Cable Forum - 50M Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2012/10/31.png

Mine was perfect as I can expect last night and speed never dropped below maximum as it was doing on evenings with the blip. not sure I like the jitter on the minimum latency but that's something that's been a factor since I got upload bonding, before then it was always a flat line.

Chrysalis

17-10-2012 10:30

Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)

Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35485164)

Funny how there's one glitch on one ping monitor service and all of a sudden everyone's blaming all their connection speed problems on it?

ignition posted on tbb why its fixed now, so does indeed look like it was something within VMs control.

Stephen

17-10-2012 11:26

Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)

Well I spoke to someone internally and my area has a big fault which is causing me a loss of service everynight. Its being looked into apparently.

Kymmy

17-10-2012 12:37

Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)

Hmmm, just noticed that I had a drop-out early Monday morning

http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...15-10-2012.png

Looks like I now have 2 upstreams

Code:

Downstream

Locked        43        283000000 Hz        QAM256        6.7 dBmV        43.9 dB        13443        171

Locked        41        267000000 Hz        QAM256        7.5 dBmV        43.9 dB        13841        701

Locked        42        275000000 Hz        QAM256        7.2 dBmV        43.8 dB        12988        84

Locked        44        291000000 Hz        QAM256        6.4 dBmV        43.6 dB        12922        88

Locked        45        299000000 Hz        QAM256        7.8 dBmV        43.6 dB        9630        67

Locked        46        307000000 Hz        QAM256        7.2 dBmV        43.3 dB        9423        49

Locked        47        315000000 Hz        QAM256        6.9 dBmV        43.2 dB        9449        10

Locked        48        323000000 Hz        QAM256        6.5 dBmV        42.6 dB        10412        18





Upstream

Locked        2        35800000 Hz        ATDMA        39.3 dBmV        16QAM        6400000        20480 Kbits/sec

Locked        3        27400000 Hz        ATDMA        38.5 dBmV        16QAM        6400000        20480 Kbits/sec

Unlocked        0        0 Hz        Unknown        0.0 dBmV        Unknown        Unknown        0 Kbits/sec

Unlocked        0        0 Hz        Unknown        0.0 dBmV        Unknown        Unknown        0 Kbits/sec

I now have drops in Minimum Latency as well

http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...17-10-2012.png

craigj2k12

17-10-2012 15:18

Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)

It looks more like its flicking between upstream channels than actually bonding them

LenMackin

17-10-2012 16:31

Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)

Couldn't get internet access again this afternoon without rebooting my router. Here is the chart showing dropouts. I thought it was settling down this week but no such luck - what are you doing Virgin Media?

http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...17-10-2012.png

qasdfdsaq

17-10-2012 19:18

Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrysalis (Post 35485948)

ignition posted on tbb why its fixed now, so does indeed look like it was something within VMs control.

Link plz.

VM posted a while back on their own forums why it's fixed, I'm curious if their explanations match.

thenry

17-10-2012 19:24

Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)

forums.thinkbroadband.com/virgin_cable/4168973-how-is-latency-tonight.html?vc=1

Chrysalis

17-10-2012 23:30

Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)

Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35486123)

Link plz.

VM posted a while back on their own forums why it's fixed, I'm curious if their explanations match.

I read it after ignition's post and they do more or less match.

Just the VM post went into a bit more detail, basically VM's peering got saturated which is what and I others said at the start whilst you were denying it for some odd reason even with VM's track record.

VM blame atrato but ultimately its VMs responsibility to manage their own links, its amatuer to only react after several days of customers complaining.

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:39.

Page 161 of 392

161

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page