Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Sport (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=88)
-   -   General : WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours) (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33613781)

wwe 08-01-2014 21:22

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
I kind of could see kaitlyn going hardly see her in the ring these days. Would be so cool if wwe announcement tonight would be to get rid of the pg and to bring a ppv over here to England

Russ 08-01-2014 21:31

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Or Wales.

Russ 09-01-2014 06:05

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Word is doing the rounds that Mae Young is very ill in hospital and has just been taken off life support which is certainly not good news.

MalteseFalcon 09-01-2014 07:49

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
So WWE Network will cost $9.99 a month (at current exchange rate that is £6.07 a month) with a minimum 6 month commitment. So nobody could buy for a month to see what it is like then cancel it. You can pay with a credit card or through PayPal.

Full FAQ list here:

http://www.wwe.com/help#two

Russ 09-01-2014 09:13

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
There's nothing there that would convince me to sign up. WWE is also showing usual contempt for fans in other countries by making us wait almost a year for it.

adzii_nufc 09-01-2014 10:26

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
They nearly sold me at £6 a month until I seen the minimum sub length. It would be ideal for my working pattern. Always a way to ruin everything eh.

MalteseFalcon 09-01-2014 10:27

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Bull, never saw that. Was going to be tempted to get someone to buy me a subscription for my birthday. Oh well.

Chad 13-01-2014 20:40

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Here is a good article comparing the WWE model and the UFC model:

http://www.mmafighting.com/2014/1/10...ufc-fight-pass

If both are a success, it'll kill the televised PPV market in America.

Russ 14-01-2014 09:48

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
First time in a LONG time I've been excited about a WWE HoF inductee - can't wait!

MalteseFalcon 14-01-2014 11:56

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Whereas I am a bit meh about him.

tizmeinnit 14-01-2014 12:15

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chad (Post 35662521)
Here is a good article comparing the WWE model and the UFC model:

http://www.mmafighting.com/2014/1/10...ufc-fight-pass

If both are a success, it'll kill the televised PPV market in America.

the only comparison I am interested in is Fake and Real lol

Russ 27-01-2014 08:20

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Watching the opening match between Wyatt and Bryan at the RR, Bryan is ridiculously over, not seen anything like this since Stone Cold.

---------- Post added at 08:02 ---------- Previous post was at 07:24 ----------

Kofi Kingston - always fun in the Rumble!

---------- Post added at 09:20 ---------- Previous post was at 08:02 ----------

Overall - not a good PPV. Opening match was the peak.

MalteseFalcon 27-01-2014 09:51

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Gutted with the results. If it wasn't for the fact that I have to download it for my brother then it wouldn't even waste space on my laptop.

adzii_nufc 27-01-2014 14:31

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 35666271)
Watching the opening match between Wyatt and Bryan at the RR, Bryan is ridiculously over, not seen anything like this since Stone Cold.

---------- Post added at 08:02 ---------- Previous post was at 07:24 ----------

Kofi Kingston - always fun in the Rumble!

---------- Post added at 09:20 ---------- Previous post was at 08:02 ----------

Overall - not a good PPV. Opening match was the peak.

It was awful and I say that a lot. The crowd last night were dead. I don't think I've ever seen anything like that.

Media Boy UK 27-01-2014 14:39

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
BBC Radio 1: Daniel Bryan blames WWE for exclusion.

A WWE (World Wrestling Entertainment) star has apologised to fans who were disappointed he did not appear in the Royal Rumble main event on Sunday.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/25911039

Russ 27-01-2014 15:15

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Media Boy (Post 35666389)
BBC Radio 1: Daniel Bryan blames WWE for exclusion.

A WWE (World Wrestling Entertainment) star has apologised to fans who were disappointed he did not appear in the Royal Rumble main event on Sunday.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/25911039

Which part of "no spoilers for 24 hours" isn't clear?

---------- Post added at 16:15 ---------- Previous post was at 16:11 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by adzii_nufc (Post 35666385)
It was awful and I say that a lot. The crowd last night were dead. I don't think I've ever seen anything like that.

It was easily the worst Rumble ever. Xpac heat for a lot of the guys as they made their entrance to the ring. It seems like the only purpose of the RR match itself was to put Roman Reigns over (which I think worked) and for who won it. Having one or two surprise entrants was ok (Grecian 2000 much?) but an utterly dire event.

Russ 29-01-2014 13:54

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Word is doing the rounds that CM Punk has left WWE legit.

MalteseFalcon 29-01-2014 15:20

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Yes, I gather he told Vince during RAW he didn't want to do it any more and walked out. He has been removed from all house shows, and apparently was due to be in the Chamber match but was replaced as he has left.

Sad day if he has gone for good, he is one of my favourites.

wwe 29-01-2014 16:38

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
OMG why would he walk out for he one of wwe best superstars

Russ 29-01-2014 16:42

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by wwe (Post 35667083)
OMG why would he walk out for he one of wwe best superstars

Tired of part-time stars returning and getting main event pushes, promises of headlining Wrestlemanias not materialising, only being given time off when injured, plenty of reasons really.

MalteseFalcon 29-01-2014 16:48

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
I can see his point though about the part timers coming back and getting push after push. Yet the 2 best athletes on the entire roster, Punk and D Bry, are being held back because their faces don't fit.

I'm seriously worried about the product once Vince dies. Triple H will run it into the ground. Much as he is my all time favourite wrestler, I think his business skills are rubbish.

Chad 29-01-2014 22:13

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Some good wrestling rumors on this site:

http://www.cagesideseats.com/2014/1/...hamber-matches

Not sure how many are true however

adzii_nufc 30-01-2014 10:38

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
I'm also getting the impression WWE is heading in the wrong direction and can only get worse. I've been annoyed at PG for some time now but it was something I could live with. PPV's can generally be hit and miss but the Royal Rumble was just something else. Punk leaving is just the start but I disagree with the Batista thing, he has something to give and can make an effort like everyone else. I don't agree with the Rumble win but still he's a mile ahead of some idiot like Lesnar.

Lesnar then, look at this guy in the ring, he's hopeless, the MMA thing is just awful and he looks completely dead after 5 minutes. The rumours of having him pull off a match with Taker at WM30 make me want to boycott it already. Have lesnar fake kimura him for 40 minutes? No thanks. Cena or Bryan please.

Reigns going on his own should provide something for a while though.

Russ 30-01-2014 12:52

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
This is the problem when Vince no longer has a promoter with deeper pockets than his own as competition....

TheDaddy 30-01-2014 15:31

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 35667398)
This is the problem when Vince no longer has a promoter with deeper pockets than his own as competition....

It's not a problem Russ, just stop watching it, I did years ago and if enough others do the same things will change.

Media Boy UK 21-02-2014 01:46

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Big Daddy V dies.

Quote:

Originally Posted by WWE (Post 35667473)
WWE is saddened by the news that Nelson Frazier Jr., aka Big Daddy V and Mabel, has passed away. A larger-than-life Superstar, Frazier was a former World Tag Team Champion, Hardcore Champion and the 1995 King of the Ring.

He was 43 last Friday.

RIP.

http://www.wwe.com/inside/big-daddy-v-passes-26182717

Russ 21-02-2014 22:22

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
http://www.wwe.com/inside/hulk-hogan-returns-to-wwe

Hulk Hogan returns to WWE but thankfully not to wrestle.

wwe 22-02-2014 01:45

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 35674532)
http://www.wwe.com/inside/hulk-hogan-returns-to-wwe

Hulk Hogan returns to WWE but thankfully not to wrestle.

Would love to see him back in the ring to wrestle. But having him back is better then northing. Thought he was working for tna these days?

MalteseFalcon 22-02-2014 07:14

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Worst business decision EVER by Vince. Cannot believe he is spending money on that washed up has been.

Russ 22-02-2014 07:57

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
He's a has-been in terms of in-ring ability (he won't wrestle or even do a run-in as he failed the wellness tests) but his name still has brand value. He'll forever be the first (and some say biggest) worldwide wrestling 'superstar' but the timing of this indicates it's more a case of Vince using him for the launch of the Network - rumour is he'll be on Raw this Monday along with the return of the Undertaker.

Chad 25-02-2014 20:33

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Jake the Snake diagnosed with Cancer

http://www.wrestlingnewssource.com/n...iagnosed-With/

wwe 27-02-2014 02:15

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
What's happening with cmpunk has he really left or is it part of a story line?

Russ 27-02-2014 05:31

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
It's no storyline but will probably be incorporated in to one if he ever returns.

MalteseFalcon 27-02-2014 07:43

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Shame if he has left for good, wonder how long it is before Daniel Bryan gets fed up with being screwed over every opportunity the company gets.

Russ 27-02-2014 08:58

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
It's a bit different for Bryan as Punk is older and pretty close to the age he wanted to retire at anyway.

Russ 06-04-2014 08:46

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Watching WWE Hall of Fame, in all the years I've watched it I have never seen anything like Jake the Snake's acceptance speech. Such a tragic waste of talent and life but you can see the guy has faced his demons square in the eye. Anyone starting out in the business needs to carefully study what he had to say to know of the pitfalls that can swallow them up. DDP clearly saved his life many times, let's hope he stays on the right track.

adzii_nufc 06-04-2014 18:48

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
CM Punk to return tonight? Can you VPN the WWE network? I'm at work. Usually am for all PPVs now so isn't a big deal paying a years sub. Guessing you'll be naffed off when paying Via British bank or credit card. If anyone has suggestions for watching it on mobile. Do let me know.

Russ 06-04-2014 18:52

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
There are rumours he'll be there and have some sort of encounter with Stone Cold Steve Austin who is strongly rumoured to be part of the show - he's been photographed at the WWE hotel.

If Punk is going to be involved it has been very well hidden - apparently he is in the area but that could be something to do with AJ Lee.

Russ 08-04-2014 06:22

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
I've always said the best RAW crowd is the one after 'Mania and this year is no exception. One day I WILL do the AXXESS/Mania weekend thing but it won't be complete without doing RAW too :)

This has to be WWE's best PPV/RAW combo in a long time - possibly ever.

Finally it looks like they've decided that listening to the fans is what's 'best for business'.

MalteseFalcon 08-04-2014 07:13

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Not according to the stock market, apparently their shares went down $5 yesterday during trading.

Russ 08-04-2014 07:39

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
That was due to the figures being released for the WWE Network. They were hoping for 1 million by WM but only managed 600,000.

adzii_nufc 08-04-2014 07:39

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Yeah, taking 21 years of history and handing it to a battered UFC reject is what was best for business says the 20% slip on the stock market. one promo was gold, besides that it felt like a pretty normal raw.

600,000 in the US alone.. says it all. Now what? Lesnar retires, we persist with HHH inserting himself into every single storyline on the show.

Russ 08-04-2014 07:43

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by adzii_nufc (Post 35686945)
Yeah, taking 21 years of history and handing it to a battered UFC reject is what was best for business says the 20% slip on the stock market.

I agree that Lesnar was the wrong person to break the streak, in fact other than Bray Wyatt or Roman Reigns I can't think of anyone it should have gone to if it had to be ended at all.

But it was a massive swerve, we didn't see it coming and pro wrestling is all about playing on our emotions.

Plus according to reports it was Taker's choice to put Lesnar over.

adzii_nufc 08-04-2014 07:45

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 35686946)
I agree that Lesnar was the wrong person to break the streak, in fact other than Bray Wyatt or Roman Reigns I can't think of anyone it should have gone to if it had to be ended at all.

But it was a massive swerve, we didn't see it coming and pro wrestling is all about playing on our emotions.

Plus according to reports it was Taker's choice to put Lesnar over.

They seem to have plans for Reigns as a face. Whomever broke it would be a monster heel for however long needed, with lesnar that's wasted.

Russ 08-04-2014 07:53

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Yeah it would need to be heel but I mean in terms of what was being planned for whoever it was. Apparently Reigns is being groomed as the next 'Cena' (in a good way - maybe the next 'Rock' would be a better description) so big things are in store for him.

The only heel I can think of along those lines would be Wyatt.

MalteseFalcon 08-04-2014 08:17

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
To be brutally honest though, there was no way WWE or Taker was going to let the streak end to someone like Reigns in case they bombed. Looking back, I bet they are glad that Punk didn't end the streak the way he walked out.

It was always going to be someone like Brock.

Russ 08-04-2014 08:37

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MarkC1984 (Post 35686949)
To be brutally honest though, there was no way WWE or Taker was going to let the streak end to someone like Reigns in case they bombed.

Definitely - I'm only saying Reigns or Wyatt if the streak had to be ended, and I certainly believe Taker should have retired with it intact. If it had been a lesser number like 7-0 then I can understand it getting broken as to allow a future superstar to challenge it. That way they could have carried it on for as long as they wanted to, a bit like when someone holds a championship title for a record time. OK a lesser number would mean it wasn't so significant as Taker's record but I think they made a rod for their own back - it's virtually impossible they'll ever have someone try to top 21 wins from now.

wwe 09-04-2014 01:03

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Will we see undertaker in the ring again or at wrestlemania 31?

Russ 09-04-2014 07:59

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/20...l#post35687241

Chad 19-04-2014 00:22

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Just watched a great documentary on the WWE Network called Ultimate Warrior, The Ultimate Legend. It's probably one of the best WWE documentaries I've seen.

It's a behind the scenes look at Warriors Hall of Fame week through to the point of his passing. It was great to see him put his demons to bed one by one, and renew old friendships, before his life abruptly ended. I was surprised to see Sting in the documentary discussing his relationship with the Warrior and his death. HHH and Vince McMahon are really struggling to keep it together at the end.

If you have access to the WWE Network you really need to catch this. Alternatively it's available via the 2 main wrestling torrent trackers.

Russ 19-04-2014 07:00

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
I watched it last night too - probably the greatest WWE documentary I've ever seen. Genuine emotion from Vince and HHH and it easily buried the Self Destruction DVD.

Chad 19-04-2014 09:48

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 35690228)
I watched it last night too - probably the greatest WWE documentary I've ever seen. Genuine emotion from Vince and HHH and it easily buried the Self Destruction DVD.

Totally agree. Warrior was right, where are all the Self Destruction DVD's for the likes of Scott Hall etc...

Watched WWE Legends House last night. It's WWE meets Big Brother. Rowdy Roddy Piper, Tony Atlas, Mean Gene Okerlund, Jimmy Hart, Hacksaw Jim Duggan, Hillbilly Jim, Howard Finkel and Pat Patterson living together in Palm Springs. Not totally sold on it however the best bit was mad mental Gary Busey popping round for a spot of meditation and breakfast :D

I don't really watch WWE at all now, I just tend to drop in and out. The WWE Network is great for those who love documentaries and love action from the 80's and 90's. Infamous Gimmicks and Biggest Blunders where also fun watches from their Countdown series.

This needs to come to the UK on a official capacity.

Russ 19-04-2014 10:16

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
WWE does have a UK office.

I've got no interest in watching the Legends House. I watched the first season of Total Divas as I'm always interested in the behind-the-scenes stuff but Season 2 started a few weeks ago and I've got no interest in that either. That and LH just seem a bit 'meh' for me.

adzii_nufc 01-05-2014 11:30

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
WWE won't be using the term PPV anymore. Companies are pulling out from selling them too. More people watched on WWE network than they did TV PPV. There's talks Raw will move to Spike TV but if it does it'll only be short term. It seems inevitable now that once the WWE Network launches worldwide that all WWE programming will be removed from TV and solely broadcasted on the WWE Network.

It's likely WWE programming will continue in certain countries though where internet and payment options are a problem.

The live shows will still be riddled with ad breaks unfortunately.

In other news, Daniel Bryan somehow found himself Double Booked. He's due in Japan and New York on the same night.

TheDaddy 01-05-2014 13:01

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by adzii_nufc (Post 35694207)
WWE won't be using the term PPV anymore. Companies are pulling out from selling them too. More people watched on WWE network than they did TV PPV. There's talks Raw will move to Spike TV but if it does it'll only be short term. It seems inevitable now that once the WWE Network launches worldwide that all WWE programming will be removed from TV and solely broadcasted on the WWE Network.

It's likely WWE programming will continue in certain countries though where internet and payment options are a problem.

The live shows will still be riddled with ad breaks unfortunately.

In other news, Daniel Bryan somehow found himself Double Booked. He's due in Japan and New York on the same night.

I've said before in this thread that fifteen years ago I work for ondigital in special projects and came up for a plan of showing wwf as was then, wcw, ecw and some of.the indies on a dedicated channel, I was over ruled in favour of showing championship and football league, with consequences known to all. Not sure how wwe plan to full it up, can't all be repeats of classic matches and catch up.

adzii_nufc 01-05-2014 21:42

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35694243)
I've said before in this thread that fifteen years ago I work for ondigital in special projects and came up for a plan of showing wwf as was then, wcw, ecw and some of.the indies on a dedicated channel, I was over ruled in favour of showing championship and football league, with consequences known to all. Not sure how wwe plan to full it up, can't all be repeats of classic matches and catch up.

WWE Network is a netflix clone for solely WWE content that will show every Live WWE event as well as every event they televised. It has no schedule other than live events. Everything else is netflix style. A one month sub costs half of what a standard PPV used to cost. They might still keep WWE branded channels on TV but filling them isnt an issue. Live Events and so forth similar to the Sky F1 channel.

£6 a month for the WWE Network with all that content including special events/PPV
Or £15 each PPV and whatever you pay to Sky to access Sky Sports.

I have no idea what ondigital tried if you wish to educate me on both the idea and the outcome. Too young to have paid attention.

As for the filling up without repeats. They're trying that with their own TV shows which to be fair are horrible.

Its obvious WWE are coming to an end of dealing with TV deals and the 600,000 subs signed up to see WM30 over the 400,000 on TV show it's already started.

Russ 01-05-2014 21:44

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Brits Mason Ryan, Oliver Grey and Martin Stone have been released from NXT.

adzii_nufc 07-05-2014 13:32

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
No idea where the Cena - Wyatt thing is heading but I've enjoyed Wyatt, I can see why they chose Cena though, biggest guy in the company and who better to put Wyatt way over.

Surprisingly enjoying the 3MB - Hornswoggle thing :confused:

Evolution vs the Shield is a no brainer, unless you really have it in for WWE.

Lastly, Kane vs D-Bryan just isn't doing it for me. Bryan's fine but didn't they do this storyline with Cena and Kane not so long ago? Another opponent please.

Russ 07-05-2014 13:40

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by adzii_nufc (Post 35695798)
No idea where the Cena - Wyatt thing is heading but I've enjoyed Wyatt, I can see why they chose Cena though, biggest guy in the company and who better to put Wyatt way over.

Yep, it has elevated Wyatt to where he ought to be. My only concern is where do they go with him once they're done with their biggest star. Word is they're carrying on the feud at least to Payback and good thing - what they're doing with the kids is nothing short of genius, not seen anything like that in WWE for ages.

Quote:

Surprisingly enjoying the 3MB - Hornswoggle thing :confused:
I think it's because 3MB have been stale for way too long. Can't see any appeal with the Matadors though.

Quote:

Evolution vs the Shield is a no brainer, unless you really have it in for WWE.
Something that worries me about this, HHH has a habit of burying people he's up against especially when he's with his friends. Shield have a massive following and surely must be making money for the company plus Roman Reigns is their next breakout guy so I hate to think WWE will end up making them look weak.

Quote:

Lastly, Kane vs D-Bryan just isn't doing it for me. Bryan's fine but didn't they do this storyline with Cena and Kane not so long ago? Another opponent please.
Apparently it;s only because they didn't have anyone else for Bryan. There were plans for him to feud with Batista but when it was clear he was rejoining Evolution they had to have an above-decent worker for Bryan and I guess as Kane's "Director of Operations" gimmick was wearing thin this was a good way to reignite him, pardon the pun.

adzii_nufc 07-05-2014 13:43

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 35695803)
Yep, it has elevated Wyatt to where he ought to be. My only concern is where do they go with him once they're done with their biggest star. Word is they're carrying on the feud at least to Payback and good thing - what they're doing with the kids is nothing short of genius, not seen anything like that in WWE for ages.



I think it's because 3MB have been stale for way too long. Can't see any appeal with the Matadors though.



Something that worries me about this, HHH has a habit of burying people he's up against especially when he's with his friends. Shield have a massive following and surely must be making money for the company plus Roman Reigns is their next breakout guy so I hate to think WWE will end up making them look weak.



Apparently it;s only because they didn't have anyone else for Bryan. There were plans for him to feud with Batista but when it was clear he was rejoining Evolution they had to have an above-decent worker for Bryan and I guess as Kane's "Director of Operations" gimmick was wearing thin this was a good way to reignite him, pardon the pun.

We'll never see the appeal anymore, 2 man tag teams in a below par division, long gone are the days of Edge + Christian, The Dudley boyz and the Hardy Boyz. There's just no way you'd get a match out of Los Matadores that'd come anything close to what those 3 teams provided. Same applies to the majority of the Tag Division in WWE. You get great and cool teams that come along every so often like Team Hell No, but we knew Bryan was destined for Singles greatness and wouldn't be spending long sharing the spotlight.

Media Boy UK 07-05-2014 13:49

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
IRS sons are the most over rated WWE Superstars I have seen and they only got WWE jobs due to their Dad.

adzii_nufc 07-05-2014 13:51

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
You're crazy! It's on of the best WWE gimmicks in a longgggggg time!

Chad 08-05-2014 00:23

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Seen these doing the rounds before. Supposed leaked WWE script. Nothing really shocking however the check list page is a good read:

http://www.news.com.au/sport/more-sp...-1226903326419

Russ 08-05-2014 07:24

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
I saw that last week, apparently WWE doesn't use paper scripts for reasons such as this. It appears the script was drawn up by the venue and that happens a lot. There's a rumour it was deliberately leaked by a disgruntled employee to embarrass WWE and one of the pages has a footprint on it which has been suggested was to give it a more 'accidental leak' look and also to signify what the 'leaker' thought of that week's production....

Chad 11-05-2014 23:35

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Legendary WWE commentator Jim Ross to call boxing for FOX Sports on the 26th May:

http://www.badlefthook.com/2014/5/10...xing-on-may-26

I'm intrigued to see how he gets on.

MalteseFalcon 12-05-2014 13:55

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
If it is anything like WWE, then bloody marvellous. Might have to see if I can watch that fight, miss JR doing commentary on WWE. Bryan winning at WM XXX would have been even better with JR going nuts.

Russ 13-05-2014 08:20

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
I love Adam Rose's gimmick but it looks like it has a disastrously short shelf life. Impressive pre-debut vignets, instantly over with the crowd and an interactive entrance theme for the fans....look what happened with Fandango.

wwe 13-05-2014 13:44

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
With Daniel Bryan out injured and he was ment to be on the wrestlemania revenge tour which starts in the uk tommorow (Wednesday) any idea what the main event will be as it was ment to be randy orton vs Daniel Bryan for the belt

MalteseFalcon 13-05-2014 13:56

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Speculation elsewhere is that he will be allowed the next PPV off and then defend it as normal at the PPV after that. Other speculation is that Bryan will drop the title to Kane at the next PPV and have a few months out to recover and come back at the Rumble next year to win and then headline WM XXXI.

To be honest though, with the McMahon family who knows what they will do?

Chad 17-05-2014 14:44

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
WWE shares slammed as TV deal fails to impress investors

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-27444584

Media Boy UK 17-06-2014 21:04

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
WWE release 11.

Gone are:

JTG
Drew McIntyre
Jinder Mahal
Aksana
Curt Hawkins
Theodore Long
Camacho
Brodus Clay
Evan Bourne
Yoshi Tatsu
Marc Harris (referee)

http://www.wwe.com/inside/wwe-releas...-2014-26386880

MalteseFalcon 17-06-2014 21:07

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Already fired is the chief writer, and also apparently Vicki Guerrero has been sacked by WWE. NXT is also facing some severe cuts, due to the poor state of finances in the company.

Also, Daniel Bryan has been stripped of the title and the MITB match is now for the vacant title. Looking likely we will once again be in the age of Cena being champion. YAWN.

Russ 17-06-2014 21:22

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Theodore Long wasn't sacked, he just didn't renew his contract. Same for Vicky.

Media Boy UK 17-06-2014 21:24

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 35707699)
Theodore Long wasn't sacked, he just didn't renew his contract. Same for Vicky.

If Vicky is going what will happen on TV with that storyline this past week?

Russ 17-06-2014 21:39

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
They'll likely kayfabe sack her for something.

Chad 18-06-2014 23:23

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Why don't they do promos like this any more?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOSFpzPlO4Q

That would definitely boost PPV buys :erm:

Chad 20-06-2014 19:48

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Oscar De La Hoya and FOX where so impressed with Jim Ross' boxing play by play debut that he'll be doing it on a regular basis going forward. Here's a sample of how Ross got on for anyone who's interested.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8sL4-K6ik64

Russ 20-06-2014 19:53

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
That's good but I won't be happy until I hear the words "Bah gawd almighty!! What a slobberknocker!!" or "beaten like a government mule" :D

Chad 20-06-2014 20:42

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Personally I'd prefer "Bah gawd, he is broken in half!" :)

MalteseFalcon 20-06-2014 22:01

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
I am disgusted with WWE that they stood by the old drunk Flair and got rid of JR. WWE has never been the same since he stopped commentating. I mean don't get me wrong, Michael Cole is OK but he is never going to be JR.

Best all time team has to be Gorilla and Bobby Heenan though. True chemistry, never been replicated since.

TheDaddy 21-06-2014 00:12

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MarkC1984 (Post 35708673)
I am disgusted with WWE that they stood by the old drunk Flair and got rid of JR. WWE has never been the same since he stopped commentating. I mean don't get me wrong, Michael Cole is OK but he is never going to be JR.

Best all time team has to be Gorilla and Bobby Heenan though. True chemistry, never been replicated since.

Anyone remember lord Alfred Hayes, now he was awful imo

Chad 21-06-2014 00:44

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35708691)
Anyone remember lord Alfred Hayes, now he was awful imo

I do, he was terrible. Roddy Piper outed him for his taste in young women, in a recent shoot interview.

---------- Post added at 00:44 ---------- Previous post was at 00:38 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by MarkC1984 (Post 35708673)
Best all time team has to be Gorilla and Bobby Heenan though. True chemistry, never been replicated since.

Agree 100% I loved how Bobby Heenan always sided with the heel in the match. Classic Heenan banter:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3zZyOAo8FU

Russ 21-06-2014 07:47

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chad (Post 35708694)
Agree 100% I loved how Bobby Heenan always sided with the heel in the match. Classic Heenan banter:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3zZyOAo8FU

When the Rockers split up and HBK threw Janetty through the glass,

Quote:

"Jannetty tried to dive through the window to escape!"
:D

Chad 21-06-2014 14:12

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 35708707)
When the Rockers split up and HBK threw Janetty through the glass

The 2 first real WTF moments I remember watching the WWF growing up was Jake the Snake being blinded by Rick Martell and Shawn turning on Marty.

Media Boy UK 25-06-2014 15:32

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
"I got some bad news for ya."

They say things come in three's:

1st. England out of world Cup.
2nd. WWE.com is reporting some bad news about Bad News Barrett
3rd. (What next?)

http://www.wwe.com/news

Russ 30-07-2014 06:13

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Just finished watching The Ultimate Legend again and still can't get my head around the fact he's dead. For all the BS in the Self-Destruction DVD, HHH, Vince, Hogan and others show genuine emotion. Would have loved to have seen what if anything he and Hogan could have done together, although obviously not a match.

Media Boy UK 30-07-2014 23:36

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
WWE.com: Ricardo Rodriguez released.

http://www.wwe.com/inside/ricardo-ro...eased-26531379

Russ 31-07-2014 06:44

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
A shame as he was one of the best heel managers they'd had in a long time but his release shouldn't come as much of a shock. Although a talented wrestler he wasn't in anywhere near good enough shape for WWE and for about a year or so his role was limited to backstage agent, PPV commentary for the Spanish announcer team and assisting with NXT production.

If he can get in decent shape I wouldn't be surprised to see him back one day.

MalteseFalcon 31-07-2014 07:50

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
And the blood letting continues. Much worse people there who need to be sacked.

Media Boy UK 12-08-2014 20:44

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Alberto Del Rio released

http://www.wwe.com/inside/alberto-de...eased-26553840

MalteseFalcon 12-08-2014 21:24

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Yes, he apparently assaulted a member of the backstage staff, although RUMOURS on Twitter are that he assaulted a member of staff who is well known for making racist comments and Del Rio was the one who was fired.

Russ 12-08-2014 21:28

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Word is the employee was in catering and someone asked him to clear a plate, to which he replied "That's Del Rio's job" - in America they have a lot of Mexican waiters, cleaners, home-help etc

Media Boy UK 15-09-2014 12:37

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Sean O'Haire dies in apparent suicide.

Sean O’Haire took his own life, it has been reported.

The former WWE wrestler was found hanged by his father at his home in South Carolina, local police sources were quoted as saying.

The cause of the 43-year-old athlete’s death is not being treated as suspicious.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/pe...e-9725817.html

Russ 30-09-2014 06:36

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
WWE have delayed the launch of the Network in the UK, they're holding off announcing the date until 1st November while they continue negotiations with connected parties so who knows when we'll get it. I bet we'll get nothing like the American version and if we have to pay on top for PPVs they'd better make the price extremely low.

Media Boy UK 14-10-2014 12:46

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Justin Roberts' contract not renewed by WWE.

http://www.wwe.com/inside/justin-rob...newed-26726645

MalteseFalcon 14-10-2014 21:02

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Yeah, a bit shocked by that. Always found him quite nice, and thought next to Lilian Garcia the best announcer they had.

Also from what I gather, looks like Daniel Bryan might be forced to give up wrestling as he still has no power in his right arm. Apparently there is a surgery they can do but if they do that he will be forced to retire.

Russ 14-10-2014 21:15

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Apparently he does have some movement in it but obviously not enough to be a wrestler with. The procedure is ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction and apparently there's a good chance of success but recovery can be 6 to 12 months.

wwe 05-11-2014 16:51

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
As the WWE tour coming up will randy Orton be there just as what happened to him on raw he my favourite. Also what's happening with wwe network?

MalteseFalcon 05-11-2014 17:49

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
I don't think Orton will be performing much this month now, he is filming a movie.

Russ 24-11-2014 13:18

Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
 
Best Survivor Series EVER :)


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:55.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum