Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 35216228)

The bible says gay sex is a sin. God loves all sinners. some Christians can cure sinners.

by getting them to talk to God, I think.

Originally Posted by Welshchris (Post 35216418)

Religion is for fools, God loves everyone and made me who i am and if he wishes to Judge me for who i am when i go then so be it, but no one else will.

Originally Posted by Welshchris (Post 35216418)

The Bible also claims that Slavery and Prostitution are ok does that mean we should live by their rules also?

Originally Posted by Welshchris (Post 35216418)

The bible is nothing more than a bunch of stories written by Hypocrits that just wanted people to live by what they wanted while they proberbly did the complete opposite. Take the catholic church, HOMOSEXUALITY IS A SIN!, yeah but having it off with little boys seems rife and it dates back years and even the Pope himself tried to block police looking into it and proof came about when a letter from the Pope came to light telling the priests, cardinals etc NOT to cooperate with the Police. Typical Religion, Followers must follow what we say but we can do what we like.

Originally Posted by Welshchris (Post 35216418)

Religion is for fools, God loves everyone and made me who i am and if he wishes to Judge me for who i am when i go then so be it, but no one else will.

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35215368)

Arthur is correct, up to a point. The landlord can kick anyone out of his pub and he doesn't have to give a reason.

Mind you, if he does give a reason, that reason can't be one that would breach a law such as the Equality Act, but he is certainly well within his rights to decide he wants no snogging in his pub and to act accordingly.

Originally Posted by Stuart (Post 35216543)

He is, up to a point.

It's worth remembering that when you go into a pub or shop, you are allowed in because the landlord/manager/owner has allowed you in. You do not have an automatic right to be there. The owner has the ultimate right, but the manager or landlord can act in their absence. We were actually told when I worked for Blockbuster (the small Express store I worked in rarely had a manager on duty) that if we felt uncomfortable dealing with a customer we were within our rights to ask them to leave.

Of course, that does not mean we could ask them to leave based purely upon their race, gender or sexuality. We had to operate within the confines of the law.

Originally Posted by Zing (Post 35216549)

asking a dodgy customer to leave is a sure fire way of making him/her more dodgy lol

Originally Posted by Stuart (Post 35216555)

Not necessarily. In my experience, most people will leave if they are required to. They may moan about it, but they will do it.

If they don't, you can always involve the Police who will happily move them on (and did, the one time I did have trouble).

Originally Posted by Zing (Post 35216558)

I used to be a butcher. Our most problematic customers were Indians last thing on a Saturday wanting a shoulder of Lamb boned and defatted when all I wanted to do was go home lol lol

Originally Posted by Zing (Post 35216376)

well and I know I am going to get flamed here but abortion is far to easy to get nowadays. I will never ever agree that abortion is ever right when used as contraception IE morning after pill and I will never agree that abortion is right for women who just caught by mistake. Spread your legs with no protection you made the choice you should bare the consequences its murder in my eyes.The only time I my opinion is a bit different is where health is at risk

The back street abortions were due to society not accepting single women getting pregnant I do think the change there is good except for those who do it to get housed and benefit

Well marriage is a contract and being a victim of a cheating woman who got away scott free maybe divorce should be harder to get now

Well you only have to see the influx of immigrants and how soft this country is for me I think racial equality although fair should not mean those native to this country have less rights in certain situations than those who were either born abroad or are children of those born abroad.

I know my views will be distasteful to some but I am honest and not afraid to voice my opinion

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35216561)

As I said today there are some issues that are handled differently and there is a reason for that.I'm sad that some women having got to a better position re equality use it as a weapon against men..it's not right and it's not fair and it tars those women whom are not guilty of thinking that way.

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35216561)

Wasn't just single women who visited back street abortionists Zing.Contraception pre Pill was very unreliable.

As for the rest of your views well I cannot agree with all of them.

Some women were treated dreadfully by their husbands and during that time the idea that domestic abuse should be an affair for the police was unheard of.
I know you think women get an easy ride these days but there was a time when the laws of this country were very much weighted in the interests of men.Any woman who left her home and her children because of domestic abuse were deemed to have left the marital home and to have lost the right of access to their children.
Sadly there were no refuges for such women and their children and taking your children with you to live rough was not a solution for most women especially if they had no family to turn to.

As I said today there are some issues that are handled differently and there is a reason for that.I'm sad that some women having got to a better position re equality use it as a weapon against men..it's not right and it's not fair and it tars those women whom are not guilty of thinking that way.

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35216561)

Wasn't just single women who visited back street abortionists Zing.Contraception pre Pill was very unreliable.

As for the rest of your views well I cannot agree with all of them.

Some women were treated dreadfully by their husbands and during that time the idea that domestic abuse should be an affair for the police was unheard of.
I know you think women get an easy ride these days but there was a time when the laws of this country were very much weighted in the interests of men.Any woman who left her home and her children because of domestic abuse were deemed to have left the marital home and to have lost the right of access to their children.
Sadly there were no refuges for such women and their children and taking your children with you to live rough was not a solution for most women especially if they had no family to turn to.

As I said today there are some issues that are handled differently and there is a reason for that.I'm sad that some women having got to a better position re equality use it as a weapon against men..it's not right and it's not fair and it tars those women whom are not guilty of thinking that way.