![]() |
Re: [Merged] Is it Art?
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Is it Art?
Quote:
but it really is horrible. |
Re: [Merged] Is it Art?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-19146362
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Is it Art?
:D Oh my, I can just see some over rich person displaying this pile of manure in his expensive, but tasteless, home. I have heard of "taking the p***" but this takes the art of parting a fool from his money to a whole new level.
|
Re: [Merged] Is it Art?
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Is it Art?
Lifted from another site with one word changed hence no link as the word hits the swear filter.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Is it Art?
Not impressed by the fresco that much anyway..Don't think I would go out of my way to see it.:erm:
|
Re: [Merged] Is it Art?
Is it art, almost certainly, is it sexist definitely
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotlan...-fife-19390354 |
Re: [Merged] Is it Art?
I didn't post about this because as far as I'm concerned ART should be inclusive not exclusive.
|
Re: [Merged] Is it Art?
I too saw this report and was concerned about the exclusive slant.
Having grown up in a business environment where women were stereotypically typists and men were the bosses I fought for years to be treated as an equal with my male counterparts and feel that to put up barriers, in any area of life where none previously existed, is wrong. Maybe a good way of getting publicity and attracting attention but not something I would want to be associated with. |
Re: [Merged] Is it Art?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-19698006
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Is it Art?
I watched the programme featuring the authentication of these paintings last night and was pleasantly surprised when the Turner expert Martin Butlin begrudgingly agreed that the evidence did in fact show that he had previously been wrong in declaring them to be fakes, seemingly he had been previously swayed by the moralistic views of earlier 'experts'. Watching him squirm and admit he had been wrong was delicious.
The story behind the paintings was fascinating, the reported comments of the art critics who first saw these paintings after Turners death and judged them to be fakes based on their own moralistic prejudices was an eye opener. I wonder how many art pieces to-day would be treated as fake due to their respected creators having secret affairs with people judged to be socially unworthy? Not many I would guess, money speaks too loudly now. |
Re: [Merged] Is it Art?
Quote:
Many paintings done by women during the medieval period were deemed to have been done by their fathers,brothers or husbands or any other family male member or a male apprentice because no mere woman could produce art work the equal of any man.:rolleyes: |
Re: [Merged] Is it Art?
Maybe that is where the saying "Behind every successful man there lurks a woman who's in charge." comes from. :)
I once had to deal with a pompous idiot who wouldn't believe that I was the person who had been brought in to see if his 'precious' crumbling ceiling bosses could be restored in situ. He insisted in speaking to John who had driven me to the job. Painting and guilding 25ft up on top of scaffolding was man's work don't ya know. :D |
Re: [Merged] Is it Art?
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:39. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum