't seem to keep it schtum and Liam Fox has a history of mentally masturbating over the idea of deregulation and a bonfire of workers' rights that he's reminded us of with his support for Hannan's think tank while Theresa May, echoed by Phillip Hammond, talks about a less turbulent approach. I personally would probably benefit from the IFT's approach. Chances are 90%+ of this forum and the country wouldn't. Singapore is wealthy, and for those with means it's an incredible place. It's also horrifically unequal, and the Government have control over many things Hannan et al would leave to the private sector making things potentially worse here. |
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
https://twitter.com/mrjamesob/status/914054003234951168 Mr Hannan: Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit discussion
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/u-shocks-w...175328264.html
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:36. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum