Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Size isn't everything Mick......

Maybe Jezza could lend Donald his anorak?

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Talking of which - I believe Crooked Hillary is putting her name forward again, LMFAO :rofl:

---------- Post added at 15:04 ---------- Previous post was at 15:03 ----------

Do catch up - Damien, was laps ahead of you on this point.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

How are they allowing a convicted felon to stand ?:confused:

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

When was she convicted, last I heard she got let off after actually violating several Federal Statutes that normally carry prison time, if broken?

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

'Got let off' = no evidence = innocent

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

She is not innocent. She admitted her mistake!!!

You obviously have not read the official reports then - typical, no wonder you get many things wrong and incorrect when you don't bother to read the full stories and only what your eyes want to see.

The facts are as follows:

• The Justice Department's inspector general was/is looking into the FBI's handling of a batch of Hillary Clinton emails found on Anthony Weiner's laptop before the 2016 presidential election. Some of the emails discovered were TOP SECRET or at Classified level.
  
• Andrew McCabe, who abruptly quit the FBI before being SACKED, is at the centre of the inquiry.
  
• The FBI, under James Comey and Andrew McCabe's watch, didn't act on the discovery of the emails for weeks, according to the report.

So I'd say - She violated the Statutes that cover Classified Material. Classified Hillary Clinton emails being found on an insecure device belonging to the husband of her aide is pretty strong evidence of a violation or two of Federal law. But alas, she got a free pass thanks to the FBI not doing their jobs properly and or being politically motivated at the time, under the former leadership team, 6 of which have now been terminated from their jobs. ;)

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

[QUOTE=Mick;35970291]Talking of which - I believe Crooked Hillary is putting her name forward again, LMFAO :rofl:

---------- Post added at 15:04 ---------- Previous post was at 15:03 ----------




That's good news for the republicans ,another term for Trump looks a certainty.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

The only certain things in life are death and taxes.;)

Attachment 27638

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Admitting to a mistake is not the same as being guilty or being found guilty by a court, jury or judge.

She was let off, meaning not guilty.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Once the Democrat controlled House of Representatives have completed their investigations into Trumps affairs, Hillary will look a saint....

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Let off by people who later got fired from the FBI - go figure. It is irrelevant - She violated the laws/Statutes - nothing you say will negate this.

But wow, thanks for yours and others basic Arm chair lesson in law which I will gladly ignore.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

She's not locked up as promised. Btw where's that wall or healthcare reform ? Me thinks the blond buffoon is full of it and his worshippers have a short attention span...

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

There is no substance in the known universe that can polish that turd into a saint.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

As I said the skeletons in Trumps massive cupboard could.....

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Hold on, I thought Robert Mueller was already doing this and after nearly a year, has found NOTHING on Trump ???

Stop getting ahead of yourself - The Democrats Control the House and that's all.

Trump/Republicans control. Senate / White House / Department of Justice / Supreme Court.

All the Democrats have, is subpoena power but that can still fail when it comes to a sitting President. There is no clear authority on compelling presidential testimony before Congress. The Justice Department has repeatedly asserted an absolute presidential immunity from congressional compulsion to testify.

---------- Post added at 20:21 ---------- Previous post was at 20:13 ----------

Yet again you spout utter immature bollocks. This is nothing to do with worshipping someone, I could say you worship Corbyn, but I won't because it is totally immature. Grow up FFS.

I just see facts overriding certain members feelings, just like they are letting their emotions override their benefit of intellect, and I say this given the absolute poor knowledge certain members have regarding the balance of powers in the U.S Government system.