![]() |
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Well this clown show of a government get even better and the clueless "BARONESS BARRAN".
They are trying to backdoor ban VPN's!!, but only for people under 18, won't be long though before that age increases. They are not looking though to do it in the open and instead trying to do it via the backdoor by attaching a single clause to bill that will more than likely just get approved with no real looking at. https://bills.parliament.uk/publicat...spdhGirKYkiSzw Clause 27 just read on from there (page 19 is the main part). What the clueless clowns want, is for you to have to provide ID/Age Scan when you sign up to a VPN Provider, then when you download it, you will need to provide ID/Age Scan and the same every time you want to connect to said VPN, you will be required to provide a new scan of your ID/Age Scan. Now because most VPN's do not collect information to "Monitor" what they want, it will mean that VPN providers will have to start collecting/monitoring and storing information, doing exactly what a VPN is used to avoid. Wonder how that is going to work when a school kid needs to connect to a VPN do a school class from home? They are also apparently going to look to have a database created with all the childrens names and relevant information including a photo to be updated every 6 months to 12 months, and any site that does Age Scans must, scan that database to see if there is a match so that they can ensure that no child's image is used, but in reality they are just creating a peodophiles wet dream of information. All I can think is that Labours funders must be getting a way with a hell of lot, to continue to fund them! |
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Labour, the party of very big sticks and no carrots ;)
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Something that rhymes with sticks!
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
UK Lords proposes ban on VPN's for children:
https://www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-pr...s-for-children This cross party amendment must still clear the Commons to become law. |
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Its increasingly worrying just how incredibly stupid these people are.
When are they going to learn that people will NOT just give their IDs to random companies to "check". Once again, people will just bypass this by using more "dodgy" VPNs (or just make your own, I have two of my own). Plus of course, as I have said repeatedly, you dont need a VPN for browsing, you can just use a proxy server (public, paid, or your own). |
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
You can now pickup a free copy of 1984 by visiting the Labour party press office any day of the week. Facial age verification and a copy of your DNA and social media record will be required on arrival
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
The desire to limit the use of VPN's to stop people bypassing restrictions (and using other countries for streaming purposes) appears to be spreading around the world:
https://www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-pr...ts-are-worried Experts said to be worried. |
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Experts are worried, lmao. Of course they are. Their attempts to control via age restrictions are meaningless as so easily bypassed. They cannot ban VPNs however.
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
You should never take notice of experts, it's almost as crazy as using Facebook as the best source of 'up to date' information on football or politics.
Just look what 'experts' have done to us over the last 10 years or so ;) |
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Obviously there needs to be regular reminders ;)
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Once again, just utter nonsense.
How many time does this need to be said, you cannot just "monitor" what a VPN is being used for. These morons really need to get a dictionary and look up "Private". Saying its illegal to use one for certain purposes is meaningless, its like saying you cannot smoke in your house anymore, short of coming into your house to watching you, know one is going to know. |
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
Let's not also forget, unless you have found a way to stop it and send no information to Microspy, then Windows 8 and up all send's information to Microspy regardless of if you have a VPN or not, and all the Government's need to do is get that information. A VPN and even a Tunnel is not protection in the way that most think it is, but it's more of a "infuriation device" and it's not difficult for them to be blocked, banned, black listed or what ever word you wanted to use to describe them. The simple fact is, this country was shafted by the Conservatives when they started this whole process, regardless of whether they implemented it or not, and then shafted by Labour who implemented it and are trying to use it, to control every aspect of your life, from movement to speech. More rumours are coming out that you will have to provide a photo/live scan in order to use search engines, make purchases online, sign up to services like Sky, Virgin etc online, basically even to open a web browser they will want a photo or live scan. Anyone know what the entry criteria is to North Korea as I would like to go to somewhere that actually still has some freedoms, at least freedom to breath without needing to provide a photo for each breath :rofl: |
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
All this stuff . . in fact this Government . . is similar to her indoors, as in when she gets something in her head, no matter how much evidence there is to say she's wrong, she still believes she's right . . . until eventually she isn't . . . at which time she goes on a month long mardy arse strop :D
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
Even when this problem becomes apparent to most people, this government will continue in denial and leave it to the next government to drop it so they can protest about how dreadful it all is that children are unprotected. You know, just as they are now. |
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
in Danish; but Google translate is your friend; that the proposed bill has now been withdrawn by the minister concerned for ‘amendments', probably to remove any references to VPN. The crash of 'reverse gear' being engaged is quite audible! |
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
The important (translated) part ;
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
The offended must be loving this. They keep screaming we want more and this clown show of a government caves in to them.
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
I know it has been used as inspiration for another saying, but this does sum up all the fools who think they are capable of protecting others whilst doing no harm! "He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." The more common version of that saying is the one that people like from Batman: "You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain." The perpetually offended clown show brigade should really take note, it's not difficult to see who will be the most hated in this country in the next few years, Starmer wanted to do good but thank's to the puppets pulling his strings and him not having a back bone, he is currently the most hated man in Britain, even more so I would say than the likes of Saville! |
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
The stated aims of the OSA (and other variations in other countries) have nothing to do with adults 'being offended'.
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
Give it time..... |
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
---------- Post added at 23:36 ---------- Previous post was at 23:34 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
Farage has pledged to abolish it when they come to power, as almost certainly, they will. Therefore, it’s absolutely relevant. ---------- Post added at 20:03 ---------- Previous post was at 19:58 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
What about the unofficial - i.e. the real - reasons?
(sigh) They really need to stop using 1984 as an instruction manual. I'm only surprised Earth isn't careering out of orbit due to the Coriolis force of Orwell spinning in his grave at Mach 20. |
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
It's not just Orwell mate, I often hear distant echoes of Darwin screaming "I said survival of the fittest, not thickest"
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
for those that would like to see how your privacy has been and will be removed by our clown fest government and the offended, Take a look the year in review.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygozXDY8naI |
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/se...dhu-k-wYA9jlTK Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
not so long ago the UK was to become an AI superpower, now it's getting shut down ,shoved in a box and buried under a mountain of regulations, ah well back to the drawing board [literally]
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
I don't know why the government is dithering about this. Let me state it plainly: PRODUCTION OF SEXUALISED IMAGES OF MINORS (defined as under 18) IS A CRIMINAL OFFENCE IN THIS COUNTRY. I heard of a bloke who got a prison sentence for owning pics of under-18 girls and they weren't even nude, just in bikinis. So anyone ordering production of such images via Grok can be said to be producing them, and they are therefore legally liable as child pornographers. The same for abuse/violence, under the Criminal Justice Bill (or is it an Act now?).
As for Musk allowing this, he should be extradited and arrested IMO for facilitating the creation of such images. He doesn't seem to get why people are upset. As one critic said, he's a man-child. I agree. What part of 'criminal offence' doesn't this moron get? Clearly, being a genius and being smart are not the same thing. As for me, I'm quite looking forward to an interviewer asking about my social media use...I'll get to see the look on their face when I tell them I have zero presence on Facebook (I refuse to call it Meta even though I don't use it), Twitter (same), Instagram, TikTok, WhatsApp or anything similar. Never used them, never will. As much as my life sucks, it is at least a life. :p: In fact, since I can't provide 5 years' worth of social media use seeing as I've never used it, I don't think I'd be allowed into the Un-united Nazi States...not that I intend or could ever afford to go anyway. :p: |
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Social Media presence . . no thanks.
Spent most of my life trying to avoid idiots, shysters, University educated tosspots, and the 'Walter Mitty' type people . . not to mention experts who mainly tell you what you already know. No way am I now going to actively go looking for them :D |
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
---------- Post added at 07:02 ---------- Previous post was at 06:59 ---------- Quote:
You might find the article about 1/3 of the way through this programme interesting: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m002pqlk |
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
I wonder why Pornhub are to restrict access from the UK from next week? They say it's because the Online Safety Act will lead to people accessing more harmful content as they've lost 77% of traffic from the UK.
But what good will this do to help? Is it to get people to register an account, a publicity stunt or to encourage more people to use a VPN and, therefore, as users are not officially living here, none of the restrictions on inappropriate porn (like strangulation) will apply to them?? Edit: A discussion on Radio 4 concluded that the real reasons are the first and last suggestions and because they are adverse to regulation. |
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
As said previously. Nothing will happen. They lost 77% of UK traffic and that is simply due to people using VPNs.
They do not need encouragement to use VPNs as it is already happening. |
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
I thought this was all about keeping kids safe, not preventing consenting adults from watching some online rumpy pumpy :shrug:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
I think it's primarily a publicity stunt/free advertising as, despite blocking non registered users in the UK, all those that want this material need to do is register with Pornhub or, as Steohen says, use a VPN. |
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
So the UK Dictatorship I think has told Pornhub "You must force registrations or face a ban" so they are now going to force registration but anyone who has any common sense will refuse to register since Pornhub recently was hacked and data of registered members stolen. Yet another reason to look into leaving this hell hole of a country. |
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:34. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum