![]() |
Re: U.S Election 2020
Quote:
|
Re: U.S Election 2020
Quote:
:angel: It’s a difficult balancing act though. On the one hand these are commercial enterprises, they have ownership and they get criticised if they allow their property to be used to facilitate criminality. On the other hand they have deliberately sought market dominance and that gives them extraordinary power to control terms of public debate (unlike Cable Forum). To be honest I’m a little more worried about Google and Apple denying access to their app stores to services like Parler. They are a step removed from what goes on within the app and it is an uncomfortable development if these two companies between them are going to decide this stuff for almost all mobile phone users in most of the world. Google suspends Parler, Apple threatens to: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-55598887 |
Re: U.S Election 2020
The issue is they have so much power in being the main communication platforms on the internet that there is a real-world consequence to them deplatforming a politician. That said the flip side of that is there is a real-world consequence to them giving people a platform from which they can incite.
Trump has been a headache for ages for social media companies. I think they probably wanted to do this for ages but now Trump is on his way out, significantly weakened his support in congress and given them a reason they took it. I really don't know the answer because we also don't want the Government regulating it either. |
Re: U.S Election 2020
Quote:
|
Re: U.S Election 2020
Quote:
This seems to be a rule that holds true regardless of the size of the platform unless you believe that the Government has the right to over-rule site-owners. If tech companies over-reach themseleves, then I can see governments getting more involved, perhaps insisting on independent appeals procedures, etc for the bigger sites. But I think they've been pretty patient with Trump, perhaps because he has driven large numbers to their platforms and for fear of a backlash from Trump's supporters. |
Re: U.S Election 2020
Quote:
Some of the stuff on there though is direct advocacy of violence, it's pretty explicit look though some of the content on there. Even before the weekend, you had people whose Twitter accounts were more moderate whereas on Parlar they were directly advocating for people's deaths. It might be a step removed from Apple/Google's reach but if the developers of the application are not showing any desire to remove this content and even openly celebrating the fact they won't then I think Apple/Google's decision is made a whole lot easier. I think that is actually an easier decision than the Trump on Twitter one. |
Re: U.S Election 2020
Quote:
|
Re: U.S Election 2020
Quote:
|
Re: U.S Election 2020
Quote:
On a lighter note (ish) Quote:
|
Re: U.S Election 2020
No he cannot use potus account, Dorsey locked that one and deleted the tweets Trump posted after his own personal one was locked.
|
Re: U.S Election 2020
Quote:
|
Re: U.S Election 2020
Quote:
|
Re: U.S Election 2020
https://twitter.com/sarajust/status/1347942663778168833
Quote:
|
Re: U.S Election 2020
Quote:
|
Re: U.S Election 2020
I imagine if there is a serious threat he'll get Secret Service project. Biden could probably order it anyway.
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:13. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum