Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
 

Love to bet with you Mr Banana but I don't trust the Democrats to play a straight race, they do not know how to. Politics is too dirty in America, for me to feel secured about placing any bet.

Latest on this Peter Strzok scandal: The chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, sent a letter to the FBI on Thursday that shows the multiple edits to Comey’s highly scrutinized exoneration statement for Hillary Clinton, during last years FBI Criminal Investigation of her unsecured private email server in which she sent and received classified material, in which she was conveniently cleared of all wrong doing.

In an early draft, Then FBI Director, Comey said it was “reasonably likely” that “hostile actors” gained access to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email account. That was changed later to say the scenario was merely “possible.”

Another edit showed language was changed to describe the actions of Clinton and her colleagues as “extremely careless” as opposed to “grossly negligent.” This is a key legal difference because the change is a massive watering down of the FBI's initial findings.

In the initial drafted FBI report, it clearly identified that Hillary Clinton broke the law and such a charge would have prevented her candidacy for President in the U.S Election in 2016.

Now, there is nothing wrong with making edits here and there in a draft, but changing categorizations, which either means exoneration or indictments, is serious, given that the key person responsible for those edits, was aggressively Anti-Trump and had a very, 'I'm with her' bias, when it came to supporting Hillary Clinton, that key person was Peter Strzok, who was the same FBI agent who sent the damning, 'Insurance Policy' if Trump was elected' text message.

Deputy Attorney General, Rod Rosenstein, testified on Wednesday and hinted that it is possible to re-open the Clinton FBI email investigation, if it is deemed appropriate to do so but is waiting on a full report being conducted by the Inspector General, before deciding on this decision further. This is the same IG who discovered the text messages by Peter Strzok, to his mistress, Lisa Page.

Looks like the real collusion going on here, is the FBI aligning itself with the Democrats and Clinton campaign. :rolleyes:

Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
 

Well there are certainly enough candidates on this forum for a game of musical chairs.;)

Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
 

Even Fox news viewers are deserting him...
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...-a8111561.html

Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
 

It is illegal but there is no evidence it happened in significant numbers at all. I believe the entire evidence for this was a tweet from one person no?

Trump's approval numbers have been dropping for a while: http://dyn.realclearpolitics.com/epo...oval-6179.html

Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
 

Best President for years. The West needed a rousing awakening. As usual, the snowflakes are cacking themselves.

Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
 

But sadly dogged by traitors [sounds familiar] who constantly frustrate the will of the people because they wanted the crazy lady in office .


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TT36I2Ncz4w

Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
 

Spot on.


The Trump hate comes from rich globalists who hate Trump because of his belief in National Sovereignty. They finance anti Trump news outlets such as CNN and indirectly, finance anti Trump marches. That is the reason that such news outlets get to Attend such events as Bilderberg and Bohemian Grove.

Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
 

Remembers the 90% chance Hillary had to become President on Election night. Sorry Damien, don’t trust these polls, at all.

Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
 

That wasn't a poll. It was a calculation the NY Times 'Upshot' statistical model came up. Incidentally 90% means there is still 1 in 10 chance something will happen. 1 in 10 is nowhere near an impossible possibility.

But anyway as I said that wasn't a poll. The actual popular vote polling had:

Clinton: 46.8
Trump: 43.6

A Clinton lead of 3.2%.

The actual results were:

Clinton: 48.2
Trump: 46.1

A Clinton lead of 2.1%.

So the popular vote average of polls was only 1% out....

Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
 

Still, I do not trust them. To say Trumps base has shrunk is baseless and inaccurate. He is fulfilling his campaign promises. A reluctant Trump voter, said last year he could not vote for the devil, (Hillary), so reluctantly went for Trump, now he says, I stand shoulder to shoulder with Trump.

Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
 

It's not baseless though, Presidential approval numbers have been used for 50+ years, and whilst polling can be inaccurate it's the best metric we have until the next election. Certainly better than assumption or anecdote.

Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
 

Poll numbers don’t mean nothing, I just have no faith in them at all. History proves they are totally unreliable. Republican President Ronald Reagan, was unpopular in his first year, he won his second term in a landslide.

If Trump gets his legislative agenda out, instead of being fought at every turn by the corrupted & obstructionist Democrats and the one sided liberal media, CNN, NYT & WP, he will do just fine.

Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
 

Certainly people can go from bad poll ratings to good ones. If Trump will is up for debate, I personally don't think he will. I also don't like the Democrats are anymore corrupt than Trump for that matter.

Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
 

Bah. Exit polls taste of hat; just ask Paddy Pantsdown.

Go Donald! There's a job to do; stay on course.

Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
 

I’m not making any predictions yet, too early plus too much going on in background to get him ousted.

Trump was never meant to win and given these latest text revelations, it suggests, there is/was a plan, especially with this insurance policy that a FBI agent talks about, in a text message to his mistress, if he does get elected.