Originally Posted by Mythica (Post 35995040)

So the working time directive isn't a benefit?

Originally Posted by Angua (Post 35995049)

The washing is necessary for US chicken as it is a cost saver. Their inhumane system of chicken rearing is the problem that chlorine washing is trying to solve (not always successfully).

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35995001)

Never give up trying eh, just look at Tm's deal coming back for another go ;)

if people couldn't keep on having another go and trying to succeed there wouldn't be any women drivers on the roads.

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 35995053)

Ridiculous question, Mythica. We are just as capable of enacting laws that are good for us. More capable, in fact, because UK laws are written more succinctly and do not require the degree of interpretation as EU laws.

EU law is needlessly complex and over the top, requiring companies to have an army of lawyers to interpret them, increasing costs. Which inevitably leads to increased prices.

---------- Post added at 07:46 ---------- Previous post was at 07:41 ----------



If there is a problem with hygiene in the US chicken industry, then any trade deal with the US can address this and require appropriate standards to be applied. As long as they were reasonable, there is no reason for the US to object as this would be opening up a whole new market for US farmers.

We could send out our inspectors to check on those standards, just as we do to prevent child labour in the clothing industry.

And for those who do not wish to eat chlorinated chicken for whatever reason, look for the labels and buy alternatives.

Originally Posted by Angua (Post 35995049)

The washing is necessary for US chicken as it is a cost saver. Their inhumane system of chicken rearing is the problem that chlorine washing is trying to solve (not always successfully).

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35995059)

It’s brilliant isn’t it.

I didn’t realise that when when strip through the layers of the argument what Brexit main issue boils down to is ............Chicken.

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35995055)

Except, obviously, a second Referendum... :rolleyes:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35995062)

It is NOT automatically necessary. Even if it was, it is the end result that matters. If the end result is LESS bugs to multiply, then that is better, isn't it?


The rest of the world doesn't seem to have much of an issue with US chicken, as the US is a major exporter.


In the past the UK has had stricter rules on products. Eg We had stricter rules on UHT milk, and banned UHT milk from France. The EU said we had to accept what to us was sub-standard produce. The EU is about being a cartel, not about raising standards.

Originally Posted by Angua (Post 35995066)

You do realise that profit is king in the US. They would nail down everything that could prejudice sales of their chicken.

The problem is that chlorine washing is not effective enough at reducing contamination. The bugs can hide under folds of skin, only to start breeding again when conditions permit. This is why ensuring chickens are as salmonella free as possible in the first place is better. US bred chickens live in conditions that spread salmonella, campylobacter & streptococcus.

Washing chicken at home is not recommended as this spreads any contamination further with hidden spray from the washing process.

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35995055)

Except, obviously, a second Referendum... :rolleyes:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35995068)

Then they have to make an assumption of how many Leave supporters would vote Labour and Tory regardless.

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35995067)

Indeed as one should never chicken at home as the best way to kill any bugs , etc is by cooking it properly.

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35995068)

I think many bods will have their calculators out on May 24th. To do some sums such as:

% that turned out to vote

% that vote Brexit

% that vote LibDem, Green, Change and to some degree SNP

Then they have to make an assumption of how many Leave supporters would vote Labour and Tory regardless.

Then try and extrapolate that into a referendum result.

It will be interesting to see if the appetite for a 2nd Ref is still so great after the elections, because lose a 2nd Ref and that’s it there’s no debate left or wiggle room to try and engineer a way to stay in.

Therefore why would you campaign for a 2nd Ref if you’re likely to lose it? Or if it’s too close to call? Better to try and thwart Brexit another way.

That said if Remain looks strong enough then a 2nd Ref is most likely a certainty as the spineless parliamentarians will see it as their way out of this.

Originally Posted by Angua (Post 35995066)

You do realise that profit is king in the US. They would nail down everything that could prejudice sales of their chicken.

The problem is that chlorine washing is not effective enough at reducing contamination. The bugs can hide under folds of skin, only to start breeding again when conditions permit. This is why ensuring chickens are as salmonella free as possible in the first place is better. US bred chickens live in conditions that spread salmonella, campylobacter & streptococcus.

Washing chicken at home is not recommended as this spreads any contamination further with hidden spray from the washing process.

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35995070)

The safest thing, for our health and the planet, is probably not to eat any meat. But that's probably for another thread ;)

---------- Post added at 10:03 ---------- Previous post was at 09:59 ----------



Any % for the Brexit/UKIP parties that is less than 50% is a vote to Remain imho. ;)

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35995068)

I think many bods will have their calculators out on May 24th. To do some sums such as:

% that turned out to vote

% that vote Brexit

% that vote LibDem, Green, Change and to some degree SNP

Then they have to make an assumption of how many Leave supporters would vote Labour and Tory regardless.

Then try and extrapolate that into a referendum result.

It will be interesting to see if the appetite for a 2nd Ref is still so great after the elections, because lose a 2nd Ref and that’s it there’s no debate left or wiggle room to try and engineer a way to stay in.

Therefore why would you campaign for a 2nd Ref if you’re likely to lose it? Or if it’s too close to call? Better to try and thwart Brexit another way.

That said if Remain looks strong enough then a 2nd Ref is most likely a certainty as the spineless parliamentarians will see it as their way out of this.

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 35995077)

Remainers look set to vote Lib Dem and leavers for Farages party.