Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   President Trump 2.0 (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33712850)

Paul 17-03-2026 13:54

Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36212548)
Like I said, Starmer should have allowed the USA to use our bases.

Why ? Its not our war or anything we needed to be part of.

Hugh 17-03-2026 14:53

Re: President Trump 2.0
 
1 Attachment(s)
How long before Trump pulls the USA out of NATO?

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...9&d=1773762818

Damien 17-03-2026 14:54

Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36212542)
Like I said, USA was bounced into the war by Israel, imo.

---------- Post added at 21:40 ---------- Previous post was at 21:40 ----------



It's about how Starmer should have worked.

I am confused by your position where you seem to accept it's a stupid war, accept that Trump isn't acting rationally here, but think we should have supported it and him because it's the USA?

I agree that when the US requests our help, we owe it greater hearing than we do other nations because of the support we require from them, but that's not unconditional. If we think they've gone completely off the reservation, then we are not totally beholden to them. Just as if we went mad and decided it was time to invade some country, we shouldn't expect them to come and help us do so.

It's not in our interests to get too involved in military action in Iran. It's even so when you consider the Americans seem to have not only no plan, but no clear objective as to what success would be. Iraq was famously a disaster, but even that had much more planning for the initial stages than this war does. Even by American standards, this is an extremely stupid military endeavour.

You've succumbed to the same reflexive thought that our hyperactive political and media class succumbed to. That there is an American-led war, and therefore we should join without condition. It only takes a few minutes of thought to get past that impulse to ask why and how until you understand what a terrible idea it really is.

Hugh 17-03-2026 14:58

Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36212588)
I am confused by your position where you seem to accept it's a stupid war, accept that Trump isn't acting rationally here, but think we should have supported it and him because it's the USA?

I agree that when the US requests our help, we owe it greater hearing than we do other nations because of the support we require from them, but that's not unconditional. If we think they've gone completely off the reservation, then we are not totally beholden to them. Just as if we went mad and decided it was time to invade some country, we shouldn't expect them to come and help us do so.

It's not in our interests to get too involved in military action in Iran. It's even so when you consider the Americans seem to have not only no plan, but no clear objective as to what success would be. Iraq was famously a disaster, but even that had much more planning for the initial stages than this war does. Even by American standards, this is an extremely stupid military endeavour.

You've succumbed to the same reflexive thought that our hyperactive political and media class succumbed to. That there is an American-led war, and therefore we should join without condition. It only takes a few minutes of thought to get past that impulse to ask why and how until you understand what a terrible idea it really is.

Also (it seems) because Starmer didn’t do it, it’s bad that he didn’t do it - its not a pro-Trump position, it’s an anti-Starmer* stance…

*whatever stance Starmer takes, Seph is against it…

Damien 17-03-2026 15:10

Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Well Andrew Neil is getting dunked on across social media for having two articles a week apart, the first proclaiming how he is to admit to his American friends that Starmer has gone mad for not supporting Trump, the second bemoaning Trump has no plan and shouldn't have done this.

These people (not anyone on here) are just terminally incapable of thinking about anything beyond the immediate hysteria and energy of the moment. Trump has gone to war! This is about history, the world stage, statecraft of the highest level, and in this moment, their greatest ally has abandoned them! Then, a week later, Trump is a lunatic who started a war with no plan.

Social media has cooked people's brains to the extent that they have no attention span. Everything is about the takes on x/Bluesky. I remember back when Trump blew up at Zelenskyy in the Oval Office, and you had liberals on Bluesky legitimately wondering if Starmer needed to resign because he hadn't put out a statement in the hours after it happened.

Everyone has gone mad about everything. Just take a breath, step back, and wait to think for a few moments before acting or commenting.

Carth 17-03-2026 15:20

Re: President Trump 2.0
 
I'm convinced that the only sane people left in the World are those with a minimal social media presence . . of course I'm one of them

:wavey:

papa smurf 17-03-2026 15:35

Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36212592)
I'm convinced that the only sane people left in the World are those with a minimal social media presence . . of course I'm one of them

:wavey:

I'm the other one, the rest of em are all nuts :nutter:

Damien 17-03-2026 15:57

Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Ironically, even old school forums like this are healthier, not least because you have to write in full paragraphs (or at least attempt to do so).

Paul 17-03-2026 17:13

Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Spit his dummy again ....

Quote:

"We no longer 'need,' or desire, the Nato countries' assistance — WE NEVER DID!"
If you never needed it, then why did you ask for it ?
If you didnt need it, then you should be happy - since you didnt get it.

Carth 17-03-2026 17:38

Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Probably doesn't need all his military bases throughout Europe either then

1andrew1 17-03-2026 18:32

Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36212600)
Probably doesn't need all his military bases throughout Europe either then

Indeed. I somehow doubt the US Airforce wants to stop using its UK bases at the moment!

Hugh 17-03-2026 19:10

Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36212602)
Indeed. I somehow doubt the US Airforce wants to stop using its UK bases at the moment!

Or Ramstein Air Base, in Germany, which is the largest U.S. military hospital outside the United States, where they initially shipped casualties from Iraq and Afghanistan in order to treat them in a timely manner (rather than a 10-12 hour flight back to the USA) - if Donnie keeps on in this manner, they (unfortunately) may have need of it...

Carth 17-03-2026 19:46

Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Humpty Trumpy has already won the war, he says, they've taken out anything that can hurt them . . . so . . . the only reason his troops would need medical facilities is . . . the infamous American friendly fire :D

Hugh 17-03-2026 20:58

Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36212606)
Humpty Trumpy has already won the war, he says, they've taken out anything that can hurt them . . . so . . . the only reason his troops would need medical facilities is . . . the infamous American friendly fire :D

tbf, the Kuwaitis shot down three F-15Es, and one KC-135 Stratotanker refuelling plane was downed by collision with another, so no "friendly fire" was involved*…

*so far…

TheDaddy 17-03-2026 21:17

Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36212604)
Or Ramstein Air Base, in Germany, which is the largest U.S. military hospital outside the United States, where they initially shipped casualties from Iraq and Afghanistan in order to treat them in a timely manner (rather than a 10-12 hour flight back to the USA) - if Donnie keeps on in this manner, they (unfortunately) may have need of it...

They have need of it now, there have been at least 200 Americans injured and at least 10 of them are very seriously injured, could even be more but the regime is hiding the figures


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:42.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum