Cable Forum
Page 150 of 195 « First 50100140146147148149 150 151152153154160 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   President Trump 2.0 (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33712850)

Sephiroth 10-01-2026 21:46
Re: President Trump 2.0
 
It seems to me that only Trump fans would defend the slaying of an obviously innocent woman and not make any allowance for poor judgement on the officer's part. He took an innocent life.

Pierre 10-01-2026 22:10
Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36208724)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/inves...g-minneapolis/



He was in so much danger he kept filming on his phone whilst he shot the driver…
The woman drove several hours from another state to get “involved”.

Her partner got out the car, and she then positioned the car in such a way as to interfere with the ICE actions.

She was instructed, three times? , not sure , to stop the vehicle and get out.


Her partner video’s and goaded the officers.

Her partner then told to “drive baby drive” whilst the officers were trying to detain the vehicle.

Directly into one officer, that had been a victim of a similar incident previously in which he had been seriously injured.

He fired in self defence.

She , and her partner, travelled a great distance and went looking for trouble, and she found it.

Zero sympathy for her,

Maximum sympathy for her kids.

Shame she didn’t think about them at the time.

---------- Post added at 23:02 ---------- Previous post was at 23:00 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 36208743)
However if you watch the other videos, the murderer .
The murderer.

What a joke you are.

---------- Post added at 23:06 ---------- Previous post was at 23:02 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 36208753)
She literally reversed, turned the wheel to the right and moved. That is also clear to see from the murderers own phone footage.
She also literally indicated, winded her window down, waved a handkerchief,………..

---------- Post added at 23:10 ---------- Previous post was at 23:06 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36208757)
It seems to me that only Trump fans would defend the slaying of an obviously innocent woman and not make any allowance for poor judgement on the officer's part. He took an innocent life.
How is she innocent?

She put herself on harms way.

She travelled there for several hours from another state with the express intention to interfere with ICE agents operations.

She pulled her car across the carriageway in order to block ICE vehicles.

Her reason for being in that location at that time was to be an activist again federal law agents.


She was in no way at all …………..”innocent”

nomadking 10-01-2026 22:15
Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36208758)
The woman drove several hours from another state to get “involved”.

Her partner got out the car, and she then positioned the car in such a way as to interfere with the ICE actions.

She was instructed, three times? , not sure , to stop the vehicle and get out.


Her partner video’s and goaded the officers.

Her partner then told to “drive baby drive” whilst the officers were trying to detain the vehicle.

Directly into one officer, that had been a victim of a similar incident previously in which he had been seriously injured.

He fired in self defence.

She , and her partner, travelled a great distance and went looking for trouble, and she found it.

Zero sympathy for her,

Maximum sympathy for her kids.

Shame she didn’t think about them at the time.

---------- Post added at 23:02 ---------- Previous post was at 23:00 ----------



The murderer.

What a joke you are.

---------- Post added at 23:06 ---------- Previous post was at 23:02 ----------



She also literally indicated, winded her window down, waved a handkerchief,………..

---------- Post added at 23:10 ---------- Previous post was at 23:06 ----------



How is she innocent?

She put herself on harms way.

She travelled there for several hours from another state with the express intention to interfere with ICE agents operations.

She pulled her car across the carriageway in order to block ICE vehicles.

Her reason for being in that location at that time was to be an activist again federal law agents.


She was in no way at all …………..”innocent”
Not sure she travelled a long distance. They lived in the town.

Pierre 10-01-2026 22:33
Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36208762)
Not sure she travelled a long distance. They lived in the town.
Well, I admit, reports vary and that could be the case,but remains to be seen.

But what seems to be undeniable, is that she was there solely for the purpose to interfere with the ICE agents operation.

She didn’t need to be there and put herself there, and did something stupid.

nomadking 10-01-2026 22:44
Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36208763)
Well, I admit, reports vary and that could be the case,but remains to be seen.

But what seems to be undeniable, is that she was there solely for the purpose to interfere with the ICE agents operation.

She didn’t need to be there and put herself there, and did something stupid.
They had lived in Kansas City, but moved to Canada because Trump was elected(says it all). They then moved to Minneapolis which is in the state of Minnesota.

Pierre 10-01-2026 22:47
Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36208765)
They had lived in Kansas City, but moved to Canada because Trump was elected(says it all). They then moved to Minneapolis which is in the state of Minnesota.
She drove to that specific location, regardless of where she is domiciled, in order to interfere with the ICE agents operation………yes or no?

Sephiroth 11-01-2026 07:32
Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36208758)
<SNIP>

How is she innocent?

She put herself on harms way.

She travelled there for several hours from another state with the express intention to interfere with ICE agents operations.

She pulled her car across the carriageway in order to block ICE vehicles.

Her reason for being in that location at that time was to be an activist again federal law agents.


She was in no way at all …………..”innocent”
She did nothing that warranted the taking of her life.

1andrew1 11-01-2026 08:34
Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36208766)
She drove to that specific location, regardless of where she is domiciled, in order to interfere with the ICE agents operation………yes or no?
The question is not about her zip code. It's whether her actions warranted her being shot.

Stephen 11-01-2026 09:48
Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36208770)
The question is not about her zip code. It's whether her actions warranted her being shot.
Which they definitely did not.

Hugh 11-01-2026 09:52
Re: President Trump 2.0
 
1 Attachment(s)
https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/100...smid=url-share

This video show the position of the ICE agent at the time of the first shot

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...8&d=1768128690

Before the shooting, the video shows him going round the SUV, filming with his phone in his right hand - at the time of the shooting, he had the phone in his left hand and the gun in his right hand.

nomadking 11-01-2026 11:35
Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36208766)
She drove to that specific location, regardless of where she is domiciled, in order to interfere with the ICE agents operation………yes or no?
Yes, but your claim was that they travelled for several hours from another state. That is not true.

---------- Post added at 12:28 ---------- Previous post was at 12:05 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36208774)
https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/100...smid=url-share

This video show the position of the ICE agent at the time of the first shot

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...8&d=1768128690

Before the shooting, the video shows him going round the SUV, filming with his phone in his right hand - at the time of the shooting, he had the phone in his left hand and the gun in his right hand.
Irrelevant. What was the situation at the point in time that he had decide to draw his gun and shoot? There wasn't several seconds between the two.My still frames prove that at that point in time, the car was moving straight ahead and at him. The car pushed him out of the way. Other video from the distant right shows that. Even in your picture, his foot is just inches away from the car. That shows that even if he wasn't actually hit, it was a very close run thing.
REACTION TIMES!
Whatever way you look at it, when he had to decide in that INSTANT, what to do, the car was very near and moving directly at him.
As the car reverses with left hand down(an important aspect), the background(eg a big tree) moves from her right to being in front. Same with the officer. Her viewpoint shifts, not the objects outside.

---------- Post added at 12:35 ---------- Previous post was at 12:28 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36208770)
The question is not about her zip code. It's whether her actions warranted her being shot.
Depends on which set of actions you're talking about. Nobody really disputes that by itself, being there didn't warrant the outcome. But ending up with a car moving directly at someone is another matter. Doesn't have to have been any intent. the fact is, at a point in time, the car was moving at him.

Mr K 11-01-2026 11:43
Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Dont think people care about evidence in the US. It's one side or the other, if you're on the other side you're fair game to be shot. Civil war? Thinks its started already.

nomadking 11-01-2026 12:06
Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Somebody needs to set up a simulation, where somebody is standing still and a vehicle to the right, reverses with left hand down and starting moving directly towards them. Wonder what any measured fear response would be.
If humans would be too aware of what was being tested, try it with animals, eg dogs or cats. That would settle the question of whether there would be a fear of being injured or killed.
Or better still, try it for real with one of the complaining Democrats as a test subject. Might need to be done a few thousand times with different test subjects.:D

thenry 11-01-2026 12:08
Re: President Trump 2.0
 
SnoopZ is willing :D

Stephen 11-01-2026 12:23
Re: President Trump 2.0
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36208788)
Somebody needs to set up a simulation, where somebody is standing still and a vehicle to the right, reverses with left hand down and starting moving directly towards them. Wonder what any measured fear response would be.
If humans would be too aware of what was being tested, try it with animals, eg dogs or cats. That would settle the question of whether there would be a fear of being injured or killed.
Or better still, try it for real with one of the complaining Democrats as a test subject. Might need to be done a few thousand times with different test subjects.:D
For the umpteenth time, she never drove directly at anyone, the murderer was at the corner when he took his forst shot. He was also clearly not in danger as he kept his phone in hand filming with his gun in the other hand. Obviously on his feet and steady enough to take aim and shoot 3 times.

There was no justification for his actions.


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:20.
Page 150 of 195 « First 50100140146147148149 150 151152153154160 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum