![]() |
Re: Coronavirus
Saw in passing something about research in France indicating smokers recover better or suffer less than non-smokers. This looks linked to nicotine so was some suggestions giving healthcare workers patches. It certainly didn't endorse smoking.
My initial thought was that smokers have so knackered their throats etc the virus couldn't bind :P. Sorry no reference, this was on new app on phone early in morning as just scanning through. |
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
|
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
|
Re: Coronavirus
A thing that is odd about France, is their advice for social distancing is to stay just ONE metre from anyone.
|
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
|
Re: Coronavirus
In my seven day sabbatical I found some interesting analysis from a Professor at the University of Edinburgh.
https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...nd-coronavirus Countries that intervened early such as New Zealand, where Jacinda Ardern insisted defeating the virus relied upon 'going hard and going early', could come out of this economically better off whereas the herd immunity/it'll happen anyway countries could find themselves undergoing years of turmoil as they are unable to recover the trace, track, isolate mechanism of breaking transmission chains. Somewhat ironic really if steps to 'protect' the economy, against internationally recognised protocols on dealing with pandemics, made the situation worse. |
Re: Coronavirus
If people need to be told not to inject disinfectant, I'm sorry but the gene pool doesn't need you.
|
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
Having said that, I await the second wave. Have you looked at Japan? As I have said consistently, you can delay, but you cannot prevent. You can quote me on that. |
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
I'm not sure what I'm quoting you on, that failing to adhere to internationally recognised best practice doesn't get desirable outcomes? I'm sure we are in agreement on that. |
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...ic-lost-nerve/ In particular: The point about the national pandemic plan is that it is specifically required to be proportionate to the risk, though it does err on the side of a “reasonable worst-case scenario”. This means that there can be over-responses, as there was to the swine flu in 2009 which turned out not to be as bad as feared. For coronavirus, the Government was following this framework almost to the letter while preparing the country for what would be a difficult period. But that all changed on Mother’s Day when pictures of people out and about led to a clamour for a lockdown that was never planned for. Prof Heneghan says the Government lost its nerve. Concerned that it would be seen to be putting the economy ahead of the NHS, it is now inflicting worse damage on the country than the virus itself. ---------- Post added at 20:46 ---------- Previous post was at 20:36 ---------- Quote:
Give us a break! |
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
https://twitter.com/kenolin1/status/1253746729515704322 |
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
The Government never had any nerve, which is why it’s didn’t take the necessary decisions early enough or hard enough. The economy will lose more in the long term as we face years of social distancing and restrictions. |
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
|
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
|
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:07. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum