Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   President Trump 2.0 (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33712850)

Sephiroth 23-01-2026 14:01

Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Trump is 'friendly fire'.

thenry 23-01-2026 14:20

Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Does that effectively mean Zelenskyy is dead :shocked:

Sephiroth 23-01-2026 14:21

Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 36209512)
Does that effectively mean Zelenskyy is dead :shocked:

Might as well be. Sort of.

thenry 23-01-2026 14:22

Re: President Trump 2.0
 
:woot: cost of living is no more let's rejoice :D

Carth 23-01-2026 14:28

Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 36209512)
Does that effectively mean Zelenskyy is dead :shocked:

Nah, Trump will let him live as long as he hands over all the mineral rights . . . not a great choice is there, Trump or Putin :erm:

thenry 23-01-2026 14:32

Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Why did you have to piss on my parade :mad: I was celebrating having pound note in my pocket :cleader:

Hugh 23-01-2026 14:45

Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 36209516)
Why did you have to piss on my parade :mad: I was celebrating having pound note in my pocket :cleader:

Well, until Putin moves on Latvia/Lithuania/Estonia…

Carth 23-01-2026 15:07

Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36209517)
Well, until Putin moves on Latvia/Lithuania/Estonia…

. . . . Greenland?

;)

Hugh 23-01-2026 15:20

Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36209501)
U.K. Political Party Leaders comments on Trump’s remarks


Starmer - "wrong to diminish the role of Nato troops, including British forces, in Afghanistan following the 9/11 attacks on the US"."

Badenoch - "Donald Trump's comments are flat-out nonsense - British, Canadian, and Nato troops fought and died alongside the US for 20 years. This is a fact, not opinion. Their sacrifice deserves respect not denigration."

Davey - "457 British troops lost their lives in Afghanistan. Trump avoided military service five times. How dare he question their sacrifice."

Farage -

https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2026/01/6.gif

In the interest of balance, NF has finally spoken up about Trump’s comments.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ghanistan.html

Quote:

In a tweet he said: 'Donald Trump is wrong. For 20 years our armed forces fought bravely alongside America's in Afghanistan.'

And he liked to a clip of himself speaking at the World Economic Forum in which he said he would object 'politely', to what Trump said.

'When the decision was made to go into Afghanistan we went in with America and a coalition of the willing,' he said.

'We stayed by America for the whole 20 years, we proportionately spent the same money as America, we lost the same number of lives as America, pro-rata, and the same applies to Denmark and other countries too, so it is not quite fair.'

"not quite fair"…

---------- Post added at 16:20 ---------- Previous post was at 16:20 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36209518)
. . . . Greenland?

;)

Trump has dibs on that…

jem 23-01-2026 19:21

Re: President Trump 2.0
 
""not quite fair”…”


Wow, seriously harsh words from our Nigel there!

---------- Post added at 20:21 ---------- Previous post was at 20:08 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 36209508)
I like Trump but this is a low blow, he needs telling by a regulator if any such exist. Sure America was the ever bigger presence out there but to say others basically hid is just wrong. :td:

I wonder what his views are on friendly fire :erm:

Yes it is a low blow, maybe, just maybe, you are prepared to start to re-evaluate your opinion on Trump. He lies, he outright lies, anything to boost his own distorted view of reality for short-term gains.

Friendly fire, depends. If it’s American shooting down an allied aircraft, dropping cluster munitions on allied troops, well just one of those unfortunate things that can happen in war (sort of true), obviously the fault of the allied forces for being in the wrong place (really not true).

An ally shooting down an American aircraft by mistake - WAR CRIME.

thenry 23-01-2026 20:14

Re: President Trump 2.0
 
My opinion remains the same. His self inflicted wounds are much better than Kamala Harris warmongering. I shudder to think the state this world would have been in under her.

Paul 23-01-2026 20:40

Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Seems our PM gave a public rebuke, calling the remarks "insulting and frankly appalling".

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c9dvnlvzjw7o

Hugh 23-01-2026 21:10

Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 36209533)
My opinion remains the same. His self inflicted wounds are much better than Kamala Harris warmongering. I shudder to think the state this world would have been in under her.

I know…

She might have bombed Syria, Somalia, Iraq, Yemen, Iran, Venezuela (whilst kidnapping the Head of State), Nigeria, and threatened to invade Greenland and to annex Canada…

Phew, lucky escape!

thenry 23-01-2026 21:33

Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36209538)
I know…

She might have bombed Syria, Somalia, Iraq, Yemen, Iran, Venezuela (whilst kidnapping the Head of State), Nigeria, and threatened to invade Greenland and to annex Canada…

Phew, lucky escape!

Your knowledge knows no bounds. Have those strikes led to war?

Kamala Harris would have warmonger Israel. That would have been a disaster fighting on all fronts. Venezuela would have had to use greater democracy to stop drug trafficking. Absolute chaos. The others fair enough the use of wartime tactics knows no bounds.

Carth 23-01-2026 21:35

Re: President Trump 2.0
 
https://external-content.duckduckgo....a3c4a09878563e


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:52.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum