Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   The state benefits system mega-thread. (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33692770)

johnhook 25-06-2015 19:28

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35785156)
Those in their 20's and 30's will have to provide for their own pensions as the giant Ponzie state scheme is coming to a shuddering halt. The triangle is collapsing as the population ages.

I think we have a duty to provide for those who have decades of contributions. The real losers here are likely to be those in their forties and early fifties, being caught between being unable to build a personal pension pot and the state pension falling in value.

good job the welfare state will look after those in need

Kursk 25-06-2015 21:09

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35785149)
On the bright side, we are living longer nowadays...

:) And triple-locked longer into the bargain.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gavin78 (Post 35785133)
I'll be working till 100 to claim

I think the young are to blame for living longer due to their healthy lifestyles, the contentment of owning their own home and their feckless procreation :D.

Chrysalis 01-07-2015 16:45

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignitionnet (Post 35785068)
You're actually entirely accurate there. Since 2012-13 welfare outside of that being paid to pensioners has dropped while the pensioner welfare bill continues to rise.

It'll also only get worse if wage growth remains weak, as pensions are guaranteed to rise by at least 2.5% even if inflation and wage growth run below that level.

Ignore Kursk; he appears to live in a different reality. A selfish, misanthropic one at that.

I got no idea if ignition agrees with me on what should be done with working age benefits, but I 100% agree with ignition that there needs to be something done about the special treatment to pensioners, pensions make a huge chunk of the DWP budget, and yet we have a government claiming much smaller budgets the country cannot afford.

My view is that pensioners should get the same treatment as working age sickness benefits, so increases and decreases are linked, and things like heating allowance, free tv licenses scrapped. Also they should be subject to the same housing changes, so bedroom tax and council tax support changes.

The entire benefit system is geared around giving a level of support depending on your age. e.g. the single room rate for housing benefit threshold was pushed to 35 years of age from 25, and I expect in 10 years it will be pushed again to 45 and 10 years later then 55 and so on. The cuts are been aimed at certain age groups, and of course this applies to pensions as well, as those currently funding the current pensioners will not get the same treatment when they retire.

peanut 01-07-2015 17:43

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Lost for words.. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-expenses.html

Pierre 01-07-2015 19:03

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by peanut (Post 35786211)

Bit of a non-story really.

MPs have a credit card they can use for incidentals. They have to square it off every month by justifying the expenditure or it is blocked. seems like a good system to me.

All this is highlighting is that MPs are bad with their paperwork nothing more

Quote:

All have since cleared their debts.

Kursk 01-07-2015 19:49

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrysalis (Post 35786197)
I got no idea if ignition agrees with me on what should be done with working age benefits, but I 100% agree with ignition that there needs to be something done about the special treatment to pensioners, pensions make a huge chunk of the DWP budget, and yet we have a government claiming much smaller budgets the country cannot afford.

My view is that pensioners should get the same treatment as working age sickness benefits, so increases and decreases are linked, and things like heating allowance, free tv licenses scrapped. Also they should be subject to the same housing changes, so bedroom tax and council tax support changes.

The entire benefit system is geared around giving a level of support depending on your age. e.g. the single room rate for housing benefit threshold was pushed to 35 years of age from 25, and I expect in 10 years it will be pushed again to 45 and 10 years later then 55 and so on. The cuts are been aimed at certain age groups, and of course this applies to pensions as well, as those currently funding the current pensioners will not get the same treatment when they retire.

You are 36 and you assess that there's nothing in this pensions lark for you therefore those who have earned their pension should be fleeced to support your current day benefits? Bit transparent.

martyh 01-07-2015 20:03

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35786225)
You are 36 and you assess that there's nothing in this pensions lark for you therefore those who have earned their pension should be fleeced to support your current day benefits? Bit transparent.

Very transparent,.My state pension will be exactly the same as everyone else's despite paying in loads more than someone who spent their working life claiming benefits.People rather conveniently forget that JSA and some other benefits pay tax and NA's for claimants

Ramrod 01-07-2015 23:43

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by johnhook (Post 35785086)
That is a good but emotive reason. It is unsustainable it is a bad medicine to swallow but if it does not change then the welfare bill will grow and grow no matter what cuts are made

The state made a promise to them 'cradle to grave'. To renege on that promise would be shameful.
I'm 47 but I don't expect much or any pension when i retire in spite of paying national insurance. I have been forewarned and am taking steps to provide for myself in retirement unlike people who are pensioners atm.

johnhook 01-07-2015 23:56

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramrod (Post 35786244)
The state made a promise to them 'cradle to grave'. To renege on that promise would be shameful.
I'm 47 but I don't expect much or any pension when i retire in spite of paying national insurance. I have been forewarned and am taking steps to provide for myself in retirement unlike people who are pensioners atm.

to keep the facts from the public is also

Chrysalis 02-07-2015 01:07

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35786225)
You are 36 and you assess that there's nothing in this pensions lark for you therefore those who have earned their pension should be fleeced to support your current day benefits? Bit transparent.

I currently claim no unemployment benefits, just get some DLA.

No i dont have the same outlook as you, where #1 comes first.

Someone who is 64 and unemployed would be labeled as a undeserving scrounger by tory ministers but then he turns 65 (or whatever the pension age is) and suddenly he is a well deserving pensioner, what is all that about?

The fact is, if everyone is in austerity together then everyone should be treated the same in terms of cuts etc.

The modern world for the young adult.

zero hour contracts
record house prices in comparison to average income levels
annual reduction of state assistance
university loans that are to be paid back vs grants
lack of new council housing for secure renting.

The average age of shareholders for the multi billion pound company my sister works for is 69 years old, that company has very high demands for profitability, cutting jobs even tho profits are at record levels and also threatened workers with the sack who were not going to vote tory in the just recent election (how is that legal?).

Few people are honest tho, my dad who is now in his 70s admits his generation has had it very easy compared to my generation and the generation before him.

In the past 5 years I have actually donated more than 20% of my earnings and thats with a average income under 20k per annum. I have also gave many 1000s of hours working for charities. Because I know what its like to be working age and with no job. Not the fun and games people claim it is.

Kursk 02-07-2015 01:19

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35786230)
Very transparent,.My state pension will be exactly the same as everyone else's despite paying in loads more than someone who spent their working life claiming benefits.People rather conveniently forget that JSA and some other benefits pay tax and NA's for claimants

Indeed.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrysalis (Post 35786252)
I currently claim no unemployment benefits, just get some DLA.

No i dont have the same outlook as you, where #1 comes first.

I receive no benefits whatsoever but I am more than happy for those who need support to receive it.

Yes, these are difficult times for young people but I can't think of a decade when everything was hunky dory - today's 'cushy' pensioners have had their own share of tough times. Do you think they delighted in war or power cuts or luncheon meat or rationing, no double glazing, no wii, no x-box?

As for your Dad, the poor old bloke is probably punch drunk from you moaning about what a tough life you're having...:D

Chrysalis 02-07-2015 01:27

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Some information regarding expenditure and cuts.

social loans scrapped - the last 7 years of its use were self funded, and 4 of the 7 years were budget surplus by over 6 figures.

2013 figures

state pensions 74.22 billion (close to 50% of total DWP budget). - no cuts
DLA 12billion - apparently unaffordable - cut for working age, pensioners and ex armed forces excluded
ESA 4.8 billion still been targeted for more cuts is less than 10% of pension budget
JSA I think similar to ESA just under 5 billion - (picture is heavily compressed) - targeted very heavily for cuts especially for under 25s

There is of course budgets such as housing benefits which are a complete minefield as its split across all age groups as well as many full time employed people, and a lot of housing benefit expenditure goes into private landlord pockets as well.

Kursk 02-07-2015 01:35

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
TBH this has all been done to death in this thread. Its the DLA bit that gets your goat isn't it? ;)

Chrysalis 02-07-2015 05:03

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
actually no.

DLA is often paid to people who have other income, so the changes arent so serious as the ESA/JSA stuff.

Is the changes to housing and unemployment benefits that goats me. so you guessed wrong, you have that mentality that because you are self serving I must be, whilst I have issues with how DLA changes have been managed, I wouldnt have an issue if pensioners and all parts of the country were under the same conditions.

I would say the #1 issue that goats me out of everything perhaps even more than workfare is pensioners currently.

johnhook 02-07-2015 10:25

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrysalis (Post 35786254)
Some information regarding expenditure and cuts.

social loans scrapped - the last 7 years of its use were self funded, and 4 of the 7 years were budget surplus by over 6 figures.

2013 figures

state pensions 74.22 billion (close to 50% of total DWP budget). - no cuts
DLA 12billion - apparently unaffordable - cut for working age, pensioners and ex armed forces excluded
ESA 4.8 billion still been targeted for more cuts is less than 10% of pension budget
JSA I think similar to ESA just under 5 billion - (picture is heavily compressed) - targeted very heavily for cuts especially for under 25s

There is of course budgets such as housing benefits which are a complete minefield as its split across all age groups as well as many full time employed people, and a lot of housing benefit expenditure goes into private landlord pockets as well.


JSA has dropped to under 3 billion iirc. No one is interested in the harsh reality of the State pension just wait 5 years the poor and sick will be on pennies and dying and the state pension will have risen again by more than the cuts have saved. The State pensions figures now are 88 billion a rise of over the 12 billion wanted in cuts over 2 years. If this follows in 15 years the state pension will be more than the whole welfare budget is now

Kursk 02-07-2015 16:46

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrysalis (Post 35786257)
actually no.

DLA is often paid to people who have other income, so the changes arent so serious as the ESA/JSA stuff.

Is the changes to housing and unemployment benefits that goats me. so you guessed wrong, you have that mentality that because you are self serving I must be, whilst I have issues with how DLA changes have been managed, I wouldnt have an issue if pensioners and all parts of the country were under the same conditions.

I would say the #1 issue that goats me out of everything perhaps even more than workfare is pensioners currently.

Not for the first time on this forum I am wrongly accused. In this instance, you call me self serving. How am I self served by supporting pensioners whose income is earned (I am not a pensioner)?; how am I self served by suggesting that benefits need to be targeted toward those in need? (I receive no benefits).

No, it is simply this: there are people who feel their 'predicament' is just not fair and that their situation can be alleviated at the expense of others. In this case, the target is older people. The truly self serving people are those who would bleed their grandmother and grandfather of the modest income that allows them to enjoy their old age with dignity.

It's just as well there are systems in place to protect the defenceless from a youth that expects their needs to be satiated immediately.

Like Ramrod says there is plenty of time for you to provide for yourself if you are concerned about the cost of future pensions and anyway, you never know who might try to take it away from you just when you are relying upon it.

heero_yuy 02-07-2015 18:44

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35786334)
Not for the first time on this forum I am wrongly accused. In this instance, you call me self serving. How am I self served by supporting pensioners whose income is earned (I am not a pensioner)?; how am I self served by suggesting that benefits need to be targeted toward those in need? (I receive no benefits).

No, it is simply this: there are people who feel their 'predicament' is just not fair and that their situation can be alleviated at the expense of others. In this case, the target is older people. The truly self serving people are those who would bleed their grandmother and grandfather of the modest income that allows them to enjoy their old age with dignity.

It's just as well there are systems in place to protect the defenceless from a youth that expects their needs to be satiated immediately.

Like Ramrod says there is plenty of time for you to provide for yourself if you are concerned about the cost of future pensions and anyway, you never know who might try to take it away from you just when you are relying upon it.

:clap:

Chrysalis 02-07-2015 19:04

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by johnhook (Post 35786269)
JSA has dropped to under 3 billion iirc. No one is interested in the harsh reality of the State pension just wait 5 years the poor and sick will be on pennies and dying and the state pension will have risen again by more than the cuts have saved. The State pensions figures now are 88 billion a rise of over the 12 billion wanted in cuts over 2 years. If this follows in 15 years the state pension will be more than the whole welfare budget is now

yep I couldnt find more recent figures so just posted those, but as you said the gap has widened.

---------- Post added at 17:04 ---------- Previous post was at 17:02 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35786334)
Not for the first time on this forum I am wrongly accused. In this instance, you call me self serving. How am I self served by supporting pensioners whose income is earned (I am not a pensioner)?; how am I self served by suggesting that benefits need to be targeted toward those in need? (I receive no benefits).

No, it is simply this: there are people who feel their 'predicament' is just not fair and that their situation can be alleviated at the expense of others. In this case, the target is older people. The truly self serving people are those who would bleed their grandmother and grandfather of the modest income that allows them to enjoy their old age with dignity.

It's just as well there are systems in place to protect the defenceless from a youth that expects their needs to be satiated immediately.

Like Ramrod says there is plenty of time for you to provide for yourself if you are concerned about the cost of future pensions and anyway, you never know who might try to take it away from you just when you are relying upon it.

we need to get away from all this earned nonsense.

you talk as if no young people earn their income and pay taxes.

you talk as if every single pensioner has worked for the full duration of their working age.

you talk as if what you earned is the most important thing (when it isnt).

Again your post proves you only thinking about yourself, you just said it, you have the belief because you worked hard, then that is more important than everything else.

martyh 02-07-2015 19:17

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrysalis (Post 35786254)
Some information regarding expenditure and cuts.

social loans scrapped - the last 7 years of its use were self funded, and 4 of the 7 years were budget surplus by over 6 figures.

2013 figures

state pensions 74.22 billion (close to 50% of total DWP budget). - no cuts
DLA 12billion - apparently unaffordable - cut for working age, pensioners and ex armed forces excluded
ESA 4.8 billion still been targeted for more cuts is less than 10% of pension budget
JSA I think similar to ESA just under 5 billion - (picture is heavily compressed) - targeted very heavily for cuts especially for under 25s

There is of course budgets such as housing benefits which are a complete minefield as its split across all age groups as well as many full time employed people, and a lot of housing benefit expenditure goes into private landlord pockets as well.

Bimey you really got it in for pensioners ain't ya

You do realise that a lot of these hateful private landlords are using their property to fund their retirement so they aren't so reliant on state benefits.I suppose every shop from Tesco to the local corner shop should be dragged through the mud as well for daring to make a profit off the backs of the unemployed and disabled :rolleyes:

---------- Post added at 18:17 ---------- Previous post was at 18:13 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrysalis (Post 35786350)

we need to get away from all this earned nonsense.

.

That is your problem right there ,you see no importance in earning the help the state provides .In your own words it's 'nonesense'

johnhook 02-07-2015 19:46

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35786353)
Bimey you really got it in for pensioners ain't ya

You do realise that a lot of these hateful private landlords are using their property to fund their retirement so they aren't so reliant on state benefits.I suppose every shop from Tesco to the local corner shop should be dragged through the mud as well for daring to make a profit off the backs of the unemployed and disabled :rolleyes:

---------- Post added at 18:17 ---------- Previous post was at 18:13 ----------



That is your problem right there ,you see no importance in earning the help the state provides .In your own words it's 'nonesense'


bet you they will all take it though

Kursk 02-07-2015 20:31

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrysalis (Post 35786350)
we need to get away from all this earned nonsense.

you talk as if no young people earn their income and pay taxes.

you talk as if every single pensioner has worked for the full duration of their working age.

you talk as if what you earned is the most important thing (when it isnt).

Again your post proves you only thinking about yourself, you just said it, you have the belief because you worked hard, then that is more important than everything else.

Your post has a bearing of such great significance I think it would be rude to rebut it.

Perhaps it should be carved in stone for posterity and for the reader to draw their own conclusions.

In the meantime, shouldn't you be out robbing graves or something?:D

Chris 02-07-2015 20:49

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35786377)
Perhaps it should be carved in stone for posterity and for the reader to draw their own conclusions.

Why not. It worked for Ed Miliband. :D

Kursk 02-07-2015 21:48

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Delaney's Donkey (amended) in memory of the late, great Val Doonican:

Now Benefits were a donkey that everyone admired
Particularly the lazy and permanently tired
A leg at every corner balancing its head
And a tail to let you know which end they wanted to be fed :D

johnhook 02-07-2015 22:52

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35786392)
Delaney's Donkey (amended) in memory of the late, great Val Doonican:

Now Benefits were a donkey that everyone admired
Particularly the lazy and permanently tired
A leg at every corner balancing its head
And a tail to let you know which end they wanted to be fed :D

what percentage of the sick and unemployed do you think are doing it by choice?

Kursk 02-07-2015 23:01

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by johnhook (Post 35786396)
what percentage of the sick and unemployed do you think are doing it by choice?

No leading questions please :sleep:

johnhook 02-07-2015 23:41

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35786398)
No leading questions please :sleep:

I apologise the question was poor

It should have been how many people on ESA and JSA do you think are work shy and not actually ill or disabled and how many on JSA can not find a job or do you think maybe most of those on ESA are sick and disabled and a good portion on JSA either can not get a job or perhaps a large number actually get a job and some are newly unemployed?

TheDaddy 03-07-2015 00:34

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35786380)
Why not. It worked for Ed Miliband. :D

No it didn't...

Sirius 03-07-2015 07:15

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by johnhook (Post 35786358)
bet you they will all take it though

I will and with a smile on my face and a tip of my cap.

johnhook 03-07-2015 07:51

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35786422)
I will and with a smile on my face and a tip of my cap.

so what really is the issue with the welfare state?

a small portion of those claiming benefits are swinging the lead.They are in the wrong but in all reality they are not that much of a burden on the tax payer. Most people are legit so most of you would say those truly in need should get support this is happening.

Is it jealousy? because the workshy are not going out doing an 8 hour shift often in jobs they hate?

It has to be something unless of course you believe most the people claiming are swinging especially as some here have mentioned that they will happily become members of a group who are a greater burden on the tax payer than the unemployed and sick combined

( not aimed at you Sirius aimed generally)

---------- Post added at 06:51 ---------- Previous post was at 06:41 ----------

The sad fact as I see it is the government have spent 5 years focusing on those claiming leading to the tax payer believing the shirker is taking large sums of money out of their pockets. It is clear to anyone who looks at the figures and reads the reports on estimated fraud figures that this simply is not happening

JSA now is so hard to claim long term unemployed have to show they do 35 hours jobsearch courses and basically jumping through hoops to get their money constantly at risk of sanctions
ESA all the work assessments have become so much stricter leading to so many people being taken off fit for work when they are not
PIP as above
Tax Credits well even workers get these due to the ridicules system we have where people can not earn a living wage

I do really want to know exactly how much they think they are losing to the work shy and why do they harbour such resentment

Sirius 03-07-2015 08:52

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by johnhook (Post 35786423)
so what really is the issue with the welfare state?

a small portion of those claiming benefits are swinging the lead.They are in the wrong but in all reality they are not that much of a burden on the tax payer. Most people are legit so most of you would say those truly in need should get support this is happening.

Is it jealousy? because the workshy are not going out doing an 8 hour shift often in jobs they hate?

It has to be something unless of course you believe most the people claiming are swinging especially as some here have mentioned that they will happily become members of a group who are a greater burden on the tax payer than the unemployed and sick combined

( not aimed at you Sirius aimed generally)

---------- Post added at 06:51 ---------- Previous post was at 06:41 ----------

The sad fact as I see it is the government have spent 5 years focusing on those claiming leading to the tax payer believing the shirker is taking large sums of money out of their pockets. It is clear to anyone who looks at the figures and reads the reports on estimated fraud figures that this simply is not happening

JSA now is so hard to claim long term unemployed have to show they do 35 hours jobsearch courses and basically jumping through hoops to get their money constantly at risk of sanctions
ESA all the work assessments have become so much stricter leading to so many people being taken off fit for work when they are not
PIP as above
Tax Credits well even workers get these due to the ridicules system we have where people can not earn a living wage

I do really want to know exactly how much they think they are losing to the work shy and why do they harbour such resentment

I certainly do not tar everyone with the same brush, there are those in genuine need whilst looking for work and there are those who have never worked and have no intension of working.

I have been very lucky in my life as I have only ever been out of work for a total of about six months. I am looking forward to my retirement and the pensions that will allow me to live a decent life. I do know how hard it can be to find a decent job and the hoops that those who wish to claim are being put through as my eldest lad is out of work at the moment.

I don’t know where we go with the welfare bill but I do know that come retirement I will need to make use of the pensions I have paid into all my life.

johnhook 03-07-2015 12:36

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
ultimately all I want is for everyone to realise that out of the tax they pay only a tiny fraction of it goes into the pockets of the shirker but people seem just blinkered to the reality

Osem 03-07-2015 14:07

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by johnhook (Post 35786470)
ultimately all I want is for everyone to realise that out of the tax they pay only a tiny fraction of it goes into the pockets of the shirker but people seem just blinkered to the reality

Some people are but surely a statement like that is as much a generalisation as that which you're complaining about.

johnhook 03-07-2015 14:15

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35786483)
Some people are but surely a statement like that is as much a generalisation as that which you're complaining about.

or you could just see it as its directed and that is to the people it concerns

oh and incidentally the lack of the word Some alters my point and the facts nill. What is your view on my point Osem please rather than your opinion of how I wrote it

heero_yuy 03-07-2015 14:50

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by johnhook (Post 35786470)
ultimately all I want is for everyone to realise that out of the tax they pay only a tiny fraction of it goes into the pockets of the shirker but people seem just blinkered to the reality

Some figures to back up that assertion would be good.

Osem 03-07-2015 16:01

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Yes but it works both ways doesn't it. I've lost count how many times around here I've had to make the point that it's only a proportion of those on benefits who abuse the system when I've never claimed anything different. Far too often people complain loudly about negative stereotyping of claimants then do the very same thing when anyone raises a concern or with comments like -

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrysalis
Someone who is 64 and unemployed would be labeled as a undeserving scrounger by tory ministers

As for the rest of your post, I agree with some of what you say but have made my views known a number of times in this thread already and don't feel the need to do so further.

johnhook 03-07-2015 16:09

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35786500)
Some figures to back up that assertion would be good.

well firstly the figures posted earlier in this thread

220 billion Welfare bill

Government spending 720 billion http://visual.ons.gov.uk/uk-perspect...ces-in-the-uk/ 600 and something of that comes from the tax payer

JSA 2.353 billion
ESA 13.7 billion
so for point of arguement 16 billion
If you add the housing benefit and all the tax credits to this although these are shared between a much wider demograph you come up to 68 billion this figure is higher than what those on ESA and JSA would be claiming but its a figure so lets say 10% of the total tax an ni take goes to those on ESA and JSA way over estimated

So everyone on the sick and unemployed has a maximum total take off the tax payer of 10% of their tax (already a fraction)

So if 50% of all those claiming were to be swinging the lead you get a maximum of 5% the total tax take again massively over estimated
all figures taken from the graph here http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...12billion.html

Now lets look at the DWPs fraud and error levels

2013/14 are complete

Total 3.4 billion lost in total of which 2.2 was claimant or official error 1.3 % of expenditure 1.2 billion lost to fraud 0.7 % expenditure

https://www.gov.uk/government/upload...al_Release.pdf

Now I am not a mathematician but it is clear to me the very highest lost to the workshy is 5% of the whole tax and NI take down to 0.7 % of 2013/14s welfare bill which is something stupid like 0.15% of the whole take



So I stand firmly by the belief that only a fraction of our tax goes to the work shy

Kursk 03-07-2015 17:00

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by johnhook (Post 35786423)
I do really want to know exactly how much they think they are losing to the work shy and why do they harbour such resentment

You acknowledge that some people are work shy; every penny that goes to those people means someone else in real need is missing out.

Is it wrong that the people who provide the funding (taxpayers) should expect the system to deliver benefit to the right people?

The reason why spongers are resented is, with respect, pretty obvious.

johnhook 03-07-2015 17:01

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35786527)
You acknowledge that some people are work shy; every penny that goes to those people means someone else in real need is missing out.

Is it wrong that the people who provide the funding (taxpayers) should expect the system to deliver benefit to the right people?

The reason why spongers are resented is, with respect, pretty obvious.

I agree totally but I just want it put into proportion and the proportion is tiny and has been blown well out of proportion to fit an agenda

A vast numbers of legitimate claimants are also resented and been treated badly which in my opinion trumps the tax payer

Kursk 03-07-2015 17:01

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by johnhook (Post 35786528)
I agree totally but I just want it put into proportion and the proportion is tiny and has been blown well out of proportion to fit an agenda

By whom?

johnhook 03-07-2015 17:08

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35786529)
By whom?

Whoever it is who really pulls the strings in this country. Direct focus on the weak while the strong continue unhindered

It is propaganda all the news about benefit cuts and emergency budget. Seriously for 12 billion ?

All the while the fat cats with their tax loopholes and fingers in pies offering back handers here and there and laughing to the sums of hundreds of billions

Never more has the phrase " The rich get richer while the poor get poorer" been true than it is today

Kursk 03-07-2015 17:23

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by johnhook (Post 35786532)
Whoever it is who really pulls the strings in this country. Direct focus on the weak while the strong continue unhindered

It is propaganda all the news about benefit cuts and emergency budget. Seriously for 12 billion ?

All the while the fat cats with their tax loopholes and fingers in pies offering back handers here and there and laughing to the sums of hundreds of billions

Never more has the phrase " The rich get richer while the poor get poorer" been true than it is today

It's just as well that money, whilst important, isn't everything.

heero_yuy 03-07-2015 18:41

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by johnhook (Post 35786513)
well firstly the figures posted earlier in this thread

<big snip>

So I stand firmly by the belief that only a fraction of our tax goes to the work shy

It's a long thread, thank you. :tu:

martyh 03-07-2015 18:54

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by johnhook (Post 35786407)
I apologise the question was poor

It should have been how many people on ESA and JSA do you think are work shy and not actually ill or disabled and how many on JSA can not find a job or do you think maybe most of those on ESA are sick and disabled and a good portion on JSA either can not get a job or perhaps a large number actually get a job and some are newly unemployed?

I'll have a crack at answering that .

In my opinion a lot of those claiming disability benefits could actually work,not every ailment needs state support ,I am living proof of that .The problem is that in the past it was so easy to claim that claiming benefits for the slightest health issue became the first option for many because it was the easiest option ,in fact any claim for any benefit should be the last resort when all other options have failed.The government are trying to change the way people see benefits ,it has been pointed out that the overall savings will be comparatively small ,what some people don't realise though is that ,that is only half the reason for the cuts ,the government want to make claiming benefits difficult so people will see it as a last resort,just like it used to be ,that way everyone will benefit .

johnhook 03-07-2015 19:15

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35786548)
I'll have a crack at answering that .

In my opinion a lot of those claiming disability benefits could actually work,not every ailment needs state support ,I am living proof of that .The problem is that in the past it was so easy to claim that claiming benefits for the slightest health issue became the first option for many because it was the easiest option ,in fact any claim for any benefit should be the last resort when all other options have failed.The government are trying to change the way people see benefits ,it has been pointed out that the overall savings will be comparatively small ,what some people don't realise though is that ,that is only half the reason for the cuts ,the government want to make claiming benefits difficult so people will see it as a last resort,just like it used to be ,that way everyone will benefit .

Thank you :)

---------- Post added at 18:15 ---------- Previous post was at 18:14 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35786546)
It's a long thread, thank you. :tu:

feedback?

---------- Post added at 18:15 ---------- Previous post was at 18:15 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35786538)
It's just as well that money, whilst important, isn't everything.

when you have very little it is hard not to think about anything else

ianch99 03-07-2015 20:06

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by johnhook (Post 35786532)
Whoever it is who really pulls the strings in this country. Direct focus on the weak while the strong continue unhindered

It is propaganda all the news about benefit cuts and emergency budget. Seriously for 12 billion ?

All the while the fat cats with their tax loopholes and fingers in pies offering back handers here and there and laughing to the sums of hundreds of billions

Never more has the phrase " The rich get richer while the poor get poorer" been true than it is today

It is this post that sums up the real issue here. The focus of the Tories, the right-wing press, etc. is to target the the poorer sections of society in order to save some of the money the Government requires. The end result of this campaign is a context where reducing benefits for all is acceptable.

The fact that these cuts will impact the people who may need the money as well as the much discussed "scroungers" is just seen as collateral damage. A shame but that's life, right?

Some perspective: Last year, Britain’s financial sector paid out £15bn in bonuses and bonuses paid out in the financial sector have reached £91bn since October 2007. This figure is likely to exceed £100bn by the end of March

Yes, these are BONUSES, money on top of an already high salary .. and the Government is screwing the poor for 12 billion? This is the real problem with our society as John has highlighted ..

martyh 03-07-2015 20:42

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 35786557)

Yes, these are BONUSES, money on top of an already high salary .. and the Government is screwing the poor for 12 billion? This is the real problem with our society as John has highlighted ..

The governments job is to govern the country not administer bonuses to bankers ,one has nothing to do with the other .

---------- Post added at 19:42 ---------- Previous post was at 19:37 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 35786557)
It is this post that sums up the real issue here. The focus of the Tories, the right-wing press, etc. is to target the the poorer sections of society in order to save some of the money the Government requires. The end result of this campaign is a context where reducing benefits for all is acceptable.

The fact that these cuts will impact the people who may need the money as well as the much discussed "scroungers" is just seen as collateral damage. A shame but that's life, right?

The end result will be a society that will use the benefit system as it was intended .Like it or not people have to be more accountable for their own lives instead of running to the state when things get a bit tough

TheDaddy 03-07-2015 20:48

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35786561)
The governments job is to govern the country not administer bonuses to bankers ,one has nothing to do with the other

It has everything to do with government when the things they do to get these bonuses land the country in brown stuff over and over again. Any one else gets found guilty of massive conspiracy fraud and sent to jail, they get fined for miss selling, still what better can we expect when they have the top politicians and their parties bought and paid for

martyh 03-07-2015 21:11

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35786563)
It has everything to do with government when the things they do to get these bonuses land the country in brown stuff over and over again. Any one else gets found guilty of massive conspiracy fraud and sent to jail, they get fined for miss selling, still what better can we expect when they have the top politicians and their parties bought and paid for

I meant in the context of this thread .You could outlaw bankers bonuses as much as you want but you will always have poor people ,you will always have people who think the world owes them a living, you will always have people with a chip on their shoulder against anyone better off than themselves and you will always have people not prepared to help themselves ........but bankers won't get bonuses so all is well .

TheDaddy 03-07-2015 22:14

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35786565)
I meant in the context of this thread .You could outlaw bankers bonuses as much as you want but you will always have poor people ,you will always have people who think the world owes them a living, you will always have people with a chip on their shoulder against anyone better off than themselves and you will always have people not prepared to help themselves ........but bankers won't get bonuses so all is well .

Perhaps if the government were properly regulating that industry instead of bashing the poor and sick this whole mess could've been avoided, banker bashing there's a laugh, they should try being on dla a while then they can moan about bashing.

Btw I actually thought you were talking about bankers for a second there, you described them so well, chip on shoulder, prepared to help themselves, don't like anyone better of than themselves etc etc

Kursk 04-07-2015 01:55

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by johnhook (Post 35786549)
when you have very little it is hard not to think about anything else

Which is why it is important to ensure those in need get proper support and those who aren't, don't. If the imbalances of our society need to be rectified, then we have to start somewhere.

The bigger fish will have to await the revolution.

denphone 04-07-2015 10:15

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35786586)
Which is why it is important to ensure those in need get proper support and those who aren't, don't. If the imbalances of our society need to be rectified, then we have to start somewhere.

The bigger fish will have to await the revolution.

That's the problem though as they say they will sort out the bigger fish but we are still waiting......and waiting..... and waiting.

johnhook 04-07-2015 10:36

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35786598)
That's the problem though as they say they will sort out the bigger fish but we are still waiting......and waiting..... and waiting.

lol it wont trickle down . Our whole society is built on greed and the acquisition of material wealth

The consumer get no value for money the cost of living has exploded yet Tescos make hundreds of millions ( even with the BS loss they announce which is not as it seems) Utility companies profiteered and price fixed for years until new companies start to compete with the big 6. All they are interested in is the dividends they can pay the share holder this is arse about face the consumer should have to power

And who do you thinks runs the country? the government ? nah big business bankers the likes of Rothschild who lend the money to countries to continue to be mismanaged . And in the end money is artificial it means nothing but everyone wants it to buy more stuff

Osem 04-07-2015 11:06

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
It may be an inconvenient truth to you but many millions of ordinary people are 'shareholders'. They're taxpayers, consumers and pensioners too and the latter rely on dividends to pay their pensions.

johnhook 04-07-2015 12:00

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35786610)
It may be an inconvenient truth to you but many millions of ordinary people are 'shareholders'. They're taxpayers, consumers and pensioners too and the latter rely on dividends to pay their pensions.

Not an inconvenient truth cuz the small shareholder does not even enter my mind. I see I have to specify things a little clearer so little holes are picked and the bigger picture missed

---------- Post added at 11:00 ---------- Previous post was at 10:59 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnhook (Post 35786603)
lol it wont trickle down . Our whole society is built on greed and the acquisition of material wealth

The consumer get no value for money the cost of living has exploded yet Tescos make hundreds of millions ( even with the BS loss they announce which is not as it seems) Utility companies profiteered and price fixed for years until new companies start to compete with the big 6. All they are interested in is the dividends they can pay the larger share holders who make the decisions this is arse about face the consumer should have to power

And who do you thinks runs the country? the government ? nah big business bankers the likes of Rothschild who lend the money to countries to continue to be mismanaged . And in the end money is artificial it means nothing but everyone wants it to buy more stuff

Ok clarified my point a little

Osem 04-07-2015 13:57

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by johnhook (Post 35786615)
Not an inconvenient truth cuz the small shareholder does not even enter my mind. I see I have to specify things a little clearer so little holes are picked and the bigger picture missed

What's a 'small shareholder' then and what's that got to do with it?

You don't have to own shares directly to be reliant on the dividends paid to private pension funds and very many ordinary people are in that situation never having bought shares in their lives. Do they not enter your mind either or are they fair game? It's another of those stereotypes which seeks to portray all shareholders as rich cigar smoking, caviar eating and champagne quaffing fat cats.

johnhook 04-07-2015 14:07

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35786628)
What's a 'small shareholder' then and what's that got to do with it?

You don't have to own shares directly to be reliant on the dividends paid to private pension funds and very many ordinary people are in that situation never having bought shares in their lives. Do they not enter your mind either or are they fair game? It's another of those stereotypes which seeks to portray all shareholders as rich cigar smoking, caviar eating and champagne quaffing fat cats.

See plenty of stereo typing in this thread . Cameron even said himself you are either a worker or a shirker

Pick apart what I say by all means any chance of any feedback on the figures and evidence I have posted showing how much I believe the so called shirker actually takes from the tax payer ???

If you think the system as it stands is working then fair play to ya

Osem 04-07-2015 14:55

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
You're fixated with 'shirkers', I'm not and I've already told you I'm not going over old ground again for your benefit - read this thread from the start if you want to know what I think.

You referred to shareholders and now can't even clarify what you're talking about. It's all very well banging on about Tesco and shareholders as if they're dirty words but it serves your argument no good because it's the same old simplistic nonsense and stereotyping we've all heard a million times before. You take exception to unfavourable stereotyping but indulge in it yourself whenever it suits. You're argument would be stronger if you avoided doing it.

Anyway those are my last words to you on this subject.

Chris 04-07-2015 15:45

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35786632)

Anyway those are my last words to you on this subject.

As they say on Strictly ... A-May-ZING. ;)

Osem 04-07-2015 16:39

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35786636)
As they say on Strictly ... A-May-ZING. ;)

Bad pennies have a habit... :D

johnhook 04-07-2015 17:08

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35786636)
As they say on Strictly ... A-May-ZING. ;)

Knew I gave myself away should never had joined in here. Also forgot to turn my vpn on a couple of times but didn't know if my customer number had changed with new contracts

So what happens now ? Banned again or what ? already decided or debate needed?

Pierre 04-07-2015 22:18

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by johnhook (Post 35786648)
Knew I gave myself away should never had joined in here. Also forgot to turn my vpn on a couple of times but didn't know if my customer number had changed with new contracts

So what happens now ? Banned again or what ? already decided or debate needed?

Why keep coming back if you don't like it?

Osem 04-07-2015 22:33

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35786680)
Why keep coming back if you don't like it?

Masochism? :D

Paul 04-07-2015 22:36

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by johnhook (Post 35786648)
So what happens now ? Banned again or what ? already decided or debate needed?

No debate is required, you made sure of that with your rant last year.
The team have instructions to ban you immediatly your id is confirmed.

Everyone move on now please, back to the subject at hand.

Gary L 05-07-2015 11:55

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Tesco's want you to donate food to feed people in the UK
http://foodcollection.tesco.com/#together

What we really need is aid and food from America and such.
all the countries around the world can send the UK all their unwanted clothes and bric a brac.

papa smurf 05-07-2015 12:20

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 35786719)
Tesco's want you to donate food to feed people in the UK
http://foodcollection.tesco.com/#together

What we really need is aid and food from America and such.
all the countries around the world can send the UK all their unwanted clothes and bric a brac.

if you shop at tesco you can't afford to give anything away ;)

Gary L 05-07-2015 12:24

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35786728)
if you shop at tesco you can't afford to give anything away ;)

LOL I thought that was Aldi and Lidl :)

papa smurf 05-07-2015 15:33

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 35786737)
LOL I thought that was Aldi and Lidl :)

i mean because tesco is expensive -and i do shop at aldi

Gary L 05-07-2015 15:50

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35786781)
i mean because tesco is expensive

Don't they do the cheap plain stripey stuff anymore?

Quote:

and i do shop at aldi
I don't suppose you've noticed that the noodles you add hot water to are gooey mush now compared to before?

heero_yuy 05-07-2015 16:01

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 35786784)

I don't suppose you've noticed that the noodles you add hot water to are gooey mush now compared to before?

The Lidl ones are OK. :p:

Over 50% of the population are on some kind of state benefit. Perhaps if that was substantially reduced then those who really need it might not feel the pinch so much.

Gary L 05-07-2015 16:10

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35786791)
The Lidl ones are OK. :p:

The Aldi ones were perfect. then all of a sudden when you do them now they just end up as gooey mush.

Quote:

Over 50% of the population are on some kind of state benefit. Perhaps if that was substantially reduced then those who really need it might not feel the pinch so much.
What the noodles?
10p would be good.

papa smurf 05-07-2015 16:14

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
[QUOTE=Gary L;35786796]The Aldi ones were perfect. then all of a sudden when you do them now they just end up as gooey mush.


maybe its bad water ;) or operator error

Gary L 05-07-2015 16:22

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35786798)
maybe its bad water ;) or operator error

The same 300ml of boiling water and a microwave.

You've got me thinking now though because I always used to do them in a pastic measuring jug. and I use a glass one now. I checked that 300ml is the same on both. they are.

so it could be the glass that's making them gooey!

papa smurf 05-07-2015 16:26

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 35786805)
The same 300ml of boiling water and a microwave.

You've got me thinking now though because I always used to do them in a pastic measuring jug. and I use a glass one now. I checked that 300ml is the same on both. they are.

so it could be the glass that's making them gooey!

maybe the mains power is now slightly higher or lower and you are overcooking/under-cooking them in the microwave

Gary L 05-07-2015 16:35

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
I'll try with the plastic before I get my multimeter and hammer out :)

vincerooney 05-07-2015 16:35

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
what do we think will happen this week then?? 24k maximum a year for benefits. tax credits completely changed apparently!

denphone 05-07-2015 16:37

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by vincerooney (Post 35786813)
what do we think will happen this week then?? 24k maximum a year for benefits. tax credits completely changed apparently!

Well within 72 hours some will know their fate that's for sure.

vincerooney 05-07-2015 17:04

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35786814)
Well within 72 hours some will know their fate that's for sure.

what are your predictions den?? i always see articles with tax credits at the top in terms of most money spent on "unprotected" benefits since child benefit and some others seem safe

denphone 05-07-2015 17:09

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Tax credits will be hit massively that's for sure , the housing benefit cap will come down , some sickness/disabled benefits are likely to be hit as well , inheritance tax will be raised and probably there are quite a few other things in the mix as well Vince.

heero_yuy 05-07-2015 17:16

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
As I understand the thrust is to make employers pay better wages so that the state doesn't need to supplement them with expensive benefits. What's the problem with that?

Making the poor pay taxes so the state then gives them back the money they should have kept in the first place is just daft. Get the state off the peoples backs.

martyh 05-07-2015 19:01

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35786826)
As I understand the thrust is to make employers pay better wages so that the state doesn't need to supplement them with expensive benefits. What's the problem with that?

Making the poor pay taxes so the state then gives them back the money they should have kept in the first place is just daft. Get the state off the peoples backs.

Totally agree ,the main problem with tax credits though is the potential debt they can leave already hard up families ,the whole tax credit system needs abolishing or changing completely ,scrapping the minimum wage in favour of a living wage would be good though

denphone 05-07-2015 21:21

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35786826)
As I understand the thrust is to make employers pay better wages so that the state doesn't need to supplement them with expensive benefits. What's the problem with that?

Making the poor pay taxes so the state then gives them back the money they should have kept in the first place is just daft. Get the state off the peoples backs.

Yes one would hope that employers would make up the shortfall in peoples salary's but thats a very big if in my book.

Ignitionnet 06-07-2015 00:48

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35786791)
The Lidl ones are OK. :p:

Over 50% of the population are on some kind of state benefit. Perhaps if that was substantially reduced then those who really need it might not feel the pinch so much.

Might be trickier than it sounds given how many of that 50% are either in work and having derisory wages topped up to pay extortionate rents or retired.

heero_yuy 06-07-2015 10:35

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
1 Attachment(s)
Rather enjoyed Brighty's cartoon in my redtop today:

http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/at...2&d=1436171562

Paywall linky

Last two items bottom right. :LOL:

Attachment 26232

Julian 06-07-2015 11:40

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35786886)
Yes one would hope that employers would make up the shortfall in peoples salary's but thats a very big if in my book.

Just out of interest, where would all this money come from?

Not all businesses make huge profits you know.

Small businesses with few employees would get rid of staff, I know I would.

Osem 06-07-2015 11:56

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Julian (Post 35786940)
Just out of interest, where would all this money come from?

Not all businesses make huge profits you know.

Small businesses with few employees would get rid of staff, I know I would.

Well they could try putting their prices up but then they'd have the same very same people complaining about the cost of everything going up... :spin:

Julian 06-07-2015 12:07

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35786942)
Well they could try putting their prices up but then they'd have the same very same people complaining about the cost of everything going up... :spin:

Exactly!

denphone 06-07-2015 12:16

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Julian (Post 35786940)
Just out of interest, where would all this money come from?

Not all businesses make huge profits you know.

Small businesses with few employees would get rid of staff, I know I would.

Well GO and DC seems to think employers will take the strain and raise workers wages to cover the tax credit shortfalls but those statements are full of if , buts and maybes be it whether it is a smaller firm or even the larger ones to whether they will raise their workers salaries to make up for this.

Osem 06-07-2015 12:22

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Well someone will have to pay. More profitable companies may be able to absorb the cost but you can't pay staff out of losses for very long (unless you're in Greece lol) so in respect of those companies struggling to survive, either the ranks of the unemployed will be added to or we'll have to pay more for our goods and services.

Gary L 06-07-2015 13:05

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Loads of businesses will make redundancies.
Loads of people will pack in their jobs.
Loads of businesses will close.

Taf 06-07-2015 19:11

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Let us not forget that there is a Budget coming up.....


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BI7fudmO7FY

peanut 13-07-2015 15:10

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Hmm, this doesn't sound good.

David Cameron open to idea of workers saving up to fund own sick pay.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/...d-own-sick-pay

IDS must have something big on Camoron.

Hugh 13-07-2015 15:14

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
From the article
Quote:

The proposal of fortune accounts for the UK was examined in depth in a paper by the free market libertarian Adam Smith Institute thinktank in 1995, which looked at how people could go to a single private provider for an account that gave them long-term care insurance, disability cover, health insurance, savings fund management and unemployment insurance.
When I had a mortgage, I always had a policy that paid the mortgage if I was sick, unemployed, or died - it's quite common..

richard s 13-07-2015 15:21

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Will the living wage be worth £9 in five years time!

heero_yuy 13-07-2015 15:59

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35788183)
From the article

When I had a mortgage, I always had a policy that paid the mortgage if I was sick, unemployed, or died - it's quite common..

Unfortunately the banks did much to discredit such insurance with their own PPI scandals.:(

Osem 13-07-2015 16:07

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35788183)
From the article

When I had a mortgage, I always had a policy that paid the mortgage if I was sick, unemployed, or died - it's quite common..

Us too. Seemed like a perfectly sensible thing to do...

---------- Post added at 15:07 ---------- Previous post was at 15:01 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35788196)
Unfortunately the banks did much to discredit such insurance with their own PPI scandals.:(

Yes and now we're heading towards the point where nobody will be keen to give advice about anything for fear of being sued or otherwise held accountable if it goes wrong 10 years down the line...

nomadking 13-07-2015 16:10

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by richard s (Post 35788184)
Will the living wage be worth £9 in five years time!

No, because the inevitable price increases because of ......... the living wage.

denphone 13-07-2015 17:27

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35788196)
Unfortunately the banks did much to discredit such insurance with their own PPI scandals.:(

And trust is hard to win back after a plethora of scandals some which are still ongoing.

Hugh 13-07-2015 18:14

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by richard s (Post 35788184)
Will the living wage be worth £9 in five years time!

Well, with inflation at around 0 to 1%, and expected to stay there for the next couple of years, yes.....

---------- Post added at 17:14 ---------- Previous post was at 17:12 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35788201)
No, because the inevitable price increases because of ......... the living wage.

So we should have the insane situation where low salaries are topped up by the Government, at a time when business profits are at their highest levels in two decades?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/c...e-economy.html

TheDaddy 13-07-2015 20:39

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35788197)
Yes and now we're heading towards the point where nobody will be keen to give advice about anything for fear of being sued or otherwise held accountable if it goes wrong 10 years down the line...

Or perhaps we're heading to a point where no one will give misleading, fraudulent advice just to line their own pockets for fear of being found out ten years down the line and then being held accountable for it

Gary L 13-07-2015 21:02

Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by peanut (Post 35788181)
Hmm, this doesn't sound good.

David Cameron open to idea of workers saving up to fund own sick pay.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/...d-own-sick-pay

IDS must have something big on Camoron.

Isn't that what National Insurance is for?


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:59.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum