![]() |
Re: R30 - Superhub R29 is no more....
So far so good for me on R30. :cool:
Moved from 145mbps to 300mbps and found it now works. Looking good. No drop outs or reboots yet. I'll leave it for a couple more days before trying 5ghz. |
Re: R30 - Superhub R29 is no more....
i know there is nothing i can do to get the R30 quicker.. but i have called them and they said that it will be in available in my area within 40 hours... that 40 hours expired oer 24hrs ago.... and i'm in London... so i would have assumed this area would have it by now....
I called them up earlier to ask about it and the 'other call centre' i was put through to kept trying to tell me about Windows updates, even though i am a Mac user... and after a few minutes, he has ordered me a new superhub... um.... i should probably try during business hours on Monday to get some real answers... |
Re: R30 - Superhub R29 is no more....
Quote:
---------- Post added at 01:33 ---------- Previous post was at 01:28 ---------- Quote:
Deceptive marketing aside, there *are* things VM are good at, but this Superhub business is the worst I've seen in a long time. The only positive reports I've heard of it are from people not using it as a hub or not not doing anything beyond the bare basics. At the end of the day I don't and never will want a router, hub or any other faffy consumer "managed" service. I want an internet connection, over which I can send and receive IP data without it being messed with by some crappy device in the middle I have no control over. I still see the Superhub as utterly unneccessary and technically pointless, and am glad I've never had to go near one in "hub" mode and hopefully never will. |
Re: R30 - Superhub R29 is no more....
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
If you don't think that, my apologies again. |
Re: R30 - Superhub R29 is no more....
No, I was really trying to say the majority of general consumers who notice (or don't notice) minor glitches in their connection would just attribute to "that's just how wireless is". Or more to the point, the fact that we can't trust the number of complaints (or lack of them) from non-technical users as a gauge for how reliable the Superhub is in general as those people may not understand where the problems are actually coming from.
I suffer from problems - but not Superhub ones - since I don't have a Superhub. I admit the Superhub works fine as a simple plug-and-play managed device for those with basic needs (unless you get a faulty unit) - my gripe(s) were the fact that it was being forced on those with more than basic needs and users not being given a choice - but that's off topic for this thread. I read Seph's post as "many if not most *of* the "majority" out there are suffering", with "majority" in quotes as a nod to the fact that we don't really know if it's the majority or not - it's only opinion so far. What I was agreeing with was the fact that most people who see minor problems (including me) won't bother reporting them each and every time. Anyway, no need to apologize, we all misinterpret things sometimes :) |
Re: R30 - Superhub R29 is no more....
Quote:
will wait a while before re-booting SH as still on r26 ;) ;) |
Re: R30 - Superhub R29 is no more....
Quote:
For the avoidance of doubt, I meant that there is no evidence that the majority of customers are having no problems with the SH; also there is no evidence that the majority of customers do have SH related problems. Thus those who are saying the majority of SH users have problems make an unfounded statement. Equally those saying that the majority of SH users are perfectly happy with the SH (or similar words/meanings) are also making an unfounded statement. The people who know, are VM and then ONLY if they analuse the stats collected by their Storm probe. The SH is indeed a wretched device as evidenced by nearly a year of instability caused by memory leaks, lack of modem mode and so on. On the balnce of VM's own admission to that effect (memory leaks), it's more likely that the majority of SH users have indeed been blighted by these issues but haven't reported them. But that's speculation, albeit backed by evidence of greater weight than the silence of that potential majority. Now, as I've said, I'm ready to take a SH (as long as I can keep the VMNG300 in the cupboard). |
Re: R30 - Superhub R29 is no more....
I wasn't apologising to you, but feel free to accept it you wish...;)
|
Re: R30 - Superhub R29 is no more....
Well you should have. If you misunderstood Qas' reply to my post then you misunderstood me and I was bound up in your remarks to Qas.
Anyway, R29 is no more - let's hope the SH R30 turns out to be less dud than R26 and the past 10 months of admitted failure of that wretched device. |
Re: R30 - Superhub R29 is no more....
Quote:
|
Re: R30 - Superhub R29 is no more....
Quote:
|
Re: R30 - Superhub R29 is no more....
But not for all. My own could last maybe a week between the need for reboots probably due to only minor wifi use by me.
|
Re: R30 - Superhub R29 is no more....
Why do people insist on "one size fits all" on this topic - we usually have two laptops, two tablets, three smartphones, and a Wii attached via wifi on the VM router (as well as two devices attached via cat5), and have not experienced wifi drop-outs.
I am not saying our experience is typical or atypical, just what we are experiencing - why must others insist that people are in denial if they are not having their negative experience? |
Re: R30 - Superhub R29 is no more....
Quote:
I've had my SH for a year and have only had 2 wifi drop outs. Seems to me that some people are still in denial that not everyone has problems with the SH and many people have a totally faultless experience with the device. I use my wifi a lot and its certainly not unstable at all. |
Re: R30 - Superhub R29 is no more....
Well there was a firmware bug discovered by VM associated with wifi which caused memory leaks and memory leaks inevitably lead to hangs or other issues. I can only assume that as VM also said the bug was associated with interference maybe you two don't suffer that.
The place I lived in before my current location had no other wifi signals around so maybe mine would have been flawless there. Where I am now there are several other APs visible. Perhaps it's a case of location location location? Whatever the answer large numbers were complaining of problems which the bug that was found would have caused. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:03. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum