![]() |
Re: President Trump 2.0
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Attachment 31594 |
Re: President Trump 2.0
Quote:
|
Re: President Trump 2.0
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Even at the point of the 1st shot, the wheels were only starting to turn right. Attachment 31595 See his left foot off the ground from his leg being hit. |
Re: President Trump 2.0
When ever i here that Trump has been mouthing off again it reminds me of this https://youtu.be/nYZ4IoyztIw?t=73
|
Re: President Trump 2.0
Quote:
But as per the law enforcement rules they should not stand in front of a moving or potentially moving vehicle. You also hear the shots as she moved off to the right. |
Re: President Trump 2.0
Quote:
I think it is fairly obvious that a poorly trained person, thrust in to a position because of the current US regime are desperate to people to carry out the Fuhrer's, sorry, President’s, wishes, regardless. |
Re: President Trump 2.0
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: President Trump 2.0
It was moving at what ? 2 mph ?
Doesnt exactly seem "life threatening". |
Re: President Trump 2.0
Quote:
She would've been turning the steering to the right to straighten up, after steering left. Quote:
---------- Post added at 22:04 ---------- Previous post was at 22:00 ---------- Quote:
Why does it have to be life-threatening? It is clear the car was pointing in his direction and moving forward at the time of drawing his gun. Even being gently knocked to the ground can be fatal. |
Re: President Trump 2.0
Quote:
|
Re: President Trump 2.0
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Shows point of contact. Attachment 31596 and pushed aside. Attachment 31597 As the car moved on, he seem to do a slight hobble. NOT about what happened to him, but what COULD'VE happened to him. He could've have been dragged by the car and required 33 stitches, as had happened to him before. Quote:
|
Re: President Trump 2.0
Quote:
The women were there to deliberately disrupt ICE and block the roads. That is according to her wife. Undeniable that the car was driven towards him. Why wouldn't you call somebody who did that all sorts of names? Only on closer and detailed examination, might it appear that she might've unintentionally driven towards him. That takes time to establish. |
Re: President Trump 2.0
It seems to me that only Trump fans would defend the slaying of an obviously innocent woman and not make any allowance for poor judgement on the officer's part. He took an innocent life.
|
Re: President Trump 2.0
Quote:
Her partner got out the car, and she then positioned the car in such a way as to interfere with the ICE actions. She was instructed, three times? , not sure , to stop the vehicle and get out. Her partner video’s and goaded the officers. Her partner then told to “drive baby drive” whilst the officers were trying to detain the vehicle. Directly into one officer, that had been a victim of a similar incident previously in which he had been seriously injured. He fired in self defence. She , and her partner, travelled a great distance and went looking for trouble, and she found it. Zero sympathy for her, Maximum sympathy for her kids. Shame she didn’t think about them at the time. ---------- Post added at 23:02 ---------- Previous post was at 23:00 ---------- Quote:
What a joke you are. ---------- Post added at 23:06 ---------- Previous post was at 23:02 ---------- Quote:
---------- Post added at 23:10 ---------- Previous post was at 23:06 ---------- Quote:
She put herself on harms way. She travelled there for several hours from another state with the express intention to interfere with ICE agents operations. She pulled her car across the carriageway in order to block ICE vehicles. Her reason for being in that location at that time was to be an activist again federal law agents. She was in no way at all …………..”innocent” |
Re: President Trump 2.0
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:30. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum