Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Britain outside the EU (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33709659)

Hugh 23-06-2021 19:08

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
If no "border" is imposed (with no checks by U.K. on goods coming in from the EU (Ireland)), WTO Most Favored Nation rule means that the U.K. cannot have checks on goods coming from any country.

Quote:

Trade without discrimination

1. Most-favoured-nation (MFN): treating other people equally Under the WTO agreements, countries cannot normally discriminate between their trading partners. Grant someone a special favour (such as a lower customs duty rate for one of their products) and you have to do the same for all other WTO members.

This principle is known as most-favoured-nation (MFN) treatment (see box). It is so important that it is the first article of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), which governs trade in goods.

mrmistoffelees 23-06-2021 19:22

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
EU have informally approved the extension request

https://apple.news/ArGLOBJoYQZunioQQZ22qcQ

Such nastiness

1andrew1 23-06-2021 20:10

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36084162)
If no "border" is imposed (with no checks by U.K. on goods coming in from the EU (Ireland)), WTO Most Favored Nation rule means that the U.K. cannot have checks on goods coming from any country.

:gpoint:

Sephiroth 23-06-2021 20:13

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
all that matters is goods from Britain to NI. Unfettered access without complicated stuff.

papa smurf 23-06-2021 21:21

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Where does this leave minced beef smugglers ?

1andrew1 23-06-2021 21:30

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36084170)
Where does this leave minced beef smugglers ?

In the knacker's yard?

Pierre 23-06-2021 21:35

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36084170)
Where does this leave minced beef smugglers ?

In the same boat as the Budgie smugglers.

1andrew1 23-06-2021 21:40

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36084168)
all that matters is goods from Britain to NI. Unfettered access without complicated stuff.

You've missed a few. Add peace in Ireland. Add peace in GB. Add the integrity of the GB single market. Add the integrity of the European single market.

Sephiroth 23-06-2021 21:42

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Sod the integrity of the EU Single Market.

papa smurf 23-06-2021 21:48

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36084178)
Sod the integrity of the EU Single Market.

I'll drink to that:tu:

Mad Max 23-06-2021 21:50

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36084178)
Sod the integrity of the EU Single Market.

Well said.

Hugh 23-06-2021 21:52

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36084168)
all that matters is goods from Britain to NI. Unfettered access without complicated stuff.

Should the UK just ignore the WTO?
Quote:

Trade without discrimination

1. Most-favoured-nation (MFN): treating other people equally Under the WTO agreements, countries cannot normally discriminate between their trading partners. Grant someone a special favour (such as a lower customs duty rate for one of their products) and you have to do the same for all other WTO members.

This principle is known as most-favoured-nation (MFN) treatment (see box). It is so important that it is the first article of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), which governs trade in goods.

Sephiroth 23-06-2021 21:55

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36084181)
Should the UK just ignore the WTO?

… and sod that too. The territorial integrity of the UK and its internal market has nothing to do with the WTO.

As if you didn’t know.

Hugh 23-06-2021 22:11

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
It does when there is a contiguous border with another country - ignoring it won’t make it go away.

If we want trade agreements with other countries, telling the WTO to "sod off" is a sub-optimal approach.

1andrew1 23-06-2021 22:27

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36084178)
Sod the integrity of the EU Single Market.

No such market to sod. ;)

---------- Post added at 21:27 ---------- Previous post was at 21:25 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36084184)
It does when there is a contiguous border with another country - ignoring it won’t make it go away.

If we want trade agreements with other countries, telling the WTO to "sod off" is a sub-optimal approach.

Yup, we're in the realms of fantasy politics if such approaches were ever taken!

Sephiroth 23-06-2021 22:43

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36084184)
It does when there is a contiguous border with another country - ignoring it won’t make it go away.

If we want trade agreements with other countries, telling the WTO to "sod off" is a sub-optimal approach.

You are obtusely missing the point. The Uk internal market has nothing to do with the WTO.

The trade border with Eire is a matter between the EU (sod ‘em) and the UK (bless us).

Nobody needs to tell the WTO to sod off. It’s just my way of expressing feelings towards the EU loving crap that some on here are espousing.

1andrew1 23-06-2021 23:16

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36084188)
You are obtusely missing the point. The Uk internal market has nothing to do with the WTO.

The trade border with Eire is a matter between the EU (sod ‘em) and the UK (bless us).

Nobody needs to tell the WTO to sod off. It’s just my way of expressing feelings towards the EU loving crap that some on here are espousing.

Whatever frustrations you might post in jest, I know you're wise enough to know matters are regrettably more complicated than this.

Hugh 24-06-2021 00:11

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36084188)
You are obtusely missing the point. The Uk internal market has nothing to do with the WTO.

The trade border with Eire is a matter between the EU (sod ‘em) and the UK (bless us).

Nobody needs to tell the WTO to sod off. It’s just my way of expressing feelings towards the EU loving crap that some on here are espousing.

When the U.K. Internal Market has a contiguous border with a country that is not in that internal market, and there are no checks on goods crossing that border, to the potential detriment of other countries trading with the U.K., it has everything to do with the WTO.

Stating facts is not "EU loving crap".

Sephiroth 24-06-2021 08:16

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Stating facts that are tangential to the question of trade between GB & NI is pointless.

jonbxx 24-06-2021 09:59

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36084188)
You are obtusely missing the point. The Uk internal market has nothing to do with the WTO.

The trade border with Eire is a matter between the EU (sod ‘em) and the UK (bless us).

Nobody needs to tell the WTO to sod off. It’s just my way of expressing feelings towards the EU loving crap that some on here are espousing.

So how would you square keeping the NI/IE border open without checks AND keeping the trade between GB and NI open?

Maybe it's a lack of imagination on my part but at least one of these three agreements needs to be broken;

Northern Ireland Protocol
Belfast (Good Friday) Agreement
World Trade Organisation MFN rules

It looks like the first is the one we want to break but that will then break the Belfast Agreement unless we keep the border open, breaking the MFN rules

Sephiroth 24-06-2021 10:23

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36084207)
So how would you square keeping the NI/IE border open without checks AND keeping the trade between GB and NI open?

Maybe it's a lack of imagination on my part but at least one of these three agreements needs to be broken;

Northern Ireland Protocol
Belfast (Good Friday) Agreement
World Trade Organisation MFN rules

It looks like the first is the one we want to break but that will then break the Belfast Agreement unless we keep the border open, breaking the MFN rules

It’s very simple and a matter of rules interpretation. The EU could be friendly and assist definition of goods that are UK internal market only and thus exempt from NI customs treatment. They could agree to this in the interests of avoiding further sectarian dispute.

The Unionists quite reasonably want NI to be a proper part of the UK. The EU wants to split the UK up.

EDIT: MFN/WTO rules don’t come into this. NI is part of the UK.


mrmistoffelees 24-06-2021 11:12

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36084208)
It’s very simple and a matter of rules interpretation. The EU could be friendly and assist definition of goods that are UK internal market only and thus exempt from NI customs treatment. They could agree to this in the interests of avoiding further sectarian dispute.

The Unionists quite reasonably want NI to be a proper part of the UK. The EU wants to split the UK up.

EDIT: MFN/WTO rules don’t come into this. NI is part of the UK.



Or, the UK could align standards, but from what I've seen they're refusing to do that...... I can't think why

1andrew1 24-06-2021 11:16

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36084208)
It’s very simple and a matter of rules interpretation. The EU could be friendly and assist definition of goods that are UK internal market only and thus exempt from NI customs treatment. They could agree to this in the interests of avoiding further sectarian dispute.

The Unionists quite reasonably want NI to be a proper part of the UK. The EU wants to split the UK up.

EDIT: MFN/WTO rules don’t come into this. NI is part of the UK.


Would the WTO be happy with this idea? How could you stop NI-only goods leaking over the invisible border into the Republic eg lots of cheap Australian beef and wine in the future?

---------- Post added at 10:16 ---------- Previous post was at 10:14 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36084213)
Or, the UK could align standards, but from what I've seen they're refusing to do that...... I can't think why

The UK needs to be a friendly neighbour and align veterinary standards as they are now and stop the aggressive rhetoric.

Problem solved - or does BoJo like the current divisive situation so the Express/Telegraph can devote copy to how bad the EU is and reassure voters that they made the right choice? Despite what farmers, steel workers, fishermen, touring bands, the City, etc might be whinging about.

mrmistoffelees 24-06-2021 11:21

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36084214)
Would the WTO be happy with this idea? How could you stop NI-only goods leaking over the invisible border into the Republic eg lots of cheap Australian beef and wine in the future?

---------- Post added at 10:16 ---------- Previous post was at 10:14 ----------


The UK needs to be a friendly neighbour and align veterinary standards as they are now and stop the aggressive rhetoric. Problem solved - or does BoJo like the current divisive situation so the Express/telegraph can devote copy to how bad the EU is and how voters made the right choice despite what farmers, steel workers, fisher men, touring bands, the City etc might be whinging about.

Boris doesn't want to align standards due to one simple reason (as you well know), it would cause significant issues with future trade deals (looking at the US here)

He's up the creek without a paddle & he knows it.

1andrew1 24-06-2021 11:56

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36084216)
Boris doesn't want to align standards due to one simple reason (as you well know), it would cause significant issues with future trade deals (looking at the US here)

He's up the creek without a paddle & he knows it.

Biden has said it's not an issue for a US trade deal.
Quote:

Martin spoke after Irish officials were informed by U.S. counterparts that Biden has told U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson at the G7 summit that a temporary U.K.-EU agreement on food standards would pose no barrier to a separate U.K.-US trade deal.
Britain previously has rejected any such accord with the EU precisely because this could make it harder to reach a trade pact with America, where food production standards deviate sharply from EU rules, including use of hormones in beef production and chlorine in chicken.
https://www.politico.eu/article/uk-e...-pact-ireland/

tweetiepooh 24-06-2021 12:11

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Ireland is a bit of a unique situation being one country and two countries both at the same time. It's both in the EU and not in the EU.


We can't just try to apply normal rules to an abnormal situation.

jonbxx 24-06-2021 12:16

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36084208)
It’s very simple and a matter of rules interpretation. The EU could be friendly and assist definition of goods that are UK internal market only and thus exempt from NI customs treatment. They could agree to this in the interests of avoiding further sectarian dispute.

The Unionists quite reasonably want NI to be a proper part of the UK. The EU wants to split the UK up.

EDIT: MFN/WTO rules don’t come into this. NI is part of the UK.


It's not really rules intepretation though is it? It's changing the rules. The UK agreed that NI would be (sort of) part of the EU Single Market to keep the NI/IE border open. Now we want to change that.

There were mechinaisms in place for border posts for GB-NI trade that would facilitate the segregation of GB and EU goods but the unionists stopped them.

On your final point of MFN/WTO rules, like it or not, Northern ireland does border the EU. Without the NIP, WTO/MFN rules would apply and that either close the border or open all UK borders to unlimited trade.

mrmistoffelees 24-06-2021 12:24

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36084219)
Biden has said it's not an issue for a US trade deal.

https://www.politico.eu/article/uk-e...-pact-ireland/


So, Boris is just being awkward then....

Sephiroth 24-06-2021 12:44

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
To all of you:

1/
Again, the WTO doesn’t come into the UK single market enshrined in the NIP.

2/
The above needs appropriate interpretation by th EU.

3/
Now the rub. The UK needs trusted status and Boris is not that person to take that foward. This is my point of convergence with some Remainers (not Hugh).



1andrew1 24-06-2021 13:29

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36084224)
To all of you:

1/
Again, the WTO doesn’t come into the UK single market enshrined in the NIP.

2/
The above needs appropriate interpretation by the EU.


The UK and EU are global trading entities who have to abide by WTO rules or face the consequences. As Hugh has outlined.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36084224)

3/
Now the rub. The UK needs trusted status and Boris is not that person to take that foward. This is my point of convergence with some Remainers (not Hugh).

Who? A politician with a legal background? ;)
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36084223)
So, Boris is just being awkward then....

He seems to be going all a bit all ideological on this.

mrmistoffelees 24-06-2021 13:30

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36084224)
To all of you:

1/
Again, the WTO doesn’t come into the UK single market enshrined in the NIP.

2/
The above needs appropriate interpretation by th EU.

3/
Now the rub. The UK needs trusted status and Boris is not that person to take that foward. This is my point of convergence with some Remainers (not Hugh).




Point 2. No it doesn't, As the EU aren't doing anything illegal. (The UK government has already admitted such) if the UK govt. attitude is anything like yours with your insatiable use of 'perfidious' and referring to them as 'the enemy' why on earth would the EU shift stance?

Point 3. You would need someone who firmly believed in Brexit, as any appeasement towards the EU would be met with ghastly horror by many Brexiteers. I can't think of one who would be suitable?


The EU hold the cards here.......

TheDaddy 24-06-2021 13:39

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36084231)

The EU hold the cards here.......

Even the sim cards as roaming charges set to be reintroduced,

1andrew1 24-06-2021 13:59

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36084232)
Even the sim cards as roaming charges set to be reintroduced,

The UK could always legislate against roaming charges if it wanted to, as that's all the EU has done, there is no EU funding mechanism for it.

The deflating balloon continues to deflate.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-57595913
Quote:

Mobile operator EE will charge new customers extra to use their mobile phones in Europe from January.

Those joining or upgrading from 7 July 2021 will be charged £2 a day to use their allowances in 47 European destinations from January 2022.

EE previously said it had no plans to reintroduce roaming charges in Europe.

It is the first UK operator to reintroduce the charges since the Brexit trade deal was signed at the end of December.

Mobile networks in EU countries are not allowed to charge customers extra to use their phones in other EU countries, within fair use limits.

EE, O2, Three and Vodafone had all stated they had no plans to reintroduce roaming charges, despite Brexit giving them the option to do so.


---------- Post added at 12:59 ---------- Previous post was at 12:44 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36084231)
The EU hold the cards here.......

Agreed
Quote:

This debate over the relative merits of Brexit rages each time there is a story about exporters struggling to sell goods to Europe or whether the UK was able to vaccinate faster than Europe because of Brexit. The British government often leads the charge in these arguments, not least because Johnson led the 2016 Brexit campaign.

EU officials and diplomats fear this sort of tit-for-tat politics will be an unfortunate but permanent fixture of UK-EU relations for the foreseeable future. They also suspect it is, in part at least, an exercise in distracting the British public from the reality of life as a small nation negotiating with the world's largest trading bloc.

"For us, Brexit should be over. But we are now in a situation where we have to negotiate with a UK that is fooling itself into thinking it's as powerful as the EU," said one senior EU diplomat.
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/06/23/u...cmd/index.html

Chris 24-06-2021 17:08

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Fine by me. I’ve not traveled in Europe for years. Why should my mobile phone bill subsidise those who do? Abolishing roaming charges was never intended to save money. It was a political move designed to further the illusion of the EU as a single, seamless territory. The phone companies faced a loss of income by no longer having the option to charge customers the additional cost of managing their use via a third party telecoms network. Hands up who seriously thinks they haven’t simply rearranged the deckchairs and recouped as much of that as possible from everyone else ...

jonbxx 24-06-2021 18:05

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36084247)
Fine by me. I’ve not traveled in Europe for years. Why should my mobile phone bill subsidise those who do? Abolishing roaming charges was never intended to save money. It was a political move designed to further the illusion of the EU as a single, seamless territory. The phone companies faced a loss of income by no longer having the option to charge customers the additional cost of managing their use via a third party telecoms network. Hands up who seriously thinks they haven’t simply rearranged the deckchairs and recouped as much of that as possible from everyone else ...

It was fun while it lasted. I used to whizz through the phone charges when I travelled abroad for work. We're talking £30-40 in roaming fees each trip. When I have 5-10 trips a year, it soon adds up. Data was the killer...

Saves my work thousands a year with roaming being free in the EU for UK employees. We'll just have to wait and see what the network my company uses decides to do.

Sephiroth 24-06-2021 18:55

Re: Britain outside the EU
 

O2 has confirmed that call charges with the Europe zone will count within the monthly allowance.

Quote:

When travelling within our Europe Zone, your minutes and text allowances will work like they do in the UK. That includes calls you make and receive within our Europe Zone and back to the UK, and texts you send within our Europe Zone and back to the UK.
https://www.o2.co.uk/help/account-an...-_-CVM-_-07723


1andrew1 24-06-2021 19:10

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36084247)
Fine by me. I’ve not traveled in Europe for years. Why should my mobile phone bill subsidise those who do? Abolishing roaming charges was never intended to save money. It was a political move designed to further the illusion of the EU as a single, seamless territory. The phone companies faced a loss of income by no longer having the option to charge customers the additional cost of managing their use via a third party telecoms network. Hands up who seriously thinks they haven’t simply rearranged the deckchairs and recouped as much of that as possible from everyone else ...

It went from one extreme to the other! It was originally like the Wild West with people reporting bills in two and three figures and costs being opaque. And then it reduced to just UK charges.
I hope we don't return to rip-off Britain days.

Hugh 24-06-2021 20:07

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36084247)
Fine by me. I’ve not traveled in Europe for years. Why should my mobile phone bill subsidise those who do? Abolishing roaming charges was never intended to save money. It was a political move designed to further the illusion of the EU as a single, seamless territory. The phone companies faced a loss of income by no longer having the option to charge customers the additional cost of managing their use via a third party telecoms network. Hands up who seriously thinks they haven’t simply rearranged the deckchairs and recouped as much of that as possible from everyone else ...

As someone who used to work on Interconnect* billing for a mobile company and a Cable company, once the recharge mechanism was set up, there was very little additional cost.

*Interconnect - recharging for phone usage within or between countries using your Home Country phone.

1andrew1 24-06-2021 23:22

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36084253)
As someone who used to work on Interconnect* billing for a mobile company and a Cable company, once the recharge mechanism was set up, there was very little additional cost.

*Interconnect - recharging for phone usage within or between countries using your Home Country phone.

Yup, the costs previously charged by the mobile companies to consumers roaming included hefty mark-ups. Hence an easy win for the EU.

Damien 24-06-2021 23:44

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36084247)
Fine by me. I’ve not traveled in Europe for years. Why should my mobile phone bill subsidise those who do? Abolishing roaming charges was never intended to save money. It was a political move designed to further the illusion of the EU as a single, seamless territory. The phone companies faced a loss of income by no longer having the option to charge customers the additional cost of managing their use via a third party telecoms network. Hands up who seriously thinks they haven’t simply rearranged the deckchairs and recouped as much of that as possible from everyone else ...

I thought it worked by making operators co-exist without the massive mark-up?

It's like banking fees for international transactions where there wasn't any real justification for some of the prices the retail banks charged for them but it made them money.

Pierre 24-06-2021 23:54

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Who cares? Roaming charges were not a factor in leaving or staying in the EU.

Chris 25-06-2021 08:32

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36084256)
I thought it worked by making operators co-exist without the massive mark-up?

It's like banking fees for international transactions where there wasn't any real justification for some of the prices the retail banks charged for them but it made them money.

If it’s a price-gouging issue then UK regulators can and should intervene. Given the period of charge-free roaming we’ve just had, there is presumably the beginnings of a case already. I noticed that EE carefully justified its move by earmarking the additional revenue for UK network expansion, which is a pretty blatant attempt to align with present government targets on the rollout of 5G and overall improvement in coverage. The networks must all be aware that they’re not going to get away with high charges for nothing, especially when the present government may be quite sensitive to Press stories blaming it on Brexit.

OLD BOY 25-06-2021 20:19

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36084254)
Yup, the costs previously charged by the mobile companies to consumers roaming included hefty mark-ups. Hence an easy win for the EU.

You may be relishing this, Andrew, but I think EE is on its own here and will be forced to backtrack. If they are the only ones charging these exorbitant fees, other companies will reap the benefits of having more customers. Almost certainly, EE will be forced to backtrack.

Sorry to burst the EU love-in bubble, mate.

1andrew1 25-06-2021 20:47

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36084336)
You may be relishing this, Andrew, but I think EE is on its own here and will be forced to backtrack. If they are the only ones charging these exorbitant fees, other companies will reap the benefits of having more customers. Almost certainly, EE will be forced to backtrack.

Sorry to burst the EU love-in bubble, mate.

Dunno why I should be relishing this. Hopefully, companies won't price gouge as they did before the EU's intervention but will charge an appropriately small mark-up. And I'm with Virgin Mobile who've not announced any changes yet, as far as I know.

Not that I have any plans to visit Europe any time soon due to covid. But we're blessed in this country with an amazing coastline and a wealth of great countryside, mountains, towns, villages and cities which is where my holiday spend is going this year. So won't be impacted in 2021 even if VM does do somethng similar to EE.

OLD BOY 25-06-2021 20:52

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36084344)
Dunno why I should be relishing this. Hopefully, companies won't price gouge as they did before the EU's intervention but will charge an appropriately small mark-up. And I'm with Virgin Mobile who've not announced any changes yet, as far as I know.

Not that I have any plans to visit Europe any time soon due to covid. But we're blessed in this country with an amazing coastline and a wealth of great countryside, mountains, towns, villages and cities which is where my holiday spend is going this year. So won't be impacted in 2021 even if VM does do somethng similar to EE.

Unfortunately, most holidaymakers here want sun and warmth. A holiday in Britain? I think I’ll give that a miss.

Carth 25-06-2021 21:25

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36084348)
Unfortunately, most holidaymakers here want sun and warmth. A holiday in Britain? I think I’ll give that a miss.

Just back from 5 days near Filey, great sunny weather and quite hot. I've also got a very nice tan, and would definitely look the part if I wore a turban :p:

Mad Max 25-06-2021 21:59

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36084362)
Just back from 5 days near Filey, great sunny weather and quite hot. I've also got a very nice tan, and would definitely look the part if I wore a turban :p:


:D:D

Hugh 25-06-2021 22:24

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36084362)
Just back from 5 days near Filey, great sunny weather and quite hot. I've also got a very nice tan, and would definitely look the part if I wore a turban :p:

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1624652623

Carth 25-06-2021 22:42

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Close Hugh, just add a few wrinkles and it's about right . . . but then there's the white rings around the eyes where the sunglasses prevented the tan

The wife thought it was quite hilarious for days afterwards :eek:

1andrew1 26-06-2021 00:13

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36084348)
Unfortunately, most holidaymakers here want sun and warmth. A holiday in Britain? I think I’ll give that a miss.

You need to get over your EU holiday obsession and give Blighty a blast. More to holidays than sunbeds and sangria. ;)

Pierre 26-06-2021 00:19

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36084362)
Just back from 5 days near Filey, great sunny weather and quite hot. I've also got a very nice tan, and would definitely look the part if I wore a turban :p:

I have an A5 ring binder, that I use to store specific facts and information about that very resort. I call it my “Filey Fax”

Mad Max 26-06-2021 14:07

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36084391)
I have an A5 ring binder, that I use to store specific facts and information about that very resort. I call it my “Filey Fax”

Bloody hell that sounds painful..:D

OLD BOY 26-06-2021 15:49

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36084390)
You need to get over your EU holiday obsession and give Blighty a blast. More to holidays than sunbeds and sangria. ;)

Frankly, I would rather not have a holiday than subject myself to a tan from standing in the English rain. (With apologies….)

Sephiroth 26-06-2021 15:54

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I’ve run out of hankies to knot round my head. So I won’t be going abroad.

Pierre 26-06-2021 18:55

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36084428)
Bloody hell that sounds painful..:D

A5 not A55!!

Sephiroth 28-06-2021 20:45

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
One or two people here round on me for daring to suggest that the EU (not the people) is our enemy.

Just imagine Macron: That man is so far up himself (remember his early threat - no fish, no deal?) and he has always been forward in saying there must be consequences for leaving the EU. He is out to punish the UK and no sane person who is following all of this would say otherwise.

Then there's Merkel; she plays it more cannily - but if she can slap one on the UK, sje will. After all, British tourists don't exactly flock to Germany so it doesn't hurt her by recommending a ban on UK visitors. It may hurt her EU colleagues and quite possibly the ban won't happen. But, if she can kick the UK, she will - and gets it badly wrong with the Covid jabs and the confusion se has sewn.

Next there's the VdL person. Again, no sane person, even among the Remainers on the forum, could think of her as having any goodwill to the UK unless it bows to the EU. She is the arch-enemy.

Remainer bleating that the EU is our biggest export market does not make them less of an enemy; it simply puts more cards into their hands to play against us.

The UK must now plough ahead, open up new markets, ban their fisherman after the 5 years are up, support our people in NI if the EU won't lighten up on their rules interpretation.

And when that perfidious, yes perfidious, Varadkar takes his turn as Taoiseach, and if he hasn't softened, the UK must take none of his shit and teach him a lesson where it hurts by taking as little produce from the Republic as possible.

They are, at least for now, the enemy.




Hugh 28-06-2021 20:47

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Dude, take some Prozac - that pulsating vein in your forehead’s going to pop soon if you don’t chill out… :erm:

https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2021/06/2.gif

Sephiroth 28-06-2021 20:59

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Why should I? Remainers like you need reminding as to who the enemy is. We dared to leave.

Hugh 28-06-2021 21:09

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
If we have an "enemy", it’s Russia, who have killed people in our country, threaten our ships, and try to undermine our democracy.

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/b...tack-66vglvt7d

Quote:

The Foreign Office said GCHQ and the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) agreed it was “highly likely” that Russia’s foreign spy agency, the SVR, was responsible for so-called SolarWinds hack and meddling in elections.

“We see what Russia is doing to undermine our democracies,” Dominic Raab, the foreign secretary, said.

daveeb 28-06-2021 21:15

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36084687)
Dude, take some Prozac - that pulsating vein in your forehead’s going to pop soon if you don’t chill out… :erm:

https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2021/06/2.gif

That's hilarious, reminiscent of a few people i know.

OLD BOY 28-06-2021 21:28

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36084694)
Why should I? Remainers like you need reminding as to who the enemy is. We dared to leave.

I think we need to remind Macron and Merkel who won the war!:D:rofl:

Sephiroth 28-06-2021 22:03

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
He keeps a stock of this sort of stuff with which to insult people when he feels like it.

Hugh 28-06-2021 23:08

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36084703)
I think we need to remind Macron and Merkel who won the war!:D:rofl:

Not you, as you weren’t alive then… ;)

---------- Post added at 22:08 ---------- Previous post was at 22:07 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36084719)
He keeps a stock of this sort of stuff with which to insult people when he feels like it.

I’m not the one ranting and raving…

Sephiroth 28-06-2021 23:33

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36084730)
Not you, as you weren’t alive then… ;)

---------- Post added at 22:08 ---------- Previous post was at 22:07 ----------

I’m not the one ranting and raving…

Nor am I. It suits Hugh to describe my emphatic truths as "ranting and raving" just so that he can be contrary.

1andrew1 28-06-2021 23:52

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Lorry driver shortage: UK government and retailers in emergency talks

Defra looks for solutions as Covid and Brexit problems threaten to leave gaps on supermarket shelves

The UK government has held emergency talks with retailers, logistics groups and wholesalers as a shortage of lorry drivers threatens to leave gaps on supermarket shelves...

Industry chiefs have warned the UK is facing a summer of food shortages similar to a series of “rolling power cuts” because of a loss of up to 100,000 lorry drivers as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic and Brexit.
https://www.theguardian.com/business...s-covid-brexit[/quote]

Hugh 29-06-2021 10:55

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36084684)
One or two people here round on me for daring to suggest that the EU (not the people) is our enemy.

Just imagine Macron: That man is so far up himself (remember his early threat - no fish, no deal?) and he has always been forward in saying there must be consequences for leaving the EU. He is out to punish the UK and no sane person who is following all of this would say otherwise.

Then there's Merkel; she plays it more cannily - but if she can slap one on the UK, sje will. After all, British tourists don't exactly flock to Germany so it doesn't hurt her by recommending a ban on UK visitors. It may hurt her EU colleagues and quite possibly the ban won't happen. But, if she can kick the UK, she will - and gets it badly wrong with the Covid jabs and the confusion se has sewn.

Next there's the VdL person. Again, no sane person, even among the Remainers on the forum, could think of her as having any goodwill to the UK unless it bows to the EU. She is the arch-enemy.

Remainer bleating that the EU is our biggest export market does not make them less of an enemy; it simply puts more cards into their hands to play against us.

The UK must now plough ahead, open up new markets, ban their fisherman after the 5 years are up, support our people in NI if the EU won't lighten up on their rules interpretation.

And when that perfidious, yes perfidious, Varadkartakes his turn as Taoiseach, and if he hasn't softened, the UK must take none of his shit and teach him a lesson where it hurts by taking as little produce from the Republic as possible.

They are, at least for now, the enemy.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36084738)
Nor am I. It suits Hugh to describe my emphatic truths as "ranting and raving" just so that he can be contrary.

I am sure that in the members bar of the Sir Bufton Tufton Memorial Society* (Winnersh Triangle Branch, Honorary Life President Sir John Deadwood) this sort of diatribe is seen as normal everyday conversation, but in the real world, not so much… ;)

*club motto - "it was better in the old days, when Johnny Foreigner knew his place… "

Sephiroth 29-06-2021 11:11

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36084758)
I am sure that in the members bar of the Sir Bufton Tufton Memorial Society* (Winnersh Triangle Branch, Honorary Life President Sir John Deadwood) this sort of diatribe is seen as normal everyday conversation, but in the real world, not so much… ;)

*club motto - "it was better in the old days, when Johnny Foreigner knew his place… "

I am describing the real world in the Brexit context. And yes, it needs diatribe. You attack the messenger (that's what you like to do); I attack the perfidious EU.

1andrew1 29-06-2021 11:34

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36084761)
I am describing the real world in the Brexit context. And yes, it needs diatribe. You attack the messenger (that's what you like to do); I attack the perfidious EU.

Unfortunately, the facts don't favour your argument. It is the British government that does not want to honour its agreements with the EU and is asking for an extension.

Boris Johnson seems to be intent on resurrecting the Perfidious Albion branding that we shook off a long time ago.

Sephiroth 29-06-2021 12:05

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36084763)
Unfortunately, the facts don't favour your argument. It is the British government that does not want to honour its agreements with the EU and is asking for an extension.

Boris Johnson seems to be intent on resurrecting the Perfidious Albion branding that we shook off a long time ago.

You know my view on Boris and that his word is no good.
I do understand the argument about abiding by what the UK signed.
But:

1/
It's the Remainers who always put the abiding matter on the table;

2/
It's the Remainers who never concede that the rigorous, inflexible implementation by the EU of the NI Protocol is at the heart of the problem.

That said, the core of the heart of the problem lies in the stupidity of signing the Withdrawal Agreement as was. Being where we are now, the EU must recognise that stability in NI is now threatened and they need to relax enforcement of GB towards NI trade restrictions.

The extension is merely providing time for further negotiations and for the stupid marching season to pass. That is a waste of time unless the EU makes concessions. But they don't make concessions without extracting blood from the stone. So expect this to come back to the headlines in September.

A completely clean break is what should have happened and the folly of "our friends in Europe" is now completely clear. Even to you.


1andrew1 29-06-2021 12:18

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36084764)
You know my view on Boris and that his word is no good.
I do understand the argument about abiding by what the UK signed.
But:

1/
It's the Remainers who always put the abiding matter on the table;

2/
It's the Remainers who never concede that the rigorous, inflexible implementation by the EU of the NI Protocol is at the heart of the problem.

That said, the core of the heart of the problem lies in the stupidity of signing the Withdrawal Agreement as was. Being where we are now, the EU must recognise that stability in NI is now threatened and they need to relax enforcement of GB towards NI trade restrictions.

The extension is merely providing time for further negotiations and for the stupid marching season to pass. That is a waste of time unless the EU makes concessions. But they don't make concessions without extracting blood from the stone. So expect this to come back to the headlines in September.

A completely clean break is what should have happened and the folly of "our friends in Europe" is now completely clear. Even to you.


Boris does owe a degree of responsibility. But I think it's optimistic to think that Brexit was ever going to turn out well. And a clean break would have been impossible whilst Northern Ireland was part of the UK and the Republic part of the EU. That's the dream of keyboard warriors and nothing seriously entertained by any British Prime Minister, even one not known for his love of detail!

What lots of your rhetoric is masking is what some of us went around in circles with back in 2016 - we're a large country but we're negotiating with far larger blocs and countries. Size matters in negotiations and smaller entities do get bossed around. That's why I came to the same conclusion as Thatcher and Churchill - it's better to be in the tent pissing out than outside it getting wet.

jonbxx 29-06-2021 12:44

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36084767)
What lots of your rhetoric is masking is what some of us went around in circles with back in 2016 - we're a large country but we're negotiating with far larger blocs and countries. Size matters in negotiations and smaller entities do get bossed around. That's why I came to the same conclusion as Thatcher and Churchill - it's better to be in the tent pissing out than outside it getting wet.

It does feel sometimes that a lot of people learnt nothing from the Suez Crisis - the last nail in the coffin of the British Empire. It's an argument that the creation of the EEC and EU was a direct reaction to the US ruffling the UK and Frances' hair and reminding us that we weren't the big boys any more

Sephiroth 29-06-2021 13:21

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36084770)
It does feel sometimes that a lot of people learnt nothing from the Suez Crisis - the last nail in the coffin of the British Empire. It's an argument that the creation of the EEC and EU was a direct reaction to the US ruffling the UK and Frances' hair and reminding us that we weren't the big boys any more

Though, do remember that Suez was a joint UK/French thing, in the context of an existentialist threat by war on Israel.

That aside, the EEC was was a very good thing. The EU is a very bad thing.

Carth 29-06-2021 14:08

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Yeah the EEC worked OK, the monster it evolved into doesn't though

1andrew1 29-06-2021 14:17

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36084776)
Yeah the EEC worked OK, the monster it evolved into doesn't though

They've got less debt than us and Germany sells four times as much to China as we do. Something seems to be working ok for them.

Sephiroth 29-06-2021 14:36

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36084778)
They've got less debt than us and Germany sells four times as much to China as we do. Something seems to be working ok for them.

You miss the point, Andrew. In fact, two points.

1/
The EU, perhaps only for the most part, wants to federalise. The UK people don't want that - certainly 52%. Would you have wanted to be part of a federal Europe?

2/
The whole thing is rigged for Germany. I've explained several time the way that Germany engineered the DM to Euro exchange rate. Their overarching policy is economic domination. Guess what a federal Europe dominated by Germany means? Would you have wanted that?


1andrew1 29-06-2021 14:46

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36084779)
You miss the point, Andrew. In fact, two points.

1/
The EU, perhaps only for the most part, wants to federalise. The UK people don't want that - certainly 52%. Would you have wanted to be part of a federal Europe?

2/
The whole thing is rigged for Germany. I've explained several time the way that Germany engineered the DM to Euro exchange rate. Their overarching policy is economic domination. Guess what a federal Europe dominated by Germany means? Would you have wanted that?


1/ Didn't care what the other countries may or may not have wanted to do but the UK was not on course to do this in 2015 nor did I want it to.
2/ Don't know enough about the history of this to comment. Certainly, I'm pleased we left the ERM and I've never wanted the Euro.

I see our ideal position as somewhere between a full-on member like Germany and an affiliate like Switzerland. I thank we had the balance right before but we've now gone too far in the opposite direction but in time we will become closer.

Carth 29-06-2021 14:55

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
*in time we will become closer*

To what, the Federal German Republic and all of it's satellites?

At least the UK only has N. Ireland as a problem, I think there are a few brewing for the EU ;)

Sephiroth 29-06-2021 15:01

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36084780)
1/ Didn't care what the other countries may or may not have wanted to do but the UK was not on course to do this in 2015 nor did I want it to.
2/ Don't know enough about the history of this to comment. Certainly, I'm pleased we left the ERM and I've never wanted the Euro.

I see our ideal position as somewhere between a full-on member like Germany and an affiliate like Switzerland. I thank we had the balance right before but we've now gone too far in the opposite direction but in time we will become closer.

An interesting perspective that I'd not seen from you before.
On the Euro/Germany thing, I did give a full explanation somewhere on how Germany rigged the Euro (by letting in Greece, and Portugal to depress the basket exchange value, despite their not meeting the required thresholds).

As to our ideal position, we had this in the early 1990s. It was all going swimmingly then; no WTD for a start.

My complaint, though, is now. The EU has shown itself through the EC, Macron and Merkel (and the perfidious Varadkar), to be a nasty bunch of revanchistes. However much I would have been content to remain in the EEC, now they are beyond the pale and to hell with them.

Which brings me to Ireland and a point you made in an earlier post.
The EU skilfully exploited May's weakness by shoving the entire GFA onus onto the UK - whereas the Republic had equal onus. Had we walked away, the Republic would have had to step up and the UK/Ireland could have sorted this out bilaterally. Except that their precious Internal Market would have poked its horns into this. We could have just stood back and say to Ireland "Sort it". Our entire stance was wrong, possibly blinded by the lure of a trade deal.

Chris 29-06-2021 15:37

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36084780)
1/ Didn't care what the other countries may or may not have wanted to do but the UK was not on course to do this in 2015 nor did I want it to.
2/ Don't know enough about the history of this to comment. Certainly, I'm pleased we left the ERM and I've never wanted the Euro.

I see our ideal position as somewhere between a full-on member like Germany and an affiliate like Switzerland. I thank we had the balance right before but we've now gone too far in the opposite direction but in time we will become closer.

The ERM undervalued the Deutschmark and because of the way the ERM worked, other member states were obliged to buy and sell currencies in order to keep it that way. Eventually the Euro locked in the advantage. “Oh well Germany does loads more trade with China than us so therefore the EU is great” is, frankly, an economically illiterate argument to make because it fundamentally misunderstands some of the most foundational policy objectives of the European project.

The postwar settlement was designed to enable Germany to rebuild its economy based on industry and for France to produce enough to feed both countries. That was handled initially by pooling and sharing coal and steel resources, and soon afterwards with a broader economic union drawing in neighbouring states.

Unsurprisingly, the military security of the continent was taken right out of German hands by placing it with NATO, which ought to be repeated loud and often, especially when the EU is held up as in some way responsible for preventing another European war. NATO prevented war by confiscating Germany’s guns, occupying half the country and then pointing nuclear missiles at the paranoid dictatorship that came to occupy the other half. NATO’s political and military control is entirely disconnected from the EU, which is as it should have been because the whole idea was to lock Germany out of military issues. The western allies have taken care of Germany’s security for it, and given the murderous tendencies of Stalin’s Soviet Union, doubtless saved it from being wholly occupied by the Red Army (for the avoidance of doubt on this issue, see the Berlin Blockade).

In the midst of all this, Germany has been free, in fact has been actively encouraged and enabled, to become an economic powerhouse. Whether the very measures designed to prevent it destabilising Europe ever again will in the long term actually cause destabilisation, is yet to be seen.

Chris 01-07-2021 10:58

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Astonishing that none of the usual link-sharing suspects have rushed to share this piece of #despitebrexit news this morning.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-57666008

Quote:

Nissan has announced a major expansion of electric vehicle production at its car plant in Sunderland which will create 1,650 new jobs.
The Japanese carmaker says it will build its new-generation all-electric model at the site.
Its partner, Envision AESC, will also build a new electric battery plant.
The new electric vehicle hub, launched with £1bn worth of investment, will also support thousands of jobs in the UK supply chain.

heero_yuy 01-07-2021 11:43

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36084971)
Astonishing that none of the usual link-sharing suspects have rushed to share this piece of #despitebrexit news this morning.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-57666008

Not everybody watches the BBC and as the story is only a few hours old it has only just made it to the other news outlets. Reuters story for example is only 39 minutes old.

Nissan have also chosen to close one of its EU factories instead.

---------- Post added at 10:43 ---------- Previous post was at 10:35 ----------

Quote:

Comment at The Sun:
Sunderland’s leavers never regretted their vote.

Now they are vindicated.

First, by Nissan opting to close Barcelona, not their plant.

Second, by the battery “gigafactory” it will unveil as soon as today, creating thousands of jobs.

It will be a giant leap for electric car manufacture in the UK, the first of *several we will need, and another vote of confidence in Brexit Britain.

For all the sound and fury, EU membership was nowhere near as important to our economy as the losing side made out.

mrmistoffelees 01-07-2021 12:06

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Great news for the Sunderland and its surrounding areas (Washington, Birtley etc.)

Hopefully this will continue in other areas of the country

Hugh 01-07-2021 12:14

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Good news.

1andrew1 02-07-2021 18:00

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
More good news. Not strictly Brexit-related but it looks like the Vauxhall plant in Ellesmere Port is safe as it will shift to electric vehicle production.
https://news.sky.com/story/vauxhalls...ction-12347390

Hugh 02-07-2021 18:01

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Excellent news

Sephiroth 02-07-2021 18:10

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Indeed good news. I would say that notwithstanding my preference for a clean break with the EU, it is the tariff/quota free trade deal that makes this possible.

The political situation is quite interesting and highlights what's wrong with the EU as a supreme entity. Although it's likely to get sorted, the NHS App for Covid passport purposes is not accepted yet by the EU. Yet several nations within the EU do accept the App is evidence of vaccination. In other words, the EU is dysfunctional. That begs the question as to whether one federation, run entirely by Brussels and the Parliament will ever happen.

1andrew1 02-07-2021 18:20

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36085094)
it is the tariff/quota free trade deal that makes this possible.

Agreed, fair call. Nissan had warned that no deal = no Sunderland factory.

Itshim 02-07-2021 18:28

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36085095)
Agreed, fair call. Nissan had warned that no deal = no Sunderland factory.

Does it matter why it's happening

OLD BOY 02-07-2021 20:25

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36085097)
Does it matter why it's happening

Yes, it does. If we don’t connect cause and effect, how will we ever learn?

1andrew1 04-07-2021 13:42

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Surely, the obvious solution is for the UK to agree veterinary equivalence. The US says this won't stand in the way of a trade deal.
Quote:

Irish taoiseach urges No 10 to match EU generosity over NI protocol

Micheál Martin says the UK must engage with the bloc after extension of grace period for movement of chilled meats

The Irish taoiseach, Micheál Martin, has called on Downing Street to “reciprocate the generosity of spirit” shown by EU leaders on the Northern Ireland protocol after they extended the grace period allowing chilled meats to be shipped to the nation from Britain.

On Saturday, Martin said “warning each other is over” and called for engagement to find solutions through the withdrawal agreement.

It came after UK cabinet ministers ramped up pressure for concessions on the protocol by warning of disruption to peace if changes are not made.

Martin said: “I think the British government should acknowledge the approach of the EU this week in terms of the extension of the grace period and also in terms of the facilitation around the medicines issue.

“There is no question that the European Commission and the European Union leaders have demonstrated goodwill and a generosity of spirit towards the British government in resolving this issue.

“It really is time for British government to reciprocate the generosity of spirit that European leaders have shown. And also the sense of flexibility that Europe has indicated to the UK that it is willing to deploy, in respect of the workingout of issues pertaining to the protocol.

“The time for warning each other is over. It’s time for engagement, constructive engagement, with a view to reaching a resolution.”

The EU decision on chilled meats, after a request from the UK, avoids a trade dispute by delaying the ban until 30 September while efforts continue to find a lasting solution to measures which prevent a hard border in Ireland.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...er-ni-protocol

jfman 04-07-2021 13:45

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36085112)
Yes, it does. If we don’t connect cause and effect, how will we ever learn?

Haha, quite!

Chris 04-07-2021 13:55

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36085207)
Surely, the obvious solution is for the UK to agree veterinary equivalence. The US says this won't stand in the way of a trade deal.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...er-ni-protocol

Just checking your terminology here … do you mean equivalence, or alignment? They’re not the same. Agreed equivalence is a fairly standard aspect of an international trade deal in which both sides agree to accept each other’s standards as equally high even if they differ on the details. Alignment is when one or both sides insist that products imported into their market must comply with their market’s rules.

The reason I’m asking is, Euphiles and remainiacs generally advocate for alignment, because they see it as a way of keeping the UK close to the EU (presumably with the long-term aim of rejoining). Brexiteers oppose alignment, because the whole point of Brexit was to give us freedom to set our own market rules. Alignment with the EU requires us to implement directives set in Brussels, without any longer having the ability to influence the way those rules are formulated. That clearly is a worse democratic position than before.

Mutual acceptance of standards as equivalent, however, is something that neither the UK nor the EU should have any problems with, if they are motivated by willingness to deal and pragmatism as to solutions. In fact I believe mutual acceptance is what the UK has advocated for, not just with regards to NI but broadly in our futures arrangement with the EU. I suspect that this has not been reciprocated and it is the EU that is exhibiting a lack of pragmatism in refusing to allow chilled, processed meats to enter the single market from the UK.

Sephiroth 04-07-2021 14:22

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36085209)
Just checking your terminology here … do you mean equivalence, or alignment? They’re not the same. Agreed equivalence is a fairly standard aspect of an international trade deal in which both sides agree to accept each other’s standards as equally high even if they differ on the details. Alignment is when one or both sides insist that products imported into their market must comply with their market’s rules.

The reason I’m asking is, Euphiles and remainiacs generally advocate for alignment, because they see it as a way of keeping the UK close to the EU (presumably with the long-term aim of rejoining). Brexiteers oppose alignment, because the whole point of Brexit was to give us freedom to set our own market rules. Alignment with the EU requires us to implement directives set in Brussels, without any longer having the ability to influence the way those rules are formulated. That clearly is a worse democratic position than before.

Mutual acceptance of standards as equivalent, however, is something that neither the UK nor the EU should have any problems with, if they are motivated by willingness to deal and pragmatism as to solutions. In fact I believe mutual acceptance is what the UK has advocated for, not just with regards to NI but broadly in our futures arrangement with the EU. I suspect that this has not been reciprocated and it is the EU that is exhibiting a lack of pragmatism in refusing to allow chilled, processed meats to enter the single market from the UK.

Pierre clearly exposes the Teashop's weasel worded (perfidious?) hypocrisy. The Teashop extols the magnanimity of the EU -whereas that "magnanimity" is no more than kicking the dispute can down the road. The Teashop demands reciprocity of goodwill from the UK but provides no hint of what ground the EU might give. They'll simply accuse us of intransigence in the face of their generosity.

Alignment is a MUST NOT. Equivalence is what they viciously withold because they are punishing the UK.

Mick 04-07-2021 18:25

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Today marks 245 years, American Independence Day, when the United States of America, left Britain without a deal. :D

jfman 04-07-2021 18:44

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
And look what a hellhole it has become.

papa smurf 04-07-2021 19:01

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36085222)
And look what a hellhole it has become.

look at the idiot in charge.

Mick 04-07-2021 19:05

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36085222)
And look what a hellhole it has become.

Yep, especially in Democrat run States.

pip08456 04-07-2021 19:31

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36085223)
look at the idiot in charge.

Better than the idiot before.

Mick 04-07-2021 20:54

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36085225)
Better than the idiot before.

It’s debatable when Democrats run around officially boasting about saving Americans $0.16 (Yes, they actually did this http://www.nypost.com/2021/07/01/whi...4-cookout/amp/ ) buying barbecue stuff for the 4th July celebrations, compared to last years prices. But gas (Petrol) ⛽️ prices through roof over there and they’re rising steadily over here too. :rolleyes:

Meanwhile Nissan isn’t leaving the UK like the Remain maniacs, said they would. £1 Billion investment, kerching.

1andrew1 04-07-2021 21:59

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36085220)
Today marks 245 years, American Independence Day, when the United States of America, left Britain without a deal. :D

Don't give Scotland any ideas, Mick!


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:35.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum