Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   smoking and the pub (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=17305)

hatedbythemail 01-12-2006 12:45

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by orangebird (Post 34170104)
Not allowing freehold landlords the choice is tantamount to telling what to do in their own home.

eh? what does the public in public house stand for then?

Hugh 01-12-2006 12:47

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stuart C (Post 34170116)
If as many people want a non-smoking pub as the government appears to think, I would be suprised if there weren't several non-smoking pubs in every town..

I don't believe it is about "wanting" non-smoking pubs - it is about reducing health risks, especially to passive smokers.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6196910.stm

"Ms Hewitt said the ban would protect everyone from second-hand smoke, while making it easier for smokers to quit.
"The scientific and medical evidence is clear - second-hand smoke kills, causing a range of serious medical conditions including lung cancer, heart disease, and sudden infant death syndrome," she said. "This legislation will help to prevent the unnecessary deaths caused every year from second-hand smoke, and recognises that there is absolutely no safe level of exposure." "

orangebird 01-12-2006 12:50

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34170106)
Wouldn't that be disciminating against non-smokers?

What about discriminating against smokers??????

Quote:

What if all the pubs in a town were "smoking" - would this mean the bar-staff would have to risk their health to get a job?
You reckon that would be likely?

Quote:

And what is the difference between freehold landlords and people who run small businesses? - they will be affected as well.
Apart from pubs, I can't think of any businesses where people might live on their premises.

---------- Post added at 12:50 ---------- Previous post was at 12:47 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34170124)
I don't believe it is about "wanting" non-smoking pubs - it is about reducing health risks, especially to passive smokers.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6196910.stm

"Ms Hewitt said the ban would protect everyone from second-hand smoke, while making it easier for smokers to quit.
"The scientific and medical evidence is clear - second-hand smoke kills, causing a range of serious medical conditions including lung cancer, heart disease, and sudden infant death syndrome," she said. "This legislation will help to prevent the unnecessary deaths caused every year from second-hand smoke, and recognises that there is absolutely no safe level of exposure." "


Of course it's about want!!!!!! How many people have posted in this thread about looking forward to it because it may reduce SID??? No-one. It's mainly 'I don't want to smell of smoke' yadda yadda yadda.

TheDaddy 01-12-2006 12:51

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34170097)
http://www.ash.org.uk/html/smuggling/html/whytax99.html
"It is true that NHS costs are lower than tobacco tax revenues. Tobacco taxation amounts to £10.5 billion per year whereas a figure for NHS spending on tobacco related disease is £1.7 billion. But so what? The comparison is a false one. Tobacco tax is not and never has been a down payment on the cost dealing with ill health caused by smoking."

My mum died of smoking-related diseases (probably due to the fact she smoked 60 untipped full-strength a day (at least) from the age of 13; I don't feel any better knowing that she contributed to the tax revenues by doing so, and saved the country pension payments by dying earlier than she needed to.

Sometimes it's not about costs, it's about value.

---------- Post added at 12:34 ---------- Previous post was at 12:30 ----------

And their staff?

I have had relatives die horribly to, I am not advocating for smoking, just that they get a raw deal, it's all to easy for the government to raise the revenue and then tell us it's for our benefit, notice they fail to point out that they haven't actually lost a penny as such in revenue from the cross channel smugglers due to the taxation increases, so again law abiding smokers are footing the bill for those that choose to evade revenue.

As for staff, considering that there are more cancer causing chemicals in the air in rush hour traffic than in a local pub, where do you draw the line with that argument, ban cars, oh yes they are trying to, purely for our benefit I'm sure and that's without even going into the 'you choose to work there argument' (thank goodness)

orangebird 01-12-2006 12:51

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hatedbythemail (Post 34170121)
eh? what does the public in public house stand for then?


It's open to the public at the landlords convenience - but it's still owned and lived in by the landlord. If you're going to argue with me about this, please don't be so facetious. Do it properly or not at all. I expect an awful lot more from you.

Hugh 01-12-2006 12:54

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by orangebird (Post 34170125)
What about discriminating against smokers??????
They can still smoke, but it will be in a separate area.

You reckon that would be likely?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3986973.stm
If he wanted to work in the casino, he had no choice.


Apart from pubs, I can't think of any businesses where people might live on their premises.
mmmm- landlords can still smoke in their private living areas (which are usually above/separate to the customer areas)


Of course it's about want!!!!!! How many people have posted in this thread about looking forward to it because it may reduce SID??? No-one. It's mainly 'I don't want to smell of smoke' yadda yadda yadda.
The government (not the voters) have brought this in for health reasons, and (imho) one of the benefits of that will be lack of tobacco smell on clothes after visiting the local hostelry

Thought this would have been a good enough reason, myself......
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4309613.stm
"Passive smoking kills more than 11,000 a year in the UK - much higher than previously thought, a study shows.
The British Medical Journal study also gives a figure for people dying from second-hand smoke in the workplace - 600 a year - for the first time"

hatedbythemail 01-12-2006 13:09

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by orangebird (Post 34170131)
I expect an awful lot more from you.

dont know why. i'm an idiot. :)

Stuart 01-12-2006 13:34

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34170124)
I don't believe it is about "wanting" non-smoking pubs - it is about reducing health risks, especially to passive smokers.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6196910.stm

"Ms Hewitt said the ban would protect everyone from second-hand smoke, while making it easier for smokers to quit.
"The scientific and medical evidence is clear - second-hand smoke kills, causing a range of serious medical conditions including lung cancer, heart disease, and sudden infant death syndrome," she said. "This legislation will help to prevent the unnecessary deaths caused every year from second-hand smoke, and recognises that there is absolutely no safe level of exposure." "


Which is why I made the point about having adequate smoking rooms*. Smokers *know* what the risks are. If they still wish to smoke, let them. Adequate smoking rooms should prevent non-smokers from passive smoking, and, lets face it, the smokers aren't worried about Active smoking, they aren't going to worry about passive smoking.

Edit:* By "Adequate Smoking rooms", I actually mean adequately ventillated smoking rooms. In the local pubs around me , where they did have smoking rooms, they also had extractor fans that were so strong that there was no chance of the smoke escaping into the non-smoking parts of the pub.

Mr Angry 01-12-2006 13:36

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 34170063)
I feel quite sorry for smokers, it would serve us right if they all decided to give up at once! I wonder how the government would make up the revenue shortfall?

Speed cameras, operated by muslims.

Derek 01-12-2006 13:39

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Angry (Post 34170159)
Speed cameras, operated by muslims.

Nah too simple. Charging motorists to drive by the mile is more likely :(

orangebird 01-12-2006 13:42

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Angry (Post 34170159)
Speed cameras, operated by muslims.

pmsl :rofl:

Maggy 01-12-2006 13:43

Re: smoking and the pub
 
I still think that there should be a choice.A way to accomodate everyone's wishes.Or a damn sight more help with giving up smoking from all the revenue that the government earns from the taxes.

Stuart 01-12-2006 13:47

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Incognitas (Post 34170166)
I still think that there should be a choice.A way to accomodate everyone's wishes.Or a damn sight more help with giving up smoking from all the revenue that the government earns from the taxes.

I suspect the thing is that the Government wants to appear to be doing something, but without actually doing anything that substantially reduces the number of smokers. After all, if they get £10 billion a year in tax, they don't want to lose that.

---------- Post added at 13:47 ---------- Previous post was at 13:46 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Angry (Post 34170159)
Speed cameras, operated by muslims.

Immigrant muslims, who also happen to be Gypsies..

Hugh 01-12-2006 13:54

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stuart C (Post 34170168)
Immigrant muslims, who also happen to be Gypsies..

Tax-dodging, burqa-wearing, stone-age illegal immigrant Muslim gypsies ;)

Mr Angry 01-12-2006 13:58

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stuart C (Post 34170168)
Immigrant muslims, who also happen to be Gypsies..

Folks,I think it's important that we take an even handed approach on this matter.

Therefore we also need to consider the gay tax-dodging, burqa-wearing, stone-age illegal immigrant disabled gypsy muslim speed camera operators. If anyone has any anecdotal experience of dealing with such minorities I'd be only too glad to hear same.

Meanwhile I'm off for a fag (in the carcinogenic sense, mind you).

Hugh 01-12-2006 14:00

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Angry (Post 34170176)
Folks,I think it's important that we take an even handed approach on this matter.

Therefore we also need to consider the gay tax-dodging, burqa-wearing, stone-age illegal immigrant disabled gypsy muslim speed camera operators. If anyone has any anecdotal experience of dealing with such minorities I'd be only too glad to hear same.

Meanwhile I'm off for a fag (in the carcinogenic sense, mind you).

I'd heard you were a twenty a day man - now it all makes sense! :D

danielf 01-12-2006 14:06

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Angry (Post 34170176)
If anyone has any anecdotal experience of dealing with such minorities I'd be only too glad to hear same.

Aren't they exempt from paying the television licence fee, for fear of upsetting them?

Hugh 01-12-2006 14:08

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 34170186)
Aren't they exempt from paying the television licence fee, for fear of upsetting them?

Only on widescreen TVs. ;)

Shaun 01-12-2006 15:04

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34170179)
I'd heard you were a twenty a day man - now it all makes sense! :D

Twenty a day - Shirley she must have some across one wearing a burqa by now!

hatedbythemail 01-12-2006 15:07

Re: smoking and the pub
 
you know what, i haven't laffed so much in ages. good work all :D

Shaun 01-12-2006 15:08

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Personally I cant see the issue with popping outside for 3 min while you top up your addiction with carcinogenic drugs.

I'd not like to see a Heroin addict shooting up in the pub but at least they'd not make me smell like an ashtray.

Saying that I live with a guy who smokes but never in the house and only in pubs if everyone doesn't mind so I guess I'm used to seeing people take their dirty habit outside. :)

Hugh 01-12-2006 16:38

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Shaun (Post 34170232)
Personally I cant see the issue with popping outside for 3 min while you top up your addiction with carcinogenic drugs.

I'd not like to see a Heroin addict shooting up in the pub but at least they'd not make me smell like an ashtray.

Saying that I live with a guy who smokes but never in the house and only in pubs if everyone doesn't mind so I guess I'm used to seeing people take their dirty habit outside. :)

I thought monks were supposed to be celibate? ;)

orangebird 01-12-2006 16:40

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Shaun (Post 34170232)
Personally I cant see the issue with popping outside for 3 min while you top up your addiction with carcinogenic drugs.

I'd not like to see a Heroin addict shooting up in the pub but at least they'd not make me smell like an ashtray.

Saying that I live with a guy who smokes but never in the house and only in pubs if everyone doesn't mind so I guess I'm used to seeing people take their dirty habit outside. :)


There's a sodding great difference between ciggies and heroin. What a silly comparison.

hatedbythemail 01-12-2006 16:55

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by orangebird (Post 34170367)
There's a sodding great difference between ciggies and heroin. What a silly comparison.

eeh, you're a bit touchy on this subject o'b. are you in a no-smoking environnment this afty? ;)

orangebird 01-12-2006 17:05

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hatedbythemail (Post 34170374)
eeh, you're a bit touchy on this subject o'b. are you in a no-smoking environnment this afty? ;)

It's going to ruin my local (where I also work part time) trade, all this no smoking ********. There are penty of pubs around that have got designated no smoking areas etc etc etc. This frigging govt. They'll be telling me how mcuh chinese takeaway I shouldn't be eating next. Or maybe fining me for having more than the unit amount of alcohol recommend for a female. Seriously, wtf is going on in this country?

TheDaddy 01-12-2006 17:11

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by orangebird (Post 34170378)
They'll be telling me how mcuh chinese takeaway I shouldn't be eating next.

They already have, I seem to remember something about soy sauce not so long ago

hatedbythemail 01-12-2006 17:24

Re: smoking and the pub
 
hmm. ingestion of your chinese takeway doesn't affect others though.

well it might but let's not go there eh

---------- Post added at 17:22 ---------- Previous post was at 17:18 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by orangebird (Post 34170378)
Seriously, wtf is going on in this country?

er, its becoming more like ireland, norway, italy, malta, sweden, the us, france (ban just announced), scotland, canada......

(ok, i'm going into hiding now :) )

---------- Post added at 17:24 ---------- Previous post was at 17:22 ----------

...iran, australia, bhutan, montenegro, netherlands, tanzania




(yikes. wheres me hard hat)

TheDaddy 01-12-2006 17:55

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hatedbythemail (Post 34170383)
hmm. ingestion of your chinese takeway doesn't affect others though.

Course it does when you are dead through to much 3 DCP or what ever it's called, I am sure your cruel family will miss you :D and besides surely after people have gorged themselves senseless they, will be blocking beds that could be better used for smokers ;)

Escapee 01-12-2006 18:05

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by orangebird (Post 34170378)
It's going to ruin my local (where I also work part time) trade, all this no smoking ********. There are penty of pubs around that have got designated no smoking areas etc etc etc. This frigging govt. They'll be telling me how mcuh chinese takeaway I shouldn't be eating next. Or maybe fining me for having more than the unit amount of alcohol recommend for a female. Seriously, wtf is going on in this country?

The ban comes in sooner in Wales, I have been surprised by many of the comments in my local from the smokers. I have been surprised how many of them don't seem to mind the ban, we only have one pub in town that's a no smoking pub and it does a very healthy trade. (No pun intended)

The landlady in my local is a heavy smoker, but she seems quite happy with the ban. She will at least not have to put up with people like myself who complain about having to wash their coat after every visit to the pub or get home from the pub and shower before bed.

the other advantage is not getting your clothes burned or being burned by someone with a fag, the latter happened to me whilst being served at the bar last weekend.

Hugh 01-12-2006 20:08

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Escapee (Post 34170413)
The ban comes in sooner in Wales, I have been surprised by many of the comments in my local from the smokers. I have been surprised how many of them don't seem to mind the ban, we only have one pub in town that's a no smoking pub and it does a very healthy trade. (No pun intended)

The landlady in my local is a heavy smoker, but she seems quite happy with the ban. She will at least not have to put up with people like myself who complain about having to wash their coat after every visit to the pub or get home from the pub and shower before bed.

the other advantage is not getting your clothes burned or being burned by someone with a fag, the latter happened to me whilst being served at the bar last weekend.

http://www.caterersearch.com/Article...moking-ban.htm
"Punch said the introduction of outside smoking areas and better pub amenities, often including a quality food offer could not only negate the ban but lead to new opportunities.
The company, which said it was well advanced in its preparations for England and Wales, has set aside a smoking fund of £18m to support publicans in their preparations."

Salu 01-12-2006 20:21

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by orangebird (Post 34170378)
It's going to ruin my local (where I also work part time) trade, all this no smoking ********. There are penty of pubs around that have got designated no smoking areas etc etc etc. This frigging govt. They'll be telling me how mcuh chinese takeaway I shouldn't be eating next. Or maybe fining me for having more than the unit amount of alcohol recommend for a female. Seriously, wtf is going on in this country?

It's not so much about you OB but others. :)

Hugh 01-12-2006 20:23

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Salu (Post 34170521)
It's not so much about you OB but others. :)

Trust him, he's a doctor. :angel:

TheDaddy 01-12-2006 20:24

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34170524)
Trust him, he's a doctor. :angel:

So was Crippen :D

Hugh 01-12-2006 20:27

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 34170525)
So was Crippen :D

But he wasn't a real doctor (and he was a Yank).
http://www.stephen-stratford.co.uk/dr_crippen.htm
"Hawley Harvey Crippen was born in Michigan, USA, in 1862. When he was 21 he came to England to improve his medical knowledge. He obtained a diploma, which was endorsed by the Faculty of the Medical College of Philadelphia, and in 1885 Crippen acquired another diploma, as an eye and ear specialist, from the Ophthalmic Hospital in New York. These qualifications were not sufficient for Crippen to practice as a Doctor in the UK."

I am sure Salu's is a proper MD (not one of the D.Phil's or Ph.D's), and he did not qualify in the Caribbean ;)

TheDaddy 01-12-2006 20:29

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34170527)
But he wasn't a real doctor (and he was a Yank).
http://www.stephen-stratford.co.uk/dr_crippen.htm
"Hawley Harvey Crippen was born in Michigan, USA, in 1862. When he was 21 he came to England to improve his medical knowledge. He obtained a diploma, which was endorsed by the Faculty of the Medical College of Philadelphia, and in 1885 Crippen acquired another diploma, as an eye and ear specialist, from the Ophthalmic Hospital in New York. These qualifications were not sufficient for Crippen to practice as a Doctor in the UK."

I am sure Salu's is a proper MD (not one of the D.Phil's or Ph.D's), and he did not qualify in the Caribbean ;)

I am sure he isn't a murderer as well ;)

Hugh 01-12-2006 21:08

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 34170530)
I am sure he isn't a murderer as well ;)

Murderer is such a harsh word - I believe the correct legal terminology is "junior doctor" :rolleyes:

fireman328 01-12-2006 21:48

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Salu (Post 34170521)
It's not so much about you OB but others. :)

Try that telling that at at the roadside whilst trying to extricate mangled bodies from a vehicle with two dead but the drunk driver still alive. OB

---------- Post added at 21:48 ---------- Previous post was at 21:39 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34170527)
But he wasn't a real doctor (and he was a Yank).
http://www.stephen-stratford.co.uk/dr_crippen.htm
"Hawley Harvey Crippen was born in Michigan, USA, in 1862. When he was 21 he came to England to improve his medical knowledge. He obtained a diploma, which was endorsed by the Faculty of the Medical College of Philadelphia, and in 1885 Crippen acquired another diploma, as an eye and ear specialist, from the Ophthalmic Hospital in New York. These qualifications were not sufficient for Crippen to practice as a Doctor in the UK."

I am sure Salu's is a proper MD (not one of the D.Phil's or Ph.D's), and he did not qualify in the Caribbean ;)

I also believe Burk and Hare were emloyed by the medical profession, sometimes prematurely.

Hugh 01-12-2006 21:54

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by fireman328 (Post 34170561)
Try that telling that at at the roadside whilst trying to extricate mangled bodies from a vehicle with two dead but the drunk driver still alive. OB

---------- Post added at 21:48 ---------- Previous post was at 21:39 ----------



I also believe Burk and Hare were emloyed by the medical profession, sometimes prematurely.

Did you mean these ladies? :D
http://www.burkeandhareedinburgh.co.uk/
It's hard being a trainee medic.

Salu 01-12-2006 22:13

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34170527)
But he wasn't a real doctor (and he was a Yank).
http://www.stephen-stratford.co.uk/dr_crippen.htm
"Hawley Harvey Crippen was born in Michigan, USA, in 1862. When he was 21 he came to England to improve his medical knowledge. He obtained a diploma, which was endorsed by the Faculty of the Medical College of Philadelphia, and in 1885 Crippen acquired another diploma, as an eye and ear specialist, from the Ophthalmic Hospital in New York. These qualifications were not sufficient for Crippen to practice as a Doctor in the UK."

I am sure Salu's is a proper MD (not one of the D.Phil's or Ph.D's), and he did not qualify in the Caribbean ;)

No, I bought mine on the internet......University of Philestine....

Chris 01-12-2006 22:20

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by orangebird (Post 34170104)
shuld go and get a job in a pub that's non smoking. Not allowing freehold landlords the choice is tantamount to telling what to do in their own home.

Look, I know we went over this ad nauseam some months ago, but ... freehold landlords are already told a lot of what they can and can't do in their own homes, so your argument on that basis falls very flat indeed.

They are told what size of glasses and measures to serve their customers in, they are told they can't even serve booze without permission from a magistrate (or a local council, I think it now is), they are told when they can open and when they can close, they are told what hours they are allowed to have their staff work, they are told how many people they are allowed to have indoors at any one time, they are told where and how to install fire alarms, firefighting equipment, fire escapes and signage to show the way ...

Do I need to go on?

Mr Angry 02-12-2006 02:21

Re: smoking and the pub
 
"They are told what size of glasses and measures to serve their customers in".

Hi, could I have a mammarytastic open minded blonde / brunette who can make a full Ulster fry the morning after without the need to know my name, address or phone number....in a pint glass please?

hatedbythemail 02-12-2006 09:58

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris T (Post 34170589)
Do I need to go on?

probably not but then again doesn't stop everybody else :)

good post. as has also been said ad nauseam, this has been coming for a long, long time so landlords who resemble rabbits in full headlight gazing mode are going to look rather daft.

and, on the bright side, they can always get out of the pub trade and get into the patio heater business - i predict growth in that sector :)

Angua 02-12-2006 10:09

Re: smoking and the pub
 
As it doesn't seem to be affecting private clubs (who can make their own rules on this IIRC) we will still have 8 premises out of 27 who could still allow smoking in the Crib league :(

Chris 02-12-2006 16:17

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Angua (Post 34170755)
As it doesn't seem to be affecting private clubs (who can make their own rules on this IIRC) we will still have 8 premises out of 27 who could still allow smoking in the Crib league :(

On the contrary, it is totally banned everywhere, including private clubs.

Angua 02-12-2006 16:30

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Well that will make our team Captain very happy as she has terrible trouble with smoke everywhere and her heart problem. One local club (known as the "waiting to die club") may well bring the ban in as soon as January.

orangebird 05-12-2006 09:54

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Angry (Post 34170697)
"They are told what size of glasses and measures to serve their customers in".

Hi, could I have a mammarytastic open minded blonde / brunette who can make a full Ulster fry the morning after without the need to know my name, address or phone number....in a pint glass please?

You could've done, but I'm married now.... ;)

I wonder what the staff and landlords of the 600 rural pubs in Eire are doing now since the ban killed their business off and forced them to close?

Mr Angry 05-12-2006 10:09

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Just my luck!!

hatedbythemail 05-12-2006 10:14

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Angry (Post 34172528)
Just my luck!!

what, not living in rural eire? :)

actually o/b i have relatives in eire who own a bar which, not being in county dublin, counts as rural in my book. this was a dyed in the wool, frequented by farmers, decorated in nicotine gaff. it's doing fine. still frequented by farmers. :)

Jules 05-12-2006 11:27

Re: smoking and the pub
 
The one thing I really hate to see is if you go to a wedding reception etc and there are children and even babies there but people still light up! Go outside for 5 mins it wont hurt you unlike your second hand smoke that is being breathed in by non smokers.

And yes I do smoke :blush:

hatedbythemail 05-12-2006 11:28

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jules (Post 34172572)
The one thing I really hate to see is if you go to a wedding reception etc and there are children and even babies there but people still light up! Go outside for 5 mins it wont hurt you unlike your second hand smoke that is being breathed in by non smokers.

And yes I do smoke :blush:

i saw worse on sunday. a fella holding a very young baby and trying to light up at the same time. fag and lighter horrible close to the young uns face. stupid, stupid man.

Salu 05-12-2006 12:32

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Here's a question to smokers....

If the government decided to legalise cannabis and ignoring the morals of it for a moment, how would you feel if there were people all around you in every pub causing you to inhale it without your permission. I appreciate you may also be smoking it but if you chose not to then wouldn't you object to passively inhaling cannabis?

My point is still that my not smoking can't possibly harm you smokers but by you smokers smoking you WILL harm or effect me. Therefore as both our "rights" cannot be met the law has to protect the innocent ie the non smoker.

Mr Angry 05-12-2006 12:38

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Salu (Post 34172624)
Here's a question to smokers....

If the government decided to legalise cannabis and ignoring the morals of it for a moment, how would you feel if there were people all around you in every pub causing you to inhale it without your permission. I appreciate you may also be smoking it but if you chose not to then wouldn't you object to passively inhaling cannabis?

Very, very high?

orangebird 05-12-2006 12:40

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Salu (Post 34172624)
Here's a question to smokers....

If the government decided to legalise cannabis and ignoring the morals of it for a moment, how would you feel if there were people all around you in every pub causing you to inhale it without your permission. I appreciate you may also be smoking it but if you chose not to then wouldn't you object to passively inhaling cannabis?

My point is still that my not smoking can't possibly harm you smokers but by you smokers smoking you WILL harm or effect me. Therefore as both our "rights" cannot be met the law has to protect the innocent ie the non smoker.

But if there was a choice of smoking or non smoking pubs etc etc, you could choose not to go to the smoking pubs. That's my whole beef over this, the lack of choice.

hatedbythemail 05-12-2006 12:46

Re: smoking and the pub
 
well unless you totally ignore the realities of the employment market, staff do not get a choice - and in other industries employers have a duty to protect their staff. if you want to cite choice, landlords can choose to go and open bars in countries where smoking is allowed. in fact anyone who's been to traditional sunshine haunts of the brits will see a number have already done so :)

to me this is just another sensible piece of health and safety legislation for which, as has continually been pointed out, landlords have had plenty of time to prepare.

Salu 05-12-2006 13:50

Re: smoking and the pub
 
It's a hard balance to get between my rights and your rights, choice and discrimination and nanny state intrusion and law. The more selfsh we are as individuals in society the harder this is. My point is that we need to remember that we are a society and live as if we have neighbours rather than as if we lived in this world alone.

Quote:

Originally Posted by orangebird (Post 34172633)
But if there was a choice of smoking or non smoking pubs etc etc, you could choose not to go to the smoking pubs. That's my whole beef over this, the lack of choice.

That is never going to be a "choice" though as it excludes the word Public from Pub and makes it a club. Even then that would be bordering on discrimination nowadays wouldn't it?

At the end of the day smoking is pretty antisocial isn't it, let alone the health implications? Usually anything that involves emitting a putrid smell in public is regarded as offensive in society.

hatedbythemail 05-12-2006 14:15

Re: smoking and the pub
 
i wondered when my bottom would come into this. ;)

orangebird 05-12-2006 14:47

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Salu (Post 34172699)
It's a hard balance to get between my rights and your rights, choice and discrimination and nanny state intrusion and law. The more selfsh we are as individuals in society the harder this is. My point is that we need to remember that we are a society and live as if we have neighbours rather than as if we lived in this world alone.



That is never going to be a "choice" though as it excludes the word Public from Pub and makes it a club. Even then that would be bordering on discrimination nowadays wouldn't it?

At the end of the day smoking is pretty antisocial isn't it, let alone the health implications? Usually anything that involves emitting a putrid smell in public is regarded as offensive in society.

Yes, it is antisocial. But why not let us 'antisocial' people have a quick fag with our drink on a night out in a smoking pub, and you 'social' people go to a pub that has chosen to ban smoking? No-one's forcing you to go into a pub, are they? :shrug:

Angua 05-12-2006 15:07

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Then you would have to create separate leagues for all the pub games. Given that some pubs rely on this trade and some leagues would fold if there were not enough teams this would cause the demise of some pubs.

Hugh 05-12-2006 15:08

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by orangebird (Post 34172728)
Yes, it is antisocial. But why not let us 'antisocial' people have a quick fag with our drink on a night out in a smoking pub, and you 'social' people go to a pub that has chosen to ban smoking? No-one's forcing you to go into a pub, are they? :shrug:

People that would still be affected
- Smokers with non-smoking partners (one or other would be "discriminated" against)
- People with friends that smoke - you can always go outside for a quick smoke, not quite the same as going outside for some fresh air
- Non-smoking staff (unless you make it compulsory to hire only staff that smoke, but wouldn't that be "discrimination")

orangebird 05-12-2006 15:23

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Angua (Post 34172739)
Then you would have to create separate leagues for all the pub games. Given that some pubs rely on this trade and some leagues would fold if there were not enough teams this would cause the demise of some pubs.

But banning smoking has contributed to the demise of 600 pubs in Southern Ireland, so what's the difference?

Hugh 05-12-2006 15:25

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by orangebird (Post 34172750)
But banning smoking has contributed to the demise of 600 pubs in Southern Ireland, so what's the difference?

But Punch Taverns in Scotland have said it has not affected business, and in fact, they expect to see an increase due to the smoking ban.

orangebird 05-12-2006 15:30

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34172740)
People that would still be affected
- Smokers with non-smoking partners (one or other would be "discriminated" against)

I smoke, my husband doesn't - he's an ex smoker, to doesn't mind at all if people do smoke. Thankfully, he's one of the few 'social' people who has his head in a place other than his ****, and wouldn't dream of being so sanctimonious or patronising.
Quote:

- People with friends that smoke - you can always go outside for a quick smoke, not quite the same as going outside for some fresh air
Please explain why not?
Quote:

- Non-smoking staff (unless you make it compulsory to hire only staff that smoke, but wouldn't that be "discrimination")

No - you can advertise a job, stating that if you were to apply, you would need to bear in mind it was in an establishment that allowed smoking. Then the choice is yours. :shrug:

---------- Post added at 15:30 ---------- Previous post was at 15:27 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34172753)
But Punch Taverns in Scotland have said it has not affected business, and in fact, they expect to see an increase due to the smoking ban.


Good for them - but can they class any of their pubs as rural? Also, it's a lot easier for chains to stay afloat. They can dictate their prices, or at least negotiate a good discount for volume orders. Freehold rural pubs don't have such power. Therefore they'll lose their regular smoking customers, and what else can they do?

Hugh 05-12-2006 15:32

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by orangebird (Post 34172754)
I smoke, my husband doesn't - he's an ex smoker, to doesn't mind at all if people do smoke. Thankfully, he's one of the few 'social' people who has his head in a place other than his ****, and wouldn't dream of being so sanctimonious or patronising.
Hey, I willingly go in pubs where people smoke - I just think it's nice, since it has been proven that smoking not only kills smokers, but also kills non-smokers, that public places (including pubs) should be non-smoking; Just because I disagree with you does not make me "sanctimonious" or "have my head up my ****" - it just means I disagree with you.

Please explain why not?
Because if you go outside for a quick fag, only you are inhaling the noxious poisonous fumes - a non-smoker going outside for a quick gasp of fresh air isn't going to clear all the poison out of his lungs in two minutes.


No - you can advertise a job, stating that if you were to apply, you would need to bear in mind it was in an establishment that allowed smoking. Then the choice is yours. :shrug:
So an unemployed person has to choose between health and employment - nice! :dozey:


hatedbythemail 05-12-2006 15:33

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by orangebird (Post 34172754)
I smoke, my husband doesn't - he's an ex smoker, to doesn't mind at all if people do smoke. Thankfully, he's one of the few 'social' people who has his head in a place other than his ****, and wouldn't dream of being so sanctimonious or patronising.

i say, steady on chap ;) :)


Quote:

Please explain why not?
well for starters you would have to stay out permanently to guarantee uniterrupoted supply of clean air. this may affect staff prouctivity :D



Quote:

No - you can advertise a job, stating that if you were to apply, you would need to bear in mind it was in an establishment that allowed smoking. Then the choice is yours. :shrug:
only if you assume an unregulated market will ensure that people have real choice not to work in environment which might harm their health. i do not go along with that assumption by any stretch.

orangebird 05-12-2006 15:36

Re: smoking and the pub
 
You assume that every person that wants to work in a bar is as narrow minded and non smoking as some people on here are. :)

---------- Post added at 15:36 ---------- Previous post was at 15:33 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by hatedbythemail (Post 34172760)
i<snip> well for starters you would have to stay out permanently to guarantee uniterrupoted supply of clean air. this may affect staff prouctivity :D


<snip>

I really hope these same people that want an uniterrupted supply of clean air don't drive cars, or walk round town on a busy saturday afternoon or.......

Oh, sorry, none of that counts does it. :rolleyes:

Hugh 05-12-2006 15:38

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by orangebird (Post 34172761)
You assume that every person that wants to work in a bar is as narrow minded and non smoking as some people on here are. :)

You assume that everybody who works in a bar doesn't mind dying of secondary smoke.
;)
Cracking argument, ob - if you don't want to die of second-hand smoke, you are narrow-minded.

Good point, well made!

Stuart 05-12-2006 15:47

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Salu (Post 34172699)
It's a hard balance to get between my rights and your rights, choice and discrimination and nanny state intrusion and law. The more selfsh we are as individuals in society the harder this is. My point is that we need to remember that we are a society and live as if we have neighbours rather than as if we lived in this world alone.

True,

Quote:

That is never going to be a "choice" though as it excludes the word Public from Pub and makes it a club. Even then that would be bordering on discrimination nowadays wouldn't it?
How is allowing a landlord/lady to choose whether to make his or her pub non-smoking or not any worse than banning smoking from pubs? Either way, one group of people is banned from the pub. At least if the people who actually run the pubs are allowed to chose, both groups of people are allowed to drink in one pub or another.

Remember, if some pubs are smoking, and some non-smoking, those people who do object to people smoking have the freedom to go to a non-smoking pub. Under the government's current plans, NO-ONE has the freedom to chose a smoking pub. Fair? I think not. Antisocial? Yes.

Quote:

At the end of the day smoking is pretty antisocial isn't it, let alone the health implications? Usually anything that involves emitting a putrid smell in public is regarded as offensive in society.
So we should ban petrol and diesel vehicles then? After all, they both emit pollution which is nasty smelling and possibly dangerous..

hatedbythemail 05-12-2006 15:48

Re: smoking and the pub
 
could i ever so tentatively point out that we banned leaded petrol on health grounds ;)

Stuart 05-12-2006 15:50

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34172768)
You assume that everybody who works in a bar doesn't mind dying of secondary smoke.
;)
Cracking argument, ob - if you don't want to die of second-hand smoke, you are narrow-minded.

Good point, well made!

I believe OB was making the point that people who think Smoking should be banned in all public places are narrow minded.

punky 05-12-2006 15:55

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34172768)
You assume that everybody who works in a bar doesn't mind dying of secondary smoke.
;)
Cracking argument, ob - if you don't want to die of second-hand smoke, you are narrow-minded.

Good point, well made!

Based on that argument, you could say that about people working in a bar don't mind being stabbed/killed. Working in a bar and being stabbed/killed, like dying of second hand smoke is a risk inherent in the job. A risk you accept to take on as part of the job, and the ages you recieve. If you don't want to come in contact with second hand smoker, nor do you want to risk facing violence as part of your job, there are other occupations you can do. Anyway, if people are working in bars currently where they come into contact with second-hand smoke, they can hardly be that bothered about it?

And before anyone starts with the usual personal attacks, I am a non-smoker. Always have been, always will be.

hatedbythemail 05-12-2006 15:59

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by punky (Post 34172781)
Based on your argument, you could say that about people working in a bar don't mind being stabbed/killed. Working in a bar and being stabbed/killed, like dying of second hand smoke is a risk inherent in the job. A risk you accept to take on as part of the job, and the ages you recieveIf you don't want to come in contact with second hand smoker, nor do you want to risk facing violence as part of your job, there are other occupations you can do. .

not really a comparable risk and certainly one you can mitigate against hence this legislation

Quote:

And before anyone starts with the usual personal attacks,
:p: :p: :p: :D
Quote:

I am a non-smoker. Always have been, always will be.
apart from your passive intake? ;)

punky 05-12-2006 15:59

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Anyway, isn't it about time for one of these?

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2006/12/18.jpg

danielf 05-12-2006 16:00

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hatedbythemail (Post 34172774)
could i ever so tentatively point out that we banned leaded petrol on health grounds ;)

So by that reasoning we could simply ban Gitanes/Gaulloises cigarettes and be done with it? ;)

hatedbythemail 05-12-2006 16:01

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by punky (Post 34172790)
Anyway, isn't it about time for one of these?

http://illinoisreview.typepad.com/il...en_lovejoy.jpg

nah, stuff 'em ;)







[not really. infuriates me that so many british hostelries are so hostile to kids. compare that to ireland.....]

---------- Post added at 16:01 ---------- Previous post was at 16:01 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 34172792)
So by that reasoning we could simply ban Gitanes/Gaulloises cigarettes and be done with it? ;)

don't you start :)

Hugh 05-12-2006 16:03

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by punky (Post 34172790)
Anyway, isn't it about time for one of these?

http://illinoisreview.typepad.com/il...en_lovejoy.jpg

Nah - they haven't tested cigarettes on babies for years - they switched to beagles (apparently). ;)

---------- Post added at 16:03 ---------- Previous post was at 16:02 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 34172792)
So by that reasoning we could simply ban Gitanes/Gaulloises cigarettes and be done with it? ;)

Or anything French? :D

hatedbythemail 05-12-2006 16:03

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34172799)
Nah - they haven't tested cigarettes on babies for years - they switched to beagles (apparently). ;)

ah, do you remember sweet tobacco? yum. :)

Hugh 05-12-2006 16:05

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hatedbythemail (Post 34172801)
ah, do you remember sweet tobacco? yum. :)

Didn't that give passers-by secondary tooth decay? ;)

punky 05-12-2006 16:06

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hatedbythemail (Post 34172788)
not really a comparable risk and certainly one you can mitigate against hence this legislation

I would have thought so. If I stabbed you in various places on your body, they will die. There's no risk, as its a certainty. Its quantifiable and provable. If you inhale second hand smoke, then there a chance you'll die, whoever, not wishing to count research into the effects of smoking, but the chances are not quantifable at all, and are quite random. People who smoke 40+ a day have been known to live into their 90s, where as some don't.

Quote:

:p: :p: :p: :D apart from your passive intake? ;)
:p: Seriously though, what can I do, invest in a bubble? Ditch every friend who smokes? Bit paranoid. Besides, my parents smoked for years so the damage is well done now.

hatedbythemail 05-12-2006 16:11

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by punky (Post 34172803)
I would have thought so. If I stabbed you in various places on your body, they will die. There's no risk, as its a certainty. Its quantifiable and provable. If you inhale second hand smoke, then there a chance you'll die, whoever, not wishing to count research into the effects of smoking, but the chances are not quantifable at all, and are quite random. People who smoke 40+ a day have been known to live into their 90s, where as some don't.

the link betwen passive smoking and lung cancer is well established and if a pub allows smoking then all in it are at risk, but esp[ecially the staff. despite the lurid headlines i would respectfully suggest (and without being able to back the suggestion up :) ) that the chances of being stabbed are much lower than the health risks presented by blanket exposure of cigarette smoke.



Quote:

But what can I do, invest in a bubble? Ditch every friend who smokes? Bit paranoid. Besides, my parents smoked for years so the damage is well done now.
well here you do have a genuine choice i guess. staff in smoking pubs certainly don't and those who want to sit with friends who dont smoke in an environment where others do have a limited choice and limited protection. this really is quite simple for me. a pub is a public place. the govt, employers and indeed all of us have a duty to protect the public insofar as we can in places which are open to the public.

punky 05-12-2006 16:22

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hatedbythemail (Post 34172807)
the link betwen passive smoking and lung cancer is well established and if a pub allows smoking then all in it are at risk, but esp[ecially the staff. despite the lurid headlines i would respectfully suggest (and without being able to back the suggestion up :) ) that the chances of being stabbed are much lower than the health risks presented by blanket exposure of cigarette smoke.

Established... but not quantifiable. Unlike being stabbed or shot.

Because of the unquantiable nature of smoking and cancer, the chance of dying via smoking versus dying via stabbing, will never be known.


Quote:

staff in smoking pubs certainly don't
But they do. Noone is forced to do any job.

Quote:

and those who want to sit with friends who dont smoke in an environment
You say "want" and then you say they have no choice.

Quote:

a pub is a public place
Despite the name, it isn't though. They are private places of business and the landlords/ladies/employees/patrons choose to enter/work in.

When you say people have no choice to work in a pub, I think that's pretty insulting to them.

Hugh 05-12-2006 16:43

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by punky (Post 34172818)
Established... but not quantifiable. Unlike being stabbed or shot.

Because of the unquantiable nature of smoking and cancer, the chance of dying via smoking versus dying via stabbing, will never be known.

It is quantifiable
"In 2003 across the United Kingdom an estimated 617 people died from the effects of passive smoking at work, 54 of these were long term employees of the hospitality industry. Another 11,000 deaths were attributable to passive smoking exposure in the home in adults aged 20 to ≥ 65.This accounts for around 2% of the current annual toll from all smoking related deaths in the UK.

Population estimates in the US show the number of annual estimated deaths from Second Hand Smoke exposure as significant. For nonsmokers:

· around 3,400 people die from lung cancer (ranging from 3,423 to 8,866)
· 46,000 die from cardiac-related illness (range of 22,700 to 69,600)
· 430 children die from sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).

Another 24,500 babies are born with low birth weight and 71,900 born prematurely. There are around 202,300 episodes of childhood asthma (new cases and exacerbations) and 787,700 cases of middle ear infection in children due to SHS exposure"

Can you quantify the number of hospitality staff stabbed/shot?


Quote:

Originally Posted by punky (Post 34172818)
But they do. Noone is forced to do any job..

You obviously haven't been to JobCentre+ lately - if you don't find your type of job within 13 weeks, you must try for anything - I cannot see them accepting "I do not wish to work in an area where I will be exposed to Second Hand Smoke" as a reason not to take a job.


Quote:

Originally Posted by punky (Post 34172818)
Despite the name, it isn't though. They are private places of business and the landlords/ladies/employees/patrons choose to enter/work in..

And as a place of business, they must comply with health & safety regulations, including those about not allowing an environment or conditions that could negatively affect their employees health. We often take the jobs we can get, not the jobs we want.

Quote:

Originally Posted by punky (Post 34172818)
When you say people have no choice to work in a pub, I think that's pretty insulting to them.

If that is their skillset and they enjoy their job, how is it an insult? (I worked in a pub for a few months, and a few of my colleagues had worked in bars for over 20 years - they would find it difficult to get another job).

hatedbythemail 05-12-2006 17:00

Re: smoking and the pub
 
punky, you seem not to understand the realities of those in low wage economies. choice is not by any means a given.

as for suggesting its insulting to people when i say that they dont have a choice to work in a smoking pub, that is frankly, arrant nonsense. i'm not demeaning the job in any way - its tough (split shifts etc) and can require great diplomatic skills (hey orangebird is your mother anything like you? ;-) ) but people mnight have to take a job in a smoking pub out of necessity.

pubs are public places by definition. just because they are places of work does not make them any less public.and public places are subject to all kinds of jurisdiction as foreverwar pointed out pages and pages ago. this is simply another restriction designed to protect public health, including staff (whom I bang the drum for the most because i really dont accept that choice is always there). and govts for aeons have taken steps to protect public health so i think prevention of inhalation of benzene, nicotine etc etc is just continuing a fine and well established tradition.

sometiomews the public need protecting from themselves and other members of the public - you'll find reams and reams of legislation demonstrating that fact.


anyways this thread is getting incredibly tedious and going around in circles, enlivened only by orangebird's amusingly intemeperate interjections :)

its happening people. get over it. move along, there's nothing to see here..... ;)

punky 05-12-2006 17:12

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34172837)
It is quantifiable

It isn't. How many cigarettes give you cancer? Some people smoke 1 a day and get lung cancer at 40, some smoker 40+ and live to they are 90. How is that quantiable?

If its quantifable, then how many cigarettes will give you cancer? How much passive smoking will give you cancer? Noone can possibly say

And whats to say that a smoker who gets lung cancer is directly due to smoking? Smoking is a contributary cause, but its not the only cause. It can be coincidence.


Quote:

· around 3,400 people die from lung cancer (ranging from 3,423 to 8,866)
· 46,000 die from cardiac-related illness (range of 22,700 to 69,600)
· 430 children die from sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).
How the hell can they say SHS causes cot death? Noone knows what causes cot death. Over the years almost everything has been blamed on it, from lead paint, overheating due to being wrapped in blankets and murderous mums.

And how can they say what percentage of cardiac-related illnesses are due to SHS?

Quote:

[FONT=Arial][I]Another 24,500 babies are born with low birth weight and 71,900 born prematurely. There are around 202,300 episodes of childhood asthma (new cases and exacerbations) and 787,700 cases of middle ear infection in children due to SHS exposure"
And it can be proven that that was all down to SHS and no other cause?

Quote:

You obviously haven't been to JobCentre+ lately - if you don't find your type of job within 13 weeks, you must try for anything - I cannot see them accepting "I do not wish to work in an area where I will be exposed to Second Hand Smoke" as a reason not to take a job.
Actually, I have... And there are other jobs than bar work available. People are capable of doing hundreds of different jobs without specialisr training. You could also start your business. Retrain in something else.



Quote:

And as a place of business, they must comply with health & safety regulations, including those about not allowing an environment or conditions that could negatively affect their employees health.
What about Police? Fire brigade? Security guards?


Quote:

If that is their skillset and they enjoy their job, how is it an insult? (I worked in a pub for a few months, and a few of my colleagues had worked in bars for over 20 years - they would find it difficult to get another job).
Difficult does not equal impossible. To say people are only capable of one sole employ is insulting.

---------- Post added at 18:12 ---------- Previous post was at 18:06 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by hatedbythemail (Post 34172848)
punky, you seem not to understand the realities of those in low wage economies. choice is not by any means a given.

Yeah, OK. I disagree with you, so I don't understand?

Quote:

pubs are public places by definition.
No they aren't. That's why you can be barred by the owners. If they are public, then everyone, children and adults, would have a right to be there. They aren't. The are private businesses.

Quote:

anyways this thread is getting incredibly tedious and going around in circles,
Couldn't have put it better myself

You and your cohorts (lot allowed to say mob anymore?) can say I have no idea what its like to be poor (I am earning less than minimum wage, remember), etc, but that doesn't mean I am wrong.

hatedbythemail 05-12-2006 17:26

Re: smoking and the pub
 
who's attacking anyone? (o/b excepted of course :) )

final point before i go slash my wrists at the futility of life as highlighted by this thread - employment opportunities vary and in poorer areas, where smoking is much more prevalent, job choice is much more limited. thats my point.

as this appears to be turning into a bit of a slanging match (not my intention at all) and incredibly, incredibly tedious i shall try and, er, butt out now :)

---------- Post added at 17:26 ---------- Previous post was at 17:25 ----------

ps. youre a mod now punky. you can say what you like ;) :D

Angua 05-12-2006 17:49

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Sometimes the only job you can take is bar work because your partner works during the day minding the under 5's then you swap and this is the only job that fits your family arrangements.

punky 05-12-2006 18:06

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Foreverwar: Just to stop you from writing a long post that I have no real desire to reply to (which isn't fair on you) as this isn't going to go anywhere good can we just agree to disagree?

Salu 06-12-2006 00:23

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by punky (Post 34172803)
People who smoke 40+ a day have been known to live into their 90s, where as some don't.

Although people have been known to live into their 90s and smoked these numbers are very very small. If you smoke you are highly likely to die as as result of smoking. You also may loose your legs or spend several years on permanent oxygen and not being able to walk more than 2 paces without feeling like you have just run a marathon.

People often say to me "I could get run over by a bus tomorrow".....well that would be a much kinder way to die than from the above. It's not a quick easy death. If you smokers could spend a day with me I'm sure you'd think a little harder about stopping.

:)

Hugh 06-12-2006 10:02

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by punky (Post 34172884)
Foreverwar: Just to stop you from writing a long post that I have no real desire to reply to (which isn't fair on you) as this isn't going to go anywhere good can we just agree to disagree?

Sounds good to me :)

Let's get together for a drink on 1st July to discuss it further, eh? :D

This might be of interest to smokers (and friends/relatives thereof -
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6207176.stm
"A new type of treatment to help smokers quit is now available in the UK.

Varenicline (champix) is the first non-nicotine drug developed specifically to help smokers give up.

The drug mimics the effect of nicotine on the body and is thought to work by both reducing the urge to smoke and relieving withdrawal symptoms.

Experts said there was likely to be heavy demand for the drug ahead of the ban on smoking in public places in England, which takes effect next July."

punky 23-05-2007 17:00

Re: smoking and the pub
 
I found this quite interesting.

snippets:

Quote:

"If the smoking ban in Scotland had not been introduced I would still be a non-smoker," says Andy Hughes of Edinburgh, where the ban came into force in March last year. "I started because I was being left in pubs and clubs alone for long periods of time, while the rest of my group were outside chatting and having a smoke.

...

More smokers choose to stay at home and have a puff, exposing their children to second-hand fumes, says a report from the International Epidemiological Association.

Scottish pubs have seen a 10% drop in sales and a 14% drop in custom since the ban. But cigarette sales went up by almost 5% in the six months after the ban, according to figures from the Scottish Grocers Federation.

...

With punters who smoke being forced outside for a fag, pubs are keen to make them as comfortable as possible so they go back in and spend more money. Thousands are being spent by breweries on outdoor smoking areas.

Keeping the chill off smokers is high up the list of priorities, putting outdoor heaters on the shopping list. The introduction of the smoking ban in England is expected to trigger a huge increase in demand for heat umbrellas, potentially creating a new environmental burden

Chris W 23-05-2007 17:23

Re: smoking and the pub
 
As of tomorrow our smoking staff room at work will be no more :( Only place we will be allowed to smoke will the the "designated smoking area" (read: bus shelter). Booooo.

Derek 23-05-2007 20:07

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Andy Hughes
"If the smoking ban in Scotland had not been introduced I would still be a non-smoker," says Andy Hughes of Edinburgh, where the ban came into force in March last year. "I started because I was being left in pubs and clubs alone for long periods of time, while the rest of my group were outside chatting and having a smoke.

And the award for the least will-power in the Western world goes to Andy Hughes of Edinburgh. :rolleyes:

TheDaddy 23-05-2007 20:21

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek S (Post 34312192)
And the award for the least will-power in the Western world goes to Andy Hughes of Edinburgh. :rolleyes:

Can't wait to hear his excuse for the smack habit :D

Derek 23-05-2007 20:30

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 34312209)
Can't wait to hear his excuse for the smack habit :D

Well he is from Edinburgh.... :erm:

Quote:

Being an asthmatic, I had always been against smoking. I never used to let anyone smoke in my car or house.
Just how stupid can someone be?

r00t 23-05-2007 22:54

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Looking forward to the ban in Liverpool.
I'm a *new* non smoker see here http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/22...24-i-quit.html
and I'm not really bothered about the smell of the smoke in pubs, what does bother me is seeing smokers sitting in the non smoking area smoking; how rude!
Non smokers were given that little space in the corner where they could sit and be away from direct smoke, but someone would sit there and puff away. It annoyed me to see it done when I smoked and it annoys me more now.

Hope this doesn't come across as a advert and if its against the forum policy, staff please remove reference to it.
Allen Carr's Easyway to stop smoking, great book. I was reading this whilst using patches, I was about 2 weeks into using patches;I finished the book took off the patch and have not smoked since.

Shaun 24-05-2007 00:46

Re: smoking and the pub
 
When I read that I thought you meant the commedian Alan Carr:

http://www.funnyfirm.co.uk/users/www.../alan_carr.jpg

:blush: :rofl:

r00t 24-05-2007 00:59

Re: smoking and the pub
 
:LOL:

SMHarman 24-05-2007 19:49

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by andygrif (Post 297693)
Why don't we ban drinking in pubs too whilst we're at it? Oh and bungee jumping too?

Can adults really not make up their own minds whether to go to (or work in) a pub where people smoke?

Perhaps we should let people drive with cellphones in their hands. No need for seatbelts either, or speed limits or MOT tests, can't adults make up their own mind as to what is safe?

Smoking and passive smoking have been shown to cause cancer, not just a casual link just like wearing a seatbelt has been shown to save lives. A government has a responsibility to try and effect that change on a nation.

---------- Post added at 14:49 ---------- Previous post was at 14:44 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gavin (Post 34172856)
It isn't. How many cigarettes give you cancer? Some people smoke 1 a day and get lung cancer at 40, some smoker 40+ and live to they are 90. How is that quantiable?

If its quantifable, then how many cigarettes will give you cancer? How much passive smoking will give you cancer? Noone can possibly say

And whats to say that a smoker who gets lung cancer is directly due to smoking? Smoking is a contributary cause, but its not the only cause. It can be coincidence.

What can be said is there is an almost mathamatically impossible positive corrolation between smoking and lung cancer. That cannot be ignored.

Any statistics bell curve. Your 1 and cancer at 40 and your 40 / 90 are extremes that are statistically discounted from the population. There are exceptions to most rules and generalisations.

Mr Angry 25-05-2007 00:40

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SMHarman (Post 34312944)
Perhaps we should let people drive with cellphones in their hands. No need for seatbelts either, or speed limits or MOT tests, can't adults make up their own mind as to what is safe?

The difference in the analogies being, of course, that andygrif mooted his analogy on the basis that people were totally aware of the environment and risk involved in a mutually acceptable confluence.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SMHarman (Post 34312944)
Smoking and passive smoking have been shown to cause cancer, not just a casual link just like wearing a seatbelt has been shown to save lives. A government has a responsibility to try and effect that change on a nation.

As indeed have oral sex and exposure to sunlight - Have either of those been banned?

---------- Post added at 14:49 ---------- Previous post was at 14:44 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by SMHarman (Post 34312944)
What can be said is there is an almost mathamatically impossible positive corrolation between smoking and lung cancer. That cannot be ignored.

Whilst it "cannot be ignored" it can be irrelevant in the greater scheme of things.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SMHarman (Post 34312944)
Any statistics bell curve. Your 1 and cancer at 40 and your 40 / 90 are extremes that are statistically discounted from the population.

Not so. Lung cancer is the second biggest cancer form in the UK - the biggest being breast cancer. Take the population by gender per head and subtract the non smokers and you'll find that having t*ts or being a "lady" are a bigger risk than passive smoking.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SMHarman (Post 34312944)
There are exceptions to most rules and generalisations.

Yes, I think I've pointed that out above.

Hugh 25-05-2007 09:10

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Angry (Post 34313195)

...snip....
As indeed have oral sex and exposure to sunlight - Have either of those been banned?

...snip...

They have in our house :(


(celibate vampires)

SMHarman 25-05-2007 15:57

Re: smoking and the pub
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Angry (Post 34313195)
As indeed have oral sex and exposure to sunlight - Have either of those been banned?

Not so. Lung cancer is the second biggest cancer form in the UK - the biggest being breast cancer. Take the population by gender per head and subtract the non smokers and you'll find that having t*ts or being a "lady" are a bigger risk than passive smoking.

So in this life you don't want to be an oral sex offering smoking female who spends time outdoors!
I'm sure that our Tone given time would have tried to pass appropriate legislation.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:01.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum