Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

What we CAN do is send illegal immigrants back to their country of origin. International law requires countries to accept their own nationals returning to their country.

We are too soft - no wonder they all want to come here to be looked after.

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

https://news.sky.com/story/man-dies-...ondon-13459217

I think now, to be on the safe side and to protect British citizens, we should just deport all Afghan Nationals. Start with them.

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

Including those that acted as interpreters for us, risking their lives helping our forces? Send them back to the Taliban?

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

They should be allowed to remain, definitely.

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

It was said with tongue planted in cheek, but my point remains the same.

BTW, was this murderer one of the Social care people, or doctor or engineer that you kept saying we need to welcome with open arms?

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

Rogue landlord rents out property without necessary license required by law

https://www.express.co.uk/news/polit...thwark-Dulwich

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

Typical, we’re supposed to trust her to run the country’s finances and she can’t even handle her own affairs. That’s the issue here.

It may look to be a minor transgression however, if it was you, I or Jo Bloggs that was found guilty of of such we would be looking at https://www.mortgagestrategy.co.uk/n...20resignations.

It wouldn’t have happened to Gordon Brown, that’s all I’m saying, the lack of serious political figures, on either side, is worrying.

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

To be fair, it was the local application of laws, which are another example of councils being vindictive. Forever charging money for not doing anything.
It only applied in certain areas, so would be less easy to be aware of. The licensing system was intended for HMOs, made up of flats and/or bedsits.

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

Starmer trying to sweep it under the carpet as usual


she has been campaigning for this law in other areas

as you say this is a serious breach of the law the local council should pursue it through the courts

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

She doesn't seem to be having much luck regarding houses . . . unless I'm mistaken and she's not the one recently in bother over a new house purchase in Brighton

oh well, how the other half live eh :rolleyes:


edit: . . . just checked, I was mistaken, that was the other muppet, Rayner

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

MPs should not be landlords are this point. So many of them are, it's a conflict of interest when they're passing laws regulating landlords, and they keep getting into trouble over it.

She and Labour have passed tighter regulations so falling foul of them is pretty impressive.

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

So what exactly, should MPs be allowed to own, buy, sell, or even do? A law exists connecting to almost everything.
It was local council decisions that created the issue, not national government. A licence wouldn't have been required if the property had been in a different area within the same council area.

---------- Post added at 13:48 ---------- Previous post was at 13:45 ----------

The owner is still required to make sure that any agent has the required licence.

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

They should be allowed to do their actual job, they get paid well enough for that.

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

This political ‘GOTCHA’ mentality is childish and must stop. They are behaving like infants.

Reeves actually asked about whether she needed a licence and was told she didn’t, so in the circumstances, she appears to be blameless.

What this actually shows is that we can all get caught out when even the professionals in the field are confused. The law is too complicated and it should be simplified rather than have more layers of complexity added.