Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Online Safety Bill Etc (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33711643)

Hugh 15-06-2026 08:01

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36217332)
Tell me how a survey of 2000 people (catered to the poll subject) is a valid indication of what every parent in the UK think.

Tell me how a loaded question (every parent in the UK) tries to invalidate the established science of statistics? ;)

The survey is a statistical representation of a representative sample, which has been proven (within a margin of error of approx. +/- 3%) to provide (a high % of the time) results which reflect the real world.

Just because you don’t understand it, doesn’t make it invalid - I don’t understand how quantum tunnelling works in the microchips in my phone/tablet/PC, but somehow the devices still work… :D

https://afry.com/en/insight/fascinat...ntum-tunneling

GrimUpNorth 15-06-2026 08:35

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
You've got to be so careful not to use loaded questions. Anyway, back to the discussion, when will the government admit that the proposed policy is a failure?

papa smurf 15-06-2026 08:36

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36217351)
You've got to be so careful not to use loaded questions. Anyway, back to the discussion, when will the government admit that the proposed policy is a failure?

wait for the u turn like the rest of us do ;)

Hom3r 15-06-2026 08:49

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by joglynne (Post 36217347)
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has, this morning, confirmed that under-16s will be banned from social media as part of a major overhaul of online safety rules for children. New legislation hoped to be in place by Spring 2027

I'm 78 is this new legislation going to mean I have to prove I'm over 16 on every social media site I visit. :Yikes:
Also who will be the first to create a VPN where P = persona. It will only take one person to do it and kids will spread the information faster than a wild fire.
Never underestimate a young teenager they will always find a way around something that tries to stop them doing what they want to do.

Don't get me wrong I do believe we should protect our children but so much that has been put forward is already a naive attempt to turn back the tide.


Would I have to prove I'm over 16 on Facebook, despite I've been on there nearly 18 years?

nomadking 15-06-2026 08:52

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36217334)
It isnt, nor do we know what questions were actually asked (loaded or worded to get the answer wanted).
Its easy to ask if if you just think something is a good idea, without going into detail or the consequences.

I'm sure if you asked parents if families with children should all get free access to the internet they would all say its a great idea, without thinking about issues it may create.

This is complete ballcocks

Loss of childhood ? Seriously, what planet are they on ?

Mainstream media is more responsible for that than anyone else.

Carth 15-06-2026 09:41

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36217348)
Tell me how a loaded question (every parent in the UK) tries to invalidate the established science of statistics? ;)

The survey is a statistical representation of a representative sample, which has been proven (within a margin of error of approx. +/- 3%) to provide (a high % of the time) results which reflect the real world.

Just because you don’t understand it, doesn’t make it invalid - I don’t understand how quantum tunnelling works in the microchips in my phone/tablet/PC, but somehow the devices still work… :D

https://afry.com/en/insight/fascinat...ntum-tunneling

Oh I understand 'statistical representation of a representative sample' as you nicely put it. I also understand that it's a very small sample size, coupled with quite possibly a select (biased) choice of those polled, coupled with it's the Gov. once again possibly pushing a current controversial subject out there to show 'the people' that it's well supported.

Lots of 'ifs, buts, possibly and could be' in there but that's opinions for you ;)

Anyway, besides that, small sample statistical polling stuff is something you and I always disagree about, probably always will, it's very much a marmite thing I guess, but as long as we limit it to the occasional :PP: at each other all is well :D

Taf 15-06-2026 10:00

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Blair wanted us to have digital IDs. Brown dropped the priority to do so. The Lib-Con period saw the idea dropped completely. I smell Blair's dogma on this announcement "to save the children".

Taf 15-06-2026 10:03

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
2 Attachment(s)
Facebook (Meta) continues with it's own methods....

Hugh 15-06-2026 11:04

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 36217353)
Would I have to prove I'm over 16 on Facebook, despite I've been on there nearly 18 years?

No - the fact you’ve been on it over 16 years pretty much proves you’re over 16…

nffc 15-06-2026 11:11

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36217361)
No - the fact you’ve been on it over 16 years pretty much proves you’re over 16…


There are situations where that isn't true though e.g. there is multiple people operating the account or it has changed hands

RichardCoulter 15-06-2026 11:18

Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by joglynne (Post 36217347)
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has, this morning, confirmed that under-16s will be banned from social media as part of a major overhaul of online safety rules for children. New legislation hoped to be in place by Spring 2027

I'm 78 is this new legislation going to mean I have to prove I'm over 16 on every social media site I visit. :Yikes:
Also who will be the first to create a VPN where P = persona. It will only take one person to do it and kids will spread the information faster than a wild fire.
Never underestimate a young teenager they will always find a way around something that tries to stop them doing what they want to do.

Don't get me wrong I do believe we should protect our children but so much that has been put forward is already a naive attempt to turn back the tide.

In Australia, where they already have a ban, 70% of children are still accessing banned services.

There is also a suggestion that 16/17 year olds will face restrictions whilst on social media.


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:25.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum