![]() |
Re: STM always enforced?
Quote:
Few years ago it was -75% reduction and you only had 0.75Mbps to begin with on the top tariff. |
Re: STM always enforced?
Well I seem to have got STM after using my connection earlier....
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2013/10/12.png Think this has finally made up my mind that once FTTC is here im off VM, my area is not highly utilsed so its ridiculous to be slapped down like this. |
Re: STM always enforced?
Quote:
It's not uncommon for people who work for or even run networks to have another deal with someone else, or did you not know that? I don't care what people claim is such for the cost. I know that he CAN and DOES but handsets in wholesale from 2 companys and I also know exactly what he pays he owns and runs an MNVO in London - what do you do? Pizza boy! You're crap is much more amusing, so funny that even when you chose your username you must have had a fit.. LOL! |
Re: STM always enforced?
Quote:
|
Re: STM always enforced?
Can I remind everyone please that public rep discussion is not allowed.
Also please try to remain civil to each other. |
Re: STM always enforced?
Quote:
I think oem's were paying something like £15 per device sold to microsoft and that was profitable to microsoft (so cost was lower). In terms of samsung and other android vendors, google make android, samsung make the touchwiz overlay on top for their own phones and some custom apps. It does cost money, pointless arguing with that but my guess is the software development doesnt amount to billions. Apple software all in house with ios although I think before ios7 the updates were less of an overhaul. apple have almost 100billion usd sitting in the bank. |
Re: STM always enforced?
right, stop they petty insults. Thread back on topic and tidied up.
|
Re: STM always enforced?
I haven't read any of this at all and only seen the thread title so I thought I would chip in. It is currently 22:16 on SUnday and I have been uploading flat out for the last 3 hours which is easily over 3gb an hour but stm hasn't kicked in yet. I normally go out of my way to avoid triggering it because I like to play games in the evening but I have been watching a movie tonight so I didn't care. I was surprised to see that everything was still ticking along at full whack when I came back to my pc.
|
Re: STM always enforced?
These rumours of STM been scrapped I have seen on a few news sites now.
|
Re: STM always enforced?
I don't know the schedule, but VM are in the process of moving their TMS servers from the edge (you see them as TMR on Traceroutes) to the regional core (pr whatever they call it). While they are doing this, there will be STM gaps. My understanding is that this hiatus won't last beyond the end of October.
|
Re: STM always enforced?
Does this mean there'll be a lot less servers each handling much much higher load?
|
Re: STM always enforced?
Quote:
|
Re: STM always enforced?
The officially sourced info doesn't go into whether it's less or more servers. They were previously located at the network edge, just before hitting the peering links. So, I've put Qasi's question back to VM.
Mon General asks what the benefits are. It depends on your perspective. It'll catch P2P users not currently being caught because they don't leave the VM network. |
Re: STM always enforced?
surely the % of internal p2p traffic vs external must be minimal, certainly not enough to warrant the cost and time of moving the servers. If VM are going to be that anal about trying to catch everyone it is a bad sign regarding their approach and attitude towards traffic management.
|
Re: STM always enforced?
I can only paraphrase what a few of us were told by VM. Cards close to chest as to detail - but I've chased this up in case they wish to say more.
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:00. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum