![]() |
Re: the Big Brother thread !!
Quote:
http://forum.digitalspy.co.uk/board/...hp?t=128288&s= Someone on there called 'Inspiration' goes way too far to try and defend her imo! :) |
Re: the Big Brother thread !!
Didn't say on there about getting expelled though. I'm sure she said it and 6 times too.
|
Re: the Big Brother thread !!
this is all very sad, i cant believe people are interested in this........
|
Re: the Big Brother thread !!
Quote:
|
Re: the Big Brother thread !!
Anyone else see Shell's bum tonight? :eek:
|
Re: the Big Brother thread !!
Quote:
|
Re: the Big Brother thread !!
Why would a gorgeous woman's bum give you nightmares?
|
Re: the Big Brother thread !!
Quote:
|
Re: the Big Brother thread !!
Taken from today's Daily Mirror...
Quote:
|
Re: the Big Brother thread !!
Quote:
Having said that, I intensely dislike the way the homosexual lobby has managed to define the word 'homophobia' to mean 'hatred of' or 'discrimination against'. The correct use of the suffix '-phobia' is 'fear of', which is something quite different. So for complete accuracy, I guess it would have to be something like 'heterosexualist', which is a bit of a mouthful ... any other suggestions? |
Re: the Big Brother thread !!
Quote:
|
Re: the Big Brother thread !!
Quote:
well here's some more fuel for the fire.... BB have umpteen gay, lesbian, bisexual, gender changed people in the house for entertainment purposes - by choicing these people isnt this exploitation of their sexuality by the selection panel? |
Re: the Big Brother thread !!
Quote:
|
Re: the Big Brother thread !!
Quote:
I dont consider these people as freaks but the idea of getting as many sexually 'different' people.... is the aim to create a circus freak show? if they had a dwarf in the house it would be acceptable but if they filled half the house with dwarfs - what would they be aiming to achieve? |
Re: the Big Brother thread !!
Quote:
But there is no doubt in my mind that C4 expects, at least in part, that entertainment value of these particular 12 people being in the house is that they are sufficiently different from the majority of everyday British people that people will want to pay a ha'penny to come and stare at them. I don't think we have a houseful of 'dwarfs' either. 'Gay' certainly isn't adequate as a single categorisation in this case. They have all got their own particular 'flavour' of sexuality, from the transsexual to the militant lesbian, to two women who aren't avowedly bisexual but have enjoyed liaisons with other women, to the outrageous mincer (who strangely calmed down a lot within about 12 hours of being inside) to the homosexual male who uses the word 'gay' to refer to outrageous mincers who give all homosexuals 'a bad name'. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 11:41. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum