Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35910285)

Meh. Is it any worse than any of the other stuff?

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35910284)

If I was a Trump fan I would probably try and change the topic to Venezuela or Hillary Clinton now.
What you have highlighted is very damning of Trump.

Originally Posted by Julian (Post 35910287)

What is the obsession with some people in Britain about Trump?

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35910284)

If I was a Trump fan I would probably try and change the topic to Venezuela or Hillary Clinton now.
What you have highlighted is very damning of Trump.

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35910288)

He's the leader of the most powerful country in the world.

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35910211)

Who cares?

Over here we have cabinet "reshuffles" were 6,7,8 , 10 ministers can be sacked at once!

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35910216)

a bit the labour party merry go round of a few months back ;)

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35910291)

But not really.

Or just ignore it because there is no Russian collusion for the 131424353535674636353646464th time. Btw, we already have a Venezuelan topic.

Originally Posted by Stuart (Post 35910325)

I believe they have those in the US as well. I think the issue here is that some posts have been filled multiple times now.

---------- Post added at 09:55 ---------- Previous post was at 09:51 ----------



Difference being they weren't in power.

---------- Post added at 10:10 ---------- Previous post was at 09:55 ----------



The fact they have not launched impeachment proceedings yet does not mean that they won't. We have not seen the full evidence. Impeaching a president is not something the US Authorities do lightly, nor should they. They need evidence, especially as if any president is impeached, there may well be further legal action after the impeachment, and possible criminal charges whether against the President or members of the administration.

I don't know if there was collusion. I suspect there was. There was certainly communication between Trump's team and Russians that the intelligence agencies maintain have links with the Russian government, the team themselves have admitted as much if the media is correct.

Assuming the communications were entirely legitimate, I feel the best way Trump can handle it is to do something he is unlikely to have done before. Be totally open and honest about it. That will certainly wrong foot the democrats and may even show up any conspiracy by them to invent collusion where it didn't exist.

Hell, if he did that, and it worked, he may well come out of it looking like a hero, and would probably have secured his chance to win the next election.

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35910472)

Worth pointing out that JK Rowling has withdrawn her criticism of Trump for not shaking hands with a disabled child after she was advised he did.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/jk-rowli...y-white-house/

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35910366)

Impeachment Articles have been raised in the House of Representatives, by two Democrats. But Trump has to lose support from his own party for those articles to pass and then it requires a further vote in the Senate. The whole process is meant to be complex and hard to pass, it is not for simply not liking a sitting President, or because people feel the wrong person was elected.

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35910473)

Crucially, she 'forgot' to apologise to President Trump.

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35910473)

Crucially, she 'forgot' to apologise to President Trump.

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35910475)

but she's a woman aren't they always right

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35910476)

Yes, bit of a poor sport there but I don't think he likes giving or accepting apologies either.

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35910473)

Crucially, she 'forgot' to apologise to President Trump.