![]() |
Re: Police to get tough on internet trolls.
I've just been watching an interview from todays This Morning programme. Mollys father and Michelle Donelan the Secretary for Culture, Media & Sport appeared together.
The Secretary for the DCMS said that this new approach to the harmful but legal content is actually better. She went on to say that the legal but harmful provisions would be retained for children. For adults she said that websites would have to say whether they allowed legal, but harmful content. If they didn't allow it users would be protected, if they did the person then had an opportunity to block the site. Instead of ignoring complaints, websites will now be obliged to remove illegal content or content that breaches their own terms & conditions. Websites will also have to give users more control over what they see. Age verification was mentioned, so I assume that age verification will be required to ensure that under 18's aren't exposed to legal, but harmful content. She also said that young people today are tech savvy and know how to get around restrictions eg by lying about their age when registering.- age verification will allow websites owners to keep out under 18's and stop them from falling foul of the law by inadvertently exposing young people to inappropriate material. This is important when you consider that they could face substantial fines or even imprisonment for doing so. Mollys father produced printouts of what had been sent to his daughter after she had found websites about suicide when researching the subject. Numerous messages were sent to her encouraging her to take her own life eg 'Nobody wans to date a suicidal girl'. On the face of it this remark is (currently) a legal, but harmful, thing to say to a suicidal girl. Whilst he still thought that the Bill had been watered down, he accepted that this was necessary to ensure the Bill passed into law relatively quickly and that this was necessary in order to save future lives from being lost. |
Re: Police to get tough on internet trolls.
An interesting discussion on the Online Safety Bill from 0.20:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m001h418 Key points- - The Government is determined to get this through Parliament after the delays. - The proposal to use prison sentences for non compliance by site owners has been put back into the Bill by MP's. |
Re: Police to get tough on internet trolls.
Is Everything OK at facebook?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/w3ct39vb An interesting BBC programme that takes a look at the various problems faced by facebook. It says that facebook actually welcomes regulation by Governments, as this stops it having to make decisions about what is acceptable content that it never wanted to make in the first place. |
Re: Police to get tough on internet trolls.
:sleep::sleep::sleep:
|
Re: Police to get tough on internet trolls.
This mornings political show covered the Online Safety Bill and showed a report on the suicide of children as a result of sites that promote suicide:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m001jwhr It's about 2/3 of the way through. |
Re: Police to get tough on internet trolls.
More hold handing , nanny state, whom can we blame. It's never my fault There is a simple word ,hardly ever used in child care today. NO. Perhaps parents should try it !! Guess we need to amend the saying " sticks and stone may break my bones but WORDS will REALLY hurt me.
|
Re: Police to get tough on internet trolls.
Quote:
|
Re: Police to get tough on internet trolls.
Quote:
|
Re: Police to get tough on internet trolls.
Quote:
Also, once searched for, algorithms will keep suggesting such sites. They shouldn't exist in the first place. Just been on the BBC 10pm news that about half of Twitter staff have either been let go or chosen to leave after Elon Musk bought it. Online abuse has rocketed. |
Re: Police to get tough on internet trolls.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You must love the concept of 1984, everyone controlled by the thought police. |
Re: Police to get tough on internet trolls.
Quote:
|
Re: Police to get tough on internet trolls.
Quote:
However, thats not the same as someone going to the trouble of actually hunting out and visiting very specific websites. Quote:
The world would be much better off (IMO), but the fact is they do, we cant go back now. The sad fact is humans have been taking their own lives for 1000's years, probably much longer. Websites have existed for a very small fraction of this time, who was to blame before they existed ? Do I think such sites serve any useful purpose ? No, I dont - but neither do I believe in nanny state thought control either. |
Re: Police to get tough on internet trolls.
Quote:
|
Re: Police to get tough on internet trolls.
The only valid point for me is that certain sites / subjects should not be included within said certain algorithms'.
|
Re: Police to get tough on internet trolls.
Quote:
Do you mean by that that all sites are permitted to exist but should not be indexed by search engines? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:03. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum