Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media Internet Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   General : STM always enforced? (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33694542)

neilt0 26-10-2013 12:23

Re: STM always enforced?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by broadbandking (Post 35637022)
I have seen a config alittle while ago with 60/6 so I am guessing it has started.

Yes, I was downloading last night from 9pm for about 3 hours at full whack. I'm doing the same again this morning, post-midday!

kwikbreaks 26-10-2013 13:31

Re: STM always enforced?
 
The 60/6 config refers to the delay providing an upstream at 10% of downstream - nothing to do with STM.

craigj2k12 27-10-2013 16:37

Re: STM always enforced?
 
I saw a 60/6 config posted on the VM forum a couple of months back, nothing since though

Kushan 27-10-2013 18:15

Re: STM always enforced?
 
Wasn't it "in trialling" or something?

Mick Fisher 27-10-2013 18:18

Re: STM always enforced?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by broadbandking (Post 35636425)
Well lets just hope this means VM will remove STM but I am not going to get to happy as VM will do something else to ruin this like introduce usage caps lol.

Well that seems to be the trend among Cable Co's in the States so it would not be very surprising.

kwikbreaks 27-10-2013 19:55

Re: STM always enforced?
 
I think that by reducing STM to the pretty pointless 10% / 16% to satisfy the latest (as yet unpublished) ASA ruling so that they can continue advertising unlimited VM must have pretty much ruled out caps.

There is very little point in having 120Mbps download speed other than to download large data files. Put caps on it and VM may as well shut shop unless they are very generous indeed.

jb66 27-10-2013 20:03

Re: STM always enforced?
 
I think the removal of isohunt has helped

neilt0 27-10-2013 20:06

Re: STM always enforced?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jb66 (Post 35637711)
I think the removal of isohunt has helped

Helped what?

General Maximus 27-10-2013 20:11

Re: STM always enforced?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jb66 (Post 35637711)
I think the removal of isohunt has helped

removed from what? I can still get to it.

Kushan 27-10-2013 20:12

Re: STM always enforced?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by General Maximus (Post 35637715)
removed from what? I can still get to it.

How? It shut down a few days ago.

General Maximus 27-10-2013 20:24

Re: STM always enforced?
 
I personally don't use the site but I just went on it to see what jb was talking about. I'll pm you and you can try it for yourself otherwise I risk getting my bottom smacked by the mods.

Sephiroth 27-10-2013 20:42

Re: STM always enforced?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kwikbreaks (Post 35637709)
I think that by reducing STM to the pretty pointless 10% / 16% to satisfy the latest (as yet unpublished) ASA ruling so that they can continue advertising unlimited VM must have pretty much ruled out caps.

There is very little point in having 120Mbps download speed other than to download large data files. Put caps on it and VM may as well shut shop unless they are very generous indeed.

You're right, of course.

The problem for VM customers is that a free-for-all (except P2P which remains controlled), as in "VM will never slow you down", can hit them quite quickly, particularly if there are twice as many customers per VM optical node than in a large FTTC cabinet.

Of course FTTC can hit customers in a different way; it's distance dependent from the cabinet made worse by aluminium cable.

Interesting times ahead as VM struggles with its dilemma.

Jumping 27-10-2013 21:00

Re: STM always enforced?
 
Removal of one site is not really gonna matter there is always more than one way to find and get the stuff you want if you really want it.

kwikbreaks 27-10-2013 22:16

Re: STM always enforced?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35637728)
Of course FTTC can hit customers in a different way; it's distance dependent from the cabinet made worse by aluminium cable.

In the sort of areas where VM are competing with FTTC I suspect that the distance from subscriber to cab isn't going to be all that great. For instance I'm ~ 300m from my FTTC cabinet and have a 60Mbps estimate. I'm actually nearer than that to the next cabinet along though. I have seen mention of someone being about a mile (iirc) from their cab but I'd lay odds that there is no cable service there.

everyday 27-10-2013 22:16

Re: STM always enforced?
 
ive reported 3 to FACT via crimestoppers in the past week. Sory but I hate P2P and copyright theft in general.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:01.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum