Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Sport (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=88)
-   -   Cricket : The General Cricket Thread (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=29786)

iadom 20-06-2013 17:15

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35584035)
Essex all out for 20 by Lancashire: their lowest-ever total and the lowest County Championship score since 1983.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cricket/


Well lads its time to get out your cricket gear to replace this useless lot.:shocked:

And they are at it again, today Lancashire bowled out Div 2 leaders Northants for 62. In fact they have taken their last 23 first class wickets for just 87 runs.:shocked: Local Saddleworth lad Kyle Hogg took 7 wickets today.:cool:

denphone 20-06-2013 17:49

Re: Cricket
 
Ricky Ponting will retire from all forms of cricket in October.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cricket/22992059

Henkesghost 20-06-2013 18:18

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35586453)
Ricky Ponting will retire from all forms of cricket in October.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cricket/22992059

Fantastic player who faced a lot of adversity on and off the field at times in his life.

denphone 20-06-2013 18:25

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Henkesghost (Post 35586471)
Fantastic player who faced a lot of adversity on and off the field at times in his life.

Yes punter certainly was a great player and a most dogged character as well.

denphone 21-06-2013 05:36

Re: Cricket
 
India thrash Sri Lanka to reach final.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cricket/22968783

Cobbydaler 23-06-2013 19:36

Re: Cricket
 
England starting to make hard work of this. Can see us losing...

---------- Post added at 19:36 ---------- Previous post was at 19:21 ----------

Stupid, stupid, England...

denphone 23-06-2013 19:42

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cobbydaler (Post 35587713)
England starting to make hard work of this. Can see us losing...

---------- Post added at 19:36 ---------- Previous post was at 19:21 ----------

Stupid, stupid, England...

From the first ball we adopted that negative approach again.:(:td:

Cobbydaler 23-06-2013 20:24

Re: Cricket
 
:mad: Buttler! He should be a better servant for England... :erm:

Shadow Demon UK 23-06-2013 20:37

Re: Cricket
 
We threw it away....but that decision to give Bell out stumped was scandalous

denphone 23-06-2013 20:55

Re: Cricket
 
With 20 overs each the match was ruined as a proper match and was nothing more then a lottery.

iadom 23-06-2013 21:34

Re: Cricket
 
Well England cocked it up, cruising at one stage, took a six of Sharma and he was so rattled he then bowled two wides. Then first Morgan and Bopara slapped him straight to fielders, Bopara didn't even need to try and hit the ball it was two foot over his head and another wide. The five overthrows England gave away didn't help either. :)

Dave42 23-06-2013 21:44

Re: Cricket
 
England will never win a 1 day tournament

iadom 23-06-2013 21:59

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 35587814)
England will never win a 1 day tournament

But they did win the T20 World Cup a couple of years ago.;)

denphone 24-06-2013 07:38

Re: Cricket
 
Australia 'sack coach Mickey Arthur ahead of series'

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cricket/23026163

Oh dear lets have a few tears for those Aussies.;)

iadom 25-06-2013 19:17

Re: Cricket
 
Can't see many of this T20 side making the full test team, they are bowling some dross.:rolleyes:

denphone 25-06-2013 19:50

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by iadom (Post 35588472)
Can't see many of this T20 side making the full test team, they are bowling some dross.:rolleyes:

Looks like the all blacks will get 200 plus.:(

Cobbydaler 25-06-2013 21:59

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cobbydaler (Post 35587713)
England starting to make hard work of this. Can see us losing...

Deja Vu...

---------- Post added at 21:59 ---------- Previous post was at 21:37 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cobbydaler (Post 35588539)
Deja Vu...

Lost again, bit more intelligent this time though...

Shadow Demon UK 25-06-2013 22:24

Re: Cricket
 
Still should have finished it off at the end there. Getting a bit of a reputation for choking when its tight at the end of games.

denphone 26-06-2013 05:54

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Shadow Demon UK (Post 35588552)
Still should have finished it off at the end there. Getting a bit of a reputation for choking when its tight at the end of games.

Sometimes youth needs that little bit more experience Shadow.

iadom 26-06-2013 09:21

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35588584)
Sometimes youth needs that little bit more experience Shadow.

And they will only get that if they play of course.;)

denphone 26-06-2013 18:31

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by iadom (Post 35588621)
And they will only get that if they play of course.;)

Indeed but some supporters just have to be a bit more patient for some players to fulfil their talent.

Shadow Demon UK 28-06-2013 12:04

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Darren Lehmann’s appointment is fantastic and suddenly there has been a real shift in momentum between England and Australia. I have always said Australia can surprise England but now I’m growing more confident that if they select the right team from their squad, Australia can make a serious challenge and win back the Ashes.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/cri...t-England.html


:rofl:

Nice one Shane!

denphone 28-06-2013 12:47

Re: Cricket
 
Oh dear they do delude themselves.:nono:

Cobbydaler 28-06-2013 21:14

Re: Cricket
 
Butt finally admits spot fixing

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cricket/23107637

Trying to get his ban reduced :rolleyes:

denphone 29-06-2013 06:14

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cobbydaler (Post 35589780)
Butt finally admits spot fixing

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cricket/23107637

Trying to get his ban reduced :rolleyes:

Why don't they just take it like men and just accept their punishment.:td:

iadom 30-06-2013 15:42

Re: Cricket
 
It's a good job Shane Warne is no longer playing, England struggling against Essex leggy Craddock. :rolleyes:

iadom 08-07-2013 19:16

Re: Cricket
 
Well the fun starts on Wednesday.:)

A film on BBC 4 tonight ( shown in two parts ) is worth watching. I have already seen this, a friend in Scotland got a copy from relatives in Oz.

It's a bit simplistic and overacted in parts but the bloke who plays Packer is very good, not so the Tony Greg character, a good watch for cricket buffs anyway.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b036t8w6

Jim.

Henkesghost 08-07-2013 20:04

Re: Cricket
 
Can't wait for Wednesday. Not seen much of the Aussies but media seem a bit over confident that England will murder them. Looking forward to seeing Root and Pieterson in the test side together.

denphone 09-07-2013 05:25

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Henkesghost (Post 35593392)
Can't wait for Wednesday. Not seen much of the Aussies but media seem a bit over confident that England will murder them. Looking forward to seeing Root and Pieterson in the test side together.

Never listen to the media as their predictions have a habit of falling flat on their faces.

Dave42 10-07-2013 10:35

Re: Cricket
 
England win toss and bat first


come on England

denphone 10-07-2013 10:47

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 35593780)
England win toss and bat first


come on England

Yes 400+ would be nice in the first innings.:cleader::cleader:

denphone 10-07-2013 13:09

Re: Cricket
 
England lose Alastair Cook and Joe Root but reach lunch on 98-2 at Trent Bridge.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cricket/23234567

Henkesghost 10-07-2013 13:12

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35593809)
England lose Alastair Cook and Joe Root but reach lunch on 98-2 at Trent Bridge.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cricket/23234567

Stuck at work so can't see any of it :( Sounds pretty even so far, maybe Aussies edging it a shade.

denphone 10-07-2013 13:14

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Henkesghost (Post 35593811)
Stuck at work so can't see any of it :( Sounds pretty even so far, maybe Aussies edging it a shade.

Yes this afternoon is crucial.

denphone 10-07-2013 15:30

Re: Cricket
 
What a poor performance by England against a very average Australian side.:(:td:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cricket/23234567

denphone 10-07-2013 17:37

Re: Cricket
 
This is better.:cleader:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cricket/23234567

denphone 11-07-2013 13:08

Re: Cricket
 
Ashton Agar hits the highest Test score by a debutant number 11 to frustrate England's bowlers.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cricket/23261769

Where is Cook's leadership in the last 80 minutes.:(:td:

denphone 11-07-2013 15:44

Re: Cricket
 
England lose two wickets in two balls after Ashton Agar falls for a record 98 in Australia's 280.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cricket/23261769

Oh dear England return to the bad old days.:mad:

Henkesghost 11-07-2013 19:54

Re: Cricket
 
England threw away a huge chance today, hope they don't end up regretting it.

denphone 11-07-2013 19:58

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Henkesghost (Post 35594176)
England threw away a huge chance today, hope they don't end up regretting it.

The captaincy and some of the bowling at times left a lot to be desired and on this form England have to improve considerably to retain the Ashes.

TheDaddy 11-07-2013 20:04

Re: Cricket
 
The advantage is still with us imo, they have to bat last and they've had all the luck so far

Shadow Demon UK 11-07-2013 20:17

Re: Cricket
 
The Trott dismisal was incredible. Erasmus should be dropped for making such a ridiculous decision, it could end up being very costly for England. But i do think we are in a good position, i think batting last will be tough, especially against Swann.

denphone 11-07-2013 20:19

Re: Cricket
 
Being 15 ahead with 8 wickets left Shadow is not exactly a good position in my humble opinion.

Shadow Demon UK 11-07-2013 20:21

Re: Cricket
 
Not having to bat last puts us in a good position ;)

denphone 11-07-2013 20:22

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Shadow Demon UK (Post 35594197)
Not having to bat last puts us in a good position ;)

Lam not sure l would attach much hope to that scenario.

denphone 12-07-2013 15:44

Re: Cricket
 
Ian Bell makes a half century to help extend England's lead over Australia to 165 at tea.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cricket/23277348

Come on England.:cleader::cleader:

denphone 12-07-2013 18:25

Re: Cricket
 
Stuart Broad refuses to walk and Ian Bell is 95 not out as England's lead moves to 261 at the close.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cricket/23277348

Well what a interesting day to say the least.

Henkesghost 12-07-2013 18:34

Re: Cricket
 
Great comeback from England today, actually managed to see the last hour and a half :D Bloody work :mad:

denphone 13-07-2013 13:58

Re: Cricket
 
Australia set about chasing 311 to win the first Ashes Test against England.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cricket/23293799

Henkesghost 13-07-2013 15:49

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35594778)
Australia set about chasing 311 to win the first Ashes Test against England.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cricket/23293799

Think they'll do it :( Never thought 300 was enough with nearly 2 days to go.

denphone 13-07-2013 15:59

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Henkesghost (Post 35594820)
Think they'll do it :( Never thought 300 was enough with nearly 2 days to go.

And some revered posters thought that batting last would be a minefield and lead to certain defeat.:waving::waving:

denphone 13-07-2013 19:09

Re: Cricket
 
England in control against Australia in first Test.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cricket/23302830

Dave42 14-07-2013 10:45

Re: Cricket
 
4 wickets needed

Come On England

denphone 14-07-2013 11:22

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 35595068)
4 wickets needed

Come On England

Yes its going to be a very tense first session.

Henkesghost 14-07-2013 11:37

Re: Cricket
 
Aussies untroubled so far.

Dave42 14-07-2013 11:48

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Henkesghost (Post 35595083)
Aussies untroubled so far.

yes but we seen a few times all ready how quick it can change this test

denphone 14-07-2013 11:52

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Henkesghost (Post 35595083)
Aussies untroubled so far.

Its looking ominous for England.:(

Henkesghost 14-07-2013 11:57

Re: Cricket
 
Yaaaaas!

denphone 14-07-2013 12:08

Re: Cricket
 
:cleader::hyper:

Henkesghost 14-07-2013 12:34

Re: Cricket
 
Can probably relax now :)

iadom 14-07-2013 12:54

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Henkesghost (Post 35595102)
Can probably relax now :)

Not while Finn is bowling.:rolleyes:

denphone 14-07-2013 12:57

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by iadom (Post 35595111)
Not while Finn is bowling.:rolleyes:

When will Cook learn.:td::(

Henkesghost 14-07-2013 13:03

Re: Cricket
 
Get him off :mad:

denphone 14-07-2013 13:20

Re: Cricket
 
We have got to believe still.:cleader::cleader:

Henkesghost 14-07-2013 13:26

Re: Cricket
 
Aussies are gonna do it :(

denphone 14-07-2013 13:49

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Henkesghost (Post 35595117)
Aussies are gonna do it :(

And Cooks captaincy in this test will have a lot to do with it.:(:td:

Henkesghost 14-07-2013 14:25

Re: Cricket
 
Phew :D

denphone 14-07-2013 14:26

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Henkesghost (Post 35595138)
Phew :D

Seconded.

Dave42 14-07-2013 14:57

Re: Cricket
 
what a test match that was well done England

:cleader::cleader::cleader::cleader::cleader:

Osem 14-07-2013 15:48

Re: Cricket
 
That was a very important match to win. After a good start, much of the first innings batting was distinctly average and we very nearly let them off the hook. Still, we escaped with a win and let's hope that bodes well for the series.

MalteseFalcon 14-07-2013 16:22

Re: Cricket
 
Chuffed England won. I did say I wanted it to be close, but that was too close for comfort. Both second innings seemed to be better for the teams. Roll on next test.

idiosyncratic 14-07-2013 16:59

Re: Cricket
 
Wonder what the result would have been if Broad had 'walked'?

Henkesghost 14-07-2013 17:24

Re: Cricket
 
Feel the result today was pivotal for the whole series.

Osem 14-07-2013 17:37

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by idiosyncratic (Post 35595161)
Wonder what the result would have been if Broad had 'walked'?

Well we'd probably have lost. However, the result would probably have been different if Agar had been given out stumped, had Clarke walked instead of wasting their final review and had Trott been given not out. I'd prefer it if all batsmen walked but the Australians have long favoured the approach that it's up to the umpires to get it right so they can't really expect their opponents to apply higher standards.

007stuart 14-07-2013 17:56

Re: Cricket
 
Well done to England, congratulations from a Scots cricket fan who supports the "Auld Enemy" . Super contest between two excellent teams. Could not believe how close the final result was and on this occasion the best team won.

Can't wait for the 2nd Test to start.

Osem 14-07-2013 18:07

Re: Cricket
 
Yup same here. Given all the focus on the shorter forms of the game, this sort of match does a lot of good for the profile of test cricket. Five days of gripping excitement with lots more to come... :)

idiosyncratic 14-07-2013 19:17

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35595167)
Well we'd probably have lost. However, the result would probably have been different if Agar had been given out stumped, had Clarke walked instead of wasting their final review and had Trott been given not out. I'd prefer it if all batsmen walked but the Australians have long favoured the approach that it's up to the umpires to get it right so they can't really expect their opponents to apply higher standards.

I think you sum it up very well, however I also would prefer it if the batsmen (and fielders) were honest, rather than putting the onus on the match officials.

Osem 14-07-2013 19:47

Re: Cricket
 
The players will argue that they're sometimes the victims of bad umpiring decisions so if they get away with a few it evens things up.

Shadow Demon UK 14-07-2013 20:38

Re: Cricket
 
I watch matches like this one and wonder how people don't like cricket let alone test cricket. Each day had drama, tension and brilliant play by both sides. If the rest of the series is anything like this it will be another classic.

Osem 14-07-2013 20:45

Re: Cricket
 
People who don't like test cricket probably don't like chess either. The wonderful thing about cricket is the number of variables which enter into the match equation. Yes a draw might seem like a bit of an anti-climax after 5 days but, even then, there's usually a lot to be admired along the way whether it be batting, fielding or bowling. Some of the most exciting matches I've ever seen have been drawn. Indeed, had this match ended in stalemate, nobody could have claimed it was boring and quite a few would've claimed it was a fair result.

Osem 15-07-2013 10:16

Re: Cricket
 
Lots of stuff still going on about Broad. Heard Geoff Lawson banging on about how wrong Broad was and how he'd have walked had he edged a catch to 1st slip, but maybe not if it's been a very fine edge to the keeper. Well what's the difference? If we're going to get all moral then they both amount to cheating unless the batsman is genuinely unaware that he's made contact.

Anyway much is being made about this thick edge to 1st slip but what I see on the replay when it's slowed down is that Broad gets a very fine edge which, as the keeper is standing right up, then proceeds, in a split second, to hit the outside of the keeper's left glove and it's that which created the huge diversion we could all see of the ball going to first slip. I can see how, therefore, how the umpire might have thought the ball missed the bat and was deflected to the slips by the wicketkeeper, hence giving it not out. Anyway, it'd be interesting to know what the umpire had to say about this matter to his superiors after the close of play.

MalteseFalcon 15-07-2013 11:59

Re: Cricket
 
I've heard lots sayng the umpires had a poor test and there is even talk from some that they should be dropped from test cricket. I agree there were a couple of dodgy decisions, but Aussie benefited from one dodgy decision, so getting one against them was a bit of payback to my mind.

denphone 15-07-2013 12:19

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MarkC1984 (Post 35595320)
I've heard lots sayng the umpires had a poor test and there is even talk from some that they should be dropped from test cricket. I agree there were a couple of dodgy decisions, but Aussie benefited from one dodgy decision, so getting one against them was a bit of payback to my mind.

Indeed in my mind its all swings and roundabouts and all countries have to take the rough with the smooth.

Shadow Demon UK 15-07-2013 13:07

Re: Cricket
 
The fact is the umpires were very poor in the test, including the 3rd umpire. In my mind all 3 should be dropped, it's ok to make 1 or 2 mistakes but they seemed to make 1 or 2 each day of the test!

denphone 15-07-2013 13:13

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Shadow Demon UK (Post 35595363)
The fact is the umpires were very poor in the test, including the 3rd umpire. In my mind all 3 should be dropped, it's ok to make 1 or 2 mistakes but they seemed to make 1 or 2 each day of the test!

And if you replace them with 3 more who says the decisions will be any better.

iadom 15-07-2013 13:49

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35595367)
And if you replace them with 3 more who says the decisions will be any better.

At the moment you can't, there are only 12 umpires on the elite test panel and eight of them ( four each ) are English or Australian plus one from Pakistan, South Africa, Sri Lanka and New Zealand. By next January four umpires will have to stand in ten Ashes tests between them.

Osem 15-07-2013 14:18

Re: Cricket
 
I don't think, in general, that our umpires are really any better or worse than those in the past. Of course they're coming under much greater scrutiny and their mistakes are now highlighted with proof as opposed to conjecture. In the past stinkers used to be made and other than pretty dodgy TV footage there was no evidence upon which to base any criticism. How many tiny 'snicks', run outs and close LBW's were missed by umpires in the days before super slow motion, the snickometer, Hawkeye, hot spot etc.? What I do worry about is the availability (or not) of 'reviews' affecting their decision making process. The umpire should always make a decision based on what he sees/hears at the time and not whether one team or the other either has or hasn't got a review or two up their sleeve.

Saaf_laandon_mo 15-07-2013 14:49

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35595300)
Lots of stuff still going on about Broad. Heard Geoff Lawson banging on about how wrong Broad was and how he'd have walked had he edged a catch to 1st slip, but maybe not if it's been a very fine edge to the keeper. Well what's the difference? If we're going to get all moral then they both amount to cheating unless the batsman is genuinely unaware that he's made contact..
.
.
.

I think Lawson is saying that if he know's he's edged it he would walk. Thin edges are hard to notice. When I played cricket there were countless times when I genuinely was not sure if I had edged it or not, so waited for the umpire to decide. If I knew I'd hit it then I'd be off. So the difference is whether you know you played it or not.

---------- Post added at 14:49 ---------- Previous post was at 14:40 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shadow Demon UK (Post 35595204)
I watch matches like this one and wonder how people don't like cricket let alone test cricket. Each day had drama, tension and brilliant play by both sides. If the rest of the series is anything like this it will be another classic.

Test cricket has changed a lot over the years. We now usually get results within 5 days, a lot of the times down to poor shots. I was reading an article that short form cricket has contributed to this. I think for people new to cricket, the short form, and test matches of today are more exciting and appealing. But I have to admit I prefer the short game more than the test matches of old.

Osem 15-07-2013 15:05

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Saaf_laandon_mo (Post 35595428)
I think Lawson is saying that if he know's he's edged it he would walk. Thin edges are hard to notice. When I played cricket there were countless times when I genuinely was not sure if I had edged it or not, so waited for the umpire to decide. If I knew I'd hit it then I'd be off. So the difference is whether you know you played it or not.

I know what you mean but that is not how it came across to me. Australians are renowned for not walking and Adam Gilchrist was very much the exception. As I said before, plenty of cricketers have refused to walk in the past.

Talking of the 'spirit of the game' I recall when Greg Chappell ordered one of his bowlers to roll the final ball in a match against New Zealand in order to prevent the required 6 being scored. I've not been too keen on lectures on morality and the 'spirit of the game' from them ever since. ;)

Interestingly in my searches relating to the Broad incident and walking, I notice that that Ricky Ponting has, in the past, had quite a lot to say about Sachin Tendulkar being one of those who never walk. Hard to swallow from an Aussie who admitted the same policy...

http://www.topnews.in/sports/never-k...ponting-217944

Saaf_laandon_mo 17-07-2013 16:53

Re: Cricket
 
There's a very good write up in today's Times regarding Walking and Fair Play written by Matthew Syed (p.59) Really worth a read in light, especially in light of the recent posts.

denphone 17-07-2013 16:55

Re: Cricket
 
The only problem is The Times is behind a paywall so l can't see it.

Saaf_laandon_mo 17-07-2013 16:56

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35596245)
The only problem is The Times is behind a paywall so l can't see it.

Yes I know :( I was actually thinking of scanning it and putting it on here! Let me see if I can access it and snip it here.

Saaf_laandon_mo 18-07-2013 11:53

Re: Cricket
 
England 28-3..... And it's supposed to be a day for batting......

iadom 18-07-2013 11:53

Re: Cricket
 
Great start by England. :rolleyes:

denphone 18-07-2013 11:55

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by iadom (Post 35596506)
Great start by England. :rolleyes:

England's batting line up is looking increasingly vulnerable in this last year and this summer it seems to have got worse.:(

Cobbydaler 18-07-2013 18:35

Re: Cricket
 
Anderson as nightwatch man for Broad :confused:

denphone 18-07-2013 19:17

Re: Cricket
 
Very strange in my humble opinion.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cricket/23309559

Henkesghost 18-07-2013 20:27

Re: Cricket
 
This is going to be way tougher than 99% of us thought. Dreadful start dreadful finish great in between. Hats off to Bell, always had my reservations about him but thank goodness he's there. Root been disappointing so far.

denphone 19-07-2013 05:47

Re: Cricket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Henkesghost (Post 35596691)
This is going to be way tougher than 99% of us thought. Dreadful start dreadful finish great in between. Hats off to Bell, always had my reservations about him but thank goodness he's there. Root been disappointing so far.

Yes the Aussies might have only one true world class player but he is leading them well.

denphone 19-07-2013 14:32

Re: Cricket
 
Australia - replying to England's 361 - lose four wickets for 27 runs on the second day at Lord's.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cricket/23365388

:cleader::cleader:


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:39.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum