![]() |
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
https://www.ft.com/content/addd777e-...4-0a1e63a52f9c https://www.policeconduct.gov.uk/new...politan-police https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/c...tion-fn8zszrhn https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o..._Kingdom#2010s https://www.globalwitness.org/en-gb/...ption-scandal/ https://www.theguardian.com/books/20...ial-corruption https://www.plutobooks.com/978074533...pt-is-britain/ |
Re: Brexit discussion
Thats not proof, that’s stories in the media. Most of those links link to same “Allegations of scandals or corruption.”. One of them you linked to is behind pay wall.
In future please explain what you are linking to and why, I shouldn’t have to second guess or clicking blindly. |
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
I am always inclined to post facts. The best thing about this whole Brexit thing for me is how much I have learned about economics, trade and the EU. It’s amazing how much information we have in our hands today. Learning something new every day is great. That’s why I was asking for evidence of corruption in the EU as opposed to EU countries as I have struggled to find anything apart from people saying the institution is corrupt without anything solid to back it up. |
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
The thing is, we can survive as an independent question but that's not been in any doubt. The debate is whether we will be a stronger and more prosperous nation as part of the EU or as not part of the EU. |
Re: Brexit discussion
Sorry Mick but we do have corruption in this country and we have had it for a longtime, my half brother has as one of his business interests a property development company and he has routinely said over the years how a brown envelope with cash can progress a project more then the needs of an area. He's also long given up reporting it as despite numerous times where he provided evidence nobody bothered to take action so as he puts it he just plays the game now even allowing a percentage of project costs for backhanders and he isn't the only one I've heard the same thing from.
Corruption exists everywhere the scale of it is the difference not the existence of it and while the UK is certainly nowhere close to topping corruption tables it is a problem here. |
Re: Brexit discussion
I have never said there is absolutely no corruption in the UK. But we are certainly a more free and democratic society than say, Russia.
|
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit discussion
BREAKING: EU have agreed a draft treaty, an ‘Orderly Withdrawal’ from European Union transition period of 21 months which ends on New Year’s Day 2020.
Key points agreed:
|
Re: Brexit discussion
Looks like the 21-month transition period has been agreed. We have conceded on the Irish border and on accepting new EU legislation but not shaping it; Rees-Mogg's vassal state.
On the other hand, we can negotiate deals with third parties during this time. But most countries will only do so when they know what future relationship we will have with the EU. |
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
However, we need some hard negotiations on points 3 (NI alignment) 5 (fisheries). However, at last, the end of the tunnel is in sight. ---------- Post added at 13:04 ---------- Previous post was at 12:55 ---------- Quote:
I am absolutely confident that we will not get ourselves in a position whereby we will become a 'vassal state'! Theresa May has ruled that out completely. The compromise over the right to sign trade agreements seems eminently sensible to me. The hard liners are probably going to have to swallow that one whole. |
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
Britain's fishermen catches are primarily sold to the EU so nothing will change on that front if they want to continue doing so. Quote:
Ireland remains a problem as what the UK Government has agreed to as a backstop is unacceptable to the DUP so the hard negotiations are with the DUP and not the EU. In effect, the can has been kicked 21 months down the road on this issue. The salvation for Theresa May is that Northern Ireland DUP supporters are now better understanding the benefiits of the single market and customs union so the DUP may change its position over the next 21 months. Quote:
Norway and Sweden are both in the single market so this solution is a strange comparison. The only solution is the UK-DUP or Ireland backing down. No magical solutions exist or we would be hearing about them now. https://flipchartfairytales.wordpres...der-disappear/ Quote:
|
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
On fisheries, it is not the exports that are the problem, it's the fishing quotas. By the end of the transition period, I want the UK to get back control of fisheries policy, taking account of the traditional fishing rights we had before we joined the Common Market. As I said in my last post, the NI issue we've agreed on is purely a backstop and we will work back from that. You are right to say that neither TM nor the DUP will wear that, so that is clear. The backstop was agreed to give the UK space to develop a solution that the EU will accept and keep Ireland quiet in the meantime. However, a better solution will be found, or there will be no agreement. On the possible solution, Norway is in the EEA and it has access to the single market, but it's not part of the single market. We don't wish to be part of the EEA, of course, but the example was to show how this cross border arrangement could work. However, the answer we come up with will be unique to the UK. I am certainly facing the reality of this situation, Andrew, but you seem to prefer problems to solutions. We are getting to where we want to be, and sooner or later, you will come to see that. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:44. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum