Originally Posted by dilligaf1701 (Post 35481585)

Young and from a different country ;) :)

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35481549)

That wasnt all you did though - you posted the link in a thread about Jimmy Savile and his alleged activities, thereby creating a link between Savile and that other person. That is extremely libellous. Please note that while the newspapers have managed to get an injunction lifted, none of them has yet published anything contentious. Unless and until they do, this website is certainly not going to "break" a story that could land us in court. And we appreciate your assistance in not repeating any libellous statements in your posts.

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 35481597)

Presumably then, the fact that two national newspapers have printed that he's denied the claim means we can discuss it?

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35481603)

If it's now 'out there' and those papers are prepared to defend it, that does take the heat off us somewhat. PM me a link - the thing that we need to be careful of here is the temptation to link any living person with actions similar to those apparently committed by Jimmy Savile. A lot of people seem confused on this point; so far the only newspaper reports I have seen have stated that an injunction about a potentially libellous report has been lifted, without actually saying what that libellous report might have been.

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 35481621)

Is this a good time to mention hamsters?

Originally Posted by Sparkle (Post 35481657)

Mail now reporting more than 40 woman and a man now claiming to have been abused. That's quite extraordinary for so many people to have been abused, with Savile still managing to bury it and avoid prosecution.

.

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35481662)

I would class that as beyond the realms of credulity