I took it to be a spiteful whisper muttered under his breath as he left the forum....

You asked (& I quote)
I put it to you that if Mark had not mentioned the matter (without prompting I may add) then further questions would not have been asked. As it is he chose of his own volition to raise the issue although it may have been preferential if questions had been asked via PM as per his original post.

And I put it right back at you that:

a) You haven't answered me but hey, no reply needed I suppose...

and

b) from Bill Payer's reply (which as you say, could have been asked in PM) he was inviting an open discussion on the matter.

and

c) Fraz - you know what happened, I know what happened, the majority know what happened, so let's just drop it eh?

All rise for Mr Mark D. Welcome back to the land of postings. Hope all is well in the new job. Look forward to more of your heated debates.:wavey:

(a) I did answer you see (b)

(b) I stand by my original reply without any embellishments

(c) Yes I'm quite aware of the background

(d) For some reason you appear to have taken umbrage at the fact that Mark D openly brought the subject up and then appeared to imply that it was other posters that had brough the issue up in order to distract from this despite Mark D's own protestations.

Whoever you consider brought up the subject, would you not agree that it would be better if the subject is now dropped?

no, I've paid for a 15 minute discussion and I intend to get it :D

So why did you take umbrage ;)

Ask me in PM and we'll discuss.

That was never 15 minutes!!!

why not let people get it out of their system once and for all?

now everybody repeat after me :-


Mark D you're a very naughty boy!


:D

Chwarae Teg, shouldn't that be 'you were' rather than 'you are ' :)

yes it was

I'd say it's open to interpretation, however do you feel better now you've got it out of your system?

Are you sure ?

The next line's meant to be 'no it wasn't!' ;)