Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36187079)

Which one are you referring to. 1) decided by a court . 2) if he didn't know why on earth not , if he did my point stands:erm:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36187082)

You decide, you’re making this up as you go along. Using rationale you’re better off criticising them for what they have done rather than something they haven’t done but you think they “might” do.

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36187064)

Pretty sure the Tories regarded as "wets" were all binned by BJ…

Anyway, Thatcher’s not been in power for over 34 years - pretty sure most of the Tory MPs who stood in the 2024 Election wouldn’t have been MPs when she was in power…

Amusing you think people like Redwood, Jenkins, Patel, Badenoch, Rees-Mogg, Truss, Kwarteng, Steve Baker, Buckland, Coffey, Philip Davies, Liam Fox, Fabricant, Gillis, etc. are "wets" - says more about you than them… ;)

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36187167)

Not all of them, obviously. I was talking about Rishi’s supporters.

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36187169)

Surprised no one’s talking about Idiot Starmer misleading the House yesterday during PMQ, referencing Boris & Rishi having convictions, a FPN isn’t a conviction dumb ass, & he was a Director of public prosecutions?

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36187177)

It'll probably just get swept under the carpet because it isn't the tories

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36187177)

It'll probably just get swept under the carpet because it isn't the tories

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36187176)

Fun fact - 11 MPs in the Conservative Party under Rishi Sunak were MPs when Thatcher was in Office, and of those, pretty sure Bill Cash, Edward Leigh, David Davis, John Redwood, & Roger Gale could not be described in any way, shape, or form as “Thatcher’s Wets"… ;)

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36187201)

Probably the fact that after 14 years of Tory rule standing up in the chamber and misrepresenting things isn't noteworthy.

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36187054)

And if you think the outgoing Tory party was "left", I can see why you have a bridge…

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36187057)

They were a bunch of Maggie Thatcher’s ‘wets’. No wonder people are turning to Farage.

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36187204)

Of course they are not 'wets'. They may have served in the Conservative Party while in government, but they were not admirers of Rishi.

---------- Post added at 18:18 ---------- Previous post was at 18:12 ----------


We note that this is your position on the matter.


:sleep:.....................
:rofl:::

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36187177)

It'll probably just get swept under the carpet because it isn't the tories

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36187211)

Can you explain to me how, if only 11 Tory MPs in the last Conservative Administration were also MPs during Thatcher’s time in power, and nearly half of those were not ‘wets’, how the other 360 Conservative MPs were ”Thatcher’s wets"?

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36187234)

Your reputation for pedantry knows no bounds.

I am describing Rishi’s supporters as the type of people whom Thatcher would have described as ‘wets’.

But you knew that, didn’t you?

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36187201)

Probably the fact that after 14 years of Tory rule standing up in the chamber and misrepresenting things isn't noteworthy.