![]() |
Re: Israel v Iran conflict
Quote:
|
Re: Israel v Iran conflict
BBC 6pm news spokeswoman said that this move by Iran is largely symbolic. Iran had to be seen to be retaliating, whilst not daring to attack the USA. Attacking a base outside America with American (and British) soldiers after making sure that the Americans had been forewarned (so that people could be evacuated) is seen as much safer than attacking the USA itself.
She ended by saying that, whether there had been any American casualties, would largely determine what Trump does next. |
Re: Israel v Iran conflict
Iran has done that before. They did when Israel last hit them a few months ago, firing back in a way that would never cause a problem.
They know they cannot win this and are trying to de-escalate without losing face with their domestic audience, I guess. |
Re: Israel v Iran conflict
Now trump is apparently calling for peace.
|
Re: Israel v Iran conflict
Yes, there were no casualties and, after thanking Iran for giving them advance warning, their missiles were intercepted and there were no casualties. Trump has said that, now Iran has got this out of it's system, the conflict is as good as over.
---------- Post added at 22:22 ---------- Previous post was at 22:21 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Israel v Iran conflict
Quote:
Pick an insignificant base, in a small country thats not going to risk fighting back, warn them, and then make out you "retaliated". |
Re: Israel v Iran conflict
Yup. Though I imagine they expected Trump to play along, and not tell the world in quite such explicit terms that they let him know what they were going to do. I imagine he thinks it’s a mark of respect, as if they’re treating him like some sort of mafia boss. I doubt he has any concept of how honour/shame works in Iranian culture and politics.
|
Re: Israel v Iran conflict
I doubt he has any concept of how honour/shame works in any culture and politics.
|
Re: Israel v Iran conflict
how long before Israel attacks Iran on a matter of "national security" breaking the ceasefire deal
|
Re: Israel v Iran conflict
Quote:
From the Washington Post this morning Quote:
|
Re: Israel v Iran conflict
Quote:
|
Re: Israel v Iran conflict
Well, that didn’t last long…
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cn7z...9aa726d11#post Quote:
|
Re: Israel v Iran conflict
Quote:
|
Re: Israel v Iran conflict
Trump just needs Marge and the MAGA maniacs to believe he’s won bigly. If he can make them believe he’s caused world peace, whether or not he’s actually done so is a mere detail.
|
Re: Israel v Iran conflict
Trump: Israel and Iran both violated ceasefire
Donald Trump says both Israel and Iran have violated the ceasefire in the Middle East. Speaking to reporters before leaving for the NATO summit in The Hague, he says he's "not happy" with Israel and Iran, before adding he is "really unhappy" with Israel. Trump adds that Iran's nuclear capacities are "gone" and says Tehran will never rebuild its nuclear programme. In a subsequent Truth Social post, Trump says it would be a "major violation" if Israel were to drop bombs on Iran now, telling Israel to "bring your pilots home, now". https://news.sky.com/story/iran-trum...atest-13382979 Trump just lost it with reporters saying the two sides have been fighting for so long they don't know what the F--- they're doing |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:57. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum