Originally Posted by thenry (Post 36208725)

It's bloody law enforcement. If you want to use a potential weapon, a vehicle in this case to escape apprehension both the law enforcement and escapee are under threat. Both used force to deal with the situation. I don't understand this grievance for the driver of the vehicle. Obey instructions from those in positions of power or you'll feel each others power.

The driver was immature. An adult would deal with the situation.

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36208718)

EU will roll over . . . . as will NATO

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36208724)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/inves...g-minneapolis/



He was in so much danger he kept filming on his phone whilst he shot the driver…

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36208728)

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 36208734)

Why is the car black in your images but the images on SkyNews show the vehicle as burgundy :confused:

https://youtube.com/shorts/s5rndXDaX_Q

Originally Posted by noel43 (Post 36208726)

When vehicle moved of, wheels turned to right, no danger to the murderer

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36208738)

At the time he had to make a decision, the wheels were pointing straight ahead. Not that he would've seen them as he was too close and watching the actions of the driver.
Even at the point of the 1st shot, the wheels were only starting to turn right.
Attachment 31595
See his left foot off the ground from his leg being hit.

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36208738)

At the time he had to make a decision, the wheels were pointing straight ahead. Not that he would've seen them as he was too close and watching the actions of the driver.
Even at the point of the 1st shot, the wheels were only starting to turn right.
Attachment 31595
See his left foot off the ground from his leg being hit.

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36208723)

Independent investigation by the Democratic Minneapolis Mayor? Yeah right.
[

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 36208743)

However if you watch the other videos, the murderer was clearly in no danger at all. His first shot was to the dark right of the windshield. Showing he was at the corner of the vehicle and his own mobile phone footage shows where he was.

But as per the law enforcement rules they should not stand in front of a moving or potentially moving vehicle. You also hear the shots as she moved off to the right.

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 36208743)

However if you watch the other videos, the murderer was clearly in no danger at all. His first shot was to the dark right of the windshield. Showing he was at the corner of the vehicle and his own mobile phone footage shows where he was.

But as per the law enforcement rules they should not stand in front of a moving or potentially moving vehicle. You also hear the shots as she moved off to the right.

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36208723)

Independent investigation by the Democratic Minneapolis Mayor? Yeah right.
Attachment 31589
When he reached for his gun, wheels aimed straight ahead and he's in front of the vehicle.
A few frames on.
Attachment 31590
Vehicle has moved forwards and wheels still straight ahead.
Case closed.

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36208749)

It was moving at what ? 2 mph ?
Doesnt exactly seem "life threatening".

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36208751)

He didn't stand in front. As shown by the set of 3 pictures I posted. She reversed left hand down. That brought him, the fences, trees, and building across the road into view. Are you suggesting the fences etc moved?
She would've been turning the steering to the right to straighten up, after steering left.

The first picture, he has his hand on this gun. The 2nd picture has the gun partially out of the holster. The set of two pictures proves she was steering straight and moving straight ahead.The wheel trim is visible in both.

---------- Post added at 22:04 ---------- Previous post was at 22:00 ----------


In the olden days, somebody was killed when the vehicle was moving at 4mph(on back of Walkers crisp packet from the 1970s).
Why does it have to be life-threatening? It is clear the car was pointing in his direction and moving forward at the time of drawing his gun. Even being gently knocked to the ground can be fatal.

Originally Posted by jem (Post 36208744)

Eh no, from the picture you provided, his left foot is not ‘off the ground’, if anything it would have been his right leg, judging from the angle. There is nothing, absolutely nothing from the frame you have posted that suggests that the ICE agent’s life was in imminent danger. The car is moving away from him.

I think it is fairly obvious that a poorly trained person, thrust in to a position because of the current US regime are desperate to people to carry out the Fuhrer's, sorry, President’s, wishes, regardless.

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36208745)

Independent investigation by the FBI under its current leadership who were calling the murder victim names before she was cold, yeah right



Also in the video you don't hear him cry out in surprise or pain at the car hitting him, we do him him cursing the lady he just shot in the face though however...