![]() |
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
I think he meant about from the BBC (twice), ITV, LBC, the Daily Mail and the Independent. Aside from them. (and The Guardian) then barely a mention in the MSM.
|
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
I think that Boris has got this right.
The pompous EU will try to dictate the negotiation agenda and if it doesn’t suit as, we’ll not comply. If we are to be an independent nation, we must not be a rule-taker. If they want to export to us, then they’ll have to obey our rules. We can certainly go for equivalence on a whole range of matters - we’ll be reasonable; will they? Fishing is very important to them - so important that Macron has gobbled about 25 years. As pointed out by others, it’s a small fraction of our GDP but it’s totemic and indeed symbolic of what’s wrong with the EU. Sure give them a year, even r years in return for something concrete. But we are a sovereign nation and we must apply and preserve that sovereignty. I remember the old days when all no -seasonal fruit came from outside Europe. We must develop that so we can import food from the rest of the world and not buy from the EU if they give us too much gyp. Then there’s the level playing field. They seem to be terrified of our ability to compete; very much so. That’s not just a card for us to play; it’s a strength we should develop and beat them into the ground on world markets. Would they dare sacrifice their exports to us? They are sufficiently up themselves for that to be a possibility unless their industries put the politicians under pressure. When someone as big as the UK leaves a club like the EU, something must be fundamentally wrong with the EU. They are so far up themselves as not to see it. Macron pretends to understand by saying that the EU needs to change (and by the way France will be tough on trade negotiations) - all in the same breath. Quite how it can change is not easy to define unless the whole move to federalism is unpicked and they go back to being the EEC. The ever close union project is a sort of reverse salami slicing process; but by bit taking more and more powers to Brussels so that eventually the EU Parliament will be supreme over national parliaments. Leavers said “no” to that; Remainers, presumably, were OK with federalism. None of the Remainers in this thread have ever said they support federalism - but they would be hypocrites if they didn’t. My position has always been that I’m happy to leave and happy to remain provided that in the latter case, we could keep sticking it to them. But the deed is done and we are sovereign and should go forward from this point. |
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
Quote:
You would think that the BBC/ITV et al would have the wherewithal to take a decent pic of the crowd......unless perhaps they didn't want to? |
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
Quote:
Your other points are reasonable. But if they are telling us they want a level playing field (i.e. we do not develop our skills so that we compete with their labour practices etc) then we need to resist. For you and I to be on opposite sides of that argument is fair enough. |
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
It was a night event, so only limited numbers of locals in London were ever going to attend.
|
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
Nissan drafts plan to double down on UK under hard Brexit
Under the scenario, the Sunderland plant in the UK would be maintained as part of an audacious attempt to steal market share from other carmakers. If car makers that import to Britain such as Ford and Volkswagen face tariffs that make their cars more expensive, Nissan’s UK-made models would have a competitive edge, allowing the company to grow from 4 per cent of the market currently to as high as 20 per cent, according to the two people. https://www.ft.com/content/c4f0d1e2-...a-c4b328d9061c Nissan has drawn up a plan to pull out of mainland Europe if Brexit leads to tariffs on car exports — but to double down on the UK, where the Japanese company believes it could sell one in five cars. |
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
I’d be very happy to consider buying a Nissan. The Leaf looks like a great car.
|
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
---------- Post added at 07:48 ---------- Previous post was at 07:47 ---------- Quote:
---------- Post added at 07:51 ---------- Previous post was at 07:48 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
Quote:
Do i also have to play ode to joy to get the full experience. |
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
I think that the EEC may have been a good thing but the EU less so.
What I hope happens is that we negotiate with the EU for free trade that works both ways. We can export to EU things they want that comply with their rules and we import the same but our rules. We do buy stuff from the EU and they do buy stuff from us. We should maintain or exceed safety rules the EU has, if companies import we don't have to buy, they would learn that we aren't daft. --- Separate note - Turkey. If they do get any traction for membership I can see Cyprus wanting to leave. Talking with Cypriots, one reason for joining the EU is protection from Turkey, if the Turks get free movement they would likely just move in. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:48. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum