![]() |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
However, in today’s economies, 75% of Australia and NZ food exports go to China, East Asia, and the Oceanic countries (including USA) - do you really believe it makes economic sense to ship things 10,000 miles around the world when you have existing profitable markets closer to hand. |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
It’s not always profitable. Cane sugar from the Americas is (or would be) far cheaper than European grown beet sugar, but EU tariffs are designed to protect beet producers, which are mostly located in northern continental Europe (and most of that in France and Germany). Prior to our entry into the EU most sugar refined in the UK came from cane. There’s no reason why that shouldn’t resume, now we are no longer obligated to subscribe to Franco-German protectionism that is the very heart of the European project.
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
Seriously ... did you think the corn laws were a good idea? Keeping staple food prices artificially high to protect domestic producers is as absurd now as it ever was. |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
But Cane Sugar from the Americas is already tariff free - the Least Developed Countries (LDC) and African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries trading under Everything but Arms (EBA) have unrestricted, tariff-free imports of raw sugar into the EU.
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
As you appear to have copied from here ... https://www.ragus.co.uk/tariffs-on-sugars-explained/ ... I think I might charitably suggest you have oversimplified it to the point of misunderstanding it. The vast majority of sugar cane is produced in Brazil, imports of which attract tariffs from €98 to €419 per tonne, depending on how refined it is, and what sort of refining it is intended for. The LDC countries barely register as cane producers on a global scale. Also, would you mind clarifying: do you think it’s a good thing to use tariffs to protect domestic food production, even when this pushes up food prices for consumers? |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Keep on topic please.
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
As Paul has already said - please stick to the topic. This is not an all-purpose politics thread. Two completely off topic posts removed.
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
https://sugaralliance.org/brazils-2-...s-exposed/4412 I made the point about the Caribbean sugar imports because that's where we imported a lot of sugar from in the 50s. (and the reason I didn't provide a link previously, is that I was putting my grandson back to bed at the same time, and he distracted me - sorry). Yes, I think we should subsidise our home production, otherwise we become dependent on imports, which can so so badly wrong. ---------- Post added at 12:48 ---------- Previous post was at 12:13 ---------- On a separate note... https://www.cityam.com/boris-bridge-...o-10-confirms/ Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garden_Bridge |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:34. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum