Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Brexit (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33707507)

1andrew1 18-04-2019 13:35

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35991609)
You’ve linked to an opinion piece that isn’t evidence based.

Exactly.

denphone 18-04-2019 13:53

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35991609)
You’ve linked to an opinion piece that isn’t evidence based.

This site will just confirm the very clear evidence of the earlier post in this thread as its a impartial and respected site.

https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk...esult-16-years

Carth 18-04-2019 15:01

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35991609)
You’ve linked to an opinion piece that isn’t evidence based.

been happening since the very first 'Brexit' thread on here . . . it's all been 99% whataboutery from both sides :rolleyes:

Chris 18-04-2019 15:14

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35991605)
And in elections that matter:

Westminster Voting Intention

LAB: 33% (+1)
CON: 23% (-9)
BXP: 14% (+14)

Via @ComRes,
Changes w/ 5-7 Apr.

Lowest CON vote share in a WM VI poll since 1997...

I totally agree that in category terms, Westminster is “elections that matter” and Strasbourg is ... well, not. Kind of surprised to see you admitting it though. :D

However, there isn’t going to be a Westminster general election until 2022 unless the Tories think they can win one and Labour agrees to dissolve Parliament. There is however going to be a Strasbourg election in May, which is as close as we are going to get to a second referendum on Brexit. Given everything that has happened in our politics this year, I’d say these Euro-elections warrant a one-off, guest appearance in the “elections that matter” category ...

Angua 18-04-2019 16:22

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35991618)
I totally agree that in category terms, Westminster is “elections that matter” and Strasbourg is ... well, not. Kind of surprised to see you admitting it though. :D

However, there isn’t going to be a Westminster general election until 2022 unless the Tories think they can win one and Labour agrees to dissolve Parliament. There is however going to be a Strasbourg election in May, which is as close as we are going to get to a second referendum on Brexit. Given everything that has happened in our politics this year, I’d say these Euro-elections warrant a one-off, guest appearance in the “elections that matter” category ...

People tend to forget the amount of influence the leaders of the 28 nations have when it comes to EU direction of travel.

1andrew1 18-04-2019 18:38

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35991618)
I totally agree that in category terms, Westminster is “elections that matter” and Strasbourg is ... well, not. Kind of surprised to see you admitting it though. :D

However, there isn’t going to be a Westminster general election until 2022 unless the Tories think they can win one and Labour agrees to dissolve Parliament. There is however going to be a Strasbourg election in May, which is as close as we are going to get to a second referendum on Brexit. Given everything that has happened in our politics this year, I’d say these Euro-elections warrant a one-off, guest appearance in the “elections that matter” category ...

I think it's all about the pressure a strong vote for the Brexit Party in the Euros will apply to the current Government.

OLD BOY 18-04-2019 19:49

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35991607)
Looking at that there is plummeting support for the Conservatives which is not surprising given the omnishambles we have witnessed and rising support for the Brexit party while Labour have lost some support to the Brexit party but not as much as the Conservatives have.

Yes, well it wouldn't have been an omnishambles had Labour honoured its manifesto commitment and voted either for the deal or 'no deal'. Instead, they've just played games and tried to trip up the government at every turn.

---------- Post added at 19:27 ---------- Previous post was at 19:16 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35991610)
Where did I say that, this them and us irrationality is clouding your actual vision now as well as your judgement, what I actually said is none of the liars should get away with it and all should be held to account regardless of whose side they're on, basically for the hard of thinking two wrongs don't make a right

I know, it is not appropriate that either side should tell bare faced lies, but my earlier post was added to counter Hugh's list of 'leavers' lies' and your comment that I am not interested in balance. Yet that is exactly what I was attempting to do!

But time and time again, remainers say that Brexiteers did not know what they were voting for, and every time they retort 'But we DID know what we were voting for!'. The confusion really does seem to be predominently on the remainer side, and given that they voted remain anyway, the lies that are being complained about had no practical effect other than making the remainers even more entrenched in their views. Whereas, in the main, Brexiteers are completely unmoved.

---------- Post added at 19:31 ---------- Previous post was at 19:27 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35991613)
Old Boy and his “unbiased” Brexit Central link.

And because it is a link from Brexit Central, it is automatically discredited. Maybe you should actually concentrate and respond to the information contained therein!

But of course, you can't, can you?

Just to repeat, my post was to draw attention to the lies told by the remainers to counter Hugh's list of lies told by the brexiteers.

Touche.

---------- Post added at 19:45 ---------- Previous post was at 19:31 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35991615)
This site will just confirm the very clear evidence of the earlier post in this thread as its a impartial and respected site.

https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk...esult-16-years

Although the poll draws attention to the disillusionment of Conservative voters due to Brexit not having been achieved on time, it should not be forgotten that the Brexit Party will also have a severe impact on Labour. The Brexit debate has split both major parties to such a degree that they need to agree between them a way of delivering a proper Brexit without further delay. Time for Corbyn to show some guts and recognise reality. Insisting on the Customs Union will not cut the mustard because it takes away our ability to have our own trade policy on goods and services, which is the only way we can prosper when we leave.

---------- Post added at 19:47 ---------- Previous post was at 19:45 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angua (Post 35991619)
People tend to forget the amount of influence the leaders of the 28 nations have when it comes to EU direction of travel.

It's the EU bureaucracy that put forward the legislation to be voted on, not the member states or MEPs. That is not true democracy, I'm sorry to tell you.

---------- Post added at 19:49 ---------- Previous post was at 19:47 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35991629)
I think it's all about the pressure a strong vote for the Brexit Party in the Euros will apply to the current Government.

When Corbyn finally realises the support for the Brexit Party is also coming from many of his own supporters, he will suddenly realise that a second referendum is superfluous.

Pierre 18-04-2019 20:33

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35991544)
But the arguments you made ‘informed choices" on were sub-optimal interpretations of actuality (lies).

Christ this is tiresome, how many times do we have to go over this. Citations for your quotes would have helped although I do recognise most of them.

Quote:

“The day after we vote to leave, we hold all the cards and we can choose the path we want.”
we could, still can, choose whatever path we want if we had a government and Parliament that backed the nation. The fact we have neither doesn’t invalidate the statement.

Quote:

We were told we would replicate, or improve, all the Trade Deals the E.U. has

“The free trade agreement we will have to do should be one of the easiest in human history,”
It probably would be, but we won’t know until we leave, we haven’t left yet and therefore have not even got to the stage of negotiating an FTA.

Quote:

“There will continue to be free trade and access to the single market”
an FTA would give us access to th Single Market but see above.

Quote:

"Post Brexit a UK-German deal would include free access for their cars and industrial goods, in exchange for a deal on everything else"
Well there wouldn’t be a UK-German deal, The would be a UK-EU deal

Quote:

David Davis, said that Britain would negotiate individual trade deals with other EU countries. EU member states cannot negotiate individual trade deals with outside countries and instead do so as a bloc of 28.
I’d need a citation for this as David Davies knows how the EU works I’d be very surprised if he said that.

Dave42 18-04-2019 20:40

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35991649)
Christ this is tiresome, how many times do we have to go over this. Citations for your quotes would have helped although I do recognise most of them.

we could, still can, choose whatever path we want if we had a government and Parliament that backed the nation. The fact we have neither doesn’t invalidate the statement.



It probably would be, but we won’t know until we leave, we haven’t left yet and therefore have not even got to the stage of negotiating an FTA.

an FTA would give us access to th Single Market but see above.



Well there wouldn’t be a UK-German deal, The would be a UK-EU deal


I’d need a citation for this as David Davies knows how the EU works I’d be very surprised if he said that.

wrong again he has no idea how it worked


David Davis

Verified account

@DavidDavisMP
Follow
Follow @DavidDavisMP

More
The first calling point of the UK's negotiator immediately after #Brexit will not be Brussels, it will be Berlin, to strike a deal

10:50 AM - 26 May 2016

Hugh 18-04-2019 20:55

Re: Brexit
 
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35991649)
Christ this is tiresome, how many times do we have to go over this. Citations for your quotes would have helped although I do recognise most of them.

we could, still can, choose whatever path we want if we had a government and Parliament that backed the nation. The fact we have neither doesn’t invalidate the statement.



It probably would be, but we won’t know until we leave, we haven’t left yet and therefore have not even got to the stage of negotiating an FTA.

an FTA would give us access to th Single Market but see above.



Well there wouldn’t be a UK-German deal, The would be a UK-EU deal
H - see attachment where David Davis stated it would be a U.K.-Germany deal


I’d need a citation for this as David Davies knows how the EU works I’d be very surprised if he said that.

H - see second attachment and be surprised...


1andrew1 18-04-2019 21:44

Re: Brexit
 
David Davis is certainly one famous leaver who didn't know what he was voting for!

Mick 18-04-2019 22:02

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35991652)
...

All irrelevant. Davis is no longer Brexit secretary and Brexit has not occurred yet. You (And others) really need to stop this petty arguing all the time Hugh, and this constant "I have prove they're wrong" via a google search mentality, getting sick of it to be frank. :rolleyes:

In other news - I'm pondering that we should have a nice break from all this repetitive Groundhog day nonsense, day in, day out, that goes on in this thread and I will be closing this thread at some point, probably after midnight tonight, until Tuesday morning, so we can have a nice Easter break from Brexit chatter. The weather is going to be lovely. :Sun:

jfman 18-04-2019 22:49

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35991657)
All irrelevant. Davis is no longer Brexit secretary and Brexit has not occurred yet. You (And others) really need to stop this petty arguing all the time Hugh, and this constant "I have prove they're wrong" via a google search mentality, getting sick of it to be frank. :rolleyes:

In other news - I'm pondering that we should have a nice break from all this repetitive Groundhog day nonsense, day in, day out, that goes on in this thread and I will be closing this thread at some point, probably after midnight tonight, until Tuesday morning, so we can have a nice Easter break from Brexit chatter. The weather is going to be lovely. :Sun:

And let me be the first to wish you, and everyone on the thread, a Happy Easter. The world won’t move on between now and then, bar some opinion pieces. I’m sure we will equally disagree next week anyway!

Pierre 18-04-2019 23:06

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 35991650)
wrong again he has no idea how it worked


David Davis

Verified account

@DavidDavisMP
Follow
Follow @DavidDavisMP

More
The first calling point of the UK's negotiator immediately after #Brexit will not be Brussels, it will be Berlin, to strike a deal

10:50 AM - 26 May 2016

FFS just rhetoric.

---------- Post added at 23:04 ---------- Previous post was at 22:50 ----------

Fair enough, can’t argue with that.

but I didn’t see any of those tweets as i’m Not on Twitter ( and it would seem I knew more about the rules of Brexit than the Brexit secretary) I also don’t recall hearing any of that that from him on mainstream media so I don’t know how much that would have influenced the great unwashed ignorant swath of the population who were duped into voting leave.

---------- Post added at 23:05 ---------- Previous post was at 23:04 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35991655)
David Davis is certainly one famous leaver who didn't know what he was voting for!

Looks that way.

---------- Post added at 23:06 ---------- Previous post was at 23:05 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35991657)
All irrelevant. Davis is no longer Brexit secretary and Brexit has not occurred yet. You (And others) really need to stop this petty arguing all the time Hugh, and this constant "I have prove they're wrong" via a google search mentality, getting sick of it to be frank. :rolleyes:

In other news - I'm pondering that we should have a nice break from all this repetitive Groundhog day nonsense, day in, day out, that goes on in this thread and I will be closing this thread at some point, probably after midnight tonight, until Tuesday morning, so we can have a nice Easter break from Brexit chatter. The weather is going to be lovely. :Sun:

I’ll vote for that.

Might as well close it until October 30th as sod all will change between now and then.

Mick 23-04-2019 00:46

Re: Brexit
 
After a bit of a break-Thread Re-Opened. As we were....

Damien 23-04-2019 05:29

Re: Brexit
 
Aww but it was so peaceful....:D

Hugh 23-04-2019 07:48

Re: Brexit
 
https://news.sky.com/story/technolog...ument-11696337

Quote:

Technological solution to Irish border issue could be a decade away, says Home Office document

A Home Office presentation says a solution which would keep the border open without checkpoints is a distant prospect.

The possibility of a technological solution to the Brexit Northern Ireland border issue could be more than a decade away, according to a Home Office document seen by Sky News.

A presentation drawn up by the Home Secretary's Policy Unit and sent to HMRC and the Treasury implies that they think a technological solution - which would aim to keep the Irish border entirely open and without physical checkpoints - is a distant (and likely very expensive) prospect.

The authors state that the technology would likely not be ready to be deployed in the UK until 2030...

...The report does come up with a solution, albeit a highly complicated one.

It involves companies uploading data into a digital portal, using new blockchain technology, sensors and "Internet of things technology" along the route, "machine learning" and automated revenue collection.

"If all these technologies are brought together this could allow a seamless collection and analysis of the data needed," the presentation says. "It would also provide the ability to target interventions away from the border itself."

However, the presentation's authors acknowledge that the practical execution of such technology would be far from seamless.

They say that "no government worldwide currently controls different customs arrangements with no physical infrastructure at the border."

They believe that "technology does already exist that could be used at the border to the desired effect" but also highlights five grave practical problems in terms of actually deploying it. They are:

:: The system "must operate with 28 government agencies and a myriad of interconnected existing and planned IT systems".
:: "There is currently no budget for either a pilot or the programme itself. And it will be expensive."
:: "The suite of technology would need to operate on both sides of the border, as such it would require agreement and commitment from Northern Ireland, the Republic of Ireland and the EU too."
:: "It is a big and complex project, with possibly tight deadlines. Government does not have the strongest track record on delivery of large tech projects."
:: And crucially - "Current realisation for a similar technological solution in the UK is 2030."

Damien 23-04-2019 08:10

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

It involves companies uploading data into a digital portal, using new blockchain technology, sensors and "Internet of things technology" along the route, "machine learning" and automated revenue collection.
Buzzword bingo!

Hugh 23-04-2019 09:16

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35991921)
Buzzword bingo!

Beware of geeks sharing lifts... ;)

nomadking 23-04-2019 09:20

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35991920)

How on earth do we or anybody else, currently manage imports from other countries without all that? Yet another Remain tactic. Any procedures set in place would also have to be in place in the rest of the EU AND possibly any other country that has a customs union with the EU.

Hugh 23-04-2019 09:21

Re: Brexit
 
4 Attachment(s)
Here’s the (very) high level slide pack...

Hugh 23-04-2019 09:22

Re: Brexit
 
2 Attachment(s)
Last two.

Carth 23-04-2019 09:40

Re: Brexit
 
Looks like a massive money 'sink hole' to me, simply to check goods going in/out on the border between North/South.

Sephiroth 23-04-2019 09:56

Re: Brexit
 
Seems to me that if we go down that route, we should start straight away with a target of 10 years to leave a Customs Union.

I fully understand how complex this will be and that 10 years might be overshot. The system would have to be capable of adapting to new rules that might come out from time to time.

If the EU wants to be difficult, it could easily thwart this on the basis of who pays, who does it and being 'scared' of the complexities.

You could come at it from a reverse direction. Leave with No Deal; collect all the Customs use cases that ensue and design the initial system (for 10 years on!) accordingly.

All depends, of course, on EU cooperation and their behaviour to date suggests further difficulties.

So the choices are, it's Remain or Leave with no deal. As you know, I don't care whether or not we remain (I prefer to leave), but if we do remain, we must keep prodding them with our picador sticks.


Gavin78 23-04-2019 10:11

Re: Brexit
 
What do we think of the Brexit Party picking up some pace?

1andrew1 23-04-2019 12:20

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35991905)
After a bit of a break-Thread Re-Opened. As we were....

It was a great idea to have an Easter break. :tu:

---------- Post added at 12:20 ---------- Previous post was at 12:18 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 35991929)
Looks like a massive money 'sink hole' to me, simply to check goods going in/out on the border between North/South.

You've nailed Brexit for me there! ;)

denphone 23-04-2019 12:23

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35991954)
It was a great idea to have an Easter break. :tu:

Indeed it was.:tu:

Mr K 23-04-2019 15:12

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35991956)
Indeed it was.:tu:

Yes, praise the Lord for Easter, so to speak.

I'm sure he'd have been a Remainer. Peace and loving your neighbour and all that ;)

papa smurf 23-04-2019 15:36

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35992006)
Yes, praise the Lord for Easter, so to speak.

I'm sure he'd have been a Remainer. Peace and loving your neighbour and all that ;)

Could have sworn he was a rebel who went against the evil empire.

pip08456 23-04-2019 15:40

Re: Brexit
 
Can it be locked again until parliament an at least come up with an idea. It will remain the merry-go-round until then.

Hugh 23-04-2019 16:01

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35992007)
Could have sworn he was a rebel who went against the evil empire.



Quote:

All right... all right... but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, the education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, the freshwater system and public health... what have the Romans done for us?

Brought peace?
And actually the Romans deposed Herod because of his cruelty, and it was better after they imposed direct rule...

Pierre 23-04-2019 16:06

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35992013)




And actually the Romans deposed Herod because of his cruelty, and it was better after they imposed direct rule...

The Nazis were fantastic Engineers too.

ianch99 23-04-2019 17:35

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35992006)
Yes, praise the Lord for Easter, so to speak.

I'm sure he'd have been a Remainer. Peace and loving your neighbour and all that ;)

and a Socialist :)

Quote:

"I tell you the truth, it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God."

The saying was a response to a young rich man who had asked Jesus what he needed to do in order to inherit eternal life. Jesus replied that he should keep the commandments, to which the man stated he had done. Jesus responded, "If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me." The young man became sad and was unwilling to do this. Jesus then spoke this response, leaving his disciples astonished.

pip08456 23-04-2019 17:39

Re: Brexit
 
And in the next fairy tale...

Maggy 23-04-2019 17:42

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35992031)
And in the next fairy tale...

But it's a good one..

pip08456 23-04-2019 17:55

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35992032)
But it's a good one..

Nah, only a fool would believe it.

OLD BOY 23-04-2019 18:40

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 35992029)

Quote:

"I tell you the truth, it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God."

The saying was a response to a young rich man who had asked Jesus what he needed to do in order to inherit eternal life. Jesus replied that he should keep the commandments, to which the man stated he had done. Jesus responded, "If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me." The young man became sad and was unwilling to do this. Jesus then spoke this response, leaving his disciples astonished.

One of many mistakes and misinterpretations in the Bible. The word 'camel' is actually a mis-translation of 'rope', which makes you wonder how many other mistakes were made, given how obvious this mistake should have been to the translators.And it has been re-translated on a number of occasions.

It should also be borne in mind that the Bible is not a contemporaneous work. The writing of it took place some generations later, after being passed down from fathers to sons over those generations, with no doubt an unimaginable amount of magic and thrills embroidered into the stories to entertain the children.

Believe it if you like, but it was written by man. So is 'The Sun' by the way, and I take what I read in there with a pinch of salt as well!

So don't expect me to be impressed by your divine references!. :D

---------- Post added at 18:40 ---------- Previous post was at 18:33 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35991565)
Not only were such choices based on lies such as those you list above, but the agenda was also supported by faked film clips.


https://www.channel4.com/news/reveal...igrant-footage

Well, my point of view on Brexit has not changed. Show me where there exists a pool of Brexit supporters who feel they were misled and would have voted differently. This silly argument does not hold up. We've had the promise, we've had the vote. Now it's time to implement.

Mick 23-04-2019 19:16

Re: Brexit
 
Oops - Change UK - The Independent Group, launched it's European Elections campaign today, along with it's MEP Candidates, they say they are standing on the commitment to change British politics, yet within hours was already suffering it's first resignation due to one of it's candidates saying he wants Brexit if it stops Romanian pickpockets.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-a8882876.html

OLD BOY 23-04-2019 20:14

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35992052)
Oops - Change UK - The Independent Group, launched it's European Elections campaign today, along with it's MEP Candidates, they say they are standing on the commitment to change British politics, yet within hours was already suffering it's first resignation due to one of it's candidates saying he wants Brexit if it stops Romanian pickpockets.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-a8882876.html

This is what I meant by confused remainers! :D

Sephiroth 23-04-2019 20:25

Re: Brexit
 
Camel or rope - hardly material. But Jesus didn't do too well, did he?

However, Leave means Leave.

TheDaddy 23-04-2019 22:24

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35992036)
Nah, only a fool would believe it.

Yeah turn the other cheek and love for your neighbour have no place in the clever person's world

Chris 23-04-2019 23:08

Re: Brexit
 
Stick to the topic please.

RichardCoulter 24-04-2019 11:04

Re: Brexit
 
Anne Widdecombe has resigned from the Tory party to join and stand as a candidate for Farrages party, citing that the way Brexit has been handled has made us a laughing stock.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-48034732

Never thought i'd see her defect.

Mr K 24-04-2019 11:47

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 35992086)
Anne Widdecombe has resigned from the Tory party to join and stand as a candidate for Farrages party, citing that the way Brexit has been handled has made us a laughing stock.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-48034732

Never thought i'd see her defect.

Well she defected from C of E to RC, so she's got form as a troublemaker ;)

Chris 24-04-2019 12:04

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35992093)
Well she defected from C of E to RC, so she's got form as a troublemaker ;)

On the contrary, it shows she is truly a religious/social/political conservative. It is perceived social liberalism in the C of E that has resulted in a number of defections to Rome, and it is the Conservative PM's failure to deliver on a referendum called as a result of Conservative policy and whose outcome clearly still enjoys very widespread support amongst Conservative voters (as well as others) that has caused her to jump ship now.

A phrase I often hear grassroots Tories recite at times like this is 'I never left the party, the party left me'.

On the other hand, doing Strictly and Big Brother ... they show off her form as a troublemaker. :D

Mr K 24-04-2019 12:14

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35992099)
On the contrary, it shows she is truly a religious/social/political conservative. It is perceived social liberalism in the C of E that has resulted in a number of defections to Rome, and it is the Conservative PM's failure to deliver on a referendum called as a result of Conservative policy and whose outcome clearly still enjoys very widespread support amongst Conservative voters (as well as others) that has caused her to jump ship now.

A phrase I often hear grassroots Tories recite at times like this is 'I never left the party, the party left me'.

On the other hand, doing Strictly and Big Brother ... they show off her form as a troublemaker. :D

Yes probably why Tony Blair went RC too !

I can see why the Archbishop of Canterbury going on about poverty and food banks, has upset some Conservatives. They'll have women priests and treat them as equals next !

OLD BOY 24-04-2019 13:19

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35992093)
Well she defected from C of E to RC, so she's got form as a troublemaker ;)

It shows that she can think for herself rather than mindlessly following the crowd.

Mr K 24-04-2019 21:01

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 35992107)
It shows that she can think for herself rather than mindlessly following the crowd.

Isn't that exactly what she has done?

Mick 24-04-2019 21:23

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35992147)
Isn't that exactly what she has done?

No.

And whoever keeps bringing religion on to this topic. - Pack it in!!! :dozey:

Sephiroth 26-04-2019 10:30

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35992065)
Yeah turn the other cheek and love for your neighbour have no place in the clever person's world

Seems highly relevant to Brexit.

May was/is not a clever person yet she did just that and let the EU crap all over her.

The clever person would have told the EU when this stuff (A50) started that we were leaving in two years and invited the EU’s proposals. We would have used the 2 years for No Deal preparations and the Backstop would not have been able to be proposed by the EU.

Maybe it did have something to do with TM’s religious beliefs!

nomadking 26-04-2019 10:45

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35992303)
Seems highly relevant to Brexit.

May was/is not a clever person yet she did just that and let the EU crap all over her.

The clever person would have told the EU when this stuff (A50) started that we were leaving in two years and invited the EU’s proposals. We would have used the 2 years for No Deal preparations and the Backstop would not have been able to be proposed by the EU.

Maybe it did have something to do with TM’s religious beliefs!

May is just completely inept. Even outside of Brexit-related issues, what has she got right?

denphone 26-04-2019 10:50

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35992308)
May is just completely inept. Even outside of Brexit-related issues, what has she got right?

A pretty spot on analysis..

Sephiroth 26-04-2019 10:56

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35992308)
May is just completely inept. Even outside of Brexit-related issues, what has she got right?

She knows my first name!

Mr K 26-04-2019 11:10

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35992311)
She knows my first name!

I suspect you're Norman Tebbit in disguise. A very perfidious, hegemonic bloke ;)

Dave42 26-04-2019 12:40

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35992303)
Seems highly relevant to Brexit.

May was/is not a clever person yet she did just that and let the EU crap all over her.

The clever person would have told the EU when this stuff (A50) started that we were leaving in two years and invited the EU’s proposals. We would have used the 2 years for No Deal preparations and the Backstop would not have been able to be proposed by the EU.

Maybe it did have something to do with TM’s religious beliefs!

you know know the backstop was a uk proposal right and a no deal breaks the good Friday agreement and US have warned if that broke no trade deal

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.dad515e4d187

nomadking 26-04-2019 12:44

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 35992324)
you know know the backstop was a uk proposal right and a no deal breaks the good Friday agreement and US have warned if that broke no trade deal

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.dad515e4d187

Link

Quote:

An agreement on the backstop is important because the EU won't agree to a transitional period and substantive trade talks until it is in place.

...
The EU originally proposed a backstop that would mean Northern Ireland staying in the EU customs union, large parts of the single market and the EU VAT system.
Its chief negotiator, Michel Barnier, continually emphasised that this backstop could only apply to Northern Ireland.


The real sticking point is the "to apply unless and until an alternative arrangement implementing another scenario is agreed,", which means we are held hostage by the EU. How inept can you get?

Dave42 26-04-2019 13:04

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35992325)
Link




The real sticking point is the "to apply unless and until an alternative arrangement implementing another scenario is agreed,", which means we are held hostage by the EU. How inept can you get?

that's the problem no one has any workable idea yet for alternative arrangement the biggest problem with Brexit always has been and still is the Ireland border

Mick 26-04-2019 13:32

Re: Brexit
 
The Ireland border is just a pathetic scapegoat for Remainers to use.

No-one wants a hard border, no-ones going to build one, not Ireland, not Northern Ireland, not the EU, not the UK. See - how easy was that ? :rolleyes:

Hugh 26-04-2019 13:36

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35992327)
The Ireland border is just a pathetic scapegoat for Remainers to use.

No-one wants a hard border, no-ones going to build one, not Ireland, not Northern Ireland, not the EU, not the UK. See - how easy was that ? :rolleyes:

What about the imports and exports, with phylosanitary certificates and potential future taxation and H&S differences?

How will they be checked?

nomadking 26-04-2019 13:42

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35992330)
What about the imports and exports, with phylosanitary certificates and potential future taxation and H&S differences?

How will they be checked?

You mean like horse meat coming from Romania and Ireland?

Dave42 26-04-2019 13:48

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35992327)
The Ireland border is just a pathetic scapegoat for Remainers to use.

No-one wants a hard border, no-ones going to build one, not Ireland, not Northern Ireland, not the EU, not the UK. See - how easy was that ? :rolleyes:

we be out by now if Ireland border was solved and easy it aint easy that's why we still in at moment

Mick 26-04-2019 13:50

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 35992332)
we be out by now if Ireland border was solved and easy it aint easy that's why we still in at moment

Wrong as usual - we are still in, because of the worst Parliament since Oliver Cromwell, worst PM since Anthony Eden and a pathetic, set of self serving fools, majority of them AKA MPs.

Sephiroth 26-04-2019 13:52

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35992330)
What about the imports and exports, with phylosanitary certificates and potential future taxation and H&S differences?

How will they be checked?

By the same token, you'd rather we remain in the EU under their cosh and jurisdiction?

jonbxx 26-04-2019 15:02

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35992333)
Wrong as usual - we are still in, because of the worst Parliament since Oliver Cromwell, worst PM since Anthony Eden and a pathetic, set of self serving fools, majority of them AKA MPs.

Is it fair to presume that at the last general election, like the referendum, people knew exactly what they were voting for? If yes, then the general population must be culpable at least to some extent as the current government is only in place due to the will of the people?

Sephiroth 26-04-2019 15:27

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 35992338)
Is it fair to presume that at the last general election, like the referendum, people knew exactly what they were voting for? If yes, then the general population must be culpable at least to some extent as the current government is only in place due to the will of the people?

There's a certain irony to what you've written.

I can see where you're coming from and it's a worthwhile point. As I understand you, if the Leavers are saying that their Referendum voters knew what they were voting for the same is true of voters when voting at the General Election.

In this comparison, however, there are different forces.

The Referendum was a binary question.

The election was a different kind of question with different boundaries.

What they both had in common after the event was that the electorate didn't expect the guvmin to screw up so miserably on both fronts.

ianch99 26-04-2019 19:00

Re: Brexit
 
It is depressing when Sinn Fein have more principles and honesty than the Brexit/UKIP political entity. Putting yourself forward in an democratic election as self-avowed fifth columnists is just gutter politics.

Here's the Code of Conduct for Members of the European Parliament

Quote:

Members shall act solely in the public interest and conduct their work with disinterest, integrity, openness, diligence, honesty, accountability and respect for the European Parliament's reputation.
Mr Farage and his cohorts to a tee!

I wouldn't be surprised if, before long, Farage will deploys his fascist scare tactics in the upcoming EU elections.

Sephiroth 26-04-2019 19:20

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 35992358)
<SNIP>



Mr Farage and his cohorts to a tee!

I wouldn't be surprised if, before long, Farage will deploys his fascist scare tactics in the upcoming EU elections.

[You shouldn't brand Farage as "fascist" unless you can prove it. And I mean, prove it.

Can you even define "Fascism"? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism

Hugh 26-04-2019 19:22

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35992334)
By the same token, you'd rather we remain in the EU under their cosh and jurisdiction?

By the same token, I’d rather be part of a larger organisation of states working together to improve the quality of life of its citizens and economies of the participants countries, using its greater economic and political heft.

nomadking 26-04-2019 19:48

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35992361)
By the same token, I’d rather be part of a larger organisation of states working together to improve the quality of life of its citizens and economies of the participants countries, using its greater economic and political heft.

The likes of Romania are never, no matter how much money you give them, going to match Germany.


All Germany seems to do is want to IMPOSE on everybody else, the burdens it imposes upon itself. All in the name of a "level playing field". An EU country is not allowed to have different policies that might be beneficial to it.

gba93 26-04-2019 19:49

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35992361)
By the same token, I’d rather be part of a larger organisation of states working together to improve the quality of life of its citizens and economies of the participants countries, using its greater economic and political heft.

If only that were true - back in the day we joined the EEC which was an economic community designed to achieve what you have described - unfortunately it became more political, less representative, more invasive and developed into a massive gravy train which is not what a lot of people who originally voted IN wanted hence the majority of the current NO voters are of the older generation. So it appears that there are many people who do not want to "remain in the EU under their cosh and jurisdiction" because that is what they see happening.

Damien 26-04-2019 19:57

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35992333)
Wrong as usual - we are still in, because of the worst Parliament since Oliver Cromwell, worst PM since Anthony Eden and a pathetic, set of self serving fools, majority of them AKA MPs.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35992334)
By the same token, you'd rather we remain in the EU under their cosh and jurisdiction?

So how will we have customs checks without any border infrastructure?

Mr K 26-04-2019 20:07

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35992374)
So how will we have customs checks without any border infrastructure?

We'll just give Ireland back to the Irish, sorted. Stuff the DUP.
https://g.co/kgs/W7cuQt

Sephiroth 26-04-2019 20:31

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35992361)
By the same token, I’d rather be part of a larger organisation of states working together to improve the quality of life of its citizens and economies of the participants countries, using its greater economic and political heft.

… and that is the ballot paper divide.


---------- Post added at 20:30 ---------- Previous post was at 20:29 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35992370)
The likes of Romania are never, no matter how much money you give them, going to match Germany.


All Germany seems to do is want to IMPOSE on everybody else, the burdens it imposes upon itself. All in the name of a "level playing field". An EU country is not allowed to have different policies that might be beneficial to it.

See the CAP for details. If it doesn't suit France, it doesn't improve.

---------- Post added at 20:31 ---------- Previous post was at 20:30 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35992377)
We'll just give Ireland back to the Irish, sorted. Stuff the DUP.
https://g.co/kgs/W7cuQt

That's not too far off giving Israel "back" to the Arabs.

Pierre 26-04-2019 20:59

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35992361)
By the same token, I’d rather be part of a larger organisation of states working together to improve the quality of life of its citizens and economies of the participants countries, using its greater economic and political heft.

So would I.........do you know one?

---------- Post added at 20:52 ---------- Previous post was at 20:50 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35992377)
We'll just give Ireland back to the Irish, sorted. Stuff the DUP.
https://g.co/kgs/W7cuQt

Either very naive or very stupid

---------- Post added at 20:59 ---------- Previous post was at 20:52 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35992374)
So how will we have customs checks without any border infrastructure?

Do we have to physically inspect vehicles?

Or can what is loaded onto vehicles be logged onto a database at the loading point. ANPR can click it as passes through the border ( and at other points along the way). The contents can the be checked off again at the point of unloading.

It is not beyond the wit of man to sort this out if there was a real desire to do it.

nomadking 26-04-2019 21:03

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35992374)
So how will we have customs checks without any border infrastructure?

Everything will have already been "booked in" from our current external borders, eg container ships from China, or produced in the UK.

Damien 26-04-2019 21:05

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35992384)
Do we have to physically inspect vehicles?

Not all of them, but certainly some of them.

Quote:

Or can what is loaded onto vehicles be logged onto a database at the loading point. ANPR can click it as passes through the border ( and at other points along the way). The contents can the be checked off again at the point of unloading.
Who checks them? You can't have customs officials at every possible unloading point in the country. Do you just trust the final recipients to declare items to be taxed, items that shouldn't have made it though? The obvious place would be in the Irish Sea but that is a non-starter with the DUP and Unionists because it further diverges N.Ireland from the rest of the U.K. which is why we asked for the wider backstop.

Quote:

It is not beyond the wit of man to sort this out if there was a real desire to do it.
Plenty of people have said this but no one has an answer. People will say 'we'll just use blockchain/technology/the cloud' without elaborating or that 'it will be fine' but against without the actual answer.

---------- Post added at 20:05 ---------- Previous post was at 20:03 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35992388)
Everything will have already been "booked in" from our current external borders, eg container ships from China, or produced in the UK.

No because at the moment with the EU everything that comes into the UK from elsewhere is checked and anything from the EU is not. That's because they're checked on their entry into the EU.

We're talking about a new EU border. For most cases that's fine since we're an island so have checks at every entry point apart from one: The border on the island of Ireland.

Mick 26-04-2019 21:38

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 35992358)
It is depressing when Sinn Fein have more principles and honesty than the Brexit/UKIP political entity. Putting yourself forward in an democratic election as self-avowed fifth columnists is just gutter politics.

Here's the Code of Conduct for Members of the European Parliament



Mr Farage and his cohorts to a tee!

I wouldn't be surprised if, before long, Farage will deploys his fascist scare tactics in the upcoming EU elections.

Oh please :rolleyes: - I get sick of hearing the word "fascist" these days, so commonly and incorrectly used by people who just simply disagree with others, there is nothing Fascist what Farage has ever said - it's pathetic this typical smearing from Remainers, but as usual ignore the real issues from parties like Labour and now ChUK'ers who launched this week and at last count, has now dismissed three candidates due to their prior racist remarks.

nomadking 26-04-2019 21:44

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35992389)
Not all of them, but certainly some of them.



Who checks them? You can't have customs officials at every possible unloading point in the country. Do you just trust the final recipients to declare items to be taxed, items that shouldn't have made it though? The obvious place would be in the Irish Sea but that is a non-starter with the DUP and Unionists because it further diverges N.Ireland from the rest of the U.K. which is why we asked for the wider backstop.



Plenty of people have said this but no one has an answer. People will say 'we'll just use blockchain/technology/the cloud' without elaborating or that 'it will be fine' but against without the actual answer.

---------- Post added at 20:05 ---------- Previous post was at 20:03 ----------



No because at the moment with the EU everything that comes into the UK from elsewhere is checked and anything from the EU is not. That's because they're checked on their entry into the EU.

We're talking about a new EU border. For most cases that's fine since we're an island so have checks at every entry point apart from one: The border on the island of Ireland.

The EU is supposedly concerned about illicit goods entering the EU via NI. All goods from outside the EU and UK, will have already been checked by UK Customs.

1andrew1 26-04-2019 21:46

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 35992332)
we be out by now if Ireland border was solved and easy it aint easy that's why we still in at moment

Spot on!

Mick 26-04-2019 21:48

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 35992338)
Is it fair to presume that at the last general election, like the referendum, people knew exactly what they were voting for? If yes, then the general population must be culpable at least to some extent as the current government is only in place due to the will of the people?

Are you being serious with this rubbish?

The people instructed the government and yes, before Hugh starts barking, it was an instruction, to leave the corrupted EU, we was then met with a snap election, it is not the peoples fault if the government does not stick to their manifesto pledges.

---------- Post added at 21:48 ---------- Previous post was at 21:47 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35992399)
Spot on!

Nope, not spot on at all - you know very well we have a Remainer Parliament, we are still in because of self serving fools, who are not honouring their Manifesto pledges.

1andrew1 26-04-2019 21:56

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35992400)
Nope, not spot on at all - you know very well we have a Remainer Parliament, we are still in because of self serving fools, who are not honouring their Manifesto pledges.

The make-up of Parliament is irrelevant to the creation of the backstop. The backstop was insisted on by the Republic of Ireland - not by Theresa May, Dominic Grieve or even Amber Rudd!

Mick 26-04-2019 22:01

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35992403)
The make-up of Parliament is irrelevant to the creation of the backstop. The backstop was insisted on by the Republic of Ireland - not by Theresa May, Dominic Grieve or even Amber Rudd!

AND - This has absolutely nothing to do with why we are still in. We are still in because as I have said more than once - we have a Remainer Parliament, Remainer PM - who simply has an half-hearted effort to leave the EU.

Put a leaver in charge and we would soon depart without all this bullshit from the Remainer saboteurs.

1andrew1 26-04-2019 22:06

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35992400)
Are you being serious with this rubbish?

The people instructed the government and yes, before Hugh starts barking, it was an instruction, to leave the corrupted EU, we was then met with a snap election, it is not the peoples fault if the government does not stick to their manifesto pledges.

I'm constantly being told that everyone knows what they are voting for. I also know that people should change their minds if the facts change ie new or better evidence arises. This suggests the country knew what they were doing when they voted in a Remainer-dominated parliament. ;)

Mr K 26-04-2019 22:07

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35992404)
AND - This has absolutely nothing to do with why we are still in. We are still in because as I have said more than once - we have a Remainer Parliament, Remainer PM - who simply has an half-hearted effort to leave the EU.

Put a leaver in charge and we would soon depart without all this bullshit from the Remainer saboteurs.

So which of the 'leavers' would you put in charge ? There is a myriad of talent to choose from..... Chief Clown Boris ?

ianch99 26-04-2019 22:09

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35992396)
Oh please :rolleyes: - I get sick of hearing the word "fascist" these days, so commonly and incorrectly used by people who just simply disagree with others, there is nothing Fascist what Farage has ever said - it's pathetic this typical smearing from Remainers, but as usual ignore the real issues from parties like Labour and now ChUK'ers who launched this week and at last count, has now dismissed three candidates due to their prior racist remarks.

Seems fair to me:

Nigel Farage copies Nazi propaganda tactics as he unveils 'racist' poster showing Syrian refugees

https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2019/04/7.jpg

Quote:

Nigel Farage's poster has chilling echoes of Nazi propaganda film
https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2019/04/8.jpg

1andrew1 26-04-2019 22:12

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35992404)
AND - This has absolutely nothing to do with why we are still in. We are still in because as I have said more than once - we have a Remainer Parliament, Remainer PM - who simply has an half-hearted effort to leave the EU.

Put a leaver in charge and we would soon depart without all this bullshit from the Remainer saboteurs.

I do agree we should have had a leaver PM who should have taken responsibility to leave. But none stepped up.

---------- Post added at 22:12 ---------- Previous post was at 22:09 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35992407)
So which of the 'leavers' would you put in charge ? There is a myriad of talent to choose from..... Chief Clown Boris ?

Michael Gove is the most talented leaver but BoJo the most popular with the local associations.

Mick 26-04-2019 22:18

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35992405)
I'm constantly being told that everyone knows what they are voting for. I also know that people should change their minds if the facts change ie new or better evidence arises. This suggests the country knew what they were doing when they voted in a Remainer-dominated parliament. ;)

We know it's a Remainer dominated parliament now, don't we? :rolleyes:

We didn't before we voted and we had MPs saying they would honour the referendum result prior to themselves getting voted in.

And btw....Peoples opinions are not evidence.

---------- Post added at 22:14 ---------- Previous post was at 22:13 ----------

That is not fascism - try again please. :dunce:

---------- Post added at 22:18 ---------- Previous post was at 22:14 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35992407)
So which of the 'leavers' would you put in charge ? There is a myriad of talent to choose from..... Chief Clown Boris ?

Have you gone blind ?

I've already stated I will vote for the Brexit Party in this thread.

I want a party that honours democracy and the democratic decision to leave the EU because we do not need to be in this disgusting and corrupt union any longer.

Hugh 26-04-2019 22:35

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35992384)
So would I.........do you know one?

---------- Post added at 20:52 ---------- Previous post was at 20:50 ----------



Either very naive or very stupid

---------- Post added at 20:59 ---------- Previous post was at 20:52 ----------



Do we have to physically inspect vehicles?

Or can what is loaded onto vehicles be logged onto a database at the loading point. ANPR can click it as passes through the border ( and at other points along the way). The contents can the be checked off again at the point of unloading.

It is not beyond the wit of man to sort this out if there was a real desire to do it.

And it will take at least ten years, as shown in the Home Office presentation discussed recently in this thread

Pierre 26-04-2019 23:59

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35992415)
And it will take at least ten years, as shown in the Home Office presentation discussed recently in this thread

I doubt it.

Jimmy-J 27-04-2019 05:38

Re: Brexit
 
2019 European elections: Lib Dems stand on 'stop Brexit' message

Damien 27-04-2019 06:01

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35992398)
The EU is supposedly concerned about illicit goods entering the EU via NI. All goods from outside the EU and UK, will have already been checked by UK Customs.

It's not just illicit goods. It's ones where the products don't conform to EU/UK regulation and tariffs.

Mr K 27-04-2019 07:38

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35992424)
It's not just illicit goods. It's ones where the products don't conform to EU/UK regulation and tariffs.

Mmm, it's a problem isn't it? If only we'd thought about all this and had a plan before we started this Brexit thing ...:rolleyes:

1andrew1 27-04-2019 07:46

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35992421)
I doubt it.

You're right Pierre - Government IT projects always get delivered in less time than estimated. :D

denphone 27-04-2019 08:13

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35992426)
You're right Pierre - Government IT projects always get delivered in less time than estimated. :D

Like this you mean..;)

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-24130684

Hugh 27-04-2019 08:33

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35992421)
I doubt it.

And what do you base this on?

The people putting the presentation together were experts in International Trade and Technology, and if anything, were optimistic in their outlook.

1andrew1 27-04-2019 08:40

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35992431)
And what do you base this on?

Hopefully, something more substantial than it's not beyond the wit of man.

ianch99 27-04-2019 09:17

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35992411)
That is not fascism - try again please. :dunce:

Let's try racism then.

https://www.theneweuropean.co.uk/top...vist-1-6015344

Quote:

The video tweeted by the Our Future, Our Choice campaigner shows Femi in conversation with a young man wearing a Brexit Party T-shirt.

“A lot of people on your side of the argument say that Brexiteers are racist because they want to reduce migration,” he said, adding that the Brexit Party wants migration to be “more balanced”.

Femi replied: “So, in terms of the racism thing, Nigel Farage IS racist.

“When he showed his 'Breaking Point' poster, he was pointing at Syrian refugees, saying that they are the reason why we need to get out of the EU.

“That is inherently racist.

“The UK is not part of the EU's Common Asylum Policy, which means that not one of those refugees in the photo had any right to come here under EU law ... the only people who do have the right to come here under EU law ... are people who look like Nigel Farage.

“So he chose specifically brown people who have no rights to come here under EU law to scare people about EU immigration, which is fundamentally racist.”

The activist replied that the refugee can still come to the UK after they've claimed asylum and applied for an EU nationality.

“And so you're basically saying that a Syrian refugee who comes to, say, Germany, spends seven years ... becomes a fully-fledged German citizen, speaking German, a proper German citizen ... shouldn't come to the UK because of his ethnic origin.”

The activist denied he was saying that at all, but then trailed off and lost his train of thought.


---------- Post added at 09:17 ---------- Previous post was at 09:14 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35992411)
I want a party that honours democracy and the democratic decision to leave the EU because we do not need to be in this disgusting and corrupt union any longer.

That party does not honour democracy. It intends to put forward 5th columnist MEP candidates in the upcoming EU elections.

Sephiroth 27-04-2019 10:39

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 35992436)
<SNIP>

That party does not honour democracy. It intends to put forward 5th columnist MEP candidates in the upcoming EU elections.

How do you justify that slur?

They stand on a mandate; if the people support that mandate, they vote for the respective candidate. That is one of the principles of democracy.

As to "fifth column", what's wrong with standing on a platform that supports getting the UK out of the EU, or alternatively (no chance) of getting the EU reformed?

Hugh 27-04-2019 11:46

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35992440)
How do you justify that slur?

They stand on a mandate; if the people support that mandate, they vote for the respective candidate. That is one of the principles of democracy.

As to "fifth column", what's wrong with standing on a platform that supports getting the UK out of the EU, or alternatively (no chance) of getting the EU reformed?

How would they know - they never turn up for committee meetings, and just grandstand in the MEP meetings.

To change something, you have to try to change it - just burning it down isn't change, it's nihilism.

Sephiroth 27-04-2019 12:01

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35992444)
How would they know - they never turn up for committee meetings, and just grandstand in the MEP meetings.

To change something, you have to try to change it - just burning it down isn't change, it's nihilism.

To the 52% who democratically voted to leave the EU, the Brexit Party MEPs, if elected, would feel properly and democratically represented.

Your stance is pure head in the sand Remainism.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:11.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum