Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Coronavirus (OLD) (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33708712)

Hom3r 02-04-2020 13:07

Re: Coronavirus
 
Can we please also when in a supermarket, not stand over staff stacking shelves when asking for stuff.

My niece works part time in Asda, some people do stand away from them, but others do stand too close.

peanut 02-04-2020 13:20

Re: Coronavirus
 
So now they are concerned about those that attended the Cheltenham Festival. Sorry but they've only got their own stupidity to blame.

spiderplant 02-04-2020 13:27

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36030047)
If you're not from the same physical household. Yes, you do !!!!

"During the emergency period, no person may participate in a gathering in a public place of more than two people except..."

Is there a law that contradicts this?

mrmistoffelees 02-04-2020 13:36

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by spiderplant (Post 36030056)
"During the emergency period, no person may participate in a gathering in a public place of more than two people except..."

Is there a law that contradicts this?

you still need maintain social distancing within that gathering.....

Mick 02-04-2020 13:40

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36030011)
Anybody can have an explanation, it is another thing as to whether it stands up to proper scrutiny, or in the Kinnock case, any scrutiny at all. Without the presence of the chairs, their story might have been plausible. Their story went that they only remained long enough to sing "happy birthday", which apparently only takes 20 seconds. Either the chairs came from within the house, or they brought them with them.
LinkTravelled all the way from Wales to London. Everybody else is expected to make do with online interactions.

Why on Earth are you still whinging about nothing? :rolleyes:

For goodness sake the Kinnocks did nothing wrong - they stayed within the law, not that any law defines how long someone stays when delivering items to a vulnerable age group. You need to stop going on about a non-issue, non-law breaking incident.

spiderplant 02-04-2020 14:07

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36030058)
you still need maintain social distancing within that gathering.....

Under what law? Not The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) Regulations 2020, as far as I can see.

mrmistoffelees 02-04-2020 14:18

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by spiderplant (Post 36030064)
Under what law? Not The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) Regulations 2020, as far as I can see.


Person 1 from family A goes out and meets Person 2 from family B at the shops and does not maintain social distancing.

Person 1 is carrying the virus however is asymptomatic.

Due to not social distancing, the virus has increased risk of transmission via shedding.

Person 2 goes back to their family unit and potentially transmits to another person in their family (lets call them person 2a)

Person 2a is asymptomatic goes out and repeats the process inc not social distancing.

By maintaining social distancing regardless you minimise the risk of chains of transmission.


It's not exactly rocket science. Or perhaps you would like a law to assist you with common sense?

Hugh 02-04-2020 14:21

Re: Coronavirus
 
Calm down, calm down, everyone - let's discuss, not argue, please.

denphone 02-04-2020 14:24

Re: Coronavirus
 
The latest figures are up for discussion.

Quote:

UPDATE on coronavirus (#COVID19) testing in the UK:

As of 9am 2 April, a total of 163,194 people have been tested of which 33,718 tested positive.

As of 5pm on 1 April, of those hospitalised in the UK who tested positive for coronavirus, 2,921 have sadly died.
https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status...97879311814656

https://twitter.com/BethRigby/status...18376178667524

jfman 02-04-2020 14:26

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36030070)
The latest figures are up for discussion.



https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status...97879311814656

Can I go first? Nobody said Coronavirus killed them.

Also, that’s just hospital deaths - not care home or at home deaths.

ThunderPants73 02-04-2020 14:32

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36029981)
Well I’ve been in contact with several people I know that have/had it, and as has been posted the severity of the illness is on an individual basis.

But the two elements that seem consistent ( and this is based on a handful of people I know that thankfully have not needed hospital care) is severe breathing problems, so bad that it’s hard to talk, apparently quite distressing at the time, lasting typically for around 3-4 days accompanied with severe Muscle pain in the chest, arms, neck and abdomen. Apparently words cannot get across how it hits you. This is from people my age. 45-55,

But, thankfully, they have got over it.

I’m hoping not to experience it, where I am, I’m semi-rural my the family are staying put and I’m only going out for the shop when required, so I am hopeful we can dodge it.

Wow, I've been wondering if I had the virus late Jan/early Feb because I had a very atypical chest infection and according to Neil Ferguson, Notts/Derby could have been early hotspots. Non-productive cough, high temperature and now I read here about muscle pain in chest - I had that too, thought I'd strained my intercostal muscles coughing. I'd love to know if I actually had it, if I did, it was luckily very mild.

Hom3r 02-04-2020 14:34

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by spiderplant (Post 36030056)
"During the emergency period, no person may participate in a gathering in a public place of more than two people except..."

Is there a law that contradicts this?


unless you are from the same household.

Chris 02-04-2020 14:37

Re: Coronavirus
 
The BBC is being generally quite careful in its wording now, usually stating that “x people have died *in hospital* *with* coronavirus”.

It is very likely that people have also died at home. It is very likely that some people have died *of* coronavirus, and not just with it as a factor.

None of this really matters as long as the way the statistics are compiled remains consistent. The only way we can get an accurate view of the progress of the pandemic in the UK is a consistent count of hospital deaths where coronavirus is present.

It is also worth stating - again - that coronavirus by itself kills very, very few people. The vast majority of people who contract it and then die were already so ill that they would have been likely to die in the not too distant future anyway. This is cold comfort for them and their loved ones, but for everyone else it should help keep things in perspective.

Pierre 02-04-2020 14:39

Re: Coronavirus
 
I'm afraid I've already got COVID apathy.

Cases and deaths will continue to increase for at least the next month, so everyday being told they have, is no surprise and it shouldn't be.

---------- Post added at 14:39 ---------- Previous post was at 14:37 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThunderPants73 (Post 36030072)
Wow, I've been wondering if I had the virus late Jan/early Feb because I had a very atypical chest infection and according to Neil Ferguson, Notts/Derby could have been early hotspots. Non-productive cough, high temperature and now I read here about muscle pain in chest - I had that too, thought I'd strained my intercostal muscles coughing. I'd love to know if I actually had it, if I did, it was luckily very mild.

This is why we need the "have you had it" tests, sooner we have them the sooner things will go back to normal as those that can prove they've had it can go back to a normal life.

Mick 02-04-2020 14:40

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by spiderplant (Post 36030064)
Under what law? Not The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) Regulations 2020, as far as I can see.

The problem with the above mentioned Act is that because it was an Emergency Bill, it did not go through proper months of scrutiny that tries to address all the potential loop holes and grey areas.

We're told we can do once piece of exercise a day, the law doesn't say you cannot whilst doing that exercise, we should not sit down on a park bench to rest, drive to places to do said exercises.

ThunderPants73 02-04-2020 14:44

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36030075)
I'm afraid I've already got COVID apathy.

Cases and deaths will continue to increase for at least the next month, so everyday being told they have, is no surprise and it shouldn't be.

---------- Post added at 14:39 ---------- Previous post was at 14:37 ----------



This is why we need the "have you had it" tests, sooner we have them the sooner things will go back to normal as those that can prove they've had it can go back to a normal life.

But do we know for sure that if we've had it we have immunity? At least for a while? I wouldn't want to take risks under a false sense of security.

Mr K 02-04-2020 14:55

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36030075)
I'm afraid I've already got COVID apathy.

Cases and deaths will continue to increase for at least the next month, so everyday being told they have, is no surprise and it shouldn't be.

---------- Post added at 14:39 ---------- Previous post was at 14:37 ----------



This is why we need the "have you had it" tests, sooner we have them the sooner things will go back to normal as those that can prove they've had it can go back to a normal life.

That's the worry. If people get fed up and don't follow the advice any longer this could go on for a long time. Already we've seen traffic going back up.

Carth 02-04-2020 15:00

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36030080)
That's the worry. If people get fed up and don't follow the advice any longer this could go on for a long time. Already we've seen traffic going back up.


If I'm right, I think this was part of the thinking behind not going in to lockdown too early . . people become bored/complacent, and then start to move around at the very time they shouldn't be :shrug:

Mythica 02-04-2020 15:00

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36030078)
The problem with the above mentioned Act is that because it was an Emergency Bill, it did not go through proper months of scrutiny that tries to address all the potential loop holes and grey areas.

We're told we can do once piece of exercise a day, the law doesn't say you cannot whilst doing that exercise, we should not sit down on a park bench to rest, drive to places to do said exercises.

The law states -

6.—(1) During the emergency period, no person may leave the place where they are living without reasonable excuse.

6. - (2) gives a list that includes why you can be out including exercise. The list is non-exhaustive. It comes down to interpretation of what is reasonable or not. If the officer believes it is not reasonable that you have got in your car and travelled a distance to go and exercise when you could walk out your door and exercise, then the officer can use 6. - (1) and you would have to fight it in court.

Mr K 02-04-2020 15:23

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mythica (Post 36030083)
The law states -

6.—(1) During the emergency period, no person may leave the place where they are living without reasonable excuse.

6. - (2) gives a list that includes why you can be out including exercise. The list is non-exhaustive. It comes down to interpretation of what is reasonable or not. If the officer believes it is not reasonable that you have got in your car and travelled a distance to go and exercise when you could walk out your door and exercise, then the officer can use 6. - (1) and you would have to fight it in court.

Well according to Michael Gove going to the allotment is ok, so that's my exercise covered. That veg could come in useful.

papa smurf 02-04-2020 15:39

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36030089)
Well according to Michael Gove going to the allotment is ok, so that's my exercise covered. That veg could come in useful.

You could barter it for loo roll.

djfunkdup 02-04-2020 16:00

Re: Coronavirus
 
I think it's quite safe to say the calm before the storm is just about to end.

Please take extra care folks this is about to kick off big time in the next 24/48 hrs .The doubling effect seams to be taking hold every 24hrs rather than every 3/4 days now.

Peace .

jfman 02-04-2020 17:55

Re: Coronavirus
 
100,000 tests a day by the end of the month. Fingers crossed.

denphone 02-04-2020 18:00

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36030115)
100,000 tests a day by the end of the month. Fingers crossed.

Lets hope so.

And a £13.4bn historic NHS debt has been written off.

Mick 02-04-2020 18:01

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mythica (Post 36030083)
The law states -

6.—(1) During the emergency period, no person may leave the place where they are living without reasonable excuse.

6. - (2) gives a list that includes why you can be out including exercise. The list is non-exhaustive. It comes down to interpretation of what is reasonable or not. If the officer believes it is not reasonable that you have got in your car and travelled a distance to go and exercise when you could walk out your door and exercise, then the officer can use 6. - (1) and you would have to fight it in court.

So that’s still not a specific law that does not say you cannot go to a place and then exercise.

Mythica 02-04-2020 18:07

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36030118)
So that’s still not a specific law that does not say you cannot go to a place and then exercise.

They cant list everything that someone might invent to get around the rules. It doesn't say I can't go to a supermarket that's 100 miles away, but anyone doing that when they have got a supermarket 2 miles away would have a hard time fighting it in court.

The law that is in place now, while it could be worded better, is enough to still fine people for doing something like driving to a place to exercise. Whether people agree with that is a different matter.

Pierre 02-04-2020 18:46

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36030080)
That's the worry. If people get fed up and don't follow the advice any longer this could go on for a long time. Already we've seen traffic going back up.

It's not that I would contravene any restrictions, I'm just sick of hearing about it.

Mick 02-04-2020 19:59

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mythica (Post 36030119)
They cant list everything that someone might invent to get around the rules. It doesn't say I can't go to a supermarket that's 100 miles away, but anyone doing that when they have got a supermarket 2 miles away would have a hard time fighting it in court.

The law that is in place now, while it could be worded better, is enough to still fine people for doing something like driving to a place to exercise. Whether people agree with that is a different matter.

The fact you’ve said it could be worded better, is a technicality that could throw a case out of court. My point still stands. Time for you to move on.

Mythica 02-04-2020 20:06

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36030146)
The fact you’ve said it could be worded better, is a technicality that could throw a case out of court. My point still stands. Time for you to move on.

Ok Mick, I'll move on, shame you can't have a debate about something.

Hom3r 02-04-2020 20:30

Re: Coronavirus
 
The hardest part of the Coronavirus is this.

My family and close friend know if they need me call and I'll come running.

But now I can't, give my sister a hug as we are both worrying about our mother, and self isolatating.

tweetiepooh 03-04-2020 10:47

Re: Coronavirus
 
Current death rate curve closely matches the expected (male) curve and since us men seem more affected by COVID-19 that's expected.
Seems to show that while we do want to control spread especially because of load on NHS and protecting those we can it's not causing more deaths in the population generally.
I also guess that with the current "lockdown" there could be fewer deaths from things like traffic incidents, climbing etc.
---
At some point I'll want to get to Costco. Yes it's a drive to get there but since it's a bulk buy a single trip out to do that is statistically better than lots of smaller trips. Nice message from them that executive member can visit during trade period.

Maggy 03-04-2020 11:02

Re: Coronavirus
 
I guess I'm lucky that I live 5 minutes from the local beach.Sadly not everyone does have a wide open space on their doorstep.

Hugh 03-04-2020 11:30

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 36030181)
Current death rate curve closely matches the expected (male) curve and since us men seem more affected by COVID-19 that's expected.
Seems to show that while we do want to control spread especially because of load on NHS and protecting those we can it's not causing more deaths in the population generally.
I also guess that with the current "lockdown" there could be fewer deaths from things like traffic incidents, climbing etc.
---
At some point I'll want to get to Costco. Yes it's a drive to get there but since it's a bulk buy a single trip out to do that is statistically better than lots of smaller trips. Nice message from them that executive member can visit during trade period.

They are also opening an hour earlier for members who are in the Emergency Services, until the 5th April.

Mick 03-04-2020 11:49

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mythica (Post 36030147)
Ok Mick, I'll move on, shame you can't have a debate about something.

It's not that I don't want to debate something but I don't want an issue to keep festering on that it just becomes an argument that annoys others and like Paul says, the same members should not be arguing with each other, when it is just us rambling, it's not a debate.

I have my interpretations of the Corona virus Act, it has it's flaws, you've also pretty much admitted this too by commenting on it's wording. Another member has commented on the application of Common Sense.

I think it has perfect common sense for people to, get in their car, "alone" or with someone from their household. Drive to a remote location to do their exercising as they are still self isolating.

Chris 03-04-2020 12:03

Re: Coronavirus
 
Driving to a remote spot for self isolation exercise is great until everyone decides to drive to the same remote spot. We had horrendous problems up here in the LL&T national park with the whole of Glasgow driving out here for exercise on the first weekend of lockdown. The national park had to lock the car parks to put a stop to it and the police are doing regular patrols to make sure people aren’t just dumping their cars on the narrow roads and forestry tracks. The issue isn’t with any one car coming up here, it’s that once one does it everyone feels entitled and then you have a crowd of people who aren’t self isolated at all.

1andrew1 03-04-2020 12:17

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36030191)
It's not that I don't want to debate something but I don't want an issue to keep festering on that it just becomes an argument that annoys others and like Paul says, the same members should not be arguing with each other, when it is just us rambling, it's not a debate.

I have my interpretations of the Corona virus Act, it has it's flaws, you've also pretty much admitted this too by commenting on it's wording. Another member has commented on the application of Common Sense.

I think it has perfect common sense for people to, get in their car, "alone" or with someone from their household. Drive to a remote location to do their exercising as they are still self isolating.

I think there was a great quote used by the Chancellor attributed to Voltaire "Perfect is the enemy of good" when talking about the legislation.
Everyone accepts that the legislation is not as polished as something that's received more scrutiny and time, but it's far better than no legislation.

Hugh 03-04-2020 12:27

Re: Coronavirus
 
The problem with "common sense" is that, unfortunately, for a sizeable minority, it isn't that common.

Mick 03-04-2020 12:45

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36030193)
Driving to a remote spot for self isolation exercise is great until everyone decides to drive to the same remote spot. We had horrendous problems up here in the LL&T national park with the whole of Glasgow driving out here for exercise on the first weekend of lockdown. The national park had to lock the car parks to put a stop to it and the police are doing regular patrols to make sure people aren’t just dumping their cars on the narrow roads and forestry tracks. The issue isn’t with any one car coming up here, it’s that once one does it everyone feels entitled and then you have a crowd of people who aren’t self isolated at all.

Then it is not a remote spot is it, if it is a popular place and plenty of people go there, the very idea of going for a remote exercise, going to random remote areas, is knowing there will be no other people there and that is my point Chris. Perfectly possible to sustain self isolation.

Chris 03-04-2020 13:20

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36030198)
Then it is not a remote spot is it, if it is a popular place and plenty of people go there, the very idea of going for a remote exercise, going to random remote areas, is knowing there will be no other people there and that is my point Chris. Perfectly possible to sustain self isolation.

It’s 25 miles outside the city in a location that has the reputation of being isolated, because it’s at the end of a no-through road. I absolutely agree, if you know a secret isolated spot where you won’t meet anyone, knock yourself out, enjoy it - if it’s that out of the way, the police won’t find you anyway. The problem is with places that everyone believes to be isolated, and it’s not until they all show up at once and break the all-time visitor record (as happened here, and at other national park locations around the UK) that trouble brews.

The limitation with using primary legislation to try to manage this is that there’s no safe legal definition of what is isolated and what isn’t. If it were necessary to have such laws permanently (thankfully it won’t be), then they would end up with a massive Schedule to the Act listing locations, because there would be no other legally watertight way to do it. As we don’t have any of that, it’s not surprising that there are continuing disagreements over what is allowed, what should be allowed, and how the police enforce it.

Mythica 03-04-2020 13:28

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36030191)
It's not that I don't want to debate something but I don't want an issue to keep festering on that it just becomes an argument that annoys others and like Paul says, the same members should not be arguing with each other, when it is just us rambling, it's not a debate.

I have my interpretations of the Corona virus Act, it has it's flaws, you've also pretty much admitted this too by commenting on it's wording. Another member has commented on the application of Common Sense.

I think it has perfect common sense for people to, get in their car, "alone" or with someone from their household. Drive to a remote location to do their exercising as they are still self isolating.

It's not the self isolating that is the issue, the more people that want to get in their car means more fuel they'll need, more chance of needing breakdown or emergency services which could put more strain on the NHS.

I get it's not a nice situation to be in but it's for the greater good, we need to try and stop the spread and protect the NHS so it doesn't get overloaded. I dare say the majority of people don't need to get in their car, they just want to.

It seems the message just isn't getting through to people though. I work in a supermarket and I'm seeing the same regulars who come in everyday or every other day still coming in as usual. I understand not everyone can afford a full shop once a week but it would help if they were only buying essentials.

RichardCoulter 03-04-2020 13:40

Re: Coronavirus
 
The PM has just said on Twitter that he has to remain in isolation due to his health.

This is one of the reasons why I think it would be better to have a coalition Government or a group of senior people from the Tory party to run the country. This is too much for one person to deal with, especially when they could be out of action, in full or in part, due to the virus.

It was done in the world war and this is effectively a war too.

Re: The daily updates. Does anyone think it a coincidence that the podium that they use has yellow, red and blue to show the messages that they want to get across? I'm wondering if this is to subtly show that the main parties are as one with this?

Carth 03-04-2020 13:45

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36030201)
The PM has just said on Twitter that he has to remain in isolation due to his health.


Ringing his advisors every day asking "is it safe to come out yet?" :D

Mr K 03-04-2020 13:53

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36030201)
The PM has just said on Twitter that he has to remain in isolation due to his health.

This is one of the reasons why I think it would be better to have a coalition Government or a group of senior people from the Tory party to run the country. This is too much for one person to deal with, especially when they could be out of action, in full or in part, due to the virus.

It was done in the world war and this is effectively a war too.

Re: The daily updates. Does anyone think it a coincidence that the podium that they use has yellow, red and blue to show the messages that they want to get across? I'm wondering if this is to subtly show that the main parties are as one with this?

Boris being absent doesn't really change anything which says a lot, but Labour will have a new leader tomorrow. I don't think we need a coalition, we still need someone to bring the Govt. to account, about why we are in such a poor position to fight this thing.

The daily conferences are a joke with journalists only allowed to ask a question, they then ignore and then answer the question they'd have liked to have been asked. The journalist get little chance for comeback, as they would if they were if the same room, i think they are just put on mute !

jfman 03-04-2020 14:11

Re: Coronavirus
 
We have a group of senior people running the country. The Cabinet, supported by the Civil Service.

denphone 03-04-2020 14:13

Re: Coronavirus
 
The Queen is to address the nation this weekend on Sunday at 8pm.

Mr K 03-04-2020 14:19

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36030209)
The Queen is to address the nation this weekend on Sunday at 8pm.

She can't bump Antiques Roadshow off the schedules, it'll be the final straw for the pensioners...

denphone 03-04-2020 14:24

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36030210)
She can't bump Antiques Roadshow off the schedules, it'll be the final straw for the pensioners...

Usually the Queens speeches l think are generally around 10 minutes long so l am sure the pensioners will be able to bear it if the TAR starts 10 minutes late Mr K.;)

nomadking 03-04-2020 14:29

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36030205)
Boris being absent doesn't really change anything which says a lot, but Labour will have a new leader tomorrow. I don't think we need a coalition, we still need someone to bring the Govt. to account, about why we are in such a poor position to fight this thing.

The daily conferences are a joke with journalists only allowed to ask a question, they then ignore and then answer the question they'd have liked to have been asked. The journalist get little chance for comeback, as they would if they were if the same room, i think they are just put on mute !

Last year we were 2nd on the list of countries best prepared for a Global Pandemic. Germany was 14th. Italy was 126th out of 195 on "Emergency Response Operation Indicator". Nobody was or could really be prepared. Eg tests can't be in place for something that didn't exist at the time.



The policies used have been in place for years, based upon scientific evidence gathered from around the world on past epidemic and pandemics.

denphone 03-04-2020 14:32

Re: Coronavirus
 
The Department of Health and Social Care have just released their latest updated figures.

https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status...60747727294466

https://news.sky.com/story/coronavir...3-605-11967903

Quote:

As of 9am 3 April, a total of 173,784 people have been tested of which 38,168 tested positive.

As of 5pm on 2 April, of those hospitalised in the UK who tested positive for coronavirus, 3,605 have sadly died.

Sephiroth 03-04-2020 17:21

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36030205)
Boris being absent doesn't really change anything which says a lot, but Labour will have a new leader tomorrow. I don't think we need a coalition, we still need someone to bring the Govt. to account, about why we are in such a poor position to fight this thing.

The daily conferences are a joke with journalists only allowed to ask a question, they then ignore and then answer the question they'd have liked to have been asked. The journalist get little chance for comeback, as they would if they were if the same room, i think they are just put on mute !

A lot of us would agree with that - perhaps until yesterday (02-April) when the Health Secretary held centre stage. We'll see if today comes off as well.


---------- Post added at 17:21 ---------- Previous post was at 16:19 ----------

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-52135816

Maybe an interesting read. Here's a snippet:

Quote:

The coronavirus crisis really brings into question what the EU is all about.

Clearly not a United States of Europe, as eurosceptics have often claimed.

Far from it.

Right now, every European government is struggling to protect their populations - their jobs, their health and their economy.

Chris 03-04-2020 17:40

Re: Coronavirus
 
What a laugh. I knew it was Chief Regime Apologist Adler as soon as I read your snippets - she’s only two sentences in and setting up straw man arguments so she can have a go at ‘eurosceptics’.

Hom3r 03-04-2020 18:03

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36030201)
The PM has just said on Twitter that he has to remain in isolation due to his health.

This is one of the reasons why I think it would be better to have a coalition Government or a group of senior people from the Tory party to run the country. This is too much for one person to deal with, especially when they could be out of action, in full or in part, due to the virus.

It was done in the world war and this is effectively a war too.

Re: The daily updates. Does anyone think it a coincidence that the podium that they use has yellow, red and blue to show the messages that they want to get across? I'm wondering if this is to subtly show that the main parties are as one with this?


As a former Liebour voter I don't want Steptoe any where near power.

nomadking 03-04-2020 18:34

Re: Coronavirus
 
Another Labour MP for who the rules and the law don't apply.
Link

Quote:

A Labour MP has been blasted for "endangering lives" by attending a large funeral and ignoring coronavirus lockdown measures.
Tahir Ali was also criticised as "totally irresponsible" by West Midlands Police and Crime Commissioner, David Jamieson.
And to cap it all.

Quote:

He said he was at the Sutton Coldfield gathering only as an "observer".
Mr Ali reportedly attended two services that day, but has said he will "not be attending any other similar gatherings".

Mr K 03-04-2020 18:42

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 36030234)
As a former Liebour voter I don't want Steptoe any where near power.

Not an issue as of tomorrow.
( Anyway, Old Man Steptoe was a Tory !)

pip08456 03-04-2020 18:48

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36030201)
The PM has just said on Twitter that he has to remain in isolation due to his health.

This is one of the reasons why I think it would be better to have a coalition Government or a group of senior people from the Tory party to run the country. This is too much for one person to deal with, especially when they could be out of action, in full or in part, due to the virus.

It was done in the world war and this is effectively a war too.

Re: The daily updates. Does anyone think it a coincidence that the podium that they use has yellow, red and blue to show the messages that they want to get across? I'm wondering if this is to subtly show that the main parties are as one with this?

Stop making things up Richard. He said that although he feels well he has to remain in isolation as he still has a temperature.

denphone 03-04-2020 18:58

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36030240)
Stop making things up Richard. He said that although he feels well he has to remain in isolation as he still has a temperature.

He is doing what he should do as whether its the PM or a member of the public one should self isolate for 14 days.

It would not look good on any politician if they ignored that.

---------- Post added at 18:58 ---------- Previous post was at 18:57 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36030239)
Not an issue as of tomorrow.
( Anyway, Old Man Steptoe was a Tory !)

The wonderful Wilfrid Brambell.:D:D

Mythica 03-04-2020 19:05

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36030241)
He is doing what he should do as whether its the PM or a member of the public one should self isolate for 14 days.

It would not look good on any politician if they ignored that.

---------- Post added at 18:58 ---------- Previous post was at 18:57 ----------



The wonderful Wilfrid Brambell.:D:D

It's only 7 days if you have symptoms. Though obviously longer if you still have them.

Pierre 03-04-2020 19:44

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mythica (Post 36030200)
It's not the self isolating that is the issue, the more people that want to get in their car means more fuel they'll need, more chance of needing breakdown or emergency services which could put more strain on the NHS.
.

Not sure how Green Flag, RAC or AA transpose on to the NHS? But why stop the bandwagon.

RichardCoulter 03-04-2020 19:46

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36030240)
Stop making things up Richard. He said that although he feels well he has to remain in isolation as he still has a temperature.

I do not "make things up" as you rudely say. What I said was what was put out by the BBC news earlier today.

Hugh 03-04-2020 19:47

Re: Coronavirus
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36030248)
Not sure how Green Flag, RAC or AA transpose on to the NHS? But why stop the bandwagon.

Because the more people interact (and the breakdown services would interact with multiple people per day sorting their breakdown), the more the virus spreads, increasing the load in the NHS?

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...4&d=1585940072

RichardCoulter 03-04-2020 19:51

Re: Coronavirus
 
The issue of going somewhere in a car to excercise has been clarified by the Health Secretary as per the BBC 6PM news.

He said that there had been some confusion over this and went on to say that it was permissable to drive somewhere if it was five minutes away, but that Government advice was for people to stay as close to home as possible*.

It was also said that people can travel to work, but only if they aren't able to work from home.

* This does not include Wales, where the police are taking a far stricter approach. This was referred to later on in the bulletin.

Hom3r 03-04-2020 19:51

Re: Coronavirus
 
how many flat/buggered car batteries are there going to be?

I've been self isolating and my cars not moved only started and let run for a few minutes.

Monday I can finally go out and shop for food, so my car will get a bit of a run. but I reckon anut 100 miles in the next 12 weeks instead of 2,000 miles.

Mr K 03-04-2020 19:56

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 36030252)
how many flat/buggered car batteries are there going to be?

I've been self isolating and my cars not moved only started and let run for a few minutes.

Monday I can finally go out and shop for food, so my car will get a bit of a run. but I reckon anut 100 miles in the next 12 weeks instead of 2,000 miles.

If all I get out of this is a flat battery and terrible hair, I'll settle for that.

Mythica 03-04-2020 20:02

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36030248)
Not sure how Green Flag, RAC or AA transpose on to the NHS? But why stop the bandwagon.

The more people that defy the stay at home message and do what they want, there could be more chance of breakdowns. They come out to you, they might give it to you or vice versa. Either one of you then takes it home, then you go shopping and give it to a lot more people, some who might need hospital admissions. That's the whole point of the stay at home, protect the NHS, save lives, message. Put too much strain on the NHS and it will cost lives.

pip08456 03-04-2020 20:51

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36030249)
I do not "make things up" as you rudely say. What I said was what was put out by the BBC news earlier today.

Why not go straight to the source. It tells a different story.

https://twitter.com/BorisJohnson/sta...42407973662721

Pierre 04-04-2020 09:00

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36030250)
Because the more people interact (and the breakdown services would interact with multiple people per day sorting their breakdown), the more the virus spreads, increasing the load in the NHS?

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...4&d=1585940072

I’m sure the breakdown recovery person can fix the car with the car owner a suitable distance away. Like I say not the biggest concern in these times.

papa smurf 04-04-2020 09:04

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36030286)
I’m sure the breakdown recovery person can fix the car with the car owner a suitable distance away. Like I say not the biggest concern in these times.

I'M with green flag,they have told members if their car needs transporting they will have to stay inside it to protect green flag workforce.

Pierre 04-04-2020 09:07

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 36030252)
how many flat/buggered car batteries are there going to be?

I've been self isolating and my cars not moved only started and let run for a few minutes.

Monday I can finally go out and shop for food, so my car will get a bit of a run. but I reckon anut 100 miles in the next 12 weeks instead of 2,000 miles.

A car battery should last around a couple of months, potentially longer, before dying, if not used.

---------- Post added at 09:07 ---------- Previous post was at 09:05 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mythica (Post 36030254)
The more people that defy the stay at home message and do what they want, there could be more chance of breakdowns. They come out to you, they might give it to you or vice versa. Either one of you then takes it home, then you go shopping and give it to a lot more people, some who might need hospital admissions. That's the whole point of the stay at home, protect the NHS, save lives, message. Put too much strain on the NHS and it will cost lives.

As hypotheses go, it’s thin.

Hugh 04-04-2020 09:12

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36030286)
I’m sure the breakdown recovery person can fix the car with the car owner a suitable distance away. Like I say not the biggest concern in these times.

Point missed completely.

The point of Social Distancing is not to reduce the chance of infection to zero (because that’s impossible), but to minimise the risk of infection; doing anything unnecessary that raises the risk of infection is being selfish, and being bored of something is not a valid rsason for putting others lives at risk, and increasing the workload of an already overstretched Health Service.

---------- Post added at 09:12 ---------- Previous post was at 09:11 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36030288)
A car battery should last around a couple of months, potentially longer, before dying, if not used.

---------- Post added at 09:07 ---------- Previous post was at 09:05 ----------



As hypotheses go, it’s thin.

I didn’t realise you were an expert in Epidemiology.

Maggy 04-04-2020 09:15

Re: Coronavirus
 
Is there ANYTHING CF members WON'T argu...debate about?

Pierre 04-04-2020 09:32

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36030291)
Point missed completely.

The point of Social Distancing is not to reduce the chance of infection to zero (because that’s impossible), but to minimise the risk of infection; doing anything unnecessary that raises the risk of infection is being selfish, and being bored of something is not a valid rsason for putting others lives at risk, and increasing the workload of an already overstretched Health Service.


No point wasn’t missed.

All I’m saying is. % that are infected + % Going out in car + % then breaking down + % that call breakdown service + % that don’t distance themselves whilst car being worked on + % that infect recovery man.

Like I say, it’s thin.

Quote:

I didn’t realise you were an expert in Epidemiology.
Nope just an expert in reality, and perspective

---------- Post added at 09:32 ---------- Previous post was at 09:32 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36030294)
Is there ANYTHING CF members WON'T argu...debate about?

Absolutely not,

Mythica 04-04-2020 10:27

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36030288)
A car battery should last around a couple of months, potentially longer, before dying, if not used.

---------- Post added at 09:07 ---------- Previous post was at 09:05 ----------



As hypotheses go, it’s thin.

I disagree. But let's say everyone takes the same view as you, where do we stand as the lockdown would be pointless.

peanut 04-04-2020 10:31

Re: Coronavirus
 
Well you have people that think it's okay to drive somewhere for their exercise. So yeah I think we do need to argue certain points when there's so much stupidity about.

Pierre 04-04-2020 10:36

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mythica (Post 36030301)
I disagree. But let's say everyone takes the same view as you, where do we stand as the lockdown would be pointless.

I wasn’t disagreeing that people shouldn’t go out, of course they shouldn’t, I am just sceptical of your direct correlation of going out in the car + breakdown recovery service = NHS overload.

People need to calm the funk down.

---------- Post added at 10:36 ---------- Previous post was at 10:32 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by peanut (Post 36030302)
Well you have people that think it's okay to drive somewhere for their exercise. So yeah I think we do need to argue certain points when there's so much stupidity about.

I live in semi-rural area, and since lockdown the road (a long country lane) that I live on has never, ever been busier. There are people walking, and cycling and driving all the time. Not people from out of town but people just from the local area out for their walk.

nomadking 04-04-2020 10:39

Re: Coronavirus
 
It's possible that for many people their local area is generally more busy, so they have to seek out slightly more remote places.

peanut 04-04-2020 10:43

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36030305)
It's possible that for many people their local area is generally more busy, so they have to seek out slightly more remote places.

You only need to be 2m apart. Just excuses mainly. Other than that, stay in and do excercies.

Mythica 04-04-2020 10:46

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36030303)
I wasn’t disagreeing that people shouldn’t go out, of course they shouldn’t, I am just sceptical of your direct correlation of going out in the car + breakdown recovery service = NHS overload.

People need to calm the funk down.

---------- Post added at 10:36 ---------- Previous post was at 10:32 ----------



I live in semi-rural area, and since lockdown the road (a long country lane) that I live on has never, ever been busier. There are people walking, and cycling and driving all the time. Not people from out of town but people just from the local area out for their walk.

So you believe people should stay in. But people aren't staying in and the more people that don't stay in, especially when they see other people doing it, the more will go out. The more that go out, the chance of spreading becomes greater. The chance that spreading becomes greater, the more chance people need hospital treatment. Also those that are involved in crashes. My argument is based on people not doing as they should. The more people that go out the greater the risk. You shouldn't be sceptical of it, it's how it spreads.

peanut 04-04-2020 10:51

Re: Coronavirus
 
If you have a garden then there's no excuse to go out for a drive to do exercise. Same with an A&E Doctor saying do not do DIY, climb ladders, or allowing kids to play on trampolines etc etc. I would say common sense but then there's always some that 'think they' know better.

Carth 04-04-2020 10:57

Re: Coronavirus
 
I'll be mowing the front & rear lawns today, that's probably way too much exercise for a bloke in my condition*







* one or a few large Brandies last night :D

Pierre 04-04-2020 11:36

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by peanut (Post 36030308)
If you have a garden then there's no excuse to go out for a drive to do exercise. Same with an A&E Doctor saying do not do DIY, climb ladders, or allowing kids to play on trampolines etc etc. I would say common sense but then there's always some that 'think they' know better.

Don’t do DIY?

Do you know how many husbands that are in receipt of a jobs list as long their arm?

Myself included.

pip08456 04-04-2020 11:48

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36030322)
Don’t do DIY?

Do you know how many husbands that are in receipt of a jobs list as long their arm?

Myself included.

Now you have the perfect excuse.

mrmistoffelees 04-04-2020 11:53

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36030288)
A car battery should last around a couple of months, potentially longer, before dying, if not used.

---------- Post added at 09:07 ---------- Previous post was at 09:05 ----------



As hypotheses go, it’s thin.

Modern car batteries can go flat in as little as two weeks. Stop start batteries are the worst affected

1andrew1 04-04-2020 11:56

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36030309)
I'll be mowing the front & rear lawns today, that's probably way too much exercise for a bloke in my condition*

* one or a few large Brandies last night :D

Lol, hope you got back home last night ok. :D

Carth 04-04-2020 12:14

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36030330)
Lol, hope you got back home last night ok. :D


Woke up in my own bed . . . a vast improvement over the strange hedges I woke under during my youth ;)

denphone 04-04-2020 12:19

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36030336)
Woke up in my own bed . . . a vast improvement over the strange hedges I woke under during my youth ;)

l won't ask how you ended up there as the mind boggles.:D

Hugh 04-04-2020 12:20

Re: Coronavirus
 
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36030336)
Woke up in my own bed . . . a vast improvement over the strange hedges I woke under during my youth ;)

Like these?

Carth 04-04-2020 12:35

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quite possibly Hugh, although my view was from the ground upwards, with a hangover, . . . and the rustle of multi-legged 'things' exploring this strange body laid comatose in their domain :shocked:

Pierre 04-04-2020 13:01

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36030328)
Modern car batteries can go flat in as little as two weeks. Stop start batteries are the worst affected

Can but rare, I’ve never come back from 2weeks holiday to a flat battery, and I doubt that many do.

If it’s a worry take it for a spin around the block every few days.

Chris 04-04-2020 14:15

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36030294)
Is there ANYTHING CF members WON'T argu...debate about?

17 years and 2.5 million posts. So, no. :D

denphone 04-04-2020 14:17

Re: Coronavirus
 
On a more serious note it looks like we are about a week away from hitting the peak of the curve and these figures might suggest that.

https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status...22545840119810

Hugh 04-04-2020 14:26

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36030378)
17 years and 2.5 million posts. So, no. :D

I disagree... ;)

mrmistoffelees 04-04-2020 14:27

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36030366)
Can but rare, I’ve never come back from 2weeks holiday to a flat battery, and I doubt that many do.

If it’s a worry take it for a spin around the block every few days.

Two weeks I would agree in some cases, but this is likely to go on for I would of thought for at least another three weeks. A spin around the block is not likely to do much good and could possibly deplete the battery further. Then you have (if driving a diesel) the DPF etc to consider also

jfman 04-04-2020 15:15

Re: Coronavirus
 
Some interesting analysis by the Economist (of all places!) looking at the excess deaths in Spain and Italy against the long term trend of expected deaths. These are far in excess of the given Coronavirus figures (and obviously it captures deaths where they don’t have it, for example a car crash could have fatalities as a result of no ICU beds or where treatment isn’t available for usually treatable conditions).

However, what would be interesting to see is if someone followed the trends after Coronavirus - would the “they would probably have died anyway/underlying health condition” line stack up in which case we would see a decrease in deaths for around 12 months. Or would it simply be a line that politicians have trotted out that became disproven over time by statistics.

Sephiroth 04-04-2020 17:03

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36030391)
Some interesting analysis by the Economist (of all places!) looking at the excess deaths in Spain and Italy against the long term trend of expected deaths. These are far in excess of the given Coronavirus figures (and obviously it captures deaths where they don’t have it, for example a car crash could have fatalities as a result of no ICU beds or where treatment isn’t available for usually treatable conditions).

However, what would be interesting to see is if someone followed the trends after Coronavirus - would the “they would probably have died anyway/underlying health condition” line stack up in which case we would see a decrease in deaths for around 12 months. Or would it simply be a line that politicians have trotted out that became disproven over time by statistics.

A good question. Is it possible, though, that the politicians are being more careful this time with their "follow the science" mantra, leaving the statistics to the professionals? Vide the daily briefings.

Hugh 04-04-2020 22:18

Re: Coronavirus
 
https://www.businessinsider.com.au/b...navirus-2020-4

Quote:

Bill Gates is funding new factories for 7 potential coronavirus vaccines, even though it will waste billions of dollars

On Thursday’s episode of “The Daily Show,” the Microsoft billionaire told the host Trevor Noah that his philanthropic organisation, the Gates Foundation, could mobilize faster than governments to fight the coronavirus outbreak.

“Because our foundation has such deep expertise in infectious diseases, we’ve thought about the epidemic, we did fund some things to be more prepared, like a vaccine effort,” Gates said. “Our early money can accelerate things.”

Gates said he was picking the top seven vaccine candidates and building manufacturing capacity for them. “Even though we’ll end up picking at most two of them, we’re going to fund factories for all seven, just so that we don’t waste time in serially saying, ‘OK, which vaccine works?’ and then building the factory,” he said.

Gates said that simultaneously testing and building manufacturing capacity is essential to the quick development of a vaccine, which Gates thinks could take about 18 months.

adzii_nufc 05-04-2020 07:46

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36030383)
Two weeks I would agree in some cases, but this is likely to go on for I would of thought for at least another three weeks. A spin around the block is not likely to do much good and could possibly deplete the battery further. Then you have (if driving a diesel) the DPF etc to consider also

Shunt fuse if it has one (prominent on french cars, any vehicle with a BSI supplied by PSA Group). Doesn't need changed back until needed for full time use. It'll just keep resetting the dash and won't open with the fob after it shuts down. Depending on country or origin. Park/Parc. The current fuse position would be in client mode.

Alternatively - Dealer mode/shutdown/transport is activated via software in the dash in newer model cars. Manufacturers have steps dotted about for models.

Then there's ones of course that are completely unusable without a proprietary tool/software

Angua 05-04-2020 08:30

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36030391)
Some interesting analysis by the Economist (of all places!) looking at the excess deaths in Spain and Italy against the long term trend of expected deaths. These are far in excess of the given Coronavirus figures (and obviously it captures deaths where they don’t have it, for example a car crash could have fatalities as a result of no ICU beds or where treatment isn’t available for usually treatable conditions).

However, what would be interesting to see is if someone followed the trends after Coronavirus - would the “they would probably have died anyway/underlying health condition” line stack up in which case we would see a decrease in deaths for around 12 months. Or would it simply be a line that politicians have trotted out that became disproven over time by statistics.

Surely deaths from not getting chemotherapy (and similar) in time will go up. These don't rely on ICU beds.

jfman 05-04-2020 09:44

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by downquark1 (Post 36029994)
To combat the virus Boris has rightly or wrongly introduced what is pretty much a temporary communist system. The type of conservative that reads the telegraph is not going to be happy either way.

I'd predict the final fallout will depend on how badly other nations manage and how quickly the measures are removed. Sweden will be interesting.

The Swedish Government are seeking the emergency powers required to introduce a lockdown.

https://www.dw.com/en/sweden-mulls-u...ons/a-53020024

---------- Post added at 09:44 ---------- Previous post was at 09:43 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angua (Post 36030455)
Surely deaths from not getting chemotherapy (and similar) in time will go up. These don't rely on ICU beds.

Yes, as hospitals become overwhelmed with the Covid-19 response this will undoubtedly impact other treatments and wider mortality rates.

denphone 05-04-2020 10:00

Re: Coronavirus
 
Nothing like ignoring your own governments advice it seems..

https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/new...edic-covid-19/

https://www.itv.com/news/2020-04-04/...g-second-home/

Sephiroth 05-04-2020 10:13

Re: Coronavirus
 
My thanks to jfman for introducing an article on the Deutsche Welle web site.

In my case the article of interest is: https://www.dw.com/en/eus-von-der-le...ope/a-53021106

Marshall plan for Europe!

A quote from DW: "The many billions that have to be invested today to avert a greater catastrophe will bind the generations together," she [von der Leyen] wrote, calling the crisis a chance to renew the feeling of community among the nations of Europe."

This was accompanied by what the Spanish PM said (obviously in begging bowl mode): "Europe has to establish a wartime economy and put in place measures for the defense, the reconstruction and the economic recovery of Europe....".

It will be interesting to watch this being played out as Brussels tries to take control ogf the Coronavirus situation and to hold the EU together.

I think the above just about squeaks in as on topic!

EDIT: Wasn't the Marshall Plan a huge cash injection from the USA?





All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:11.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum