Originally Posted by Henkesghost (Post 35586312)

Will only watch if there's a vagasil special.

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 35586345)

no chance getting that sky will never change they with holding policy

Originally Posted by Henkesghost (Post 35586312)

Will only watch if there's a vagasil special.

Originally Posted by bamav (Post 35586346)

LMAO! Eugh! Vagasil is a cream for itching!! :shocked:

You may have meant a vajazzle! ;)

Not that I'm an expert or anything...

Originally Posted by bamav (Post 35586346)

LMAO! Eugh! Vagasil is a cream for itching!! :shocked:

You may have meant a vajazzle! ;)

Not that I'm an expert or anything...

---------- Post added at 13:48 ---------- Previous post was at 13:46 ----------



What Policy is that? I'm sure we've been over this before, but the last "official" word from VM was that Sky offered it to VM at a price that they didn't think was of value.

It will come eventually, just a matter of changes to circumstances...

Originally Posted by devilincarnate (Post 35586350)

Dont you mean Vajazzle and not vagisil:erm:

---------- Post added at 13:50 ---------- Previous post was at 13:49 ----------



Beat me to it:)

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 35586355)

there policy of with holding channels and sky will not lower price for SA so as said no chance and no sensible company would over pay what sky want

Originally Posted by bamav (Post 35586356)

TBH, I had to google the spelling, which started to display results including images. And I'm at work between a few females!! :erm:

Originally Posted by bamav (Post 35586356)

TBH, I had to google the spelling, which started to display results including images. And I'm at work between a few females!! :erm:

---------- Post added at 13:58 ---------- Previous post was at 13:56 ----------



I'm probably being pedantic, but there's a difference between withholding and overcharging. Agreed, the end result is the same.

I still think VM will come up with a bargaining chip of sorts, which may force Sky to rethink their policy / costs.

Originally Posted by bamav (Post 35586356)

TBH, I had to google the spelling, which started to display results including images. And I'm at work between a few females!! :erm:

---------- Post added at 13:58 ---------- Previous post was at 13:56 ----------



I'm probably being pedantic, but there's a difference between withholding and overcharging. Agreed, the end result is the same.

I still think VM will come up with a bargaining chip of sorts, which may force Sky to rethink their policy / costs.

Originally Posted by johnasimmons (Post 35586359)

The bargaining chip is that VM are allowing Sky the use of their broababnd system for overflow

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35586367)

Hardly surprising considering BSKYB are paying Virgin Media £49 million for the luxury , its a business deal good news for both parties.

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 35586360)

well they overcharging for SA and totally with holding sky sports 3+4 HD f1 HD ect and sports sports 3+4 SD from bt ect only channels I can see us having a chance of getting from sky is SSN HD and sky news HD

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35586374)

The deal is between BSKYB and VM Business for the provision of extra backhaul capacity so I'm not sure why you presume the TV side has anything to do with it , its a great deal for VM business to go along with their other contract wins from numerous mobile operators.