Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Online Safety Bill Etc (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33711643)

damien c 12-12-2025 15:43

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Well this clown show of a government get even better and the clueless "BARONESS BARRAN".

They are trying to backdoor ban VPN's!!, but only for people under 18, won't be long though before that age increases.

They are not looking though to do it in the open and instead trying to do it via the backdoor by attaching a single clause to bill that will more than likely just get approved with no real looking at.

https://bills.parliament.uk/publicat...spdhGirKYkiSzw

Clause 27 just read on from there (page 19 is the main part).

What the clueless clowns want, is for you to have to provide ID/Age Scan when you sign up to a VPN Provider, then when you download it, you will need to provide ID/Age Scan and the same every time you want to connect to said VPN, you will be required to provide a new scan of your ID/Age Scan.

Now because most VPN's do not collect information to "Monitor" what they want, it will mean that VPN providers will have to start collecting/monitoring and storing information, doing exactly what a VPN is used to avoid.

Wonder how that is going to work when a school kid needs to connect to a VPN do a school class from home?

They are also apparently going to look to have a database created with all the childrens names and relevant information including a photo to be updated every 6 months to 12 months, and any site that does Age Scans must, scan that database to see if there is a match so that they can ensure that no child's image is used, but in reality they are just creating a peodophiles wet dream of information.

All I can think is that Labours funders must be getting a way with a hell of lot, to continue to fund them!

Carth 12-12-2025 18:48

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Labour, the party of very big sticks and no carrots ;)

papa smurf 12-12-2025 20:07

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36207736)
Labour, the party of very big sticks and no carrots ;)

did you mean to say sticks or something that rhymes with sticks

pip08456 12-12-2025 20:42

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Something that rhymes with sticks!

RichardCoulter 13-12-2025 05:07

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
UK Lords proposes ban on VPN's for children:

https://www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-pr...s-for-children

This cross party amendment must still clear the Commons to become law.

Paul 13-12-2025 06:30

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Its increasingly worrying just how incredibly stupid these people are.

When are they going to learn that people will NOT just give their IDs to random companies to "check".

Once again, people will just bypass this by using more "dodgy" VPNs (or just make your own, I have two of my own).
Plus of course, as I have said repeatedly, you dont need a VPN for browsing, you can just use a proxy server (public, paid, or your own).

Carth 13-12-2025 11:08

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36207760)
Its increasingly worrying just how incredibly stupid these people are.

When are they going to learn that people will NOT just give their IDs to random companies to "check".

Once again, people will just bypass this by using more "dodgy" VPNs (or just make your own, I have two of my own).
Plus of course, as I have said repeatedly, you dont need a VPN for browsing, you can just use a proxy server (public, paid, or your own).

Suicidal Government, it's almost like they KNOW they're incompetent, and are pushing to actively lose the next (or an early) election and get back to the easier snide sniping from the back benches :D

Hugh 13-12-2025 12:09

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36207768)
Suicidal Government, it's almost like they KNOW they're incompetent, and are pushing to actively lose the next (or an early) election and get back to the easier snide sniping from the back benches :D

Anyway, enough about the Conservatives 21 months ago... ;)

Sirius 13-12-2025 13:14

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
You can now pickup a free copy of 1984 by visiting the Labour party press office any day of the week. Facial age verification and a copy of your DNA and social media record will be required on arrival

RichardCoulter 16-12-2025 13:27

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
The desire to limit the use of VPN's to stop people bypassing restrictions (and using other countries for streaming purposes) appears to be spreading around the world:

https://www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-pr...ts-are-worried

Experts said to be worried.

Stephen 16-12-2025 14:11

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Experts are worried, lmao. Of course they are. Their attempts to control via age restrictions are meaningless as so easily bypassed. They cannot ban VPNs however.

Carth 16-12-2025 14:57

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
You should never take notice of experts, it's almost as crazy as using Facebook as the best source of 'up to date' information on football or politics.

Just look what 'experts' have done to us over the last 10 years or so ;)

TheDaddy 16-12-2025 15:26

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36207858)
You should never take notice of experts, it's almost as crazy as using Facebook as the best source of 'up to date' information on football or politics.

Just look what 'experts' have done to us over the last 10 years or so ;)

I thought we were told not to listen to experts around 10 years ago... :spin:

Carth 16-12-2025 17:56

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Obviously there needs to be regular reminders ;)

papa smurf 16-12-2025 19:00

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36207877)
Obviously there needs to be regular reminders ;)

yep you know how dangerous listening can be :nono:

Paul 16-12-2025 19:15

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Once again, just utter nonsense.
How many time does this need to be said, you cannot just "monitor" what a VPN is being used for.
These morons really need to get a dictionary and look up "Private".

Saying its illegal to use one for certain purposes is meaningless, its like saying you cannot smoke in your house anymore, short of coming into your house to watching you, know one is going to know.

RichardCoulter 16-12-2025 22:09

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36207883)
Once again, just utter nonsense.
How many time does this need to be said, you cannot just "monitor" what a VPN is being used for.
These morons really need to get a dictionary and look up "Private".

Saying its illegal to use one for certain purposes is meaningless, its like saying you cannot smoke in your house anymore, short of coming into your house to watching you, know one is going to know.

There is actually a country (can't remember which) that banned smoking indoors, including in one's own home! In the UK I know of several landlords that prohibit their tenants from smoking in their homes by putting this in their tenancy agreements.

Pierre 16-12-2025 23:03

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36207895)
There is actually a country (can't remember which) that banned smoking indoors, including in one's own home!

The point was, that you can legislate it. But not enforce it.

damien c 17-12-2025 13:28

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36207883)
Once again, just utter nonsense.
How many time does this need to be said, you cannot just "monitor" what a VPN is being used for.
These morons really need to get a dictionary and look up "Private".

Saying its illegal to use one for certain purposes is meaningless, its like saying you cannot smoke in your house anymore, short of coming into your house to watching you, know one is going to know.

I think, although I cannot prove it, that certain departments of Governments etc do have the ability to monitor what traffic is being transmitted via VPN's, the problem for them is, it's illegal unless they can prove it's "Terror" related as to why they snooped iirc.

Let's not also forget, unless you have found a way to stop it and send no information to Microspy, then Windows 8 and up all send's information to Microspy regardless of if you have a VPN or not, and all the Government's need to do is get that information.

A VPN and even a Tunnel is not protection in the way that most think it is, but it's more of a "infuriation device" and it's not difficult for them to be blocked, banned, black listed or what ever word you wanted to use to describe them.


The simple fact is, this country was shafted by the Conservatives when they started this whole process, regardless of whether they implemented it or not, and then shafted by Labour who implemented it and are trying to use it, to control every aspect of your life, from movement to speech.


More rumours are coming out that you will have to provide a photo/live scan in order to use search engines, make purchases online, sign up to services like Sky, Virgin etc online, basically even to open a web browser they will want a photo or live scan.

Anyone know what the entry criteria is to North Korea as I would like to go to somewhere that actually still has some freedoms, at least freedom to breath without needing to provide a photo for each breath :rofl:

Carth 17-12-2025 14:24

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
All this stuff . . in fact this Government . . is similar to her indoors, as in when she gets something in her head, no matter how much evidence there is to say she's wrong, she still believes she's right . . . until eventually she isn't . . . at which time she goes on a month long mardy arse strop :D

OLD BOY 17-12-2025 16:50

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36207853)
The desire to limit the use of VPN's to stop people bypassing restrictions (and using other countries for streaming purposes) appears to be spreading around the world:

https://www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-pr...ts-are-worried

Experts said to be worried.

We’ve all been pointing this out from the beginning. It really shouldn’t be news to anyone following the posts on this forum.

Even when this problem becomes apparent to most people, this government will continue in denial and leave it to the next government to drop it so they can protest about how dreadful it all is that children are unprotected.

You know, just as they are now.

RichardCoulter 17-12-2025 18:31

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36207928)
We’ve all been pointing this out from the beginning. It really shouldn’t be news to anyone following the posts on this forum.

Even when this problem becomes apparent to most people, this government will continue in denial and leave it to the next government to drop it so they can protest about how dreadful it all is that children are unprotected.

You know, just as they are now.

Whether one agrees with it or not, the OSA has all party support & looks to be spreading to other parts of the world.

Carth 17-12-2025 18:35

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36207933)
Whether one agrees with it or not, the OSA has all party support & looks to be spreading to other parts of the world.

Which probably shows that we don't have exclusivity on being stupid :D

jem 17-12-2025 18:40

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36207933)
Whether one agrees with it or not, the OSA has all party support & looks to be spreading to other parts of the world.

Now being reported; https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/seneste/re...n-forbindelser

in Danish; but Google translate is your friend; that the proposed bill has now been withdrawn by the minister concerned for ‘amendments', probably to remove any references to VPN. The crash of 'reverse gear' being engaged is quite audible!

Paul 17-12-2025 19:33

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
The important (translated) part ;
Quote:

Therefore, I am removing the part about VPN in the bill, so that there can no longer be any doubt that I in no way want to ban the use of VPN, says Jakob Engel-Schmidt.

Sirius 17-12-2025 19:36

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
The offended must be loving this. They keep screaming we want more and this clown show of a government caves in to them.

damien c 18-12-2025 17:12

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 36207945)
The offended must be loving this. They keep screaming we want more and this clown show of a government caves in to them.

Exactly but when they suddenly find themselves the ones being labelled offensive by the same people they want to protect, maybe they will wake up.

I know it has been used as inspiration for another saying, but this does sum up all the fools who think they are capable of protecting others whilst doing no harm!

"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you."

The more common version of that saying is the one that people like from Batman:

"You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain."

The perpetually offended clown show brigade should really take note, it's not difficult to see who will be the most hated in this country in the next few years, Starmer wanted to do good but thank's to the puppets pulling his strings and him not having a back bone, he is currently the most hated man in Britain, even more so I would say than the likes of Saville!

RichardCoulter 19-12-2025 17:12

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
The stated aims of the OSA (and other variations in other countries) have nothing to do with adults 'being offended'.

Carth 19-12-2025 19:40

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36208007)
The stated aims of the OSA (and other variations in other countries) have nothing to do with adults 'being offended'.

Yet it's offending adults :shrug: :smokin:

jem 19-12-2025 20:02

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36208007)
The stated aims of the OSA (and other variations in other countries) have nothing to do with adults 'being offended'.

Of course not, just as the stated aims of the ‘Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act’, had nothing to do with being used to spy on people putting their bins out on the wrong day, or fibbing about where they lived to get their kids into a better school.

Give it time.....

Paul 19-12-2025 20:27

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36208007)
The stated aims of the OSA (and other variations in other countries) have nothing to do with adults 'being offended'.

The stated aim of a kitchen knife is not to kill people, that doesnt mean it cannot be used for that. :erm:

OLD BOY 19-12-2025 20:54

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36207933)
Whether one agrees with it or not, the OSA has all party support & looks to be spreading to other parts of the world.

No, it doesn’t. Reform UK doesn’t support it. The only party that is talking any sense at the moment.

RichardCoulter 20-12-2025 00:36

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36208027)
No, it doesn’t. Reform UK doesn’t support it. The only party that is talking any sense at the moment.

Reform don't count as they weren't around when it was discussed & passed in Parliament.

---------- Post added at 23:36 ---------- Previous post was at 23:34 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36208020)
Yet it's offending adults :shrug: :smokin:

Some people may find it inconvenient, unnecessary etc, but in what way do you think it's causing offence to anybody? It was a very strange term to use.

Carth 20-12-2025 01:10

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36208031)
Reform don't count as they weren't around when it was discussed & passed in Parliament.

---------- Post added at 23:36 ---------- Previous post was at 23:34 ----------



Some people may find it inconvenient, unnecessary etc, but in what way do you think it's causing offence to anybody? It was a very strange term to use.

It's not strange at all, the word 'offence' is in daily use now for a multitude of reasons . . I mean, I could get offended if someone pointed their finger at me, or gave me a 'funny' look, or sat near me on a bus and blared crap music from their iPhone . . . and then that person would probably be offended when I told them where to shove it, and then others on the bus would get offended due to two people having 'words' . . the driver may even be offended and stop the bus to call for a police person to come and sort it out, and then the police person may get offended becuase he's had to skip his lunch . . and on, and on, and on ;)

RichardCoulter 20-12-2025 17:57

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Denmark decides against VPN ban:

https://www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-pr...ublic-backlash

Sirius 21-12-2025 12:50

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36208044)

That is good news for Denmark but unfortunately we will not be so lucky as we have a clown show of a government with dictator Keir Starmer as lead clown. :banghead:

OLD BOY 21-12-2025 21:03

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36208027)
No, it doesn’t. Reform UK doesn’t support it. The only party that is talking any sense at the moment.

You said it had ‘all party support’. I was pointing out that it doesn’t, which is correct.

Farage has pledged to abolish it when they come to power, as almost certainly, they will. Therefore, it’s absolutely relevant.

---------- Post added at 20:03 ---------- Previous post was at 19:58 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36208044)

At least they must understand that would be completely ineffective.

RichardCoulter 22-12-2025 11:33

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36208063)
You said it had ‘all party support’. I was pointing out that it doesn’t, which is correct.

Farage has pledged to abolish it when they come to power, as almost certainly, they will. Therefore, it’s absolutely relevant.

---------- Post added at 20:03 ---------- Previous post was at 19:58 ----------



At least they must understand that would be completely ineffective.

Privacy concerns & curtailing internet freedom were the official reasons given.

Anonymouse 22-12-2025 12:29

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
What about the unofficial - i.e. the real - reasons?

(sigh) They really need to stop using 1984 as an instruction manual. I'm only surprised Earth isn't careering out of orbit due to the Coriolis force of Orwell spinning in his grave at Mach 20.

Carth 22-12-2025 13:32

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
It's not just Orwell mate, I often hear distant echoes of Darwin screaming "I said survival of the fittest, not thickest"

OLD BOY 22-12-2025 14:20

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36208068)
Privacy concerns & curtailing internet freedom were the official reasons given.

Yes, and Reform have pointed out that the Act does little to protect children and is putting too many barriers in the way for adults.

RichardCoulter 22-12-2025 17:46

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36208063)
You said it had ‘all party support’. I was pointing out that it doesn’t, which is correct.

Farage has pledged to abolish it when they come to power, as almost certainly, they will. Therefore, it’s absolutely relevant.

---------- Post added at 20:03 ---------- Previous post was at 19:58 ----------



At least they must understand that would be completely ineffective.

I was referring to the time that the legislation was passed, not today.

Sirius 27-12-2025 15:46

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
for those that would like to see how your privacy has been and will be removed by our clown fest government and the offended, Take a look the year in review.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygozXDY8naI

thenry 12-01-2026 17:52

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Liz Kendall: Non-consensual intimate images to be offence
A lot of she and women words. Aren't blokes victims too?

Hugh 12-01-2026 18:27

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 36208856)
A lot of she and women words. Aren't blokes victims too?

According to what’s being reported, most of the images being generated are of women and children…

https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/se...dhu-k-wYA9jlTK

Quote:

Ms Kendall labelled AI-generated images of women “tied up and gagged, with bruises, covered in blood and much, much more” as being “weapons of abuse”.

Making a statement in the Commons, the Technology Secretary said the Internet Watch Foundation “reports criminal imagery of children as young as 11, including girls sexualised and toddlers”.

She continued: “This is child sexual abuse.

“We’ve seen reports of photos being shared of women in bikinis, tied up and gagged, with bruises, covered in blood, and much, much more.

“Lives can and have been devastated by this content which is designed to harass, torment and violate people’s dignity.

“They are not harmless images.

“They’re weapons of abuse, disproportionately aimed at women and girls, and they are illegal.”

papa smurf 12-01-2026 20:37

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
not so long ago the UK was to become an AI superpower, now it's getting shut down ,shoved in a box and buried under a mountain of regulations, ah well back to the drawing board [literally]

Anonymouse 16-01-2026 02:44

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
I don't know why the government is dithering about this. Let me state it plainly: PRODUCTION OF SEXUALISED IMAGES OF MINORS (defined as under 18) IS A CRIMINAL OFFENCE IN THIS COUNTRY. I heard of a bloke who got a prison sentence for owning pics of under-18 girls and they weren't even nude, just in bikinis. So anyone ordering production of such images via Grok can be said to be producing them, and they are therefore legally liable as child pornographers. The same for abuse/violence, under the Criminal Justice Bill (or is it an Act now?).

As for Musk allowing this, he should be extradited and arrested IMO for facilitating the creation of such images. He doesn't seem to get why people are upset. As one critic said, he's a man-child. I agree. What part of 'criminal offence' doesn't this moron get?

Clearly, being a genius and being smart are not the same thing.

As for me, I'm quite looking forward to an interviewer asking about my social media use...I'll get to see the look on their face when I tell them I have zero presence on Facebook (I refuse to call it Meta even though I don't use it), Twitter (same), Instagram, TikTok, WhatsApp or anything similar. Never used them, never will. As much as my life sucks, it is at least a life. :p:

In fact, since I can't provide 5 years' worth of social media use seeing as I've never used it, I don't think I'd be allowed into the Un-united Nazi States...not that I intend or could ever afford to go anyway. :p:

Carth 16-01-2026 11:02

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Social Media presence . . no thanks.

Spent most of my life trying to avoid idiots, shysters, University educated tosspots, and the 'Walter Mitty' type people . . not to mention experts who mainly tell you what you already know.

No way am I now going to actively go looking for them :D

Itshim 16-01-2026 15:32

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36209083)
Social Media presence . . no thanks.

Spent most of my life trying to avoid idiots, shysters, University educated tosspots, and the 'Walter Mitty' type people . . not to mention experts who mainly tell you what you already know.

No way am I now going to actively go looking for them :D

Just asking is this site classed as social media:confused:

Carth 16-01-2026 15:40

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36209096)
Just asking is this site classed as social media:confused:

Sometimes it sure seems like the bottom layer, but if you're going to class a 'forum' as social media you may as well add in News/Media sites, Government information pages, Medical advice sites and anything else posted on the absolutely fabulous (and in no way dangerous or misleading) internet ;)

nffc 16-01-2026 15:55

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36209096)
Just asking is this site classed as social media:confused:

In a sense I guess it would be - it would also be classed as priority under the OSA as it involves users contributing to other users' content...

Paul 16-01-2026 19:32

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36209096)
Just asking is this site classed as social media:confused:

Technically yes, forums are classed as a type of social media.

RichardCoulter 17-01-2026 08:02

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36209096)
Just asking is this site classed as social media:confused:

What's looked at is whether it involves user to user content.

---------- Post added at 07:02 ---------- Previous post was at 06:59 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anonymouse (Post 36209072)
I don't know why the government is dithering about this. Let me state it plainly: PRODUCTION OF SEXUALISED IMAGES OF MINORS (defined as under 18) IS A CRIMINAL OFFENCE IN THIS COUNTRY. I heard of a bloke who got a prison sentence for owning pics of under-18 girls and they weren't even nude, just in bikinis. So anyone ordering production of such images via Grok can be said to be producing them, and they are therefore legally liable as child pornographers. The same for abuse/violence, under the Criminal Justice Bill (or is it an Act now?).

As for Musk allowing this, he should be extradited and arrested IMO for facilitating the creation of such images. He doesn't seem to get why people are upset. As one critic said, he's a man-child. I agree. What part of 'criminal offence' doesn't this moron get?

Clearly, being a genius and being smart are not the same thing.

As for me, I'm quite looking forward to an interviewer asking about my social media use...I'll get to see the look on their face when I tell them I have zero presence on Facebook (I refuse to call it Meta even though I don't use it), Twitter (same), Instagram, TikTok, WhatsApp or anything similar. Never used them, never will. As much as my life sucks, it is at least a life. :p:

In fact, since I can't provide 5 years' worth of social media use seeing as I've never used it, I don't think I'd be allowed into the Un-united Nazi States...not that I intend or could ever afford to go anyway. :p:


You might find the article about 1/3 of the way through this programme interesting:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m002pqlk

RichardCoulter 28-01-2026 12:03

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
I wonder why Pornhub are to restrict access from the UK from next week? They say it's because the Online Safety Act will lead to people accessing more harmful content as they've lost 77% of traffic from the UK.

But what good will this do to help? Is it to get people to register an account, a publicity stunt or to encourage more people to use a VPN and, therefore, as users are not officially living here, none of the restrictions on inappropriate porn (like strangulation) will apply to them??

Edit: A discussion on Radio 4 concluded that the real reasons are the first and last suggestions and because they are adverse to regulation.

Stephen 28-01-2026 12:30

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
As said previously. Nothing will happen. They lost 77% of UK traffic and that is simply due to people using VPNs.

They do not need encouragement to use VPNs as it is already happening.

Carth 28-01-2026 13:26

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
I thought this was all about keeping kids safe, not preventing consenting adults from watching some online rumpy pumpy :shrug:

RichardCoulter 28-01-2026 15:32

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36209752)
I thought this was all about keeping kids safe, not preventing consenting adults from watching some online rumpy pumpy :shrug:

Exactly, which is why I think there's more to it than what Pornhub are making out.

I think it's primarily a publicity stunt/free advertising as, despite blocking non registered users in the UK, all those that want this material need to do is register with Pornhub or, as Steohen says, use a VPN.

Itshim 28-01-2026 15:35

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36209745)
I wonder why Pornhub are to restrict access from the UK from next week? They say it's because the Online Safety Act will lead to people accessing more harmful content as they've lost 77% of traffic from the UK.

But what good will this do to help? Is it to get people to register an account, a publicity stunt or to encourage more people to use a VPN and, therefore, as users are not officially living here, none of the restrictions on inappropriate porn (like strangulation) will apply to them??

Edit: A discussion on Radio 4 concluded that the real reasons are the first and last suggestions and because they are adverse to regulation.

It's cheaper not to bother.

RichardCoulter 28-01-2026 15:51

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36209755)
It's cheaper not to bother.

In what way? They will still have to have the age verification mechanism in place (that they've already paid for) for those who wish to register from the UK.

damien c 28-01-2026 16:04

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36209753)
Exactly, which is why I think there's more to it than what Pornhub are making out.

I think it's primarily a publicity stunt/free advertising as, despite blocking non registered users in the UK, all those that want this material need to do is register with Pornhub or, as Steohen says, use a VPN.

Weren't you one of the people who wanted anything 18+ to be locked behind proving your age for the sake of "Protecting the children"?

So the UK Dictatorship I think has told Pornhub "You must force registrations or face a ban" so they are now going to force registration but anyone who has any common sense will refuse to register since Pornhub recently was hacked and data of registered members stolen.

Yet another reason to look into leaving this hell hole of a country.

Paul 28-01-2026 20:32

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36209752)
I thought this was all about keeping kids safe, not preventing consenting adults from watching some online rumpy pumpy :shrug:

Nope, its the UK wanting to control everything you do on the internet. Imgur have banned us (the UK), other sites have banned us, more are/will eventually follow, as our dictators insist on more and more "checks". We are becoming an online pariah.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:34.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum