Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Reform UK's chronicles (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33713145)

papa smurf 26-03-2026 08:48

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
The first direct arena :shrug:

what's the problem?

thenry 26-03-2026 08:49

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
PubeNews strikes again. Marks.

There was a live stream yesterday of him and rubber lips in West Sussex. I failed to gather enough interest to watch :no:

Carth 26-03-2026 09:14

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 36213033)
PubeNews strikes again. Marks.

There was a live stream yesterday of him and rubber lips in West Sussex. I failed to gather enough interest to watch :no:

eh :eh:

Sometimes it's like you use your very own Enigma machine :shrug:

papa smurf 26-03-2026 09:22

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36213034)
eh :eh:

Sometimes it's like you use your very own Enigma machine :shrug:

dfhjrangh :)

Carth 26-03-2026 09:54

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36213036)
dfhjrangh :)

A small town in Wales, twinned with a strange rock formation in Lanarkshire ;)

TheDaddy 26-03-2026 10:03

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36213032)
The first direct arena :shrug:

what's the problem?

Saville lived in Leeds and committed many of his crimes there...

Sephiroth 26-03-2026 10:17

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
As Digby, in Dan Dare would say: "MXSTPLK". (Eagle comic).

Carth 26-03-2026 11:07

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36213040)
Saville lived in Leeds and committed many of his crimes there...

Seems like 'guilt by association' is how we still play the game :rolleyes:

TheDaddy 26-03-2026 14:33

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36213042)
As Digby, in Dan Dare would say: "MXSTPLK". (Eagle comic).

Funny there's a fella of similar name to that saying in Smallville, he can twist reality, so he'd probably fit right in with reform uk and their fans

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36213050)
Seems like 'guilt by association' is how we still play the game :rolleyes:

I not playing any games, just proffering a possible logical explanation which may not even be correct, so make whatever connection to whatever to arrive at something you don't like you want

Hugh 26-03-2026 15:09

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36213042)
As Digby, in Dan Dare would say: "MXSTPLK". (Eagle comic).

I was stationed there…

(Digby, not MXSTPLK…)

Carth 26-03-2026 15:26

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36213060)
Funny there's a fella of similar name to that saying in Smallville, he can twist reality, so he'd probably fit right in with reform uk and their fans



I not playing any games, just proffering a possible logical explanation which may not even be correct, so make whatever connection to whatever to arrive at something you don't like you want

I will do, the same as you, otherwise you wouldn't have bothered with it :PP:

Hugh 26-03-2026 16:18

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36213065)
I will do, the same as you, otherwise you wouldn't have bothered with it :PP:

It’s like Oscar Wilde has been reincarnated and joined Cable Forum… :D

Carth 26-03-2026 17:55

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
I've been likened to many people (or things), but Oscar Wilde is a first :erm:

:scratch: I may start a novel "The AI generated Dorian Gray"

TheDaddy 26-03-2026 20:40

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36213065)
I will do, the same as you, otherwise you wouldn't have bothered with it :PP:

Whatever Oscar :)

Hugh 31-03-2026 07:34

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36211022)
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics...fice-js7f750cr

Quote:

Reform MP refuses to vacate constituency office after defecting

A former Conservative MP is locked in a battle with his old party over the use of his constituency office.

Andrew Rosindell, who defected to Reform UK last month, is in dispute with the Tories over the use of Margaret Thatcher House, his office in his Romford constituency. The property is owned in trust by the Conservatives but Rosindell is refusing to vacate, Politico reported.

Rosindell, who was a shadow Foreign Office minister under Kemi Badenoch, announced his defection days after Robert Jenrick abandoned the Tories. Jenrick was sacked by Badenoch after she learnt of his plans to defect.

Rosindell announced his defection on X and said that the main reason for his departure was his opposition to the handover of sovereignty of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius.

The Romford Conservative Association has been put into special measures after Rosindell’s defection was followed by a number of local councillors. The measures are to ensure “good governance and protect party assets”, Conservative Campaign Headquarters said.

It added: “As the property is held in trust for the Conservative Party and its members, the association is currently seeking clarification from Mr Rosindell for the legal basis on which he continues to occupy Margaret Thatcher House. This is a procedural matter concerning property governance, and we will not comment further while correspondence is ongoing.”

It is understood that the dispute centres on the terms of the rental agreement given that the property is his constituency office as an MP. The property, on Western Road, is a local hub for Conservative party operations and constituent services in the Havering area. It has previously had union flags, the St George’s Cross and blue posters for Rosindell outside it

The first comment from a Times reader was amusing (imho)…

Quote:

He wants to leave and keep the benefits of remaining

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp3l14d9wklo

Quote:

An MP has lost a High Court bid to be let back into his old constituency office after being locked out following his defection from the Conservatives to Reform UK.

Andrew Rosindell, who has represented Romford in east London since 2001, defected in January and was later locked out of the constituency office he had occupied at Margaret Thatcher House.

The MP began legal proceedings against the Romford Conservative Association (RCA), which runs the building, with his lawyers telling a hearing it had "taken the law into its own hands".

The RCA opposed the bid, with its barristers stating it was "blindingly obvious" that Rosindell's licence to use the premises only applied when he was a Tory.

The MP argued on Monday that he should be granted an injunction allowing him "full and unfettered" access but the RCA said allowing continued access would have meant he could "spy" on its activities in the run-up to the local elections.

In a ruling, Mr Justice Choudhury refused the injunction bid, stating Mr Rosindell's case was "intrinsically weak" and that he "ought to have realised that he had surrendered his right to occupy" his office.

He said: "It would have been obvious to him from the moment of defecting that continued occupation would be unsustainable."
Apparently "Leave means Leave"… :D

Chris 31-03-2026 07:42

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Nice reader comment. One of those that demands a ‘this wins today’s internet’ reply.

Hugh 18-04-2026 11:49

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
1 Attachment(s)
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...0&d=1776513020

"Concern grows for Suella Braverman as she completely forgets she spent nine years as part of the Conservative government, including two periods as Home Secretary, responsible for immigration."

thenry 18-04-2026 11:57

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Didn't she turn out to be a security concern while in power under the conservatives. That and she or her parents were immigrants. She might as well have come on a dinghy.

OLD BOY 18-04-2026 12:00

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36214081)
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...0&d=1776513020

"Concern grows for Suella Braverman as she completely forgets she spent nine years as part of the Conservative government, including two periods as Home Secretary, responsible for immigration."

Braverman was trying to change things from within the party but failed. That’s why she went over to Reform and it’s why they accepted her.

Hugh 18-04-2026 12:38

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36214084)
Braverman was trying to change things from within the party but failed. That’s why she went over to Reform and it’s why they accepted her.

https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2026/04/9.gif

Paul 18-04-2026 13:40

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36214084)
Braverman was trying to change things from within the party but failed. That’s why she went over to Reform and it’s why they accepted her.

LOL. :dunce:

OLD BOY 18-04-2026 18:29

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36214086)

Don’t mention it. Glad to have been of help! :beer:

Hugh 18-04-2026 20:00

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36214103)
Don’t mention it. Glad to have been of help! :beer:

https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2026/04/10.gif

1andrew1 24-04-2026 10:20

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Vote Reform UK - get the CCP (Chinese Communist Party)?
Quote:

A Reform UK candidate in next month’s local elections was a “de facto senior diplomat” for the government of Hong Kong until two-and-a-half years ago and praised China’s repressive national security law.

Sheung-yuen Lee, who is standing for Nigel Farage’s party in Ealing, west London, worked for the Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office (HKETO) until November 2023.

He remained in post after Beijing imposed a requirement that all civil servants formally declare their loyalty to the Hong Kong government as part of the People’s Republic of China — a demand that prompted thousands of other civil servants to resign or retire.

Ben Rogers, chair of the Hong Kong Watch campaigning organisation, expressed concern about Lee’s candidacy.

“Having someone who until very recently worked for the Hong Kong government, including representing Hong Kong as a diplomat, standing for election at any level in this country is deeply concerning,” Rogers said.
https://www.ft.com/content/477e904f-...syn-25a6b1a6=1

Sephiroth 24-04-2026 10:33

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Sounds like a witch hunt against a refugee whose utterings in Hong Kong probably saved him from arrest and trial.

Itshim 24-04-2026 10:36

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36214401)
Vote Reform UK - get the CCP (Chinese Communist Party)?

https://www.ft.com/content/477e904f-...syn-25a6b1a6=1

Or vote labour and get people that can't see what's in front of there faces ,, can't add up. Vote green and try hypnosis for yourself. Vote plaid and get labour with a Welsh accent.
Or just waste it on lib Dems. When all said and done Trump did what he said he would as crazy as he is USA got what it voted for .

1andrew1 24-04-2026 11:00

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36214403)
Sounds like a witch hunt against a refugee whose utterings in Hong Kong probably saved him from arrest and trial.

I'm not sure you've understood the excerpt? It said "He remained in post after Beijing imposed a requirement that all civil servants formally declare their loyalty to the Hong Kong government as part of the People’s Republic of China — a demand that prompted thousands of other civil servants to resign or retire."

Important to also note that his boss, Hong Kong chief executive John Lee, said he would pursue dissidents ‘to the ends of the earth’.

---------- Post added at 12:00 ---------- Previous post was at 11:57 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36214404)
Or vote labour and get people that can't see what's in front of there faces ,, can't add up. Vote green and try hypnosis for yourself. Vote plaid and get labour with a Welsh accent.
Or just waste it on lib Dems. When all said and done Trump did what he said he would as crazy as he is USA got what it voted for .

Not when it came to not starting wars or reducing prices he didn't.

Hugh 24-04-2026 11:05

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36214403)
Sounds like a witch hunt against a refugee whose utterings in Hong Kong probably saved him from arrest and trial.

Probably not…

https://www.thetimes.com/article/803...ac3412fa1f1928

Quote:

Lee Sheung-yuen, who worked as the director of the Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office (HKETO) in Bangkok and Jakarta before moving to the UK in 2024, spoke in support of a national security law that made many forms of peaceful protest punishable by up to life in prison in a speech in June 2022 in Phnom Penh,

In the speech, the former government official supported Hong Kong’s “improved electoral system”, and said that since the enactment of the law in 2020, and due to the “patriots governing Hong Kong”, the territory had returned to the correct track of “one country, two systems”, The Cambodia China Times reported.

TheDaddy 24-04-2026 19:09

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36214404)
Or vote labour and get people that can't see what's in front of there faces ,, can't add up. Vote green and try hypnosis for yourself. Vote plaid and get labour with a Welsh accent.
Or just waste it on lib Dems. When all said and done Trump did what he said he would as crazy as he is USA got what it voted for .

That's why his approval ratings are so high, we'll see how happy people are with what they voted for in November

jem 24-04-2026 20:08

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36214430)
That's why his approval ratings are so high, we'll see how happy people are with what they voted for in November

The November midterms will be a complete bloodbath for the Republican party, I suspect losing control of the House is a given and possibly the Senate as well.

That assumes that the elections actually go ahead and Thump can’t find some reason to delay or cancel them. That might be a step too far even for his most loyal MAGA supporters - it may well be the push that Vance needs to involve the 25th Amendment and take over.

Hugh 30-04-2026 21:49

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...onaire-in-2024

Quote:

Nigel Farage was given £5m by the crypto billionaire Christopher Harborne shortly before announcing he would stand in the 2024 British general election, the Guardian can reveal.

Farage had stated he did not intend to stand as a prospective MP but U-turned in June 2024, within weeks of receiving the personal gift from the Thailand-based businessman.

In July 2024, Farage became an MP for the first time and has since stated he now expects to become prime minister at the next general election.

After being approached by the Guardian about the gift, neither he nor Harborne provided a comment – instead lawyers for Reform UK and Harborne pleaded for more time. Farage then confirmed to the Daily Telegraph that he had received the gift, saying it was to pay for his personal security.

Until that point neither Harborne nor Farage had spoken publicly about the £5m gift. At the time of the gift, Farage had not announced that he would run for the seat of Clacton.

MPs said that Farage should have declared it. Parliamentary rules state that any benefits should be declared for the 12 months before taking up office as an MP, depending on whether it was for political or personal purposes. The rules state: “If there is any doubt, the benefit should be registered.”

Quote:

A spokesperson for Reform said that it was a “personal unconditional gift” and Farage’s decision to stand as an MP was “entirely unrelated”.

They said: “This gift was given when Nigel was retired from frontline politics. A while after the gift was given, Nigel confirmed he wouldn’t stand at the next general election. He then reversed his decision to stand in June.”

1andrew1 30-04-2026 22:32

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
I believe Badenoch has referred him to the Standards Committee. Will be interesting to see how it develops.

Hugh 01-05-2026 07:30

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
From the previously posted article

Quote:

Farage then confirmed to the Daily Telegraph that he had received the gift, saying it was to pay for his personal security.
Yet six months later, he said he wouldn’t (and still hasn’t, nearly two years after being elected) hold Constitutency Surgeries due to "security concerns"…

1andrew1 01-05-2026 08:03

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36214698)
From the previously posted article

Yet six months later, he said he wouldn’t (and still hasn’t, nearly two years after being elected) hold Constitutency Surgeries due to "security concerns"…

Clearly holding out for more foreign wonga before he contemplates holding any constituency surgeries

Sephiroth 01-05-2026 08:09

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36214700)
Clearly holding out for more foreign wonga before he contemplates holding any constituency surgeries

Glad to see that you appear to be a GB News watcher!

Hugh 01-05-2026 09:38

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36214700)
Clearly holding out for more foreign wonga before he contemplates holding any constituency surgeries

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36214701)
Glad to see that you appear to be a GB News watcher!


There's no need to descend to that sort of personal abuse... ;)

Sephiroth 01-05-2026 09:46

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36214705)
There's no need to descend to that sort of personal abuse... ;)

Wasn’t talking to you.

Hugh 01-05-2026 10:36

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36214706)
Wasn’t talking to you.


https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2026/05/1.gif

1andrew1 03-05-2026 05:51

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36214701)
Glad to see that you appear to be a GB News watcher!

An obvious choice when CITV closed. :D

Sephiroth 03-05-2026 08:40

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36214806)
An obvious choice when CITV closed. :D

It's all becoming clear now.

Hugh 04-05-2026 16:22

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
1 Attachment(s)
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...7&d=1777911714

Paul 04-05-2026 17:05

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
I'm confused, Reform are saying "Vote Green" :confused:

Hugh 04-05-2026 17:34

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36214896)
I'm confused, Reform are saying "Vote Green" :confused:

https://votegreengetillegals.com/

Quote:

In order to deport all illegal migrants in Britain, a Reform government will build detention capacity for at least 24,000 illegal migrants at a time.

They will not be able to leave the detention centres, and be held for a short period while they await deportation.

We understand people feel strongly about living near detention sites. So we make this guarantee:

Based on results from local elections and the next general election, no detention centre will be placed in any constituency with a Reform MP, or in any council area controlled by Reform.

Of the remaining areas, given the Green Party advocate for open borders, we will prioritise Green-held constituencies and Green-run councils to put these sites.

Paul 04-05-2026 17:39

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
That still seems nonsensical to me, how do they expect to get into government if they tell people to vote Green.

TheDaddy 04-05-2026 18:45

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36214901)
That still seems nonsensical to me, how do they expect to get into government if they tell people to vote Green.

Shockingly they want their cake and eat it, they're telling people that the greens will let anyone in but reform will save the day by removing the ones already here and that their voters won't have to put up with having detention centres in their constituencies, it'll work too I'll bet

Sephiroth 04-05-2026 18:59

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
It's an interesting suggestion by Reform but unless they have done their homework by knowing their locational options, there are too many spinning plates to allow that to be a reliable policy. It's uncaveated and thus somewhat foolish.

RichardCoulter 04-05-2026 22:06

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36214901)
That still seems nonsensical to me, how do they expect to get into government if they tell people to vote Green.

They're trying to prevent people from voting Green by saying that, if Green win, that this will result in more illegal immigrants. If Reform win then they will create detention centres and deliberately put them in areas where Green did win.

This lack of professionalism shows how worried Refirm are, now that their support is waning & the Green vote is rising. It's the sort of immature/spiteful language/policy that you'd expect from Trump.

OLD BOY 04-05-2026 22:24

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36214901)
That still seems nonsensical to me, how do they expect to get into government if they tell people to vote Green.

Seriously, is that how you read it? Who wants illegals in their back yard?

---------- Post added at 23:24 ---------- Previous post was at 23:23 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36214908)
They're trying to prevent people from voting Green by saying that, if Green win, that this will result in more illegal immigrants. If Reform win then they will create detention centres and deliberately put them in areas where Green did win.

This lack of professionalism shows how worried Refirm are, now that their support is waning & the Green vote is rising. It's the sort of immature/spiteful language/policy that you'd expect from Trump.

Not according to the latest poll.

Sephiroth 05-05-2026 06:45

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
I agree with Richard, to an extent.

The detention centre announcement does lack professionalism.

Has peak Reform occurred?
https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/reform-h...-conservatives

I believe it to be a tottering lead and May 7th will be a big marker.

Itshim 05-05-2026 07:04

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36214916)
I agree with Richard, to an extent.

The detention centre announcement does lack professionalism.

Has peak Reform occurred?
https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/reform-h...-conservatives

I believe it to be a tottering lead and May 7th will be a big marker.

Seems sky news via You Gov disagrees with you. Check it out this morning

Sephiroth 05-05-2026 07:19

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36214917)
Seems sky news via You Gov disagrees with you. Check it out this morning

I did see the Sky News reports. But I chose the link I gave because it was middle of the road.

Anyway, what matters is the next General Election. A big problem for Reform that I foresee is that they may well win the local elections hands down but then cannot deliver their programme for financial reasons. Then they'll be hammered at the GE.

Hence my assessment of peak-Reform.

Itshim 05-05-2026 09:41

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36214919)
I did see the Sky News reports. But I chose the link I gave because it was middle of the road.

Anyway, what matters is the next General Election. A big problem for Reform that I foresee is that they may well win the local elections hands down but then cannot deliver their programme for financial reasons. Then they'll be hammered at the GE.

Hence my assessment of peak-Reform.

History repeats it's self , discription so fits labour , talk the talk won't , can't or just too divided to walk the walk.

Sephiroth 05-05-2026 10:40

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
I doubt that Reform UK will be as divided as Labour.

My hope is that the Conservatives will work tactically with Reform UK to get Labour out. Kemi has ruled that out, but there's a lot of muck to flow under the bridge before that needs to become a reality.

But Kemi needs to purge her front bench of losers such as Patel, Atkins, Cleverley who exemplify the self-serving, self-important politicos who helped bring the Tories down. Otherwise, Reform has to go it alone and when push comes to shove, they may not convince enough people in a spread across the UK to give them a majority.

Dingbat 05-05-2026 11:00

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36214924)
.But Kemi needs to purge her front bench of losers such as Patel, Atkins, Cleverley who exemplify the self-serving, self-important politicos who helped bring the Tories down. Otherwise, Reform has to go it alone and when push comes to shove, they may not convince enough people in a spread across the UK to give them a majority.

Most of those Tory “losers” left the Tories and joined Reform.

1andrew1 05-05-2026 11:26

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36214924)
I doubt that Reform UK will be as divided as Labour.

My hope is that the Conservatives will work tactically with Reform UK to get Labour out.
Kemi has ruled that out, but there's a lot of muck to flow under the bridge before that needs to become a reality.

But Kemi needs to purge her front bench of losers such as Patel, Atkins, Cleverley who exemplify the self-serving, self-important politicos who helped bring the Tories down. Otherwise, Reform has to go it alone and when push comes to shove, they may not convince enough people in a spread across the UK to give them a majority.

The trouble is Reform UK is stuffed full of Tory rejects who are unlikely to get on well with the current Conservative Party. And Reform UK's USP of not being Labour or Conservative falls apart if they do work tactically together. I don't think the Labour Party has a similar issue with current and former MPs joining the Green Party, but I could be wrong.

It's looking like an interesting five-horse race in the next General Election so a coalition government could well be a possibility. Certainbly Reform UK or any other party governing on its own with just 25% of the vote would not go down well. But a coalition of Reform with another political party would undermine its USP. I'm not sure how you square the circle on these two points as Reform UK's share of the vote is unlikely to grow much given it's competing with four other parties, particularly as Badnoch is taking advantage of Starmer's political ineptitude.

Sephiroth 05-05-2026 12:14

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dingbat (Post 36214925)
Most of those Tory “losers” left the Tories and joined Reform.

That’s easy to say. Rolls off the tongue and it’s tempting.

But the three I listed are self-serving and were more incompetent that Jenrick &, dare I say, Braverman. Zahawi - yes, loser imo.


---------- Post added at 13:14 ---------- Previous post was at 13:11 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36214927)
The trouble is Reform UK is stuffed full of Tory rejects who are unlikely to get on well with the current Conservative Party. And Reform UK's USP of not being Labour or Conservative falls apart if they do work tactically together. I don't think the Labour Party has a similar issue with current and former MPs joining the Green Party, but I could be wrong.

It's looking like an interesting five-horse race in the next General Election so a coalition government could well be a possibility. Certainbly Reform UK or any other party governing on its own with just 25% of the vote would not go down well. But a coalition of Reform with another political party would undermine its USP. I'm not sure how you square the circle on these two points as Reform UK's share of the vote is unlikely to grow much given it's competing with four other parties, particularly as Badnoch is taking advantage of Starmer's political ineptitude.

You are absolutely right. More’s the pity for the least worse solution in getting Labour out and avoiding a hung Parliament.

OLD BOY 05-05-2026 12:19

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36214927)
The trouble is Reform UK is stuffed full of Tory rejects who are unlikely to get on well with the current Conservative Party. And Reform UK's USP of not being Labour or Conservative falls apart if they do work tactically together. I don't think the Labour Party has a similar issue with current and former MPs joining the Green Party, but I could be wrong.

It's looking like an interesting five-horse race in the next General Election so a coalition government could well be a possibility. Certainbly Reform UK or any other party governing on its own with just 25% of the vote would not go down well. But a coalition of Reform with another political party would undermine its USP. I'm not sure how you square the circle on these two points as Reform UK's share of the vote is unlikely to grow much given it's competing with four other parties, particularly as Badnoch is taking advantage of Starmer's political ineptitude.

I don’t agree. Reform UK has taken on those right wing Conservatives who have become disillusioned with the failure of the party to deal with the issues they care about. They got shouted down when they tried to point out the obvious.

Reform UK is a United party, not split between left and right, which is something that has plagued Labour and Conservatives alike with their obsession with pleasing the middle ground. The only real opposition Reform has got comes from other right wing parties, most notably the Conservatives, who for the time being at least have lost credibility.

Sephiroth 05-05-2026 12:29

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
It is difficult to be sure that Reform UK is a united party. It isn’t yet well honed as a political machine and the grass roots are very likely to be ordinary people whose preference is to overturn the main parties but are not further involved. Also, Rupert Lowe has shown the asplit in the party, albeit not having caught on significantly.

Reform UK has a fantastic top trio, plus I have respect for Jenrick. But the rest of the trustworthy leadership is yet to emerge. Of course, the lefties here will seize on my use of the word “trustworthy” in rfespect o f Reform UK. But that’s what it boils down to.

I would trust Farage only to the extent that I would trust an enlarged top team; and that’s a long way off.

Paul 05-05-2026 14:31

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36214910)
Seriously, is that how you read it?

Err, how else to you read "Vote Green" :dozey:

Maybe you need a new pair of glasses. :erm:

jem 05-05-2026 17:44

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36214942)
Err, how else to you read "Vote Green" :dozey:

Maybe you need a new pair of glasses. :erm:

Well only if you stop reading after the first line.

It is fairly obvious to me (and it appears many others on here) but maybe it should have been reworded to;

'Vote Green, and you absolutely WILL get illegals’

Just to avoid any confusion, it is obviously saying that ‘by all means vote Green if you want, but Reform will be the next government and will make sure that all the camps*, sorry detention centres, will only be placed in Green-voting areas.’

Now maybe Green-party voters will have the courage of their convictions, they support immigration and so certainly won’t mind having these camps, sorry again, detention centres, in their locale. In reality, I suspect a degree of NIMBYism will come into play here.

It could well be a fairly effective scare tactic, but they can backfire, offering threats rather than positives and improvements doesn’t always work.

Actually, if the inmates aren’t allowed to leave, then does it matter where they are? Will Reform only have prisons in Liberal voting areas?

The more I think about it the less sure I am that this was well thought through.


* There will need to be an inspiring inscription/motto above the gates, I’ll leave it as a exercise for the reader to think of one.

Sephiroth 05-05-2026 17:56

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jem (Post 36214948)
<SNIP>

The more I think about it the less sure I am that this was well thought through.


* There will need to be an inspiring inscription/motto above the gates, I’ll leave it as a exercise for the reader to think of one.

Semper in excreta.

1andrew1 05-05-2026 18:07

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jem (Post 36214948)
* There will need to be an inspiring inscription/motto above the gates, I’ll leave it as a exercise for the reader to think of one.

Foreigners! Donate generously to Reform UK or end up here!

Itshim 05-05-2026 18:41

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Don't forget they can hypnosis 50% or so to change there body shape. If you vote for a leader that says this you would vote for anything that they say. I think that Wales will be in a right mess come Friday. So is it plaid cymru and the greens or labour . Because reform are not going to get a majority. . Must start house hunting in channel islands again.

OLD BOY 05-05-2026 19:34

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36214942)
Err, how else to you read "Vote Green" :dozey:

Maybe you need a new pair of glasses. :erm:

Perhaps you omitted to read the full message: ‘Vote Green - get illegals’!

Do you think that is a positive message to vote Green? Do you think that encouraging illegal migrants is a vote winner?

Itshim 05-05-2026 19:53

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36214960)
Perhaps you omitted to read the full message: ‘Vote Green - get illegals’!

Do you think that is a positive message to vote Green? Do you think that encouraging illegal migrants is a vote winner?

Clearly some people welcome them , I wonder how many miles they live from there homes :erm:

Paul 05-05-2026 21:29

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36214960)
Perhaps you omitted to read the full message: ‘Vote Green - get illegals’!

There is no dash, or exclamation mark. ;)

Yes, of course I stopped there.
VOTE GREEN, right there in big letters, no one cares about anything after that (esp small print).:erm:

Sephiroth 05-05-2026 21:34

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
In the same big letters it says (with a full stop at the end):

VOTE GREEN
GET ILLEGALS.



Paul 05-05-2026 22:28

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Its on different lines, so not read as one.
When you're driving past that, or even walking past it, the FIRST LINE is what counts.

What does "Get Illegals" even mean ?
Go out and get some ? What's an "illegal" ?

If you dont get the point its a complete fail by now, you never will (or just dont want to).

Sephiroth 06-05-2026 07:03

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
It’s a two line banner. Simples.

Itshim 06-05-2026 09:55

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36214982)
It’s a two line banner. Simples.

I thought this was a clear policy statement. See that sky reports yet another apology from there leader for misleading the party , question , would that also tellingl fibs. This man makes. Boris look like honest John

Sephiroth 06-05-2026 10:52

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Of course, none of that would affexct the youth and their stupid voting intentions.

Perhaps the only saving grace in terms of voting, whether Reform or Labour or whatever is that Labour may not now wish to lower the voting age.

papa smurf 06-05-2026 11:03

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36214998)
Of course, none of that would affexct the youth and their stupid voting intentions.

Perhaps the only saving grace in terms of voting, whether Reform or Labour or whatever is that Labour may not now wish to lower the voting age.

A u turn :shocking:

Sephiroth 06-05-2026 11:15

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 

Votes for the kids would have been a Labour vote winner had they not screwed up so royally and had not the evil Israel so wantonly attacked the beautiful Hamas much to the annoyance of said kids.

May 7th tomorrow!

Hugh 06-05-2026 12:07

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36215001)

Votes for the kids would have been a Labour vote winner had they not screwed up so royally and had not the evil Israel so wantonly attacked the beautiful Hamas much to the annoyance of said kids.

May 7th tomorrow!

It’s probably the killing of Gazan civilians that "annoys" the "said kids", rather than the terrorists.

(but you probably knew that…)

Carth 06-05-2026 12:27

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Are these the same kids that can't (legally) drink, smoke, drive a car, have no bill worries (living with parents), and spend all day on TikTok?

Hugh 06-05-2026 12:45

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36215006)
Are these the same kids that can't (legally) drink, smoke, drive a car, have no bill worries (living with parents), and spend all day on TikTok?

It’s probably might be the same kids who work, pay taxes, join the Armed Forces, drive a car or have a private pilot’s license (if they’re 17), get married, get a passport, give blood, etc., etc.. ;)

Sephiroth 06-05-2026 12:52

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36215007)
It’s probably might be the same kids who work, pay taxes, join the Armed Forces, drive a car or have a private pilot’s license (if they’re 17), get married, get a passport, give blood, etc., etc.. ;)

That's about right. What's the likely percentage?

Carth 06-05-2026 15:21

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36215009)
That's about right. What's the likely percentage?

It depends on where the 'experts' decide your age means you're not a kid, but a young adult . . 15, 16, 18, 21 . . ??

oh, and responsible, for what that's worth

jem 06-05-2026 16:01

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36215020)
It depends on where the 'experts' decide your age means you're not a kid, but a young adult . . 15, 16, 18, 21 . . ??

oh, and responsible, for what that's worth

Yes I would agree with you, legally a person becomes an adult with full ‘autonomy’ at 18. But it is understood that an individual doesn’t instantly change from a child to a full adult on a particular day.

Young adult is vague, probably rightly so, so can’t have a hard and fast line. So yes a 17 year old can join the armed forces, but not sent into a combat zone, a 16 year old can legally have sex with a partner but not appear in a porn video for others to watch; or indeed view porn, (which does seem slightly odd, you can do it but not see it; but OK I’ll run with it).

Yes, I agree the various ages are somewhat arbitrary, but you can’t do much else.

Sephiroth 06-05-2026 16:20

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
From a child, I was a newspaper reader. I watched TV news, etc. So, ignorant, I wasn't. But somehow, I formed an opinion that rich people had no right to be rich.

It wasn't till I had a house and family, that my political tendencies switched from Labour to Conservative - around 24 years of age.

If you take that as a benchmark, then, in the pre-Greens & Reform UK world, you could see why Labour would want to gerrymander the 2million+ votes available from the 16-18 year olds.

Hugh 06-05-2026 16:49

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36215030)
From a child, I was a newspaper reader. I watched TV news, etc. So, ignorant, I wasn't. But somehow, I formed an opinion that rich people had no right to be rich.

It wasn't till I had a house and family, that my political tendencies switched from Labour to Conservative - around 24 years of age.

If you take that as a benchmark, then, in the pre-Greens & Reform UK world, you could see why Labour would want to gerrymander the 2million+ votes available from the 16-18 year olds.

Quote:

I formed an opinion that rich people had no right to be rich
I think that says more about you (evidenced by your posts on here, you appear to view things either/or, rather than faceted/shaded), than about 16-17 year olds; also, anecdata should not inform policy…

Not sure "gerrymander" is emotive enough - why not use "steal"?

Also, what makes you think that the 1.63 million 16-17 olds are a homogeneous group? A poll last year showed them prospectively voting Labour at 28%, followed by the Greens on 26% and the Liberal Democrats on 20%. In contrast, the Conservatives were on 9% and Reform UK on 8%.

I don’t understand how over 68% of 16-17 year olds prospectively not voting for Labour is "gerrymandering"…

Itshim 06-05-2026 17:02

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36215030)
From a child, I was a newspaper reader. I watched TV news, etc. So, ignorant, I wasn't. But somehow, I formed an opinion that rich people had no right to be rich.

It wasn't till I had a house and family, that my political tendencies switched from Labour to Conservative - around 24 years of age.

If you take that as a benchmark, then, in the pre-Greens & Reform UK world, you could see why Labour would want to gerrymander the 2million+ votes available from the 16-18 year olds.

They have in Wales:shocked:

jem 06-05-2026 17:47

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
"It wasn't till I had a house and family, that my political tendencies switched from Labour to Conservative - around 24 years of age.”

Of course, you must be aware of the old sentiment “if you are not a socialist in your teens, then you have no heart...but if you still a socialist in your thirties, you have no brain”.

Mr K 06-05-2026 19:14

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jem (Post 36215044)
"It wasn't till I had a house and family, that my political tendencies switched from Labour to Conservative - around 24 years of age.”

Of course, you must be aware of the old sentiment “if you are not a socialist in your teens, then you have no heart...but if you still a socialist in your thirties, you have no brain”.

And if you're still socialist in you're 50's, you're a really nice person, unlike everyone else ;)

Hugh 06-05-2026 20:05

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by jem (Post 36215044)
"It wasn't till I had a house and family, that my political tendencies switched from Labour to Conservative - around 24 years of age.”

Of course, you must be aware of the old sentiment “if you are not a socialist in your teens, then you have no heart...but if you still a socialist in your thirties, you have no brain”.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...2&d=1778097847

1andrew1 06-05-2026 23:36

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36215030)
From a child, I was a newspaper reader. I watched TV news, etc. So, ignorant, I wasn't. But somehow, I formed an opinion that rich people had no right to be rich.

It wasn't till I had a house and family, that my political tendencies switched from Labour to Conservative - around 24 years of age.

If you take that as a benchmark, then, in the pre-Greens & Reform UK world, you could see why Labour would want to gerrymander the 2million+ votes available from the 16-18 year olds.

lf is doing a lot of heavy lifting. So much so that anything after it may be ignored. ;)

Sephiroth 07-05-2026 06:45

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Could you be more specific, please? Do you think I'm generally wrong?

Or put another way, once the youth emerge into the capitalist world, the leave socialism or its offshoots behind? As people in our sort of society mature, their political outlook changes. Did yours?

OLD BOY 07-05-2026 07:07

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36215035)
I think that says more about you (evidenced by your posts on here, you appear to view things either/or, rather than faceted/shaded), than about 16-17 year olds; also, anecdata should not inform policy…

Not sure "gerrymander" is emotive enough - why not use "steal"?

Also, what makes you think that the 1.63 million 16-17 olds are a homogeneous group? A poll last year showed them prospectively voting Labour at 28%, followed by the Greens on 26% and the Liberal Democrats on 20%. In contrast, the Conservatives were on 9% and Reform UK on 8%.

I don’t understand how over 68% of 16-17 year olds prospectively not voting for Labour is "gerrymandering"…

But they are predominantly left wing parties. Young people tend to be idealists, not understanding as much as they think they do, heavily influenced by what their left wing teachers have been telling them.

As they start to get life experience, many of those who understand the need to work for a living start to change their minds about where they stand politically. Becoming better off starts to be an aspiration, so they know where their loyalties should lie.

Sephiroth 07-05-2026 08:15

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
OB is spot on.

Carth 07-05-2026 09:49

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
As a teenager I didn't give two monkeys about politics, it was all music, football, girls and drinking (in no particular order).

Similar to Seph, politics reared it's head a few years after getting married and buying a house. Unlike Seph, my interest in who did what when and why in politics soon waned and that crock of shit got ignored while I got on with life.

Never really had any time for people who can't answer a question without resorting to vague and meaningless gobbledygook, especially mature supposedly intelligent people that argue like school kids scoring points in the playground when discussing how to run a damn country.

GrimUpNorth 07-05-2026 15:12

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36215061)
Could you be more specific, please? Do you think I'm generally wrong?

Or put another way, once the youth emerge into the capitalist world, the leave socialism or its offshoots behind? As people in our sort of society mature, their political outlook changes. Did yours?

Mine did. As I got older and began to see the inequalities in the UK mostly because of the sod you as long as I'm alright attitude of the right of centre parties and the quest for ever greater profits at the expense of the people who are actually out there earning those profits.

I think we should be a more compassionate and inclusive society and certainly don't like seeing the hatred that seems to be becoming the accepted face of the 'civilised' country we profess to be.

Call me a lefty if you want - I really don't care.

Itshim 07-05-2026 17:12

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36215081)
Mine did. As I got older and began to see the inequalities in the UK mostly because of the sod you as long as I'm alright attitude of the right of centre parties and the quest for ever greater profits at the expense of the people who are actually out there earning those profits.

We pay our staff very well , and yes at the end of the day if it's case of staff or family. then sod the staff. Yes they know this and guess what, we treat them so very well few leave the "firm" before they retire

1andrew1 13-05-2026 12:38

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Whilst all eyes are on No 10, Farage is now being investigated for his undeclared £5m gift.

Quote:

Nigel Farage will be investigated by the parliamentary standards commissioner over his failure to declare a £5mn gift he received from crypto billionaire Christopher Harborne in the run-up to the 2024 general election, according to people briefed on the matter.

If upheld, the allegations could lead to the suspension of the Reform UK leader from the House of Commons and a by-election in his constituency.

Farage admitted earlier this month that he had received the money from Harborne in 2024, describing it as a gift to make him “safe and secure for the rest of my life”.

He insisted that he did not need to declare it as it was not related to his decision to stand as an MP.

MPs are obliged to report financial benefits they receive in the 12 months before being elected. Farage was elected in July 2024 but did not record the gift in his parliamentary register of interests.
https://www.ft.com/content/3ac372a0-...syn-25a6b1a6=1

Hugh 13-05-2026 13:08

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Oh, come on!

Who amongst us has not received a £5,000,000 gift from an overseas-based crypto billionaire with no strings attached?

I mean, it’s obviously a pure coincidence, and there is no reason to believe that when he said on the 23rd of May 2025 he wasn’t going to stand as a Candidate in the upcoming General Election, him receiving an undeclared £5,000,000 donation in late May 2024, and then stating on the 4th of June 2024 he was going to stand as a Candidate in Clacton and become (again) Leader of Reform UK, that there is any connection between those events…

1andrew1 13-05-2026 13:19

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36215388)
Oh, come on!

Who amongst us have not received a £5,000,000 gift from an overseas-based crypto billionaire with no strings attached?

These things can happen to anyone. And Christopher Harbornen is a genuinely patriotic Brit who just chooses to live in another country. He doesn't care if a Farage-led government deregulates cryto-currencies, that's just a coincidence.

The left-wing media are just picking on Farage because they want us to be ruled from Brussels! :D

Carth 13-05-2026 13:21

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
I've never had a penny, although had a few offers of a share of £20 million if I help the son of a cousin of a prominent Algerian official move some illicit funds out of their country.

;)

Hugh 13-05-2026 13:33

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36215390)
I've never had a penny, although had a few offers of a share of £20 million if I help the son of a cousin of a prominent Algerian official move some illicit funds out of their country.

;)

Ah, you’re obviously not a "man of the people", like privately-educated ex-City Trader Coutts Bank account holder private jet flying million pound a year earner like our Nige…

1andrew1 13-05-2026 13:36

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
It's all getting a bit messy between Farage and his former deputy Habib, with the latter making allegations of Farage throwing the 2019 election and Farage's lawyers writing to Habib.
https://www.thecanary.co/trending/20...ction-rigging/

Paul 13-05-2026 14:35

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36215388)
Who amongst us has not received a £5,000,000 gift from an overseas-based crypto billionaire with no strings attached?

Mine was only £4,000,000. :D

Carth 13-05-2026 14:56

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36215393)
Mine was only £4,000,000. :D

You said it was only a few quid on the lottery :shocked:

;)


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:05.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum