Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Updated: Boris resigns as party leader (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33710650)

papa smurf 13-04-2022 18:54

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36119070)
With that, I agree. But the PM appears not to have been involved with that.
My concern is simply with the inconsistency of fining Boris when Kier has got off scot free for virtually the same offence.

---------- Post added at 18:21 ---------- Previous post was at 18:18 ----------



And yet you still haven't addressed the stark difference in treatment in extremely similar circumstances. I'm afraid you are the one who is deflecting.

Kier wasn't at home he travelled 165miles for his beer and pizza party.

Hugh 13-04-2022 18:59

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
1 Attachment(s)
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...9&d=1649872717

Sephiroth 13-04-2022 19:01

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36119075)

Makes the point.

TheDaddy 13-04-2022 19:04

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36119075)

And that's why this isn't going away, so many people have stories like this and they and the people that know them aren't going to allow it to move on no matter how much some want it to

Hugh 13-04-2022 19:04

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36119074)
Kier wasn't at home he travelled 165miles for his beer and pizza party.

Johnson was just up the road at the same time…

https://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/ne...ction-victory/

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/u...idays-20516634

OLD BOY 13-04-2022 19:24

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36119073)
Yes, a meal break is exactly the same as a birthday party, an ABBA party, and a drinks party in the garden…

He was fined because he was unexpectedly presented with a birthday cake by the people he worked with. He thanked them and then got back to work.

He has not been fined for those other matters you mention, as you well know.

By the way, drinking while working does not constitute a party. You may not approve of drinking while at work, but it has been going on a long time and that does not amount to a breach of the Covid rules.

Kier Starmer had a beer at the pub in his break, but everyone seems to think that was OK. Why?

Pierre 13-04-2022 19:24

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36119005)
All you need to know:
[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

I couldn’t give a toss, I flagrantly disobeyed the rules all the way through, as much of them were incoherent and inconsistent.

At least this may serve as a lesson to not blindly follow government edicts when they try to scare you to imprison yourself.

OLD BOY 13-04-2022 19:26

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36119075)

And do these people not feel the same way about Kier’s booze up?

Chris 13-04-2022 19:31

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36119083)

Kier Starmer had a beer at the pub in his break, but everyone seems to think that was OK. Why?

Hey Siri, please translate OLD BOY into everyday English.

“I know I’m wrong but I’m not big enough to admit it.”

OLD BOY 13-04-2022 19:45

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36119086)
Hey Siri, please translate OLD BOY into everyday English.

“I know I’m wrong but I’m not big enough to admit it.”

You see, you are so blinded with joy that Boris has been fined, you cannot see the injustice of the difference in treatment between Johnson and Starmer.

Despite making the point repeatedly, you and others on your side of the argument have nothing to say.

That is, of course, because there is nothing you can say. It is unequal treatment pure and simple, but you don’t want to admit it.

And to call a presentation of a birthday cake by colleagues at work ‘a party’ is just so ridiculous, I cannot believe that a normally sensible person such as your good self is prepared to accept such a description.

But there you are.

GrimUpNorth 13-04-2022 19:49

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36119085)
And do these people not feel the same way about Kier’s booze up?

Was this the beer in Durham?

1andrew1 13-04-2022 21:21

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36119087)
You see, you are so blinded with joy that Boris has been fined, you cannot see the injustice of the difference in treatment between Johnson and Starmer.

Despite making the point repeatedly, you and others on your side of the argument have nothing to say.

That is, of course, because there is nothing you can say. It is unequal treatment pure and simple, but you don’t want to admit it.

And to call a presentation of a birthday cake by colleagues at work ‘a party’ is just so ridiculous, I cannot believe that a normally sensible person such as your good self is prepared to accept such a description.

But there you are.

Stop deluding yourself that Johnson only attended one party. There were multiple parties including an infamous BYOB party. Nothing to do with his birthday party or with cake.

Stop kidding yourself that someone making the rules and then breaking them has the moral authority to govern. Boris Johnson is the first sitting British Prime Minister to have been found to have broken the law,

Stop deceiving yourself that sticking up for Johnson is sticking up for the Conservative Party. The best thing for the Conservative Party is a new broom, Johnson is damaged goods.

Mr K 13-04-2022 21:49

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Looks like there are more fine(s) coming for our party mad PM.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics...aides-leaving/
Quote:

Boris Johnson faces a further "partygate" police fine after giving a speech at a Downing Street leaving party for a long-standing aide, The Telegraph can disclose.

The Prime Minister is facing another punishment after attending and giving a speech at the party for Lee Cain, his outgoing director of communications, on Nov 13, 2020, according to sources close to the investigation.

Alcohol was consumed by some at the event, but it is not known whether Mr Johnson had a drink.

However it is understood that he remained at the gathering for some time, making it more difficult for him to argue that it was a work event and he had a "reasonable excuse" for being there.

A report by the former Whitehall ethics chief Sue Gray will be critical of Mr Johnson's attendance at the event, increasing the likelihood that he will receive another fixed penalty notice.

A source close to the "partygate" investigation said the June 2020 birthday party event over which Mr Johnson was fined £50, and which he attended for less than 10 minutes, is far less serious than the leaving party for Mr Cain.

The source said: "The event that took place on Nov 13, 2020, to mark the departure of Lee Cain is considered to be the most serious breach of the coronavirus regulations among the events that the Prime Minister attended.

"Given that he has already received a fine for what was a relatively minor breach, it seems inevitable he will receive more fines as the police complete their investigation."

Scotland Yard is investigating a total of 12 events between May 2020 and April last year, with Mr Johnson accused of being present at six of them.

Hugh 13-04-2022 21:57

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36119083)
He was fined because he was unexpectedly presented with a birthday cake by the people he worked with. He thanked them and then got back to work.

He has not been fined for those other matters you mention, as you well know.

By the way, drinking while working does not constitute a party. You may not approve of drinking while at work, but it has been going on a long time and that does not amount to a breach of the Covid rules.

Kier Starmer had a beer at the pub in his break, but everyone seems to think that was OK. Why?

And his wife…

And his baby…

And his photographer…

And his Interior Designer…

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...2&d=1649884332

Sephiroth 13-04-2022 22:16

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36119087)
You see, you are so blinded with joy that Boris has been fined, you cannot see the injustice of the difference in treatment between Johnson and Starmer.

Despite making the point repeatedly, you and others on your side of the argument have nothing to say.

That is, of course, because there is nothing you can say. It is unequal treatment pure and simple, but you don’t want to admit it.

And to call a presentation of a birthday cake by colleagues at work ‘a party’ is just so ridiculous, I cannot believe that a normally sensible person such as your good self is prepared to accept such a description.

But there you are.


Keep digging, OB. It's a real shame and a huge blow for your credibility, imo. Sorry.

Chris 13-04-2022 22:26

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36119103)

Keep digging, OB. It's a real shame and a huge blow for your credibility, imo. Sorry.

Surely you’re not surprised? Painting himself into a corner then digging himself into an ever-deeper hole is exactly what OB always does on here.

OLD BOY 13-04-2022 23:23

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36119088)
Was this the beer in Durham?

I used that term to bring it up to speed with the presentation that is described as a party.

---------- Post added at 23:21 ---------- Previous post was at 23:20 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36119096)
Stop deluding yourself that Johnson only attended one party. There were multiple parties including an infamous BYOB party. Nothing to do with his birthday party or with cake.

Stop kidding yourself that someone making the rules and then breaking them has the moral authority to govern. Boris Johnson is the first sitting British Prime Minister to have been found to have broken the law,

Stop deceiving yourself that sticking up for Johnson is sticking up for the Conservative Party. The best thing for the Conservative Party is a new broom, Johnson is damaged goods.

You wish.

---------- Post added at 23:23 ---------- Previous post was at 23:21 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36119106)
Surely you’re not surprised? Painting himself into a corner then digging himself into an ever-deeper hole is exactly what OB always does on here.

Still no answer. I guess my point is made.

Chris 13-04-2022 23:41

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
It definitely is. Just not in the way you were hoping. My work here is done … goodnight. ;)

ianch99 13-04-2022 23:44

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36119084)
I couldn’t give a toss, I flagrantly disobeyed the rules all the way through, as much of them were incoherent and inconsistent.

At least this may serve as a lesson to not blindly follow government edicts when they try to scare you to imprison yourself.

Yes but admitting you have no moral compass is not something to boast about.

Pierre 14-04-2022 09:14

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36119118)
Yes but admitting you have no moral compass is not something to boast about.

Ah, the old “moral compass”, As the saying goes - if the government told you it was morally correct to put your hand in the fire, would you?

Because that’s what happened, and lots of people felt so morally superior imprisoning themselves and wearing useless face coverings ( some still do) …good for them.

Maggy 14-04-2022 09:28

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36119124)
Ah, the old “moral compass”, As the saying goes - if the government told you it was morally correct to put your hand in the fire, would you?

Because that’s what happened, and lots of people felt so morally superior imprisoning themselves and wearing useless face coverings ( some still do) …good for them.

I guess that you have nobody in your life who is likely to suffer from contracting Covid.However some of us do and that's why we stuck to the rules so as to protect them and I don't think it was too much to ask the same of you.

Was I expecting too much of your character?:erm:

Hugh 14-04-2022 09:45

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36119124)
Ah, the old “moral compass”, As the saying goes - if the government told you it was morally correct to put your hand in the fire, would you?

Because that’s what happened, and lots of people felt so morally superior imprisoning themselves and wearing useless face coverings ( some still do) …good for them.

No, it’s nothing like that, because in one case, you would be physically harming yourself, and in the other, you would be helping preventing the spread of a novel virus which made people very ill/die.

I don’t know anyone who felt "morally superior" for helping prevent spreading COVID - being socially responsible, probably, and thinking of others.

tweetiepooh 14-04-2022 10:20

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
"I don't think I did anything wrong" is something not unique to Boris. He could still argue that he was advised it was all above board but the investigation has found that he did breach the law and has been fined. Let's not lose sight of what "crime" was committed. It not quite Watergate is it? It doesn't even go to court, bit like a motoring offence.



I wonder how many other people also breached the letter of the law while keeping the spirit of it? Wonder how they would feel if they now received a penalty notice.

jonbxx 14-04-2022 10:30

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 36119130)
"I don't think I did anything wrong" is something not unique to Boris. He could still argue that he was advised it was all above board but the investigation has found that he did breach the law and has been fined. Let's not lose sight of what "crime" was committed. It not quite Watergate is it? It doesn't even go to court, bit like a motoring offence.



I wonder how many other people also breached the letter of the law while keeping the spirit of it? Wonder how they would feel if they now received a penalty notice.

There is a difference between making a mistake and getting done for it and making a mistake and repeatedly covering up, misdirecting and basically lying about it. I think if Boris Johnson et al put their hands up after the first breaking of the story, the public might be much more forgiving. It's the continuous dishonesty alongside the original crimes that gives the appearance of a fundamental lack of respect for all of us who did what we were asked.

Or, to channel my South London upbringing - Boris Johnson thinks we are just a bunch of mugs and thinks he is better than us. He appears to have no respect for those that he serves. It's almost sociopathic...

Sephiroth 14-04-2022 10:43

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36119084)
I couldn’t give a toss, I flagrantly disobeyed the rules all the way through, as much of them were incoherent and inconsistent.

At least this may serve as a lesson to not blindly follow government edicts when they try to scare you to imprison yourself.


I see people sort of pouncing on Pierre. Perhaps the word "flagrantly" caught their eye; but then any wilful breach would be "flagrant", I suppose.

In all honesty, who didn't break the lockdown rules in one way or another? But then we did not make the rules nor are we the PM and therein lies the distinction.

1andrew1 14-04-2022 11:03

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 36119130)
"I don't think I did anything wrong" is something not unique to Boris. He could still argue that he was advised it was all above board but the investigation has found that he did breach the law and has been fined. Let's not lose sight of what "crime" was committed. It not quite Watergate is it? It doesn't even go to court, bit like a motoring offence.

Breaking your own rules repeatedly either shows you're not not sharp enough to understand what you've just signed off on and told everyone else on national telly to do, or you feel that you're above the law. Neither of these makes you fit to govern in a Western democracy.

Doubtless more fines (which escalate in cost for repeat offenders) and pictures of unlawful indoor gatherings will come Johnson's way. The Police have only levied 50 fines for quick wins, there's more incidents to be investigated.

Under Johnson, the Party of law and order is fast becoming the Party and parties of law-breaking and disorder. It's reminiscent of the crumbling months of Major's regime. Perhaps this at least might provide Johnson with some comfort as Major has rehabilitated his reputation somewhat.

---------- Post added at 11:03 ---------- Previous post was at 10:59 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36119134)

But then we did not make the rules nor are we the PM and therein lies the distinction.

If Old Boy only takes on board once piece of insight from this thread today, this sentence would serve him well.

daveeb 14-04-2022 17:17

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36119125)
I guess that you have nobody in your life who is likely to suffer from contracting Covid.However some of us do and that's why we stuck to the rules so as to protect them and I don't think it was too much to ask the same of you.

Was I expecting too much of your character?:erm:

Yes! Just assume the worst and most self centred attitude possible and you won't go far wrong. :rolleyes:

Pierre 14-04-2022 18:43

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Lots of short memories on here on how ridiculous the lockdown rules were and how over zealous the police were.

Taped up park benches, police driving around parks on a loud speaker shouting “exercise only, no sunbathing”, sending up drones in the Peak District to spy on walkers, women fined for walking with takeaway coffees, people warned for breathing to heavily whilst running, being able to shop in a supermarket for booze but banned from buying clothes in the same shop, kids playgrounds taped up, “mandatory” mask wearing but you take them off to sing, I say “mandatory” but you could self-certify your requirement not to wear one, masks required in shops but not in pubs, put your mask on to walk the 5m from the pub/restaurant front door and take off at table.

I could go on, and on, and on, some devolved rules were even stupider.

So yes, when the rules were stupid and didn’t make a jot of sense, I ignored them, because I was taught not to do silly things that don’t make sense just because someone tells you to.

Maggy 14-04-2022 18:54

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36119134)

I see people sort of pouncing on Pierre. Perhaps the word "flagrantly" caught their eye; but then any wilful breach would be "flagrant", I suppose.

In all honesty, who didn't break the lockdown rules in one way or another? But then we did not make the rules nor are we the PM and therein lies the distinction.

Nope I didn’t.

ianch99 14-04-2022 18:59

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36119134)

I see people sort of pouncing on Pierre. Perhaps the word "flagrantly" caught their eye; but then any wilful breach would be "flagrant", I suppose.

In all honesty, who didn't break the lockdown rules in one way or another? But then we did not make the rules nor are we the PM and therein lies the distinction.

Nor did I

Itshim 14-04-2022 19:06

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 36119130)
"I don't think I did anything wrong" is something not unique to Boris. He could still argue that he was advised it was all above board but the investigation has found that he did breach the law and has been fined. Let's not lose sight of what "crime" was committed. It not quite Watergate is it? It doesn't even go to court, bit like a motoring offence.



I wonder how many other people also breached the letter of the law while keeping the spirit of it? Wonder how they would feel if they now received a penalty notice.

Wonder how many MPs etc have been fined for motoring offences , perhaps they should also be asked to resign , at least one Welsh minister has recently been banned for speeding far more dangerous than having a piece of cake with people you have been working with all day

Paul 15-04-2022 17:55

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36119126)
I don’t know anyone who felt "morally superior" for helping prevent spreading COVID - being socially responsible, probably, and thinking of others.

I'm pretty sure there are a few examples on this forum.

Despite what some say, I doubt anyone didnt break a rule at some point, intentionally or otherwise.
It wasnt always even clear cut what the rules were, they were open to a lot of interpretation.

OLD BOY 15-04-2022 19:30

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
I agree. I come into contact with a lot of people in my line of activity, and even those who appear to be the last to disobey the law find (highly inappropriate) ways of justifying their transgressions.

Boris has nothing on them!

Sephiroth 15-04-2022 19:42

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36119239)
I agree. I come into contact with a lot of people in my line of activity, and even those who appear to be the last to disobey the law find (highly inappropriate) ways of justifying their transgressions.

Boris has nothing on them!

... Except that your contacts did not lie to Parliament.

1andrew1 15-04-2022 19:46

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Tuesday could be interesting!
Quote:

Boris Johnson faces prospect of vote over misleading parliament on ‘partygate’

The opposition Labour, Liberal Democrat and the Scottish National parties are in discussions over the best way to force a vote on whether Johnson brought parliament into disrepute when MPs return from the Easter break next week.

Johnson has publicly apologised for his “mistake” over attending a surprise birthday party for him in June 2020. “I deeply regret the frustration and anger caused and I am sorry,” he said.

However, opposition MPs are eager to force a vote over whether the prime minister misled the house. One way of doing so would be for MPs to trigger “contempt” proceedings, which could lead to Johnson being found in contempt of parliament.

If such a motion was granted by Sir Lindsay Hoyle, Commons speaker, Conservative MPs would likely be whipped against it. But one senior Labour MP said that even a failed vote could serve a political purpose.

“It would be very useful ahead of local elections in May to get the Tories trooping through the lobby to defend the prime minister,” the MP said. Another senior Liberal Democrat MP said they expected “a significant number” of Tories to abstain, which could “cause the government problems”.
https://www.ft.com/content/d6c0bdf5-...7-3dd0aefecfa2

OLD BOY 15-04-2022 19:48

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36119136)
Breaking your own rules repeatedly either shows you're not not sharp enough to understand what you've just signed off on and told everyone else on national telly to do, or you feel that you're above the law. Neither of these makes you fit to govern in a Western democracy.

Doubtless more fines (which escalate in cost for repeat offenders) and pictures of unlawful indoor gatherings will come Johnson's way. The Police have only levied 50 fines for quick wins, there's more incidents to be investigated.

Under Johnson, the Party of law and order is fast becoming the Party and parties of law-breaking and disorder. It's reminiscent of the crumbling months of Major's regime. Perhaps this at least might provide Johnson with some comfort as Major has rehabilitated his reputation somewhat.

---------- Post added at 11:03 ---------- Previous post was at 10:59 ----------


If Old Boy only takes on board once piece of insight from this thread today, this sentence would serve him well.

Except that maybe Boris knows he did NOT break the rules, and the Police have misinterpreted them. It is the Met we are talking about, you know. They have form.

I don’t see any mention of birthday cake in the regulations.

Sephiroth 15-04-2022 19:55

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36119244)

This is where politics itself becomes murky and dishonourable.

Boris didn't bring Parliament into disrepute in the ordinary understanding of those English words. He brought himself into disrepute.

This isn't the time to disrupt government and make the UK the word's laughing stock.


---------- Post added at 19:55 ---------- Previous post was at 19:54 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36119246)
Except that maybe Boris knows he did NOT break the rules, and the Police have misinterpreted them. It is the Met we are talking about, you know. They have form.

I don’t see any mention of birthday cake in the regulations.

So why has Boris paid the fine for breaking the rules?

1andrew1 15-04-2022 20:23

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36119246)
I don’t see any mention of birthday cake in the regulations.

The 2020 rules were about banning indoor social gatherings which would spread Coronavirus, not on food items. Indoor social gatherings of two or more people were banned in England and people were only allowed to meet outside in groups of up to six. The two-metre social distancing rule was in place.
https://inews.co.uk/news/boris-johns...o=in-line_link

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36119246)
Except that maybe Boris knows he did NOT break the rules, and the Police have misinterpreted them. It is the Met we are talking about, you know. They have form.

Johnson has acknowledged the Police were correct.

Quote:

"When I said that I spoke in completely good faith because as I’ve said to you just now I… at the time that I was standing up for nine minutes in the Cabinet Room where I work every day, it didn’t occur to me that, as I say, that I was in breach of the rules."

“I now humbly accept that I was. But I think the best thing I can do now is, having settled the fine, is focus on the job in hand. That’s what I’m going to do.”
https://www.thejournal.ie/boris-john...36592-Apr2022/

I believe ITV still maintains the event lasted an hour. Let's see what the Sue Gray report has to say on that.

Hugh 15-04-2022 21:19

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36119239)
I agree. I come into contact with a lot of people in my line of activity, and even those who appear to be the last to disobey the law find (highly inappropriate) ways of justifying their transgressions.

Boris has nothing on them!

Like Johnson?

---------- Post added at 21:19 ---------- Previous post was at 21:14 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36119250)
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY View Post
I don’t see any mention of birthday cake in the regulations.
The 2020 rules were about banning indoor social gatherings which would spread Coronavirus, not on food items. Indoor social gatherings of two or more people were banned in England and people were only allowed to meet outside in groups of up to six. The two-metre social distancing rule was in place.
https://inews.co.uk/news/boris-johns...o=in-line_link

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY View Post
Except that maybe Boris knows he did NOT break the rules, and the Police have misinterpreted them. It is the Met we are talking about, you know. They have form
Johnson has acknowledged the Police were correct.

Quote:

When I said that I spoke in completely good faith because as I’ve said to you just now I… at the time that I was standing up for nine minutes in the Cabinet Room where I work every day, it didn’t occur to me that, as I say, that I was in breach of the rules."

“I now humbly accept that I was. But I think the best thing I can do now is, having settled the fine, is focus on the job in hand. That’s what I’m going to do.
https://www.thejournal.ie/boris-john...36592-Apr2022/

I believe ITV still maintains the event lasted an hour. Let's see what the Sue Gray report has to say on that.

OLD BOY knows better than Johnson - after all, Johnson has form…

If the Met have "misinterpreted the rules", why isn’t Johnson appealing*?

*I know, I know - because he is an inveterate liar, philanderer, dresses like 7 pounds of shit in a 5 pound bag who combs his hair with a toffee apple, but I meant appeal against the FPN

GrimUpNorth 15-04-2022 22:04

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
As someone said this evening while we were out for tea, even our nonce of an MP in Wakefield has shown more honour than Borris and realised the right thing to do is resign.

Mr K 16-04-2022 15:23

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Just had the local MP at the front door, first time that's ever happened ! The Tories are worried....
Wasted a lot of his time before he realised his party had no chance of my vote. He didn't seem to know of or talk about anyone called Boris ;) The poor sod looked so depressed/knackered....

Sephiroth 16-04-2022 15:32

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36119260)
As someone said this evening while we were out for tea, even our nonce of an MP in Wakefield has shown more honour than Borris and realised the right thing to do is resign.

We know what you mean, but that comparison really is too far out, imo.

Dave42 18-04-2022 00:55

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Boris hit by ‘indefensible’ fresh Partygate allegations
Johnson didn't just attend lockdown-busting celebrations in Downing Street, it has emerged...

https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/po...ations-319673/

1andrew1 18-04-2022 10:14

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36119340)
Boris hit by ‘indefensible’ fresh Partygate allegations
Johnson didn't just attend lockdown-busting celebrations in Downing Street, it has emerged...

https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/po...ations-319673/

That sounds like a challenge to the Forum. May I suggest it be defended by one or all of the following:
  1. Let's wait for the full Sue Gray report and give Johnson's party the benefit of the doubt in the May elections.
  2. Who didn't break the draconian and inconsistent rules?
  3. Starmer had a beer one year later too. I'm sure government rules did not alter throughout the pandemic.
  4. Where in the pandemic regulations did it mention not eating cake or drinking wine?
  5. You boring Boris-bashers really do need to move on. We need a strong and stable government to manage our response to the Ukraine war and cost of living crisis.
:D

Chris 18-04-2022 10:20

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36119350)
That sounds like a challenge to the Forum. May I suggest it be defended by one or all of the following:
  1. Let's wait for the full Sue Gray report and give Johnson's party the benefit of the doubt in the May elections.
  2. Who didn't break the draconian and inconsistent rules?
  3. Starmer had a beer one year later too. I'm sure government rules did not alter throughout the pandemic.
  4. Where in the pandemic regulations did it mention not eating cake or drinking wine?
  5. You boring Boris-bashers really do need to move on. We need a strong and stable government to manage our response to the Ukraine war and cost of living crisis.
:D

You forgot

6. If the police decide Boris broke the law, the police are wrong.

1andrew1 18-04-2022 10:58

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36119353)
You forgot

6. If the police decide Boris broke the law, the police are wrong.

:D

spiderplant 18-04-2022 11:46

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36119350)
We need a strong and stable government to manage our response to the Ukraine war and cost of living crisis.

Well that one is actually true. The sooner the better.

1andrew1 18-04-2022 11:52

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by spiderplant (Post 36119360)
Well that one is actually true. The sooner the better.

Agreed. ;)

Carth 18-04-2022 14:06

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Good luck finding one, and then you've got to persuade the public to vote them in anyway . . .


. . and after a few months half the country will be calling for their heads :D

OLD BOY 18-04-2022 17:05

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Seems like you only get Covid fines if you are a Conservative.

https://www.gbnews.uk/news/nicola-st...onfirms/274641

Scotland First Minister Nicola Sturgeon will not be prosecuted after viral footage showed her breaching face mask law.

Paul 18-04-2022 17:31

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Did Starmer get one ?

Damien 18-04-2022 18:08

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36119392)
Did Starmer get one ?

Stamer's one was a year later when the rules was a bit looser. But the police did investigate and found he didn't break it: https://www.theguardian.com/politics...er-office-beer

If Johnson admitted back in December 'Yes, there was that cake' and this was the only incident things would be been easier for him much like it was for Starmer. But Johnson is under investigation for other events and he kept lying about it all the time.

Chris 18-04-2022 18:45

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36119389)
Seems like you only get Covid fines if you are a Conservative.

https://www.gbnews.uk/news/nicola-st...onfirms/274641

Scotland First Minister Nicola Sturgeon will not be prosecuted after viral footage showed her breaching face mask law.

Actually it seems you only get them if there’s evidence of wilful rule-breaking.

I am by no means a Sturgeon fan but if she was papped without a mask on in the first 30 seconds of entering a building before remembering to put one on, that’s quite obviously not the same thing as attending a party with cake or stopping in the office for drinks.

Itshim 18-04-2022 18:57

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36119353)
You forgot

6. If the police decide Boris broke the law, the police are wrong.

And the met is a baston of truth and honesty, their officers can be so so trusted to be honest and upright . :erm:

papa smurf 18-04-2022 19:10

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36119400)
Actually it seems you only get them if there’s evidence of wilful rule-breaking.

I am by no means a Sturgeon fan but if she was papped without a mask on in the first 30 seconds of entering a building before remembering to put one on, that’s quite obviously not the same thing as attending a party with cake or stopping in the office for drinks.

I didn't realise the law said you get a 30 seconds grace period before the face mask law kicked in.

heero_yuy 18-04-2022 19:13

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36119402)
I didn't realise the law said you get a 30 seconds grace period before the face mask law kicked in.

You do if you're a Krankie. :D

papa smurf 18-04-2022 19:15

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 36119403)
You do if you're a Krankie. :D

And everyone else in the barbers shop who wasn't wearing a mask.

Mad Max 18-04-2022 20:19

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
She looks a damn sight better with a mask on. :D

Hugh 18-04-2022 20:21

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Amazing how all the people slamming the Met’s record in policing & veracity never felt the necessity to mention their doubts and concerns when it was people other than Johnson being on the receiving end of the Cockernee Plods long arm of the law… :shrug:

pip08456 18-04-2022 21:57

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
The Met Police have proven to be corrupt over many years, here's just one example. There are many more if you care to look.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-60832186

That said can the majority of the Met be called corrupt? Personally no, certainally at the lower levels and I knew a few of regular officers when I lived in the Met area for a few years (I framed a few advanced driving certificates for some of them). They had no respect for their superiors.

Maggy 19-04-2022 09:19

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36119400)
Actually it seems you only get them if there’s evidence of wilful rule-breaking.

I am by no means a Sturgeon fan but if she was papped without a mask on in the first 30 seconds of entering a building before remembering to put one on, that’s quite obviously not the same thing as attending a party with cake or stopping in the office for drinks.

:tu:

Hugh 19-04-2022 10:16

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36119350)
That sounds like a challenge to the Forum. May I suggest it be defended by one or all of the following:
  1. Let's wait for the full Sue Gray report and give Johnson's party the benefit of the doubt in the May elections.
  2. Who didn't break the draconian and inconsistent rules?
  3. Starmer had a beer one year later too. I'm sure government rules did not alter throughout the pandemic.
  4. Where in the pandemic regulations did it mention not eating cake or drinking wine?
  5. You boring Boris-bashers really do need to move on. We need a strong and stable government to manage our response to the Ukraine war and cost of living crisis.
:D

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris View Post
You forgot

6. If the police decide Boris broke the law, the police are wrong.
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...4&d=1650359774

[/img]

Hugh 19-04-2022 10:17

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36119412)
The Met Police have proven to be corrupt over many years, here's just one example. There are many more if you care to look.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-60832186

That said can the majority of the Met be called corrupt? Personally no, certainally at the lower levels and I knew a few of regular officers when I lived in the Met area for a few years (I framed a few advanced driving certificates for some of them). They had no respect for their superiors.

Quote:

The HMICFRS report said "it would not describe the Met as institutionally corrupt" based on this inspection but it did say the force's approach to tackling corruption was "not fit for purpose"
Anyway, the point I was trying to make was that some posters never seemed to previously had an issue with the Met’s "form" until it affected someone they supported…

Carth 19-04-2022 12:29

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
In hindsight, it may have been much better if the Met had received a tip off about the birthday bash.

They then could have barged in, shot everyone in attendance and confiscated the cake and booze.

Obviously the officers involved would then need to be suspended on full pay whilst awaiting the results of an investigation of 'over the top' policing at the behest of the Labour party

:D

1andrew1 19-04-2022 15:53

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
As many have said, Johnson is extremely likely to win this vote but it won't look good for the Conservatives on May 5th.

Quote:

The Commons Speaker says MPs will vote on Thursday on whether the PM should be investigated for knowingly misleading Parliament over breaching Covid laws
Sir Lindsay Hoyle says he will allow MPs time to debate a motion from Labour on whether to refer Boris Johnson to Parliament's Privileges Committee.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-politics-61143220

papa smurf 19-04-2022 16:08

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Hasn't enough time been wasted over this trivia.

BenMcr 19-04-2022 16:12

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36119461)
Hasn't enough time been wasted over this trivia.

It's not wasted time to ensure our leaders follow the laws they created and required us to follow.

Julian 19-04-2022 16:15

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36119460)
As many have said, Johnson is extremely likely to win this vote but it won't look good for the Conservatives on May 5th.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-politics-61143220

If Conservative MP's don't vote against Boris I rather suspect the inevitable trouncing in the local elections will not bother them that much.

A little bit of wailing and gnashing of teeth will no doubt ensue.

Local election results are, after all, hardly a pointer towards a likely GE outcome in two years time.

1andrew1 19-04-2022 16:17

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36119461)
Hasn't enough time been wasted over this trivia.

It's trivia only to those who find democracy trivial.

Itshim 19-04-2022 16:40

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36119464)
It's trivia only to those who find democracy trivial.

However speeding fixed penalty notices , for offences far more deadly than eating cake with people you have spent days with are treated as joke :confused:

pip08456 19-04-2022 16:43

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36119461)
Hasn't enough time been wasted over this trivia.

I agree there are more important things happening in the world there doesn't need this as a distraction.

Boris, as much as I dislike him has done a sterling job in supporting Ukraine and needs to be able to continue this.

BenMcr 19-04-2022 16:45

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36119468)
I agree there are more important things happening in the world there doesn't need this as a distraction.

It's only a 'distraction' by the actions of those that didn't follow the law.

If they had followed the rules they required us to follow, we wouldn't be talking about it now.

1andrew1 19-04-2022 16:50

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36119467)
However speeding fixed penalty notices , for offences far more deadly than eating cake with people you have spent days with are treated as joke :confused:

Misleading the house about laws you introduced and told the country to follow is far more important than doing 31 in a 30 limit. As I've explained before, the laws were about banning social gatherings and not about cake.

---------- Post added at 16:50 ---------- Previous post was at 16:48 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36119468)
I agree there are more important things happening in the world there doesn't need this as a distraction.

Boris, as much as I dislike him has done a sterling job in supporting Ukraine and needs to be able to continue this.

Agree that Johnson has been doing well on Ukraine but there's a very strong UK consensus on this issue. So no reason that this won't carry on without him.

Carth 19-04-2022 16:53

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36119461)
Hasn't enough time been wasted over this trivia.

To be fair, the Brexit thread is almost dead and buried.
Shortages of food, medicine, toilet roll and flower pickers never gets mentioned anymore.
Articles about refugee boats from across the channel have been replaced by £300 a month lodgers.

so I guess this thread is probably the only one left for moaning about the government :shrug:


edit:
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 36119469)
It's only a 'distraction' by the actions of those that didn't follow the law.

That'll be 98.62% of the population then, no matter which law they broke

jonbxx 19-04-2022 16:55

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
It's not the breaking of the rules that is the big issue here, it's the honesty to Parliament. Parliament (the legislative) exists as a check on the actions of the executive (Government) along with the courts. If the executive and its' officers are not honest to Parliament, then the link between the two is broken, breaking the (unwritten) constitution of the country.

Putting a hat on with 'Hyperbole' written on it, an executive pillar that does not and will not answer to the legislative and judicial pillars is a dictatorship

Carth 19-04-2022 16:59

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Politicians lie, to the public and themselves. Surely everyone of voting age understands this and that it will never change.

BenMcr 19-04-2022 17:05

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36119474)
Politicians lie, to the public and themselves. Surely everyone of voting age understands this and that it will never change.

Doesn't mean we shouldn't keep having a go at them for it when they do though.

Carth 19-04-2022 17:10

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 36119476)
Doesn't mean we shouldn't keep having a go at them for it when they do though.

Funnily enough, I can't recall people on this forum doing that so vigorously over the years . . strange that :rolleyes:

1andrew1 19-04-2022 17:16

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36119478)
Funnily enough, I can't recall people on this forum doing that so vigorously over the years . . strange that :rolleyes:

Just because someone can't recall something doesn't mean it didn't happen. ;)

BenMcr 19-04-2022 17:18

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36119478)
Funnily enough, I can't recall people on this forum doing that so vigorously over the years . . strange that :rolleyes:

Others have had been called out for lying when needed

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...php?t=33701595

Quote:

Cameron lied to get back in (tax credits and hard working people)
Maybe if the current government weren't doing it so regularly, then people wouldn't be so vigorous as they are.

Strange that.

pip08456 19-04-2022 17:21

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36119473)
It's not the breaking of the rules that is the big issue here, it's the honesty to Parliament. Parliament (the legislative) exists as a check on the actions of the executive (Government) along with the courts. If the executive and its' officers are not honest to Parliament, then the link between the two is broken, breaking the (unwritten) constitution of the country.

Putting a hat on with 'Hyperbole' written on it, an executive pillar that does not and will not answer to the legislative and judicial pillars is a dictatorship

Johnson could quite rightly say no rules were broken if that is what he was advised at the time. That is not him misleading Parliament but him being misled by his advisors.

The "rule" allegedly being broken is the one to stop the spread of the virus with different people meeting. These "parties" were allegedly with people who worked in close contact daily, not much chance of increasing spread there.

The only thing bad here is the Optics and the media frenzy.

BenMcr 19-04-2022 17:40

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36119481)
The only thing bad here is the Optics and the media frenzy.

So not the law breaking and lying which has generated the fines and resignations?

Carth 19-04-2022 17:44

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 36119480)
Others have had been called out for lying when needed

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...php?t=33701595



Maybe if the current government weren't doing it so regularly, then people wouldn't be so vigorous as they are.

Strange that.

You grabbed an 'example' from 7 years ago (which coincidentally also concerns a Tory) and is a thread with a mere 9 pages . . over 100 fewer than this one :D

Damien 19-04-2022 17:46

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36119481)
Johnson could quite rightly say no rules were broken if that is what he was advised at the time. That is not him misleading Parliament but him being misled by his advisors.

The "rule" allegedly being broken is the one to stop the spread of the virus with different people meeting. These "parties" were allegedly with people who worked in close contact daily, not much chance of increasing spread there.

.

These are laws his Government implemented and which he went on TV multiple times to tell people to obey. If he really didn't understand them then he is grossly incompetent.

papa smurf 19-04-2022 17:47

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
The PM has repeatedly apologised for this trivial matter, i can see no point in continuing to whine about it, there is only so much mileage in a slice of cake at work with your workmates.

BenMcr 19-04-2022 17:50

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36119484)
You grabbed an 'example' from 7 years ago (which coincidentally also concerns a Tory) and is a thread with a mere 9 pages . . over 100 fewer than this one :D

I'd go back further but the Tories have been in power for 12 years so seems a bit pointless.

And as the Theresa May years were mostly about Brexit and there is still a massive thread going on about that, I thought I'd go back before then.

Carth 19-04-2022 17:56

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
You can't find anything (apart from Brexit probably) that knocks the Government for over 100 pages?


Looks like I was right then . . . "I can't recall people on this forum doing that so vigorously over the years"

Give it up lads, you're making yourselves look stupid by chasing the media outrage over this ;)

BenMcr 19-04-2022 17:56

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36119486)
The PM has repeatedly apologised for this trivial matter, i can see no point in continuing to whine about it, there is only so much mileage in a slice of cake at work with your workmates.

It wasn't a 'no cake' law he broke.

Hugh 19-04-2022 18:00

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36119486)
The PM has repeatedly apologised for this trivial matter, i can see no point in continuing to whine about it, there is only so much mileage in a slice of cake at work with your workmates.

Don’t worry, there are lots of other comestibles and libations yet to be revealed…;)

Carth 19-04-2022 18:00

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36119486)
The PM has repeatedly apologised for this trivial matter, i can see no point in continuing to whine about it, there is only so much mileage in a slice of cake at work with your workmates.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 36119489)
It wasn't a 'no cake' law he broke.

It saddens me to say it but, my opinion is that this is nothing to do with cake, nothing to do with a party, but everything to do with Boris . . the man who delivered Brexit.*





*apologies for mentioning that word again

Hugh 19-04-2022 18:00

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 36119489)
It wasn't a 'no cake' law he broke.

They know - it’s just deflection…

1andrew1 19-04-2022 18:08

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36119491)
It saddens me to say it but, my opinion is that this is nothing to do with cake, nothing to do with a party, but everything to do with Boris . . the man who delivered Brexit.*

*apologies for mentioning that word again

Fortunately, some of the keenest Brexiters on this forum haven't fallen for that line and are able to understand the importance of this issue.

Carth 19-04-2022 18:13

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36119493)
Fortunately, some of the keenest Brexiters on this forum haven't fallen for that line and are able to understand the importance of this issue.

Just my opinion Andrew, formed by my own thoughts and not due to the ongoing media circus many people seem to follow like it's a religion

Hugh 19-04-2022 18:30

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36119495)
Just my opinion Andrew, formed by my own thoughts and not due to the ongoing media circus many people seem to follow like it's a religion

So, you’re not influenced, but you believe others are?

OK…

Damien 19-04-2022 18:32

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36119495)
Just my opinion Andrew, formed by my own thoughts and not due to the ongoing media circus many people seem to follow like it's a religion

Well you're loyal, no one can accuse you otherwise.

Itshim 19-04-2022 18:43

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
[QUOTE=1andrew1;36119470]Misleading the house about laws you introduced and told the country to follow is far more important than doing 31 in a 30 limit. As I've explained before, the laws were about banning social gatherings and not about cake.[COLOR="Silver"]

[SIZE=1]---------- Post added at 16:50 ---------- Previous post was at 16:48 ----------[/

So let's find every office ,shop, or ANY type of workers that had a cup of tea in the same room !!! :D
It's also is a matter of interpretation , as to what happened and we all know how trustworthy the met police are .

Hugh 19-04-2022 18:44

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
1 Attachment(s)
I thought this put it well (ymmv).

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...5&d=1650390211

https://twitter.com/rachelparris/sta...lJUb4Q1Q9mhCjg

Hugh 19-04-2022 18:45

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36119499)
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36119470)
Misleading the house about laws you introduced and told the country to follow is far more important than doing 31 in a 30 limit. As I've explained before, the laws were about banning social gatherings and not about cake.[COLOR="Silver"]

[SIZE=1]---------- Post added at 16:50 ---------- Previous post was at 16:48 ----------

So let's find every office ,shop, or ANY type of workers that had a cup of tea in the same room !!! :D

Did they set the rules and remind us every day on TV and other media to keep to the rules?

Carth 19-04-2022 18:47

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36119496)
So, you’re not influenced, but you believe others are?

OK…


oh definitely ;)



Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36119497)
Well you're loyal, no one can accuse you otherwise.

Loyal to whom?

At 68 yrs of age I've probably voted 5 times maximum . . . the ones I can remember:
Way back in the common market vote (against)
Once in local elections for BNP as a 'protest' vote
Once for Conservatives I think (can't remember why though)
Once for leaving the EU

There might be a 5th, there might not be. There are people though who loyally vote for a party because their family have always done so . . although is that loyalty to family or party?

Itshim 19-04-2022 18:48

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36119501)
Did they set the rules and remind us every day on TV and other media to keep to the rules?

However they were working together , if it had been tea and biscuits would there have been all this fuss. ?


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:10.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum